scholarly journals For an Efficient Integration of Palliative Care in Oncology Treatment Pathways: Guidelines of the French Speaking Association for Supportive Care in Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Aline ◽  
Block Veronique ◽  
Salleron Julia ◽  
Adam Virginie
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Treatment Pathways ◽  
French Speaking ◽  
Efficient Integration ◽  
Oncology Treatment

Supportive care in cancer organization in France: State of the art.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19640-e19640
Author(s):  
Florian Scotte ◽  
Christian Herve ◽  
Roland Bugat ◽  
Fadila Farsi ◽  
Moise Namer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Treatment Side Effects ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Centers ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
French Speaking ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pain Care ◽  
Mean Time

e19640 Background: Second Cancer Act was defined in France in December 2009 including enhancement of supportive care in Cancer (SCC). How are supportive care organized in France? Are patients informed about supportive treatment side effects? Methods: The AFSOS (French Speaking Association for Supportive Care in Cancer) conducted this observational study to evaluate practices, organizations and informations given to patients (pts) about SCC. Among 1621 french medical doctors (MD) caring cancer pts who were sent an adhoc questionnaire, 20% (330 MD including 44% medical oncologists) answered. Results: Three different organizations were described: Single MD, transversal team and specific structure specialized in global care (specifically developed in comprehensive cancer centers-CCC). Psycho-oncology, palliative care, nutrition and pain care were the four main items considered as supportive care. During their disease, 68% of pts are receiving SCC, presented by their MD (88%) or nurse devoted to announcement of disease and SCC information (57%). Supportive care is more dispensed during palliative period (90%) than at diagnosis (44%). Patients information is rather supplied during palliative care (85%) than at diagnosis (52%) using a specific questionnaire for outpatient (20%) or specific supportive care session (17%). 71% of cancer department have a cross team to provide supportive care, with specific SCC team particularly in CCC (62%; p=0.01)). 37% have inpatient specific units. Only 40% have a specific organization in home care connection, more in CCC than in public or private centers (respectively 69%, 45%, 20%; p=0.01). 73% use specific financial valorization of CSC activity. Adverse events information is dispensed to 54% of the pts for erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ASE), 74% for biphosphonates and 94% for opioids treatments, rather by medical oncologist than other specialists (p=0.01). Conclusions: Specific organization developed especially in comprehensive cancer centers seems to facilitate SCC organization and information to pts. In the mean time, recommendations include this information, involvement in supportive care team and methods have to be enhanced. Further results compared with patient point of views are expected.

Supportive care organization: Patients and oncologist national survey comparison.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 202-202
Author(s):  
Florian Scotte ◽  
Christian Herve ◽  
Jean Marc Tourani ◽  
Roland Bugat ◽  
Fadila Farsi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Analgesic Treatment ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
French Speaking ◽  
Professional Resources

202 Background: The medical doctor's (MD) perspective of supportive care in cancer (SCC) in France was previously assessed on a national survey. However, the opinion of patients (P) has never been evaluated nor compared to MD’s perception.Wepromoted and compared P and MD awareness via national surveys to monitor implementation and information delivered to patients on SCC. Methods: The French Speaking Association for SCC (AFSOS) conducted two observational studies, analyzed with a Chi2 test: S1: a 30 points questionnaire sent to 2,263 physicians caring for cancer P (oncologists, radiotherapists, haematologists, gastroenterologists); and S2: a 40 points questionnaire performed by physicians to P, using a face-to-face method. Results: 711 MDs returned S1 and S2 was conducted with 1,562 P. In S1, MDs declared relying on SCC organization (81%) but 19% of P declared they were offered to benefit from an organization called SCC (54% at diagnosis, 35% after complication). The name SCC was known by 34% of P, most frequently described as complementary care to specific treatments (55%). Palliative Care word had been previously heard by 80% P, mostly considered as care to improve quality of life during cancer treatment for 59%. In S2, professional resources identified outside the hospital were: general practitioners (84%), nurses (58%), pharmacists (52%). According to P, the top 3 supportive care consultations proposed were psychology (61%), nutrition (55%) and announcement organization (55%), while MDs mentioned palliative care (98%), psychological care (98%), social care (98%), S2 showed that supportive treatment was prescribed to 63% of P, mostly by their oncologist (74%), and 64% of those P received information on side-effects. Epoetin was prescribed to 25% and analgesics to 73%, with discussion on adverse events respectively for 38% and 53%. MDs declared delivering information on adverse events to 49% of P receiving epoetin and to 74% of P running for analgesic treatment. Conclusions: Oncologist is the cornerstone of SCC organization. Information as well as treatment must be developed to further enhance SCC and patient quality of care.

scholarly journals Recent advances in non-surgical management of cancer in the elderly

F1000Research ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 1793
Author(s):  
Emily J. Guerard ◽  
Gil E. Harmon ◽  
Kieran D. Sahasrabudhe ◽  
Noelle K. LoConte
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
The Body ◽  
The Other ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Chemotherapy Agents

This article summarizes the seminal publications from mid-2016 through 2017 in the area of medical care for older adults with cancer. Areas addressed include chemotherapy tolerance and efficacy in the aged, geriatric fitness assessments, and advancements in palliative and supportive care. The practice-changing finding from this past year’s publications is that antipsychotics should not be used in the management of terminal delirium in older adults receiving palliative care. The other trials demonstrated an improved understanding of the utility of geriatric assessments in patients with cancer, developed the body of information about which chemotherapy agents are safe and effective in older adults (and which are not), and expanded our understanding of good palliative and supportive care.

Coordination of Care and Care Transitions With Primary Care Clinicians, Specialty Palliative Care, and Hospice

2020 ◽  
pp. 211-219
Author(s):  
Areeba Jawed ◽  
Joseph D. Rotella
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Care Transitions ◽  
Healthcare Teams ◽  
Primary Care Clinicians

Patients with chronic kidney disease typically have needs that cut across a range of services, including nephrology, other specialties, primary care, and palliative care. This chapter proposes a model of integrated supportive care from diagnosis to end of life that coordinates the efforts and maximizes the benefits of different healthcare teams. Supportive care teams can learn primary kidney supportive care skills to manage symptoms, provide emotional support, and facilitate conversations that focus on what matters most to patients and families. Applying best practices of care coordination, they can facilitate seamless transitions as the patient’s condition evolves.

Beyond “Second-Line” in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Therapy and Supportive Care

2015 ◽  
pp. e414-e418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato G. Martins ◽  
Craig H. Reynolds ◽  
Gregory J. Riely
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Advanced Lung Cancer ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Although there once was a single algorithm for the treatment of patients with advanced lung cancer, the modern treatment of advanced lung cancer has multiple treatment pathways that depend on multiple factors, including histology and molecular subtype of disease. New molecular targets, targeted agents, and modes of therapy for patients, including immunotherapy, are being identified at an accelerating pace. These advances are changing outcomes and the treatment landscape, but they also highlight situations with inadequate data to support the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy. In this article, we provide an overview of data regarding cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapy and their value after second line, review the critical role of supportive care and palliative care, and emphasize the importance of advance care planning with our patients. Although this article focuses primarily on NSCLC, the comments about palliative care and advanced care planning also apply to patients with small cell lung cancer.

Palliative and Supportive Care: Introducing a new international journal; The “Care” Journal of Palliative Medicine

2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Breitbart
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Palliative Medicine ◽  
Continuum Of Care ◽  
Educational Resource ◽  
Delivery Of Care ◽  
Life Threatening

We are extremely proud and gratified to present the inaugural issue of our new international palliative care journal, Palliative & Supportive Care (P&SC). P&SC is the first international journal of palliative medicine that focuses on the psychiatric, psychosocial, spiritual, existential, ethical, philosophical, and humanities aspects of palliative care. The journal's aim is to serve as an educational resource for practitioners from a wide array of disciplines engaged in the delivery of care to those with life-threatening illnesses along the entire continuum of care, from diagnosis to the end of life. The journal also seeks to both stimulate and provide a forum for research in the psychiatric, psychosocial, and spiritual components of palliative care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document