The impact of the duration of admission to the emergency room on the mortality of intensive care patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 320 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Duran ◽  
T Ocak ◽  
V Citisli ◽  
H Kaya ◽  
MK Erkuran
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Intensive Care Patients ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals The impact of EEG in the diagnosis and management of patients with acute impairment of consciousness

2012 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
João A. G. Ricardo ◽  
Marcondes C. França Jr. ◽  
Fabrício O. Lima ◽  
Clarissa L. Yassuda ◽  
Fernando Cendes
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Epileptiform Activity ◽  
Acute Setting ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Electroencephalogram Eeg

OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency of electroencephalogram (EEG) requests in the emergency room (ER) and intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with impairment of consciousness (IC) and its impact in the diagnosis and management. METHODS: We followed patients who underwent routine EEG from ER and ICU with IC until discharge or death. RESULTS: During the study, 1679 EEGs were performed, with 149 (8.9%) from ER and ICU. We included 65 patients and 94 EEGs to analyze. Epileptiform activity was present in 42 (44.7%). EEG results changed clinical management in 72.2% of patients. The main reason for EEG requisition was unexplained IC, representing 36.3% of all EEGs analyzed. Eleven (33%) of these had epileptiform activity. CONCLUSION: EEG is underused in the acute setting. The frequency of epileptiform activity was high in patients with unexplained IC. EEG was helpful in confirming or ruling out the suspected initial diagnosis and changing medical management in 72% of patients.

scholarly journals Do we need to enlarge emergency services or new emergency hospitals?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 329-333
Author(s):  
Ensar Durmuş ◽  
Fatih Güneysu
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Emergency Services ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Emergency Admissions ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
Intensive Care Patients ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Bed Capacity

Objective: It was aimed to obtain a notion about the needed hospital bed capacity by analyzing the number of hospitalizations and referrals from the ER in this study. Material and Method: This study is a retrospective, analytical cross-sectional research. Patients admitted to a tertiary hospital’s adult emergency service in 2018-2019, hospitalized, or referred to another hospital were analyzed. Results: Of the patients, 28036 were hospitalized; furthermore, this number corresponded to 38.4 patients per day. Of these cases, 15303 (54.6%) were male, and the mean age was 57.89 (±19.5); 8438 cases (30.1%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. The department with the most hospitalizations was internal medicine with 6105 patients (21.78%) and cardiology, with 4822 hospitalized, the most intensive care patients; moreover, psychiatry had the most prolonged length of stay service average of 28 days. The number of patients required to be hospitalized from the emergency room was an average of 48.5 patients per day. The average hospital stay was seven days. Conclusion: Mainly in regions with several emergency admissions, it can be considered to establish emergency hospitals that serve particularly emergency cases to engage the number of patients to be hospitalized from the emergency room.

scholarly journals The impact of frailty on survival in elderly intensive care patients with COVID-19: the COVIP study

Critical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Jung ◽  
◽  
Hans Flaatten ◽  
Jesper Fjølner ◽  
Raphael Romano Bruno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Prognostic Indicators ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Intensive Care Patients ◽  
Prospective Multicentre Study ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led highly developed healthcare systems to the brink of collapse due to the large numbers of patients being admitted into hospitals. One of the potential prognostic indicators in patients with COVID-19 is frailty. The degree of frailty could be used to assist both the triage into intensive care, and decisions regarding treatment limitations. Our study sought to determine the interaction of frailty and age in elderly COVID-19 ICU patients. Methods A prospective multicentre study of COVID-19 patients ≥ 70 years admitted to intensive care in 138 ICUs from 28 countries was conducted. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Frailty was assessed using the clinical frailty scale. Additionally, comorbidities, management strategies and treatment limitations were recorded. Results The study included 1346 patients (28% female) with a median age of 75 years (IQR 72–78, range 70–96), 16.3% were older than 80 years, and 21% of the patients were frail. The overall survival at 30 days was 59% (95% CI 56–62), with 66% (63–69) in fit, 53% (47–61) in vulnerable and 41% (35–47) in frail patients (p < 0.001). In frail patients, there was no difference in 30-day survival between different age categories. Frailty was linked to an increased use of treatment limitations and less use of mechanical ventilation. In a model controlling for age, disease severity, sex, treatment limitations and comorbidities, frailty was independently associated with lower survival. Conclusion Frailty provides relevant prognostic information in elderly COVID-19 patients in addition to age and comorbidities. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04321265, registered 19 March 2020.

scholarly journals Impact of non-invasive respiratory support in severe patients with COVID-19

ANALES RANM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 137 (137(02)) ◽  
pp. 154-160
Author(s):  
Ester Zamarrón ◽  
Carlos Carpio ◽  
Ana Santiago ◽  
Sergio Alcolea ◽  
Juan Carlos Figueira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Respiratory Therapy ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Intensive Care Patients ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Discharged Patients ◽  
Respiratory Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: to assess the impact of non-invasive respiratory therapies in critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Methods: retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 hospitalized patients who required non-invasive respiratory support. The impact of these treatments was evaluated in three groups of patients: pre-intensive care patients, discharged patients from critical care unit (CCU) and non-CCU admitted patients. The impact was assessed 30 days after completing respiratory therapy and was categorized as hospital discharge, transfer to a rehabilitation center, admission to the UCC and deceased. Results: a total of 80 patients were included (average age: 65.9 ± 11.9; men = 45 [56.3%]). 29 (36.3%) patients received BIPAP, 35 (43.8%) CPAP and 27 (33.4%) high-oxygen nasal cannula. Regarding the groups for the indication of respiratory treatment, 37 (46.3%) patients corresponded to the pre-intensive care patients, 24 (30%) were discharged patients from the CCU and 19 (23.8%) to the non-CCU admitted group. In the pre-intensive care, admission to a CCU was avoided in 19 (52.8%) patients and, on the other hand, 14 (38.9%) patients finally were admitted in a CCU. In the group of discharged patients from the UCC 19 (82.6%) patients showed a favorable course of disease. Only 3 (13%) patients were admitted in a UCC or died. Finally, in the group of non-CCU admitted, 6 (31.3%) improved after the use of respiratory therapy and 13 (68.4%) were deceased. Conclusions: respiratory therapies have a favorable impact on critically ill patients affected by COVID-19, both in patients with an indication for admission in the CCU, in those who are discharged from the CCUs and in those who do not have criteria for admission in these units.

scholarly journals Vital signs of severe COVID-19 patients during inter-hospital helicopter transfer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelis Slagt ◽  
Eduard Johannes Spoelder ◽  
Marijn Cornelia Theresia Tacken ◽  
Maartje Frijlink ◽  
Sjoerd Servaas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Systemic Vascular Resistance ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Intensive Care Patients ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands, critically ill ventilated COVID-19 patients were not only transferred between hospitals by ambulance, but also by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS). To date, little is known about the impact of helicopter transport on critically ill patients, and COVID-19 patients in particular. This study was conducted to explore the impact of inter-hospital helicopter transfer on vital signs of mechanically ventilated severe COVID-19 intensive care patients, with special focus on take-off, midflight, and landing. Methods: All ventilated critically ill COVID-19 patients who were transported between April 2020 and June 2021 by the Dutch ‘Lifeliner 5’ HEMS team and who were fully monitored including non-invasive cardiac output, were included in this study. Three 10 minute timeframes (take-off, midflight and landing) were defined for analysis. Continuous data of vital parameters heartrate, peripheral oxygen saturation, arterial blood pressure, end-tidal CO2 and non-invasive cardiac output using electrical cardiometry were collected and stored at a 1 minute interval. Data were analysed for differences over time within the timeframes using 1-way analysis of variance. Significant differences were checked for clinical relevance. Results: Ninety-eight patients were included in the analysis. During take-off an increase was noticed in cardiac output (from 6.7 to 8.1 Lmin-1; P<0.0001) which was determined by a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (from 1068 to 750 dyne·s·cm−5, P<0.0001) accompanied by an increase in stroke volume (from 92.0 to 110.2 ml, P<0.0001). Other parameters were unchanged during take-off and mid-flight. During the landing cardiac output and stroke volume slightly decreased (from 7.9 to 7.1 Lmin-1, P<0.0001 and from 108.3 to 100.6 ml, P<0.0001 respectively) and total systemic vascular resistance increased (P<0.0001). Though statistically significant, the found changes were small and not clinically relevant to the medical status of the patients as judged by the attending physicians. Conclusions: Interhospital helicopter transfer of ventilated intensive care patients with COVID-19 can be performed safely and does not result in clinically relevant changes in vital signs. This study this has been assessed by the medical ethical committee Arnhem-Nijmegen, the Netherlands (identifier 2021-7313). The committee waived the need for informed consent. The study was registered at www.trialregister.nl (identifier NL9307).

scholarly journals Preventing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Educating Emergency Room Nurses

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Ferrazzano
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Oral Care ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Preventative Measures ◽  
Emergency Room Nurses ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Nurses Knowledge

<p>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the second most common hospital acquired infection and is primarily found in the intensive care units. The presence of an endotracheal tube is the primary risk factor for developing VAP. Many times the process of intubation occurs pre-hospital, in the emergency room (ER) or in the operating room. Ventilator associated pneumonia is associated with increased hospital stay and costs. Evidence-based guidelines have been developed to decrease the occurrence of VAP and decrease patient mortality. Preventative measures are initiated on the intensive care unit once the patient is transferred. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of an educational program on ER nurses knowledge of VAP and preventative measures to decrease VAP.</p> <p>The study took place at Rhode Island Hospital, a level 1 trauma center located in Providence, RI. Participants were ER nurses who worked in the critical care area of the ER. A pre-intervention-posttest design was used to evaluate emergency room nurses knowledge regarding VAP. The intervention consisted of a posterboard and study guide that provided information regarding evidence-based guidelines that could be implemented in the ER such as oral care, and head of bed elevation. The overall results on the pre and posttest demonstrated that ER nurses were unaware that oral care and the use of chlorhexidine were important interventions to reduce the incidence of developing VAP. Recommendations and implications for advanced practice nursing and the need for future research are discussed.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document