scholarly journals The Identification Of Merdeka Belajar (Freedom Of Learning) Values Through The Development Of Portfolio Assessment Instruments In Secondary Schools

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qurrota Neina ◽  
U’um Qomariyah
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Schools ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Assessment Instruments

scholarly journals Keterlaksanaan pembelajaran fisika implementasi kurikulum 2013 berdasarkan latar belakang akademik guru di MAN DIY

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ninik Uswatun Fadilah ◽  
Suparwoto Suparwoto
Keyword(s):  
Learning Process ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Authentic Assessment ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Project Based Learning ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Planning Stage ◽  
Academic Background ◽  
Stage 4 ◽  
Research Population

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keterlaksanaan pembelajaran fisika di MAN pilot project DIY dalam implementasi Kurikulum 2013 berdasarkan latar belakang akademik guru ditinjau dari (1) pemahaman terhadap Kurikulum 2013, (2) perencanaan, (3) pelaksanaan, (4) penilaian, (5) upaya yang dilakukan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman pada implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dan (6) hambatan yang dihadapi pada implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian survei dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Populasi penelitian ini adalah guru fisika kelas X di MAN pilot project DIY yang menerapkan Kurikulum 2013. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah angket, observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman mengenai Kurikulum 2013 berada pada kategori sangat baik. Perencanaan berada pada kategori baik, pelaksanaan berada pada kategori baik, penilaian berada pada kategori baik. Upaya guru fisika di MAN pilot project di DIY yaitu mencari informasi mengenai rasionalisasi kurikulum 2013, pendekatan saintifik, administrasi pembelajaran dan penilaian otentik baik secara mandiri maupun dari kegiatan pelatihan. Hambatan yang dihadapi guru yaitu kurangnya ketersediaan buku/panduan mengenai pendekatan saintifik, guru kesulitan dalam membuat instrumen penilaian portofolio, dan guru belum maksimal dalam memfungsikan instrumen penilaian sikap.Kata Kunci: keterlaksanaan, Kurikulum 2013, latar belakang akademik guru The Feasibility of the Physic Learning Process in Implementing Curriculum 2013 Based on the Teachers’ Academic Background  AbstractThis study aims to determine the feasibility of the physic learning process in implementing Curriculum 2013 based on the teachers’ academic background at the pilot project MAN in DIY  in terms of (1) understanding of the Curriculum 2013, (2) planning stage, (3) implementation stage, (4) assessment stage, (5) the effort of the phisycs teachers in pilot project MAN to integrat the knowledge about Curriculum 2013 in phisycs learning process; (6) the obstacles found by the phisycs teachers in the implementation of Curriculum 2013. This research was survey research with descriptive qualitative and quantitative approach. The research population was phisycs teachers of class X of pilot project MAN in DIY which implemented Curriculum 2013. The technique of data collection was questionnaires, observation, interviews, and documentation. The results show that the teachers’ knowledge of Curriculum 2013 is very good. The planning is in the quite good category, the implementation is in the good category, the assessment is in the good category. the efforts of physics teachers at pilot project MAN are looking for information about: the rationalization of the Curriculum 2013, the scientific approach, the administration of learning and authentic assessment either independently or by training program; (4) the obstacles found by the teachers are: the lack of availability of the book/guide on Problem Based Learning (PBL), Project Based Learning (PjBL) learning model, the teachers difficulty in making portfolio assessment instruments, and the teachers have not been able to maximal functioning of attitude assessment instruments.Keywords: the feasibility, Curriculum 2013, teachers’ academic background

scholarly journals Evaluation of Learning Outcome: The Comparison Between the Education Unit Level Curriculum (KTSP) and the 2013 Curriculum

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
Rusydi Ananda
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Methodology ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Learning Outcome ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Assessment Of Learning ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Evaluation Of Learning ◽  
Outcome Evaluations ◽  
Achievement Indicators

This study aimed to describe the comparative implementation of learning outcome evaluations applied at MTsN 1 Medan by using the 2013 KTSP and Curriculum 2013. The method used in this study was qualitative methodology. Data collection techniques consisted of observation, interviews, and documentation. The research findings indicated that the differences in the assessment of learning outcomes between the KTSP curriculum and 2013 curriculum include aspects of the application in the classroom, assessment aspects, aspects of the assessment system, aspects of assessment instruments, aspects of portfolio assessment concepts, aspects of report card format, aspects of value list format, aspects of competency achievement indicators, aspects of competency achievement indicators, aspects graduate competency standards, standard aspects of assessment and aspects of value ranges.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Learning Outcome: Comparative Education Unit Level Curriculum with the 2013 Curriculum in MTsN 1 Medan

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-80
Author(s):  
Rusydi Ananda
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Education ◽  
Qualitative Methodology ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Learning Outcome ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Evaluation Of Learning ◽  
Outcome Evaluations ◽  
Achievement Indicators

This study aims to describe the comparative implementation of learning outcome evaluations applied at MTsN1 Medan by using the 2013 KTSP and Curriculum 2013. The method used in this study is qualitative methodology. Data collection techniques consist of observation, interviews, and documentation. The research findings indicate differences in the assessment of learning outcomes between the KTSP curriculum and 2013 curriculum include aspects of application in the classroom, assessment aspects, aspects of the assessment system, aspects of assessment instruments, aspects of portfolio assessment concepts, aspects of report card format, aspects of value list format, aspects of competency achievement indicators, aspects of competency achievement indicators, aspects graduate competency standards, standard aspects of assessment and aspects of value ranges.

scholarly journals Authentic Assesment of The Lesson Planning Accomplished by The Indonesian Language and Literary Teachers in Bogor Secondary Schools

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-23
Author(s):  
Suhendra , ◽  
Rina Rosdiana ◽  
Stella Talitha
Keyword(s):  
Performance Appraisal ◽  
Lesson Plan ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Authentic Assessment ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Choice Test ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
Project Appraisal ◽  
Written Assessment

Teachers are an significant element in the development of assessment instruments. Assessing is, therefore, one of the competencies that must be possessed by teachers . The teacher's understanding of the assessment can be reflected in the assessment presentation on the Lesson Plans (RPP). This study examines the preparation of authentic assessment of the even semester Lesson Plan in the Indonesian language curriculum at five high schools in Bogor. The applied method in this research is qualitatively descriptive research. The purpose of this study is to describe 1) the accuracy of the formulation of the problem with the basic competence and indicator, 2) the completeness of the assessment instrument, and 3) the selection of assessment type. The results showed that 90.9% BC or indicator evaluation instrument is made while 9.1% is not made. This causes the teacher unable to know the level of students' understanding of the BC. Ninety percents (90%) of instrument evaluation is less precise; while 10 % of the evaluation instrument is less precise, less appropriate. Forty ( 40 %) of evaluation instruments are complete and 60% are incomplete (no scoring guidelines and answer keys). There are seven development forms of authentic assessment, namely performance appraisal, project appraisal, portfolio assessment, written assessment, attitude assessment, self-assessment, and product assessment. Here is an overview of the authentic assessment form used by teachers. 20% of all indicators are studied, in the form of performance appraisals, the type is the oral practice . Meanwhile, 80% is a written assessment, in the form of multiple choice test and description (short field and essay). This shows that most teachers do not take advantage of other forms of authentic assessment. Keywords: authentic assessment, basic competencies, indicators.

scholarly journals Development of Computer-Based Kindergarten Children's Creativity Portfolio Assessment Instruments

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1421-1427
Author(s):  
Marwah Nazhifah Sitorus ◽  
Anita Yus ◽  
Daulat Saragih
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Score Test ◽  
Kindergarten Children ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Design Development ◽  
Teacher Response ◽  
Group A ◽  
Computer Based

The problem in this study is that teachers still have difficulty assessing children's creativity, so the aim of this study is to develop a computer-based assessment instrument for the creativity portfolio of kindergarten children. This research is a Research and Development (R&D) using the ADDIE development model through 5 stages, namely: analyze, design, development, implementation and evaluation. Subjects in this study consisted of 3 teachers in Group A TK ABA 05 Medan. Then 6 validation experts who have the appropriate knowledge of this development research, among others: a) 2 assessment experts, b) 2 computer experts, c) 2 early childhood experts.  The determination of the feasibility level of the portfolio assessment instrument is based on the validation test of the experts, while the level of effectiveness of the portfolio assessment instrument is based on trials for teachers through teacher response questionnaires. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the assessment of the assessment expert validator I in this category was considered very valid with a percentage of 83% which means that it is very suitable for use and the second assessment expert in the category is considered very valid with a percentage of 83% which means very suitable for use. Then the computer expert I in the category is considered valid with a percentage of 81% which means it is suitable for use and the computer expert II in the category is considered very valid with a percentage of 86% which means very suitable for use. Furthermore, early childhood expert I in the very valid category with a percentage of 93% which means that it is very suitable for use and early childhood expert II in the category is considered valid with a percentage of 73% which means it is suitable for use. The results of the teacher response questionnaire on portfolio assessment using a gain score test with a value of 0.74 and can be categorized as high effectiveness, this indicates that the use of portfolio assessment instruments has been effectively used by TK ABA 05 Medan teachers.

scholarly journals English Teachers' Perceptions to Authentic Assessments

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohib Adrianto Sangia
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
School Achievement ◽  
Authentic Assessment ◽  
Language Teachers ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Teachers Perceptions ◽  
Project Assessment ◽  
Construction Of Knowledge ◽  
Basic Competencies

Authentic assessment is a meaningful measurement significantly over the study of students to the domain of attitudes, knowledge, and skills. In applying authentic assessment to determine the learning outcomes of students, teachers apply the criteria relating to the construction of knowledge, and try to observe activity, and value beyond school achievement. The purpose of this authentic assessment is to measure a variety of skills in a variety of contexts that reflect real-world situations where those skills are used. The types of authentic assessment in the curriculum in 2013 include performance assessment, portfolio assessment, project assessment, and a written assessment. Stages in authentic assessment in the 2013 curriculum are included analysing core competencies and basic competence. Basic competence determines the appropriate foundation to learning, to develop indicators of basic competencies chosen, and determining aspects, forms, rubrics, and assessment instruments. In order to implement effective authentic assessment the teacher must clearly understand the objectives to be achieved. This research has purposed to expose the response from the language teachers in Ambon after having curriculum 2013 training. The results show the teachers are grouped into two major opinions, the optimistic and pessimistic teachers.

scholarly journals PENGEMBANGAN PENILAIAN PORTOFOLIO UNTUK MENDUKUNG KEAKTIFAN SISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN IPS DI SEKOLAH DASAR

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Shafirra Bulanrizkia Efanda ◽  
Laila Fatmawati
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Student Response ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Response Sheet ◽  
Product Trial ◽  
A Value ◽  
The Social ◽  
Data Collection Instrument ◽  
Product Test

Learning will be memorable if students practice directly about the material being studied, but also the activity of students greatly affect their ability to absorb the material. With active students practice directly about the material being studied can help teachers in delivering the material being studied, especially on materials that are full of memorization as in the social studies in elementary school. For that new innovation is needed in the learning activities that are able to support students' activities in the learning process. This study aims to determine the steps of development of portfolio assessment and to determine the appropriateness of applying portfolio assessment to support student activeness in IPS learning. This research is a type of research development (R & D). The procedure is to conduct preliminary study to know the potential and problems, data collection, product design, design validation, design revision, product test, product trial revision. Portfolio assessment instruments are validated by expert testers, ie evaluation experts, materials experts and learning specialists. This research was conducted at SD Muhammadiyah Kalangan in May 2017. The data collection instrument was done with expert validation, observation sheet, and student response sheet. In this research, data analysis is done with qualitative and quantitative. The results showed that in terms of quality portfolio assessment included in the category of very good, which is suitable to be used as application of learning. The results obtained from the validation of the expert evaluation obtained a value of 68.75 with good category, the results of the material experts obtained a value of 77.78 with good category, and the results of the expert learning obtained a value of 100 with very good category. The result of the test based on the students' appraisal was obtained by 90.27 with very good category, from the observer scores obtained the value of 81.25 with very good category..

scholarly journals Using Portfolio Assessment at Lower Secondary Education in Setswana Language Lessons

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1059
Author(s):  
Eureka Mokibelo
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Schools ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Academic Progress ◽  
Record Keeping ◽  
Junior Secondary Schools ◽  
University Of Botswana ◽  
Junior Secondary ◽  
Academic Records ◽  
The University

This study examined practices in academic progress record keeping at Junior Secondary Schools in Botswana in the Setswana language programme. Using the qualitative approach it was observed that students’ academic progress at Junior Secondary Schools were recorded in scheme books with marks written at the back of it, either after an exercise or after writing monthly tests with no evidence produced when necessary during conferencing.  The recordings did not show parents, educational officials and learners students’ academic strengths and weaknesses in a particular skill they were supposed to develop in the teaching and learning processes. The study involved in-service teachers at Junior Secondary Schools who were furthering their education at the University of Botswana. A questionnaire with open ended questions and interviews were used to collect data from the participants. Data were analyzed using the grounded theory by considering thematic statements that emerged from key research questions.  The findings indicated that the measures used for academic records by teachers were not systematic and effective. The study recommends portfolio assessment not as a means to an end, but as a strategy that can be adopted and used to develop a systematic way of keeping students’ academic records and monitoring their academic growth and development progress.

The Token and Reporter's Tests

1985 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-255
Author(s):  
Penelope K. Hall ◽  
Linda S. Jordan
Keyword(s):  
Language Development ◽  
Language Disorders ◽  
Language Assessment ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Token Test ◽  
Normal Language

The performance of 123 language-disordered children on the DeRenzi and Faglioni form of the Token Test and the DeRenzi and Ferrari Reporter's Test were analyzed using two scoring conventions, and then compared with the performances of children with presumed normal language development. Correlations with other commonly used language assessment instruments are cited. Use of the Token and Reporter's Tests with children exhibiting language disorders is suggested.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document