Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) competition with navy beans

1993 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 1309-1313 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Wall
Keyword(s):  
Yield Loss ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Test Weight ◽  
Yield Losses ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris L ◽  
Navy Bean ◽  
Rectangular Hyperbola ◽  
Weed Density ◽  
Wild Mustard ◽  
Navy Beans

Field studies were conducted in 1989 and 1991 to investigate the competitiveness of wild mustard with navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Wild mustard growing in the crop row was highly competitive with beans sown in rows spaced 53 cm apart. Navy bean yields decreased with increasing wild mustard density. The greatest incremental yield losses occurred at weed densities of less than 20 plants m−2. Estimated yield losses at 20 wild mustard plants m, were 57 and 46% in 1989 and 1991, respectively. Wild mustard competition reduced seed test weight (g 0.5 L−1) less than 4% over the range of weed densities investigated. Key words: Navy bean ’Seafarer’, rectangular hyperbola, seed test weight, weed density, yield loss

scholarly journals Impact of common bacterial blight on the yield, seed weight and seed discoloration of different market classes of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 703-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Boersma ◽  
A. Hou ◽  
C. L. Gillard ◽  
K. B. McRae ◽  
R. L. Conner
Keyword(s):  
Phaseolus Vulgaris ◽  
Seed Weight ◽  
Bacterial Blight ◽  
Common Bacterial Blight ◽  
Yield Losses ◽  
Dry Beans ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris L ◽  
Navy Bean ◽  
Navy Beans ◽  
The Impact

Boersma, J. G., Hou, A., Gillard, C. L., McRae, K. B. and Conner, R. L. 2015. Impact of common bacterial blight on the yield, seed weight and seed discoloration of different market classes of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 703–710. Common bacterial blight (CBB) is a seed-borne disease of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), causing significant economic loss to growers due to reductions in seed yield and quality and the need to annually purchase disease-free seed. Over the past decade a number of breeding lines and cultivars with resistance to CBB have been developed in several bean market classes including navy, black and cranberry beans. A comparison of three susceptible navy bean cultivars and seven resistant navy, three black and one cranberry bean entries in Manitoba revealed that most resistant navy and black bean lines had significantly reduced the incidence of leaf symptoms and their mean yield losses were reduced to less than 17%, while those of the susceptible lines were as high as 36% under severe disease pressure. Only the weakly resistant navy bean cultivar HR67 and the cranberry bean line F4GR1 failed to substantially reduce CBB symptoms or show a yield advantage. The Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) marker PVctt001 in combination with Sequence Characterized Amplified Region (SCAR) marker SU91 was associated with a low incidence of CBB symptoms and a reduced yield loss in five navy bean lines, but not in the cranberry bean line F4GR1. Disease symptoms on the pods in the resistant black and navy beans and seed discoloration of navy beans caused by CBB were also significantly reduced by resistance. Seed weights were reduced by 2.1–4.7% in the susceptible cultivars, but there was only a slight or no decrease or no effect on the seed weight of the CBB-resistant lines and cultivars. Generally the magnitude of the reductions in yield was much greater than the impact on seed weight, which suggests that yield losses were caused by a combination of reduced seed weight and the number of seeds per plant.

Wild mustard interference in traditional and semi-leafless field peas

1991 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 473-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Wall ◽  
G. H. Friesen ◽  
T. K. Bhati
Keyword(s):  
Field Studies ◽  
Competitive Effect ◽  
Yield Losses ◽  
Seeding Rate ◽  
Rectangular Hyperbola ◽  
Wild Mustard ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Field Peas ◽  
Moderate Effect ◽  
Seed Yields

Field studies were conducted in 1987, 1988 and 1989 to determine the competitive effect of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) on two field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars; Century, a traditional cultivar, and Tipu, a semi-leafless cultivar, each planted at recommended (172 kg ha−1) and half the recommended seeding rate (86 kg ha−1). For both cultivars, 20 wild mustard plants m−2 reduced seed yields from 2 to 35% at the recommended seeding rate and from 4 to 35% at the low seeding rate. Tipu was more competitive with wild mustard when planted at the recommended seeding rate than when planted at half the recommended rates. Seeding rate had only a moderate effect on wild mustard competition in Century in years with normal precipitation. For both cultivars the effect of wild mustard interference on yield was influenced by the amount of precipitation received, with the greatest yield losses occurring in seasons with normal to high rainfall. Key words: Field peas, competition, weed density, seeding rate, cultivars, yield, rectangular hyperbola

Lanceleaf Sage (Salvia reflexa) Interference in Sugarbeet

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis C. Odero ◽  
Abdel O. Mesbah ◽  
Stephen D. Miller ◽  
Andrew R. Kniss
Keyword(s):  
Yield Loss ◽  
Maximum Yield ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Root Yield ◽  
Rectangular Hyperbola ◽  
Weed Density ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Critical Timing ◽  
The Relationship

Field studies were conducted in Powell, WY, in 2006 and 2007 to determine the influence of season-long interference of various lanceleaf sage densities and durations of interference on sugarbeet. The rectangular hyperbola model with the asymptote (A) constrained to 100% maximum yield loss characterized the relationship between lanceleaf sage density and sugarbeet yield loss. The estimated parameterI(yield loss per unit weed density as density approaches zero) was 3% for both root and sucrose yield loss. Increasing duration of lanceleaf sage interference had a negative effect on sugarbeet root yield. The critical timing of weed removal to avoid 5 and 10% root yield loss was 37 and 52 d after sugarbeet emergence, respectively. Lanceleaf sage interference did not affect percentage of sucrose content. These results indicate that lanceleaf sage is not as competitive as other weeds but that appropriate control measures should be undertaken to minimize sugarbeet yield loss from interference.

Venice Mallow (Hibiscus trionum) Interference in Sugarbeet

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 581-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis C. Odero ◽  
Abdel O. Mesbah ◽  
Stephen D. Miller ◽  
Andrew R. Kniss
Keyword(s):  
Seed Bank ◽  
Yield Loss ◽  
Sucrose Concentration ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Root Yield ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Rectangular Hyperbola ◽  
Weed Density ◽  
Hibiscus Trionum ◽  
Critical Timing

Field studies were conducted in Powell, WY, in 2006 and 2007 to determine the influence of season-long interference of various Venice mallow densities and duration of interference on sugarbeet. Sucrose concentration was not affected by Venice mallow interference. The effect of Venice mallow density on sugarbeet root and sucrose yield loss was described by the rectangular hyperbola model. Root and sucrose yield loss increased as Venice mallow density increased. The estimated asymptote,A(percent yield loss as density approaches infinity) was 61% for both root and sucrose yield loss, and the estimated parameter,I(percent yield loss per unit weed density as density approaches zero) was 6% for both root and sucrose yield loss. Sugarbeet root yield decreased as the duration of Venice mallow interference increased. The critical timing of weed removal to avoid 5 and 10% root yield loss was 30 and 43 d after sugarbeet emergence, respectively. Results show that Venice mallow is competitive with sugarbeet implying that it should be managed appropriately to reduce negative effects on yield and prevent seed bank replenishment and re-infestation in subsequent years.

Interference of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Sweetpotato

Weed Science ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Meyers ◽  
Katherine M. Jennings ◽  
Jonathan R. Schultheis ◽  
David W. Monks
Keyword(s):  
Yield Loss ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Light Interception ◽  
Palmer Amaranth ◽  
Amaranthus Palmeri ◽  
Yield Losses ◽  
Positive Linear Relationship ◽  
Rectangular Hyperbola ◽  
Yield And Quality ◽  
Biomass Plant

Field studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 at Clinton and Faison, NC, to evaluate the influence of Palmer amaranth density on ‘Beauregard’ and ‘Covington’ sweetpotato yield and quality and to quantify the influence of Palmer amaranth on light interception. Palmer amaranth was established at 0, 0.5, 1.1, 1.6, 3.3, and 6.5 plants m−1within the sweetpotato row and densities were maintained season-long. Jumbo, number (no.) 1, and marketable sweetpotato yield losses were fit to a rectangular hyperbola model, and predicted yield loss ranged from 56 to 94%, 30 to 85%, and 36 to 81%, respectively for Palmer amaranth densities of 0.5 to 6.5 plants m−1. Percentage of jumbo, no. 1, and marketable sweetpotato yield loss displayed a positive linear relationship with Palmer amaranth light interception as early as 6 to 7 wk after planting (R2= 0.99, 0.86, and 0.93, respectively). Predicted Palmer amaranth light interception 6 to 7, 10, and 13 to 14 wk after planting ranged from 47 to 68%, 46 to 82%, and 42 to 71%, respectively for Palmer amaranth densities of 0.5 to 6.5 plants m−1. Palmer amaranth height increased from 177 to 197 cm at densities of 0.5 to 4.1 plants m−1and decreased from 197 to 188 cm at densities of 4.1 to 6.5 plants m−1; plant width (69 to 145 cm) and shoot dry biomass plant−1(0.2 to 1.1 kg) decreased linearly as density increased.

scholarly journals Determining the critical period for weed control in high-yielding cotton using common sunflower as a mimic weed

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 800-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham W. Charles ◽  
Brian M. Sindel ◽  
Annette L. Cowie ◽  
Oliver G. G. Knox
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Yield Loss ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Growing Degree Days ◽  
Degree Days ◽  
Weed Density ◽  
High Level ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Planting Season

AbstractField studies were conducted over six seasons to determine the critical period for weed control (CPWC) in high-yielding cotton, using common sunflower as a mimic weed. Common sunflower was planted with or after cotton emergence at densities of 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 plants m−2. Common sunflower was added and removed at approximately 0, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, and 900 growing degree days (GDD) after planting. Season-long interference resulted in no harvestable cotton at densities of five or more common sunflower plants m−2. High levels of intraspecific and interspecific competition occurred at the highest weed densities, with increases in weed biomass and reductions in crop yield not proportional to the changes in weed density. Using a 5% yield-loss threshold, the CPWC extended from 43 to 615 GDD, and 20 to 1,512 GDD for one and 50 common sunflower plants m−2, respectively. These results highlight the high level of weed control required in high-yielding cotton to ensure crop losses do not exceed the cost of control.

Economic and interference threshold densities of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) in potato (Solanum tuberosum)

Weed Science ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Régis Baziramakenga ◽  
Gilles D. Leroux
Keyword(s):  
Yield Loss ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Potato Yield ◽  
Hyperbolic Function ◽  
Yield Losses ◽  
Economic Threshold ◽  
Elytrigia Repens ◽  
Shoot Number ◽  
Dry Biomass

Field studies were conducted in 1989 and 1990 at St-Augustin, Quebec, Canada, to determine the economic threshold density of quackgrass in potato. Potato yield losses due to quackgrass interference increased with quackgrass population density. Potato yield ranged from 33 to 73% in 1989, and from 19 to 44% in 1990. The relationship between potato yield losses and quackgrass densities was described by a rectangular hyperbolic function. Dry weight of quackgrass proved to be the best predictor of potato yield loss compared to shoot number. The interference thresholds for 10% potato yield loss amounted to 25 shoots m−2or 20 g total dry biomass m−2. The economic threshold varied between 0.04 and 2 shoots m−2or 0.0165 and 1.5 g total dry biomass m−2, depending on the variables considered.

The Critical Period of Bengal Dayflower (Commelina Bengalensis) Control in Peanut

Weed Science ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore M. Webster ◽  
Wilson H. Faircloth ◽  
J. Timothy Flanders ◽  
Eric P. Prostko ◽  
Timothy L. Grey
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Plant Pathogens ◽  
Yield Loss ◽  
Maximum Yield ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Yield Losses ◽  
Competitive Effects ◽  
Peanut Crop ◽  
The Relationship

Bengal dayflower (also known as tropical spiderwort) is one of the most troublesome weeds in peanut in Georgia, United States. Field studies conducted in 2004 and 2005 evaluated the relationship between the duration of Bengal dayflower interference and peanut yield in an effort to optimize the timing of weed control. In 2004, the critical period of weed control (CPWC) necessary to avoid greater than 5% peanut yield loss was between 316 and 607 growing degree days (GDD), which corresponded to an interval between June 8 and July 2. In 2005, the CPWC ranged from 185 to 547 GDD, an interval between May 30 and July 3. Maximum yield loss in 2005 from season-long interference of Bengal dayflower was 51%. In 2004, production of peanut pods was eliminated by interference with Bengal dayflower for the initial 6 wk (495 GDD) of the growing season. Robust Bengal dayflower growth in 2004 shaded the peanut crop, likely intercepting fungicide applications and causing a reduction in peanut yield. Therefore, the competitive effects of Bengal dayflower are likely complicated with the activity of plant pathogens. In spite of higher Bengal dayflower population densities, greater Bengal dayflower growth, and greater peanut yield losses in 2004 than in 2005, the CPWC was a relatively similar 4-wk period that ended during the first week of July, for peanut that was planted in the first week of May.

Response of Rice (Oryza sativa) to Low Rates of Glyphosate and Glufosinate

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad Davis ◽  
Robert C. Scott ◽  
Jason K. Norsworthy ◽  
Edward Gbur
Keyword(s):  
Yield Loss ◽  
Flag Leaf ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Leaf Length ◽  
University Of Arkansas ◽  
Yield Losses ◽  
Time Of Application ◽  
Flag Leaf Length ◽  
The University ◽  
Significant Injury

Field studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 at the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff farm near Lonoke to evaluate and compare the effects of low rates of glufosinate and glyphosate on rice. Two rice cultivars were seeded, and glyphosate and glufosinate were applied at 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 of the labeled use rate of 870 g ae ha−1and 616 g ai ha−1, respectively, at the three- to four-leaf, panicle initiation (PI), and boot stages. Rice canopy height reductions, reduction in flag leaf length, prolonged maturity, and yield losses were caused by both herbicides at all evaluated application timings. Although both herbicides caused significant injury, symptoms varied greatly between the two herbicides. Glufosinate injury to rice was more rapid and visually intense than with glyphosate. Glufosinate symptoms, which consisted of rapid necrosis, were visible in 1 to 2 d, whereas glyphosate symptoms, stunting and chlorosis, became visible after 7 to 10 d or not at all depending on time of application. Glyphosate applied at the 1/2× rate to rice in the boot growth stage caused less than 10% injury at 3 wk after treatment but resulted in 80% yield loss. Glufosinate at boot caused 80% injury and 80% yield loss. Glyphosate symptoms from PI and boot timings were typically only visible at heading and included malformed panicles and shortened flag leaves. Harvested grain seed weights were reduced as much as 14% by either herbicide applied at PI and boot. Germination of harvested grain was not affected by any treatment. At the rates evaluated in this research, glufosinate-induced injury to rice can be just as detrimental as glyphosate in reducing yield.

Wild Buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus) Interference in Sugarbeet

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis C. Odero ◽  
Abdel O. Mesbah ◽  
Stephen D. Miller ◽  
Andrew R. Kniss
Keyword(s):  
Yield Loss ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Sucrose Content ◽  
Root Yield ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Wild Buckwheat ◽  
Weed Density ◽  
Polygonum Convolvulus ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Critical Timing

Field studies were conducted in Powell, WY in 2006 and 2007 to determine the influence of season-long interference of various wild buckwheat densities and duration of interference on sugarbeet. Percent sucrose content was not affected by wild buckwheat interference. Root and sucrose yield loss per hectare increased as wild buckwheat density increased. The estimated percent yield loss as wild buckwheat density approaches infinity was 64 and 61% for root and sucrose yield loss, respectively. The estimated percent yield loss per unit weed density at low weed densities was 6% for both root and sucrose yield loss. Greater durations of wild buckwheat interference had a negative effect on sugarbeet root yield. The critical timing of weed removal (CTWR) to avoid 5 and 10% root yield loss was 32 and 48 d after sugarbeet emergence (DAE), respectively. These results show that wild buckwheat is competitive with sugarbeet and should be managed appropriately to forestall any negative effects on sugarbeet root and sucrose yield.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document