scholarly journals Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amos Lal ◽  
Ajay Kumar Mishra ◽  
Jamal Akhtar ◽  
Christoph Nabzdyk
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Economic Status ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
Extended Period ◽  
Clinical Environment ◽  
False Sense ◽  
Health Care Infrastructure ◽  
Vulnerable Patient ◽  
Clinical Stabilization

COVID-19 has involved numerous countries across the globe and the disease burden, susceptible age group; mortality rate has been variable depending on the demographical profile, economic status, and health care infrastructure. In the current clinical environment, COVID-19 is one of the most important clinical differential diagnoses in patients presenting with respiratory symptoms. The optimal mechanical ventilation strategy for these patients has been a constant topic of discussion and very importantly so, since a great majority of these patients require invasive mechanical ventilation and often for an extended period of time. In this report we highlight our experience with a COVID-19 patient who most likely suffered barotrauma either as a result of traumatic endotracheal intubation or primarily due to COVID-19 itself. We also aim to highlight the current literature available to suggest the management strategy for these patients for a favorable outcome. The cases described are diverse in terms of age variance and other comorbidities. According to the literature, certain patients, with COVID-19 disease and spontaneous pneumothorax were noted to be managed conservatively and oxygen supplementation with nasal cannula sufficed. Decision regarding need and escalation to invasive mechanical ventilation should be taken early in the disease to avoid complications such as patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) and barotrauma sequelae such as pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum Recent systematic review further supports the fact that the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in certain patients with COVID-19 pneumonia may give a false sense of security and clinical stabilization but has no overall benefit to avoid intubation. While invasive mechanical ventilation may be associated with higher rates of barotrauma, this should not mean that intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation should be delayed. This becomes an important consideration when non-intensivists or personnel with less experience provide care for this vulnerable patient population who may rely too heavily on NIV to avoid intubation and mechanical ventilation.

scholarly journals Multicenter Interim Guidance on Use of Antivirals for Children With Coronavirus Disease 2019/Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Chiotos ◽  
Molly Hayes ◽  
David W Kimberlin ◽  
Sarah B Jones ◽  
Scott H James ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
Supplemental Oxygen ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Oxygen Requirement ◽  
Web Based

Abstract Background Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a mild infection in most children, a small proportion develop severe or critical illness. Data describing agents with potential antiviral activity continue to expand such that updated guidance is needed regarding use of these agents in children. Methods A panel of pediatric infectious diseases physicians and pharmacists from 20 geographically diverse North American institutions was convened. Through a series of teleconferences and web-based surveys, a set of guidance statements was developed and refined based on review of the best available evidence and expert opinion. Results Given the typically mild course of COVID-19 in children, supportive care alone is suggested for most cases. For children with severe illness, defined as a supplemental oxygen requirement without need for noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), remdesivir is suggested, preferably as part of a clinical trial if available. Remdesivir should also be considered for critically ill children requiring invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO. A duration of 5 days is appropriate for most patients. The panel recommends against the use of hydroxychloroquine or lopinavir-ritonavir (or other protease inhibitors) for COVID-19 in children. Conclusions Antiviral therapy for COVID-19 is not necessary for the great majority of pediatric patients. For children with severe or critical disease, this guidance offers an approach for decision-making regarding use of remdesivir.

Ambulatory care of non-invasive mechanical ventilation in COPD patients with global decompensated respiratory acidosis

Pneumologie ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S1-S125
Author(s):  
EJ Soto Hurtado ◽  
P Gutiérrez Castaño ◽  
JJ Torres ◽  
MD Jiménez Fernández ◽  
M Pérez Soriano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Ambulatory Care ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Acidosis ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Copd Patients

scholarly journals Respiratory mechanics and gas exchanges in the early course of COVID-19 ARDS: a hypothesis-generating study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-L. Diehl ◽  
N. Peron ◽  
R. Chocron ◽  
B. Debuc ◽  
E. Guerot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Dead Space ◽  
Respiratory Mechanics ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Endothelial Damage ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Pulmonary Mechanics ◽  
High Peep ◽  
Gas Exchanges ◽  
Physiological Dead Space

Abstract Rationale COVID-19 ARDS could differ from typical forms of the syndrome. Objective Pulmonary microvascular injury and thrombosis are increasingly reported as constitutive features of COVID-19 respiratory failure. Our aim was to study pulmonary mechanics and gas exchanges in COVID-2019 ARDS patients studied early after initiating protective invasive mechanical ventilation, seeking after corresponding pathophysiological and biological characteristics. Methods Between March 22 and March 30, 2020 respiratory mechanics, gas exchanges, circulating endothelial cells (CEC) as markers of endothelial damage, and D-dimers were studied in 22 moderate-to-severe COVID-19 ARDS patients, 1 [1–4] day after intubation (median [IQR]). Measurements and main results Thirteen moderate and 9 severe COVID-19 ARDS patients were studied after initiation of high PEEP protective mechanical ventilation. We observed moderately decreased respiratory system compliance: 39.5 [33.1–44.7] mL/cmH2O and end-expiratory lung volume: 2100 [1721–2434] mL. Gas exchanges were characterized by hypercapnia 55 [44–62] mmHg, high physiological dead-space (VD/VT): 75 [69–85.5] % and ventilatory ratio (VR): 2.9 [2.2–3.4]. VD/VT and VR were significantly correlated: r2 = 0.24, p = 0.014. No pulmonary embolism was suspected at the time of measurements. CECs and D-dimers were elevated as compared to normal values: 24 [12–46] cells per mL and 1483 [999–2217] ng/mL, respectively. Conclusions We observed early in the course of COVID-19 ARDS high VD/VT in association with biological markers of endothelial damage and thrombosis. High VD/VT can be explained by high PEEP settings and added instrumental dead space, with a possible associated role of COVID-19-triggered pulmonary microvascular endothelial damage and microthrombotic process.

Combined Renal-Pulmonary Extracorporeal Support with Low Blood Flow Techniques: A Retrospective Observational Study (CICERO Study)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Guglielmo Consales ◽  
Lucia Zamidei ◽  
Franco Turani ◽  
Diego Atzeni ◽  
Paolo Isoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Multiorgan Failure ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Acidosis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Protective Ventilation ◽  
Retrospective Observational Study ◽  
Organ Support ◽  
Chronic Obstructive

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure frequently present concomitant lung and kidney injury, within a multiorgan failure condition due to local and systemic mediators. To face this issue, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO<sub>2</sub>R) systems have been integrated into continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) platforms to provide a combined organ support, with efficient clearance of CO<sub>2</sub> with very low extracorporeal blood flows (&#x3c;400 mL/min). <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To evaluate efficacy and safety of combined ECCO<sub>2</sub>R-CRRT support with PrismaLung®-Prismaflex® in patients affected by hypercapnic respiratory acidosis associated with AKI in a second level intensive care unit. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We carried out a retrospective observational study enrolling patients submitted to PrismaLung®-Prismaflex® due to mild to moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aeCOPD). The primary endpoints were the shift to protective ventilation and extubation of mechanically ventilated patients and the shift to invasive mechanical ventilation of patients receiving noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Clinical-laboratoristic data and operational characteristics of ECCO<sub>2</sub>R-CRRT were recorded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 12/17 patients on mechanical ventilation shifted to protective ventilation, CO<sub>2</sub> clearance was satisfactorily maintained during the whole observational period, and pH was rapidly corrected. Treatment prevented NIV failure in 4 out of 5 patients. No treatment-related complications were recorded. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> ECCO<sub>2</sub>R-CRRT was effective and safe in patients with aeCOPD and ARDS associated with AKI.

scholarly journals Preemptive ganciclovir for mechanically ventilated patients with cytomegalovirus reactivation

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Papazian ◽  
◽  
Samir Jaber ◽  
Sami Hraiech ◽  
Karine Baumstarck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intravenous Ganciclovir ◽  
Subdistribution Hazard ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Cytomegalovirus Reactivation ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Cmv Reactivation

Abstract Background The effect of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation on the length of mechanical ventilation and mortality in immunocompetent ICU patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation remains controversial. The main objective of this study was to determine whether preemptive intravenous ganciclovir increases the number of ventilator-free days in patients with CMV blood reactivation. Methods This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial involved 19 ICUs in France. Seventy-six adults ≥ 18 years old who had been mechanically ventilated for at least 96 h, expected to remain on mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 h, and exhibited reactivation of CMV in blood were enrolled between February 5th, 2014, and January 23rd, 2019. Participants were randomized to receive ganciclovir 5 mg/kg bid for 14 days (n = 39) or a matching placebo (n = 37). Results The primary endpoint was ventilator-free days from randomization to day 60. Prespecified secondary outcomes included day 60 mortality. The trial was stopped for futility based on the results of an interim analysis by the DSMB. The subdistribution hazard ratio for being alive and weaned from mechanical ventilation at day 60 for patients receiving ganciclovir (N = 39) compared with control patients (N = 37) was 1.14 (95% CI from 0.63 to 2.06; P = 0.66). The median [IQR] numbers of ventilator-free days for ganciclovir-treated patients and controls were 10 [0–51] and 0 [0–43] days, respectively (P = 0.46). Mortality at day 60 was 41% in patients in the ganciclovir group and 43% in the placebo group (P = .845). Creatinine levels and blood cells counts did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions In patients mechanically ventilated for ≥ 96 h with CMV reactivation in blood, preemptive ganciclovir did not improve the outcome.

scholarly journals Association between cardiometabolic disease and severe COVID-19: a nationwide case–control study of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e044486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Svensson ◽  
Robin Hofmann ◽  
Henrike Häbel ◽  
Tomas Jernberg ◽  
Per Nordberg
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Population Type ◽  
Susceptible Patient ◽  
Control Study

AimsThe risks associated with diabetes, obesity and hypertension for severe COVID-19 may be confounded and differ by sociodemographic background. We assessed the risks associated with cardiometabolic factors for severe COVID-19 when accounting for socioeconomic factors and in subgroups by age, sex and region of birth.Methods and resultsIn this nationwide case–control study, 1.086 patients admitted to intensive care with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation (cases), and 10.860 population-based controls matched for age, sex and district of residency were included from mandatory national registries. ORs with 95% CIs for associations between severe COVID-19 and exposures with adjustment for confounders were estimated using logistic regression. The median age was 62 years (IQR 52–70), and 3003 (24.9%) were women. Type 2 diabetes (OR, 2.3 (95% CI 1.9 to 2.7)), hypertension (OR, 1.7 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.0)), obesity (OR, 3.1 (95% CI 2.4 to 4.0)) and chronic kidney disease (OR, 2.5 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.7)) were all associated with severe COVID-19. In the younger subgroup (below 57 years), ORs were significantly higher for all cardiometabolic risk factors. The risk associated with type 2 diabetes was higher in women (p=0.001) and in patients with a region of birth outside European Union(EU) (p=0.004).ConclusionDiabetes, obesity and hypertension were all independently associated with severe COVID-19 with stronger associations in the younger population. Type 2 diabetes implied a greater risk among women and in non-EU immigrants. These findings, originating from high-quality Swedish registries, may be important to direct preventive measures such as vaccination to susceptible patient groups.Trial registration numberClinicaltrial.gov (NCT04426084).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document