scholarly journals Impact of PharmaNet-Based Admission Medication Reconciliation on Best Possible Medication Histories for Warfarin

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie Au ◽  
Hilary Wu ◽  
Cindy San ◽  
Doson Chua ◽  
Victoria Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medication Reconciliation ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Medication History ◽  
Implementation Phase ◽  
Outpatient Prescription ◽  
Medicine Service ◽  
Base De Données ◽  
Before And After

<p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Inaccurate documentation of medication histories may lead to medication discrepancies during hospital admissions. Obtaining a best possible medication history (BPMH) for warfarin can be challenging because of frequent dosage changes and nonspecific directions of use (e.g., “take as directed”). On February 27, 2012, the study hospital implemented an admission medication reconciliation (MedRec) process using a form that compiled the most recent 6 months of outpatient prescription dispensing history from a provincial electronic database called PharmaNet. It was unclear whether admission MedRec had improved the process of obtaining warfarin BPMHs and the quality of their documentation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the rates of complete warfarin BPMH documentation before and after implementation of PharmaNet-based admission MedRec.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre, retrospective chart review was conducted using the health records of patients receiving warfarin who were admitted to the hospital’s Internal Medicine service before and after implementation of admission MedRec. The study periods were October 1, 2009, to February 26, 2012, and February 27, 2012, to July 31, 2014, respectively. The primary outcome was the rate of complete warfarin BPMH documentation during each period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were recorded for 100 patients in the pre-implementation phase and 100 patients in the post-implementation phase. The rates of complete warfarin BPMH documentation were 65% and 84% in these 2 phases, respectively (<em>p </em>= 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of PharmaNet-based admission MedRec was associated with a statistically significant increase in the rate of complete warfarin BPMH documentation.</p><p><strong>RÉSUMÉ</strong></p><p><strong>Contexte : </strong>La consignation inexacte des schémas thérapeutiques peut mener à des divergences au chapitre des médicaments durant l’hospitalisation. Il peut être difficile d’établir un meilleur schéma thérapeutique possible (MSTP) pour la warfarine à cause de fréquents changements de posologie et de modes d’emploi imprécis (par exemple, « usage connu »). Le 27 février 2012, l’hôpital où s’est déroulée l’étude a mis en place un processus de bilan comparatif des médicaments (BCM) à l’admission. Celui-ci emploie un formulaire dressant la liste des médicaments d’ordonnance délivrés aux patients externes au cours des six derniers mois selon PharmaNet, une base de données numérique provinciale. On ignorait si les BCM à l’admission avaient amélioré le processus d’obtention et la qualité de la consignation des MSTP liés à la warfarine.</p><p><strong>Objectif : </strong>Comparer les taux de MSTP relatifs à la warfarine parfaitement consignés avant et après la mise en place d’un processus de BCM à l’admission qui s’appuie sur PharmaNet.</p><p><strong>Méthodes : </strong>Une analyse rétrospective des dossiers médicaux de patients menée dans un seul centre a été réalisée. Elle a porté sur les patients recevant de la warfarine et ayant été hospitalisés au service de médecine interne de l’hôpital avant ou après la mise en place d’un processus de BCM à l’admission (respectivement du 1er octobre 2009 au 26 février 2012 et du 27 février 2012 au 31 juillet 2014). Le principal paramètre d’évaluation était le taux de MSTP relatifs à la warfarine parfaitement consignés pendant ces périodes.</p><p><strong>Résultats : </strong>On a recueilli des données sur 100 patients hospitalisés avant la mise en place du processus et sur 100 patients hospitalisés après sa mise en place. Les taux de MSTP relatifs à la warfarine parfaitement consignésétaient de 65 % avant la mise en place et de 84 % après la mise en place (<em>p </em>= 0,002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion : </strong>La mise en place d’un processus de BCM à l’admission s’appuyant sur les données de PharmaNet était associée à une augmentation statistiquement significative du taux de MSTP relatifs à la warfarine parfaitement consignés.</p>

Pharmacist-Run Medication Reconciliation for Veterans Admitted to Non-Veterans Affairs Hospice Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-48
Author(s):  
Anne Alley ◽  
Holly Dorscheid ◽  
Kathryn Hentzen
Keyword(s):  
Medication Reconciliation ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Transition Process ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Cost

PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to increase pharmacist involvement in the outpatient hospice transition process to improve care of veterans, prevent medication errors, and to ensure medications are provided to the patient via the appropriate pharmacy.METHODS: This project began with implementation of a pilot process for the pharmacist to complete medication reconciliation for each patient admitted to non-Veterans Affairs (VA) hospice care from the Omaha VA Medical Center. The second step of this project was completion of a retrospective chart review of the interventions made. Statistical analysis was completed via descriptive statistics.RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were eligible for this study. The mean age was 78 years. The average total number of medications per veteran before and after medication reconciliation for VA meds were 13 and 4 and for non-VA meds were 4 and 6, respectively. The average total cost savings for one fill of all medications changed to non-VA was estimated to be $40.08. The pharmacist noted on average 12.6 medication discrepancies during medication reconciliation per veteran. Just less than half of the clinical recommendations made by the pharmacist were accepted by the providers.CONCLUSIONS: All veterans admitted to non-VA hospice care had at least one medication discrepancy noted by the pharmacist during medication reconciliation. A majority of the veterans had at least one VA medication changed to non-VA since hospice was now prescribing and providing. The cost savings on average appear to outweigh the time spent on medication reconciliation by the pharmacist.

Pharmacist-Run Medication Reconciliation for Veterans Admitted to Non-Veterans Affairs Hospice Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-48
Author(s):  
Anne Alley ◽  
Holly Dorscheid ◽  
Kathryn Hentzen
Keyword(s):  
Medication Reconciliation ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Transition Process ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Cost

Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to increase pharmacist involvement in the outpatient hospice transition process to improve care of veterans, prevent medication errors, and to ensure medications are provided to the patient via the appropriate pharmacy. Methods: This project began with implementation of a pilot process for the pharmacist to complete medication reconciliation for each patient admitted to non-Veterans Affairs (VA) hospice care from the Omaha VA Medical Center. The second step of this project was completion of a retrospective chart review of the interventions made. Statistical analysis was completed via descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 21 patients were eligible for this study. The mean age was 78 years. The average total number of medications per veteran before and after medication reconciliation for VA meds were 13 and 4 and for non-VA meds were 4 and 6, respectively. The average total cost savings for one fill of all medications changed to non-VA was estimated to be $40.08. The pharmacist noted on average 12.6 medication discrepancies during medication reconciliation per veteran. Just less than half of the clinical recommendations made by the pharmacist were accepted by the providers. Conclusions: All veterans admitted to non-VA hospice care had at least one medication discrepancy noted by the pharmacist during medication reconciliation. A majority of the veterans had at least one VA medication changed to non-VA since hospice was now prescribing and providing. The cost savings on average appear to outweigh the time spent on medication reconciliation by the pharmacist.

scholarly journals Completeness of Medication Reconciliation by Pediatric Residents at Hospital Admission for Asthma

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Martin ◽  
Jaime McDonald ◽  
Joanna Holland
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Medication Reconciliation ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Drug Dose ◽  
Oral Drug ◽  
Medication History ◽  
Resident Physicians ◽  
Quality Improvement Interventions ◽  
Time Of Admission

Background: Medication errors at hospital admission, though preventable, continue to be common. The process of medication reconciliation has been identified as an important tool in reducing medication errors. The first step in medication reconciliation involves documenting a patient’s best possible medication history (BPMH); at the authors’ tertiary pediatric hospital, this step is completed at time of admission by resident physicians. Objectives: To describe and quantify the completeness of admission BPMH by resident physicians for pediatric inpatients with asthma. Methods: This single-centre, retrospective chart review evaluated documentation of admission medication reconciliation for pediatric inpatients with asthma who were admitted between January 2016 and December 2017. Medication reconciliation forms were deemed incomplete if records for asthma medications were missing drug name, inhaler strength or oral drug dose, directions for use, or evidence of reconciliation. Results: A total of 241 charts were evaluated, of which 97 (40%) had incomplete documentation for at least 1 medication; in particular, 48 (37%) of the 130 inhaled corticosteroid orders were missing inhaler strength. For most of the charts with incomplete medication history (68% [66/97]), no reason was documented; however, review of the medication reconciliation forms and physician notes revealed that families might have been unsure of a patient’s home medications or physicians might have left it to the pharmacy to clarify medication doses. Conclusions: Documentation of inhaler medications on admission medication reconciliation forms completed by resident physicians for pediatric patients with asthma was often incomplete. Future quality improvement interventions, including resident and patient education, are required at the study institution. Collaboration with pharmacy services is also likely to improve completeness of the medication reconciliation process. RÉSUMÉ Contexte : Bien qu’elles soient évitables, les erreurs de médication au moment de l’admission à l’hôpital sont encore répandues. Le processus du bilan comparatif des médicaments a été reconnu comme étant un outil important pour réduire ces erreurs. La première étape du bilan comparatif des médicaments vise à décrire le meilleur schéma thérapeutique possible (MSTP) du patient; dans l’hôpital pédiatrique tertiaire des auteurs, les médecins résidents se chargent de cette étape au moment de l’admission. Objectifs : Décrire et quantifier le degré d’exhaustivité du MSTP réalisé par les médecins résidents pour les patients en pédiatrie souffrant d’asthme. Méthodes : Cet examen rétrospectif unicentrique des dossiers a permis d’évaluer l’élaboration du bilan comparatif des médicaments à l’admission en pédiatrie des patients souffrant d’asthme entre janvier 2016 et décembre 2017. Les formulaires de bilan comparatif des médicaments étaient jugés incomplets si les dossiers relatifs aux médicaments contre l’asthme n’indiquaient pas le nom du médicament, la force de l’inhalateur ou la dose orale du médicament, le mode d’emploi ou les preuves de conciliation médicamenteuse. Résultats : L’évaluation portait sur 241 tableaux; au moins 1 médicament manquait dans la description de 97 d’entre eux (40 %); en particulier la force de l’inhalateur ne figurait pas dans 48 (37 %) des 130 ordonnances relatives aux corticostéroïdes administrés par inhalation. La plupart des tableaux dont l’histoire pharmacothérapeutique était incomplète (68 % [66/97]) n’en indiquaient pas la raison; cependant, l’examen des formulaires du bilan comparatif des médicaments et les notes des médecins ont révélé que les familles n’étaient peut-être pas certaines des médicaments que le patient prenait à domicile ou que les médecins auraient pu laisser aux pharmaciens le soin de clarifier les doses. Conclusions : La description des médicaments administrés au moyen d’inhalateurs au moment de l’admission, figurant sur les formulaires du bilan comparatif des médicaments remplis par les médecins résidents pour les patients en pédiatrie souffrant d’asthme, était souvent incomplète. De futures interventions sur l’amélioration de la qualité, y compris les instructions données au patient et au résident, sont nécessaires dans l’institution où s’est déroulée l’étude. Il est probable que la collaboration avec les services de pharmacie améliorerait l’exhaustivité du processus du bilan comparatif des médicaments.

scholarly journals Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e021647 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Walker ◽  
Duncan Wagstaff ◽  
Dermot McGuckin ◽  
Cecilia Vindrola-Padros ◽  
Nicholas Swart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Perioperative Medicine ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Quality Of Recovery ◽  
Mixed Methods Evaluation ◽  
Medicine Service ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionPerioperative complications have a lasting effect on health-related quality of life and long-term survival. The Royal College of Anaesthetists has proposed the development of perioperative medicine (POM) services as an intervention aimed at improving postoperative outcome, by providing better coordinated care for high-risk patients. The Perioperative Medicine Service for High-risk Patients Implementation Pilot was developed to determine if a specialist POM service is able to reduce postoperative morbidity, failure to rescue, mortality and cost associated with hospital admission. The service involves individualised objective risk assessment, admission to a postoperative critical care unit and follow-up on the surgical ward by the POM team. This paper introduces the service and how it will be evaluated.Methods and analysis of the evaluationA mixed-methods evaluation is exploring the impact of the service. Clinical effectiveness of the service is being analysed using a ‘before and after’ comparison of the primary outcome (the PostOperative Morbidity Score). Secondary outcomes will include length of stay, validated surveys to explore quality of life (EQ-5D) and quality of recovery (Quality of Recovery-15 Score). The impact on costs is being analysed using ‘before and after’ data from the Patient-Level Information and Costing System and the National Schedule of Reference Costs. The perceptions and experiences of staff and patients with the service, and how it is being implemented, are being explored by a qualitative process evaluation.Ethics and disseminationThe study was classified as a service evaluation. Participant information sheets and consent forms have been developed for the interviews and approvals required for the use of the validated surveys were obtained. The findings of the evaluation are being used formatively, to make changes in the service throughout implementation. The findings will also be used to inform the potential roll-out of the service to other sites.

scholarly journals The impact of cognitive rehabilitation on quality of life in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 205521732110402
Author(s):  
Kathleen C Munger ◽  
Amy Pacos Martinez ◽  
Megan H Hyland
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Cognitive Function ◽  
Cognitive Rehabilitation ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Rehabilitation Program ◽  
Cognitive Profiles ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Background Cognitive impairment in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) negatively impacts daily function and quality of life (QoL). Prior studies of cognitive rehabilitation in pwMS have shown limited benefit but many focused on cognitive function scores rather than QoL measures. Studies using QoL metrics primarily evaluated group cognitive rehabilitation, which may be less appropriate due to variable cognitive profiles in pwMS. This study assesses the impact of an individualized cognitive rehabilitation approach on QoL in MS. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of NeuroQoL assessments done by pwMS (n = 12, mean age 47.9 ± 4.0 years, 75% female, 100% White, 75% RRMS) before and after participation in an individualized compensatory cognitive program. We used a comparison group of pwMS who were candidates for the program but did not participate (n = 9, mean age 48.9 ± 4.4 years, 88.9% female, 100% White, 66.7% RRMS) Results PwMS who participated in the rehabilitation program saw improvements in Sleep Disturbance (50.5 from 55.5, p = 0.005), Fatigue (52.5 from 57.0, p = 0.024), Anxiety (49.8 from 55.4, p = 0.011), and Cognitive Function (39.3 from 36.7, p = 0.049). Conclusions Individualized compensatory cognitive rehabilitation appears effective for improving QoL measures in pwMS with cognitive complaints, supporting the need for further randomized controlled prospective analysis of this intervention.

Kepuasan Masyarakat Terhadap Pelayanan Kelurahan Setelah Pemekaran Di Tangerang Selatan

Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-159
Author(s):  
Pitri Yandri
Keyword(s):  
Public Perception ◽  
Service Personnel ◽  
Urban Services ◽  
Hospitality Workers ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Cartesian Diagram ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this study is (1) to analyze public perception on urban services before and after the expansion of the region, (2) analyze the level of people's satisfaction with urban services, and (3) analyze the determinants of the variables that determine what level of people's satisfaction urban services. This study concluded that first, after the expansion, the quality of urban services in South Tangerang City is better than before. Secondly, however, public satisfaction with the services only reached 48.53% (poor scale). Third, by using a Cartesian Diagram, the second priority that must be addressed are: (1) clarity of service personnel, (2) the discipline of service personnel, (3) responsibility for care workers; (4) the speed of service, (5) the ability of officers services, (6) obtain justice services, and (7) the courtesy and hospitality workers.

Strategic Role of Zakat in Multidimensional Quality of Life in Sijunjung, Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-72
Author(s):  
Herlin Hamimi ◽  
Abdul Ghafar Ismail ◽  
Muhammad Hasbi Zaenal
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Wealth Distribution ◽  
Absolute Poverty ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Status ◽  
Being There ◽  
The Impact

Zakat is one of the five pillars of Islam which has a function of faith, social and economic functions. Muslims who can pay zakat are required to give at least 2.5 per cent of their wealth. The problem of poverty prevalent in disadvantaged regions because of the difficulty of access to information and communication led to a gap that is so high in wealth and resources. The instrument of zakat provides a paradigm in the achievement of equitable wealth distribution and healthy circulation. Zakat potentially offers a better life and improves the quality of human being. There is a human quality improvement not only in economic terms but also in spiritual terms such as improving religiousity. This study aims to examine the role of zakat to alleviate humanitarian issues in disadvantaged regions such as Sijunjung, one of zakat beneficiaries and impoverished areas in Indonesia. The researcher attempted a Cibest method to capture the impact of zakat beneficiaries before and after becoming a member of Zakat Community Development (ZCD) Program in material and spiritual value. The overall analysis shows that zakat has a positive impact on disadvantaged regions development and enhance the quality of life of the community. There is an improvement in the average of mustahik household incomes after becoming a member of ZCD Program. Cibest model demonstrates that material, spiritual, and absolute poverty index decreased by 10, 5, and 6 per cent. Meanwhile, the welfare index is increased by 21 per cent. These findings have significant implications for developing the quality of life in disadvantaged regions in Sijunjung. Therefore, zakat is one of the instruments to change the status of disadvantaged areas to be equivalent to other areas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document