From SMET to STEM at MTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Tom Drake ◽  
Tim McGeehan
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Graduate Students ◽  
Naval Research ◽  
International Forum ◽  
Diverse Workforce ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Office Of Naval Research ◽  
Marine Technology ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Valuable Role

Abstract The Student Poster Competition (SPC) has been an integral component of OCEANS meetings since 1989. This enduring program continues to play a valuable role in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education and professional development, providing an international forum for undergraduate and graduate students to showcase their efforts and interact with future colleagues, mentors, and employers. As a sponsor of the SPC since 1999, the Office of Naval Research (ONR) relies on programs like SPC to help inspire, foster, and develop talent across the diverse workforce needed to address the complex marine technology challenges of today and tomorrow.

scholarly journals Does Latinx Representation Matter for Latinx Student Retention in STEM?

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blanca E. Rincón
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Student Retention ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Stem Students ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
The University ◽  
The Relationship

Using student-level data, this study explores the relationship between Latinx student representation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and student retention. Results revealed that a 1% increase in cohort-level Latinx student representation in STEM subfields is associated with a decrease in student departures from the university, but not STEM. Furthermore, Latinx STEM students may be more responsive to changes in the representation of their cohorts compared with increases in diversity for upper-division undergraduate or graduate students.

scholarly journals Doctoral Advisor-Advisee Pairing in STEM Fields: Selection Criteria and Impact of Faculty, Student and Departmental Factors

10.28945/2302 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 343-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simy Joy ◽  
Xiang Fen Liang ◽  
Diana Bilimoria ◽  
Susan Perry
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Career Stage ◽  
American University ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Time Of Admission

Unlike the doctoral programs in places where students are paired with advisors at the time of admission itself, most US programs require the students to choose their advisors, and the advisors to formally accept the students as advisees. Little research has been done to understand how students and faculty approach this mutual selection and pairing process. This paper examines this process in STEM departments (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), with specific focus on factors influencing the decisions. Based on focus groups and interviews of doctoral students and faculty from STEM departments in an American university, we identify criteria applied by students and faculty in making their choices. Students were found to assess faculty on available funding, area of research, personality, ability to graduate students fast, and career prospects for students, and faculty to assess students on their qualifications/credentials and perceived ability to contribute to research. We also found that this mutual assessment was not objective, but influenced by perceptions associated with faculty gender and career stage, and student nationality. In the end, whether students and faculty were actually paired with persons of their choice depended on departmental factors including prevalent pairing practices, restrictions on student numbers per faculty, and reward structure. We discuss implications of the findings for research and practice.

Partnerships for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education and Career Prosperity

2019 ◽  
pp. 337-349
Author(s):  
Chih-Che Tai ◽  
Ryan Andrew Nivens ◽  
Karin J. Keith
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Professional Development ◽  
Nonprofit Organizations ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
Local School ◽  
Business Partners ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Career Opportunities ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
The Impact

The purpose of this chapter is to report on partnerships between local school agents, business partners, institutes of higher education, and nonprofit organizations that promote science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) activities that enhance career opportunities for students. The authors share the importance of these partnerships as well as the benefits that result for all members. In addition to describing the benefits of the partnerships, the authors lay out techniques used to manage and develop partnerships. Most importantly, the authors share the outcomes of these partnerships, including professional development projects rooted in the work between the member partners. The chapter provides data about the impact of these partnerships on students' academic achievement and concludes with recommendations and suggestions to develop and sustain partnerships.

Strategies to Increase Representation of Students with Disabilities in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffry L. White ◽  
G.H. Massiha
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
College Students ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
College Attendance ◽  
Persons With Disabilities ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Personal Services ◽  
College Students With Disabilities ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Integrated Program

As a nation wrestles with the need to train more professionals, persons with disabilities are undereducated and underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The following project was proposed to increase representation of students with disabilities in the STEM disciplines. The program emphasizes an integrated program of interventions for college students with disabilities (SwD) majoring in STEM which centers on a system of continuous student monitoring with rapid access to academic and personal services, as well as professional development and degree enhancing experiences supplied during the entire period of college attendance.

scholarly journals Teaching Assistant Professional Development in Biology: Designed for and Driven by Multidimensional Data

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara A. Wyse ◽  
Tammy M. Long ◽  
Diane Ebert-May
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Multidimensional Data ◽  
Graduate Teaching ◽  
Learner Centered ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Undergraduate Science ◽  
Reported Data ◽  
Direct Measures

Graduate teaching assistants (TAs) are increasingly responsible for instruction in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses. Various professional development (PD) programs have been developed and implemented to prepare TAs for this role, but data about effectiveness are lacking and are derived almost exclusively from self-reported surveys. In this study, we describe the design of a reformed PD (RPD) model and apply Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Framework to evaluate multiple outcomes of TA PD before, during, and after implementing RPD. This framework allows evaluation that includes both direct measures and self-reported data. In RPD, TAs created and aligned learning objectives and assessments and incorporated more learner-centered instructional practices in their teaching. However, these data are inconsistent with TAs’ self-reported perceptions about RPD and suggest that single measures are insufficient to evaluate TA PD programs.

scholarly journals Enhancing Thai In-service Teachers’ Perceptions of STEM Education with Tablet-based Professional Development

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasithep Pitiporntapin ◽  
Panuvit Chantara ◽  
Wachira Srikoom ◽  
Prasart Nuangchalerm ◽  
Lisa M. Hines
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Stem Education ◽  
Basic Education ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Educational Approach ◽  
Teachers Perceptions ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Stem Teaching ◽  
Do So

National efforts in Thailand are currently focused on promoting STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education in order to better prepare the future generations to be an effective and productive workforce. In accordance with this mission, the goal of this research is to develop a tablet-based professional development (PD) program to enhance in-service teachers’ perceptions of STEM education, which will directly affect both their decision to incorporate STEM, as well as their ability to effectively do so in their own classroom. To assess the efficacy of the PD program, we recruited 240 STEM and non-STEM teachers from basic education schools in Thailand to participate in the program. The activities in this program were divided into three parts: 1) increasing knowledge about STEM education, 2) providing demonstrations of STEM teaching, and 3) developing STEM-based lessons. Data were collected throughout the tablet-based PD program from focus group discussion sessions, pre-post questionnaires, and informal interviews. Data were analyzed using content analysis. The findings revealed that before participating in the tablet-based PD program, the majority of participants had limited knowledge on STEM education and were uncertain on how to integrate STEM into their instructional practices. They also had difficulty with connecting the different STEM disciplines in their activities. Although they were interested in implementing the STEM educational approach, they lacked confidence on how to accomplish this. After completing the tablet-based PD program, many participants had a much better understanding of STEM education and greater confidence with implementing STEM pedagogical approaches.

scholarly journals STEM Faculty as Learners in Pedagogical Reform and the Role of Research Articles as Professional Development Opportunities

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. es8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy B. Mulnix
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Education Reform ◽  
Stem Education ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Pedagogical Change ◽  
Emergent Learning ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Stem Education Reform

Discipline-based education research (DBER) publications are opportunities for professional development around science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education reform. Learning theory tells us these publications could be more impactful if authors, reviewers, and editors pay greater attention to linking principles and practice. This approach, which considers faculty as learners and STEM education reform as content, has the potential to better support faculty members because it promotes a deeper understanding of the reasons why a pedagogical change is effective. This depth of understanding is necessary for faculty members to successfully transfer new knowledge to their own contexts. A challenge ahead for the emergent learning sciences is to better integrate findings from across sister disciplines; DBER reports can take a step in that direction while improving their usefulness for instructors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document