Sensitivity Analysis of Ballistics Performance with Respect to Statistical Design Parameters

2011 ◽  
Vol 130-134 ◽  
pp. 373-376
Author(s):  
Chang Qing Liu ◽  
Wen Cai Luo

To investigate the effect of design parameters with statistical characteristics on ballistics performance, sensitivity analysis of the flight range objective with respect to relevant parameters was conducted to demonstrate it. Statistical parameters were modeled using an iterative method in order to determine descriptive statistics for further sampling. Simulation of flight range based on a dynamics model was then carried out. Finally, sensitivity derivatives from the baseline design scheme were calculated to locate the most sensitive parameters which can be controlled specially for better performance. Results show that by sensitivity analysis, thrust parameters affect the flight range objective obviously while others not, which provides suggestions about whether some parameters should be limited in a range or not.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Asad Abbus Naqvi

After the 1994 Northridge earthquake, research has been conducted to develop new types of beamcolumn moment connections, such as Reduced Beam Section (RBS) connections. This study performs a sensitivity analysis of the cyclic response of RBS connections using detailed finite element simulation. The significance of the effect of twenty-one factors is assessed using a statistical design of experiment method. The input factors are related to the material properties or the geometry of the beam-column connection. A two-level fractional factorial design is used to create factor combinations for the sensitivity analysis. The cyclic response of RBS connections is assessed in terms of five response variables, including: the total dissipated energy, initial stiffness, strength degradation rate, maximum moment capacity and rupture index at 7.5% storey drift. The sensitivity analysis results show that the beam depth has the greatest influence on the cyclic response of RBS connections.


Author(s):  
Rahul Rajasekharan ◽  
E. P. Petrov

Abstract High-pressure turbines of modern gas-turbine engines use single crystal blades that exhibit material anisotropy. Due to manufacturing tolerances, each blade in the bladed disk will have different crystal anisotropy axis orientation, thereby creating mistuning in the structure. In this paper, the blade anisotropy angles are considered as uncertain design parameters to study the variation in forced response of a mistuned bladed disk. For realistic, high fidelity model of a bladed disk, linear bonded contact conditions at blade roots and shrouds are considered. The following two kinds of analysis are performed: (a) statistical analysis using polynomial chaos expansion and (b) global sensitivity analysis using Sobol indices. An effective strategy based on gradient information is used to minimize the computational cost involved in statistical and sensitivity analysis. For the first time, the possibility of introducing intentional blade material anisotropy mistuning to reduce the amplification of forced response is investigated.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Asad Abbus Naqvi

After the 1994 Northridge earthquake, research has been conducted to develop new types of beamcolumn moment connections, such as Reduced Beam Section (RBS) connections. This study performs a sensitivity analysis of the cyclic response of RBS connections using detailed finite element simulation. The significance of the effect of twenty-one factors is assessed using a statistical design of experiment method. The input factors are related to the material properties or the geometry of the beam-column connection. A two-level fractional factorial design is used to create factor combinations for the sensitivity analysis. The cyclic response of RBS connections is assessed in terms of five response variables, including: the total dissipated energy, initial stiffness, strength degradation rate, maximum moment capacity and rupture index at 7.5% storey drift. The sensitivity analysis results show that the beam depth has the greatest influence on the cyclic response of RBS connections.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 731-740
Author(s):  
Giovanni Formentini ◽  
Claudio Favi ◽  
Claude Cuiller ◽  
Pierre-Eric Dereux ◽  
Francois Bouissiere ◽  
...  

AbstractOne of the most challenging activity in the engineering design process is the definition of a framework (model and parameters) for the characterization of specific processes such as installation and assembly. Aircraft system architectures are complex structures used to understand relation among elements (modules) inside an aircraft and its evaluation is one of the first activity since the conceptual design. The assessment of aircraft architectures, from the assembly perspective, requires parameter identification as well as the definition of the overall analysis framework (i.e., mathematical models, equations).The paper aims at the analysis of a mathematical framework (structure, equations and parameters) developed to assess the fit for assembly performances of aircraft system architectures by the mean of sensitivity analysis (One-Factor-At-Time method). The sensitivity analysis was performed on a complex engineering framework, i.e. the Conceptual Design for Assembly (CDfA) methodology, which is characterized by level, domains and attributes (parameters). A commercial aircraft cabin system was used as a case study to understand the use of different mathematical operators as well as the way to cluster attributes.


Author(s):  
Dong Hwan Choi ◽  
Se Jeong Lee ◽  
Jonathan A. Wickert ◽  
Hong Hee Yoo

The operating positional error of a robot manipulator, which develops inevitably because of manufacturing tolerances and assembly clearances, is preferentially maintained within a certain range in order to achieve an acceptable level of performance and accuracy. Because additional cost is incurred when manufacturing tolerances are tightened, an alternative design strategy maximizes the tolerances (so as to reduce the cost) while minimizing positioning error (to satisfy a performance requirement). In this paper, a new joint clearance model is developed for spatial mechanisms that incorporate revolute joints, which in turn are subjected to specified tolerance or uncertainty in the orientation of their axes. Statistical design parameters related to variations of link length and joint axis orientation are identified from the clearance model. The statistical influence of the design parameters on the robot manipulator’s response is investigated through a general multibody dynamics sensitivity formulation. The method offers substantial improvement in computational efficiency when compared to the Monte Carlo procedure. The uncertainty in orientation of a revolute joint’s axis influences the positioning accuracy of the robot manipulator’s response to a greater degree than does uncertainty in the length of a link.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adwait Verulkar ◽  
Corina Sandu ◽  
Daniel Dopico ◽  
Adrian Sandu

Abstract Sensitivity analysis is one of the most prominent gradient based optimization techniques for mechanical systems. Model sensitivities are the derivatives of the generalized coordinates defining the motion of the system in time with respect to the system design parameters. These sensitivities can be calculated using finite differences, but the accuracy and computational inefficiency of this method limits its use. Hence, the methodologies of direct and adjoint sensitivity analysis have gained prominence. Recent research has presented computationally efficient methodologies for both direct and adjoint sensitivity analysis of complex multibody dynamic systems. The contribution of this article is in the development of the mathematical framework for conducting the direct sensitivity analysis of multibody dynamic systems with joint friction using the index-1 formulation. For modeling friction in multibody systems, the Brown and McPhee friction model has been used. This model incorporates the effects of both static and dynamic friction on the model dynamics. A case study has been conducted on a spatial slider-crank mechanism to illustrate the application of this methodology to real-world systems. Using computer models, with and without joint friction, effect of friction on the dynamics and model sensitivities has been demonstrated. The sensitivities of slider velocity have been computed with respect to the design parameters of crank length, rod length, and the parameters defining the friction model. Due to the highly non-linear nature of friction, the model dynamics are more sensitive during the transition phases, where the friction coefficient changes from static to dynamic and vice versa.


Author(s):  
Alfonso Callejo ◽  
Daniel Dopico

Algorithms for the sensitivity analysis of multibody systems are quickly maturing as computational and software resources grow. Indeed, the area has made substantial progress since the first academic methods and examples were developed. Today, sensitivity analysis tools aimed at gradient-based design optimization are required to be as computationally efficient and scalable as possible. This paper presents extensive verification of one of the most popular sensitivity analysis techniques, namely the direct differentiation method (DDM). Usage of such method is recommended when the number of design parameters relative to the number of outputs is small and when the time integration algorithm is sensitive to accumulation errors. Verification is hereby accomplished through two radically different computational techniques, namely manual differentiation and automatic differentiation, which are used to compute the necessary partial derivatives. Experiments are conducted on an 18-degree-of-freedom, 366-dependent-coordinate bus model with realistic geometry and tire contact forces, which constitutes an unusually large system within general-purpose sensitivity analysis of multibody systems. The results are in good agreement; the manual technique provides shorter runtimes, whereas the automatic differentiation technique is easier to implement. The presented results highlight the potential of manual and automatic differentiation approaches within general-purpose simulation packages, and the importance of formulation benchmarking.


Author(s):  
Shilpa A. Vaze ◽  
Prakash Krishnaswami ◽  
James DeVault

Most state-of-the-art multibody systems are multidisciplinary and encompass a wide range of components from various domains such as electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, etc. The design considerations and design parameters of the system can come from any of these domains or from a combination of these domains. In order to perform analytical design sensitivity analysis on a multidisciplinary system (MDS), we first need a uniform modeling approach for this class of systems to obtain a unified mathematical model of the system. Based on this model, we can derive a unified formulation for design sensitivity analysis. In this paper, we present a modeling and design sensitivity formulation for MDS that has been successfully implemented in the MIXEDMODELS (Multidisciplinary Integrated eXtensible Engine for Driving Metamodeling, Optimization and DEsign of Large-scale Systems) platform. MIXEDMODELS is a unified analysis and design tool for MDS that is based on a procedural, symbolic-numeric architecture. This architecture allows any engineer to add components in his/her domain of expertise to the platform in a modular fashion. The symbolic engine in the MIXEDMODELS platform synthesizes the system governing equations as a unified set of non-linear differential-algebraic equations (DAE’s). These equations can then be differentiated with respect to design to obtain an additional set of DAE’s in the sensitivity coefficients of the system state variables with respect to the system’s design variables. This combined set of DAE’s can be solved numerically to obtain the solution for the state variables and state sensitivity coefficients of the system. Finally, knowing the system performance functions, we can calculate the design sensitivity coefficients of these performance functions by using the values of the state variables and state sensitivity coefficients obtained from the DAE’s. In this work we use the direct differentiation approach for sensitivity analysis, as opposed to the adjoint variable approach, for ease in error control and software implementation. The capabilities and performance of the proposed design sensitivity analysis formulation are demonstrated through a numerical example consisting of an AC rectified DC power supply driving a slider crank mechanism. In this case, the performance functions and design variables come from both electrical and mechanical domains. The results obtained were verified by perturbation analysis, and the method was shown to be very accurate and computationally viable.


Author(s):  
Srikanth Akkaram ◽  
Jean-Daniel Beley ◽  
Bob Maffeo ◽  
Gene Wiggs

The ability to perform and evaluate the effect of shape changes on the stress, modal and thermal response of components is an important ingredient in the ‘design’ of aircraft engine components. The classical design of experiments (DOE) based approach that is motivated from statistics (for physical experiments) is one of the possible approaches for the evaluation of the component response with respect to design parameters [1]. Since the underlying physical model used for the component response is deterministic and understood through a computer simulation model, one needs to re-think the use of the classical DOE techniques for this class of problems. In this paper, we explore an alternate sensitivity analysis based technique where a deterministic parametric response is constructed using exact derivatives of the complex finite-element (FE) based computer models to design parameters. The method is based on a discrete sensitivity analysis formulation using semi-automatic differentiation [2,3] to compute the Taylor series or its Pade equivalent for finite element based responses. Shape design or optimization in the context of finite element modeling is challenging because the evaluation of the response for different shape requires the need for a meshing consistent with the new geometry. This paper examines the differences in the nature and performance (accuracy and efficiency) of the analytical derivatives approach against other existing approaches with validation on several benchmark structural applications. The use of analytical derivatives for parametric analysis is demonstrated to have accuracy benefits on certain classes of shape applications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document