scholarly journals Sustained Oligoclonal T Cell Expansion Correlates with Durable Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Lung Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sope Olugbile ◽  
Jae Hyun Park ◽  
Philip Hoffman ◽  
Livia Szeto ◽  
Jyoti Patel ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirin Lak ◽  
Valérie Janelle ◽  
Anissa Djedid ◽  
Gabrielle Boudreau ◽  
Ann Brasey ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundThe stimulation and expansion of antigen-specific T cells ex vivo enables the targeting of a multitude of cancer antigens. However, clinical scale T-cell expansion from rare precursors requires repeated stimulations ex vivo leading to T-cell terminal effector differentiation and exhaustion that adversely impact therapeutic potential. We leveraged immune checkpoint blockade relevant to antigen-specific CD8+ human T cells to improve the expansion and function of T cells targeting clinically relevant antigens.MethodsA clinically-compliant protocol relying on peptide-pulsed monocyte-derived dendritic cells and cytokines was used to expand antigen-specific CD8+ targeting the oncogenic Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and the tumor associated antigen (TAA) Wilms Tumor 1 (WT1) protein. The effects of antibody-mediated blockade of immune checkpoints applied to the cultures (T-cell expansion, phenotypes and function) were assessed at various time points. Genomic studies including single cell RNA (scRNA) sequencing and T-cell receptor sequencing were performed on EBV-specific T cells to inform about the impact of immune checkpoint blockade on the clonal distribution and gene expression of the expanded T cells.ResultsSeveral immune checkpoints were expressed early by ex vivo expanded antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, including PD-1 and TIM-3 with co-expression matching evidence of T-cell dysfunction as the cultures progressed. The introduction of anti-PD-L1 (expressed by the dendritic cells) and anti-TIM-3 antibodies in combination (but not individually) to the culture led to markedly improved antigen-specific T-cell expansion based on cell counts, fluorescent multimer staining and functional tests. This was not associated with evidence of T-cell dysfunction when compared to T cells expanded without immune checkpoint blockade. Genomics studies largely confirmed these results, showing that double blockade does not impart specific transcriptional programs or patterns on TCR repertoires. However, our data indicate that combined blockade may nonetheless alter gene expression in a minority of clonotypes and have donor-specific impacts.ConclusionsThe manufacturing of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells can be improved in terms of yield and functionality using blockade of TIM-3 and the PD-L1/PD-1 axis in combination. Overcoming the deleterious effects of multiple antigenic stimulations through PD-L1/TIM-3 blockade is a readily applicable approach for several adoptive-immunotherapy strategies.


2021 ◽  
pp. jim-2021-001806
Author(s):  
Hannah Elizabeth Green ◽  
Jorge Nieva

The advent of checkpoint blockade-based immunotherapy is rapidly changing the management of lung cancer. Whereas past anticancer drugs’ primary toxicity was hematologic, the newer agents have primarily autoimmune toxicity. Thus, it is no longer enough for oncology practitioners to be skilled only in hematology. They must also understand management of autoimmune conditions, leveraging the skills of the rheumatologist, endocrinologist and gastroenterologist in the process. Herein we describe the mechanism of action and toxicities associated with immune checkpoint blockade in patients with lung cancer and provide a framework for management of adverse events.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e001460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuting Liu ◽  
Graham D Hogg ◽  
David G DeNardo

The clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibitors has highlighted the central role of the immune system in cancer control. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can reinvigorate anti-cancer immunity and are now the standard of care in a number of malignancies. However, research on immune checkpoint blockade has largely been framed with the central dogma that checkpoint therapies intrinsically target the T cell, triggering the tumoricidal potential of the adaptive immune system. Although T cells undoubtedly remain a critical piece of the story, mounting evidence, reviewed herein, indicates that much of the efficacy of checkpoint therapies may be attributable to the innate immune system. Emerging research suggests that T cell-directed checkpoint antibodies such as anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) can impact innate immunity by both direct and indirect pathways, which may ultimately shape clinical efficacy. However, the mechanisms and impacts of these activities have yet to be fully elucidated, and checkpoint therapies have potentially beneficial and detrimental effects on innate antitumor immunity. Further research into the role of innate subsets during checkpoint blockade may be critical for developing combination therapies to help overcome checkpoint resistance. The potential of checkpoint therapies to amplify innate antitumor immunity represents a promising new field that can be translated into innovative immunotherapies for patients fighting refractory malignancies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A728-A728
Author(s):  
Shengqing Gu ◽  
Wubing Zhang ◽  
Xiaoqing Wang ◽  
Peng Jiang ◽  
Nicole Traugh ◽  
...  

BackgroundCancer immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy, is leading to a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, as a small percentage of cancer patients have obtained durable remission following ICB treatment. Successful ICB responses rely on cancer cells presenting antigens to the cell surface via the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), which activates antigen-specific T-lymphocytes to kill cancer cells. Type-I MHC (MHC-I) is wildly expressed in all cell types and mediates the interaction with cytotoxic CD8 T cells. However, over 65% of cancer patients are estimated to show defects in MHC-I-mediated antigen presentation, including downregulation of its expression that can lead to primary or acquired resistance to ICB therapy, and therapeutic strategies to effectively restore or boost MHC-I are limited.MethodsHere, we employed a CRISPR screening approach with dual-marker FACS sorting to identify factors that decouple the regulation of MHC-I and PD-L1. The experimentally validated target was used to generate a KO differential expression signature. Using this signature, we analyzed transcriptome data from drug perturbation studies to identify drugs that regulate MHC-I but not PD-L1. Finally, we validated the effect of the identified drug to enhance ICB response in a T-cell-dependent manner in vivo.ResultsCRISPR screens identified TRAF3, a suppressor of the NF-κB pathway, as a negative regulator of MHC-I but not PD-L1. The Traf3-knockout (Traf3-KO) gene expression signature is associated with better survival in ICB-naive cancer patients and better ICB response. We then screened for drugs with similar transcriptional effects as this signature and identified SMAC mimetics. We experimentally validated that the SMAC mimetic birinapant upregulates MHC-I, sensitizes cancer cells to T-cell-dependent killing, and adds to ICB efficacy. However, in cancer cells with high NF-κB activity, the effect of birinapant on MHC-I is weak, indicating context-dependent MHC-I regulation.ConclusionsIn summary, Traf3 deletion specifically upregulates MHC-I without inducing PD-L1 in response to various cytokines and sensitizes cancer cells to T-cell-driven cytotoxicity. The SMAC mimetic birinapant phenocopies Traf3-knockout and sensitizes MHC-I-low melanoma to ICB therapy. Further studies are needed to elucidate the context-dependencies of MHC-I regulation. Our findings provide preclinical rationale for treating some tumors expressing low MHC-I with SMAC mimetics to enhance sensitivity to immunotherapy. The approach used in this study can be generalized to identify other drugs that enhance immunotherapy efficacy.AcknowledgementsThis study was supported by grants from the NIH (R01CA234018 to XSL, R01AI137337 to BEG, P50CA101942-12 and P50CA206963 to GJF), Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF-19-100 to XSL), Burroughs Wellcome Career Award in Medical Sciences (to BEG), and Sara Elizabeth O'Brien Trust Fellowship (to SG).We thank Drs. Kai Wucherpfennig and Deng Pan for their insightful suggestions on this study.Ethics ApprovalAll mice were housed in standard cage in Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Animal Resources Facility (ARF). All animal procedures were carried out under the ARF Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol and were in accordance with the IACUC standards for the welfare of animals.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1764-1767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko Horio ◽  
Koutaro Takamatsu ◽  
Daisuke Tamanoi ◽  
Ryo Sato ◽  
Koichi Saruwatari ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 4931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Bianco ◽  
Fabio Perrotta ◽  
Giusi Barra ◽  
Umberto Malapelle ◽  
Danilo Rocco ◽  
...  

Manipulation of the immune response is a game changer in lung cancer treatment, revolutionizing management. PD1 and CTLA4 are dynamically expressed on different T cell subsets that can either disrupt or sustain tumor growth. Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) against PD1/PDL1 and CTLA4 have shown that inhibitory signals can be impaired, blocking T cell activation and function. MoAbs, used as both single-agents or in combination with standard therapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), have exhibited advantages in terms of overall survival and response rate; nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab and more recently, durvalumab, have already been approved for lung cancer treatment and more compounds are in the pipeline. A better understanding of signaling elicited by these antibodies on T cell subsets, as well as identification of biological determinants of sensitivity, resistance and correlates of efficacy, will help to define the mechanisms of antitumor responses. In addition, the relevance of T regulatory cells (Treg) involved in immune responses in cancer is attracting increasing interest. A major challenge for future research is to understand why a durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) occurs only in subsets of patients and the mechanisms of resistance after an initial response. This review will explore current understanding and future direction of research on ICI treatment in lung cancer and the impact of tumor immune microenvironment n influencing clinical responses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A5.1-A5
Author(s):  
A Martinez-Usatorre ◽  
E Kadioglu ◽  
C Cianciaruso ◽  
B Torchia ◽  
J Faget ◽  
...  

BackgroundImmune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with antibodies against PD-1 or PD-L1 may provide therapeutic benefits in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, most tumours are resistant and cases of disease hyper-progression have also been reported.Materials and MethodsGenetically engineered mouse models of KrasG12Dp53null NSCLC were treated with cisplatin along with antibodies against angiopoietin-2/VEGFA, PD-1 and CSF1R. Tumour growth was monitored by micro-computed tomography and the tumour vasculature and immune cell infiltrates were assessed by immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometry.ResultsCombined angiopoietin-2/VEGFA blockade by a bispecific antibody (A2V) modulated the vasculature and abated immunosuppressive macrophages while increasing CD8+effector T cells in the tumours, achieving disease stabilization comparable or superior to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, these immunological responses were unexpectedly limited by the addition of a PD-1 antibody, which paradoxically enhanced progression of a fraction of the tumours through a mechanism involving regulatory T cells and macrophages. Elimination of tumour-associated macrophages with a CSF1R-blocking antibody induced NSCLC regression in combination with PD-1 blockade and cisplatin.ConclusionsThe immune cell composition of the tumour determines the outcome of PD-1 blockade. In NSCLC, high infiltration of regulatory T cells and immunosuppressive macrophages may account for tumour hyper-progression upon ICB.Disclosure InformationA. Martinez-Usatorre: None. E. Kadioglu: None. C. Cianciaruso: None. B. Torchia: None. J. Faget: None. E. Meylan: None. M. Schmittnaegel: None. I. Keklikoglou: None. M. De Palma: None.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document