scholarly journals Local Evaluation Criteria for Global Textbooks: A Case Study from Iran

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Karamifar ◽  
Hossein Barati ◽  
Manijeh Youhanaee
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria

scholarly journals Appraising psychotherapy case studies in practice-based evidence: introducing Case Study Evaluation-tool (CaSE)

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Greta Kaluzeviciute
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Internal Validity ◽  
Knowledge Generation ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Third Way ◽  
Study Evaluation ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
Randomised Controlled

AbstractSystematic case studies are often placed at the low end of evidence-based practice (EBP) due to lack of critical appraisal. This paper seeks to attend to this research gap by introducing a novel Case Study Evaluation-tool (CaSE). First, issues around knowledge generation and validity are assessed in both EBP and practice-based evidence (PBE) paradigms. Although systematic case studies are more aligned with PBE paradigm, the paper argues for a complimentary, third way approach between the two paradigms and their ‘exemplary’ methodologies: case studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Second, the paper argues that all forms of research can produce ‘valid evidence’ but the validity itself needs to be assessed against each specific research method and purpose. Existing appraisal tools for qualitative research (JBI, CASP, ETQS) are shown to have limited relevance for the appraisal of systematic case studies through a comparative tool assessment. Third, the paper develops purpose-oriented evaluation criteria for systematic case studies through CaSE Checklist for Essential Components in Systematic Case Studies and CaSE Purpose-based Evaluative Framework for Systematic Case Studies. The checklist approach aids reviewers in assessing the presence or absence of essential case study components (internal validity). The framework approach aims to assess the effectiveness of each case against its set out research objectives and aims (external validity), based on different systematic case study purposes in psychotherapy. Finally, the paper demonstrates the application of the tool with a case example and notes further research trajectories for the development of CaSE tool.

A multi-attribute approach to select the best method for repairing river bridge columns

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitra Salmaninezhad ◽  
S. Mahmood Jazayeri Moghaddas
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Bridge Columns ◽  
Pier Scour ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Weighing Method

PurposePier scour is one of the main causes of damage to the columns of the river bridges. It is essential to select the best method among various repair methods based on different evaluation indices. However, there is no procedure for ranking these repair methods based on their attributes. The present study seeks to set an approach for this ranking.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper, a multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) model is presented for ranking the repair techniques, in which alternatives are examined using the most important evaluation criteria. In addition, a combination of entropy and eigenvector methods has been proposed for weighting these attributes. A case study is then used to demonstrate the applicability and the validity of the method.FindingsThe execution of the model using two multi-criteria methods yielded similar results, which confirms its accuracy and precision. Moreover, the research findings showed the consistency of the objective and subjective weighting methods and the conformity of the weights obtained for the attributes from the combination of these methods to the nature of the problem.Originality/valueThe selection of the proper method for repairing the bridge columns plays an essential role in success of the bridge restoration. The proposed model introduces an approach for ranking repair methods and selecting the best one that has not been presented so far. Also, the weighing method for attributes is an innovative method for ranking restoration methods that has been proven in a case study.

An Innovative Approach to P&A Barrier Verification and Cement Plug Placement Utilising In-Situ Completion Strings: A Case Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Imrie ◽  
Ashikin Kamaludin ◽  
Andrew Hood ◽  
Alistair Agnew
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Innovative Approach ◽  
Bond Quality ◽  
Cement Slurry ◽  
Additional Time ◽  
Time Saving ◽  
Deviation Analysis ◽  
Degree Deviation ◽  
Cement Plug

Abstract Traditional evaluation of behind-casing cement bond quality prior to cement plug placement involves removal, storage, transportation, and disposal of the tubing completion string. This paper presents an innovative approach to verifying cement bond and subsequent cement plug placement. This method involves cutting and retrieving part of the completion string and deploying acoustic logging tools into the casing, followed by using the tubing as a cement stinger. The procedure described in this paper first involves plugging and cutting the tubing, followed by partial retrieval of the completion to expose the abandonment horizon, which may be an impermeable shale or salt layer. A radial cement bond log tool is conveyed on wireline out of the tubing cut in order to evaluate the cement bond behind the exposed casing section. The existing cement sheath is assessed in accordance to a cement evaluation criteria to determine suitability as a barrier. A balanced cement plug is pumped utilising the existing completion string rather than a dedicated stinger. The permanent barrier is then verified appropriately based on satisfying key metrics in the pumping operation before hanging off the completion tubing in-hole and progressing with the rest of the abandonment programme. In the case study presented here, the tool string design considered the need to pass completion restrictions, convey through production tubing, and remain centralised with up to 50-degree deviation. Analysis of cement bond log data indicated that bond quality was good and suitable to place an internal cement plug across the abandonment horizon. This satisfied a minimum of 200-ft coverage across the zone of interest. The existing deep-set mechanical plug placed in the tubing prior to tubing cut was utilised as a base for the cement barrier. A 2,000-ft balanced cement plug was successfully set across the zone of interest. The completion tubing was used as a conduit for cement slurry placement, eliminating the usage of a dedicated work string. At the end of displacement, the tubing string was pulled out of hole safely to approximately 500-ft above the top of the cement with the help of controlled-gel progression properties incorporated in the slurry design. Due to existing completion accessories, setting a through-tubing cement plug and tubing rotation is not an option. Expandable cement was pumped to mitigate natural shrinkage and enhance post-set cement expansion to ensure a competent barrier. The cement job objectives were achieved by meeting the cementation execution criteria with no requirement to wait on cement. This provides additional time saving to the well abandonment. The discussed approach has successfully realised a significant rig-time saving of approximately two days on each well. Going forward, the methodology has effectively been applied to multiple wells across the Southern North Sea (SNS).

Classification as Evaluation

2011 ◽  
pp. 41-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sari Hakkarainen ◽  
Darijus Strasunskas ◽  
Lillian Hella ◽  
Stine Tuxen
Keyword(s):  
Web Applications ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Classification Approach ◽  
The Core ◽  
Ontology Language ◽  
Ontology Building ◽  
Using Data

Ontology is the core component in Semantic Web applications. The employment of an ontology building method affects the quality of ontology and the applicability of ontology language. A weighted classification approach for ontology building guidelines is presented in this chapter. The evaluation criteria are based on an existing classification scheme of a semiotic framework for evaluating the quality of conceptual models. A sample of Web-based ontology building method guidelines is evaluated in general and experimented with using data from a case study in particular. Directions for further refinement of ontology building methods are discussed.

Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: An entropy-based approach to assess tourism sustainability

2019 ◽  
pp. 135481661988520
Author(s):  
Joseph Andria ◽  
Giacomo di Tollo ◽  
Raffaele Pesenti
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Entropy Maximization ◽  
Tourist Destinations ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Direct Applicability

In this article, we propose a method for ranking tourist destinations and evaluating their performances under a sustainability perspective: a fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making method is applied for determining sustainability performance values and ranking destinations accordingly. We select a set of sustainability evaluation criteria and use a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to weight the selected criteria. We also optimize each evaluator’s membership function support by means of a fuzzy entropy maximization criteria. A case study is illustrated and results are compared with two data envelopment analysis–based models. The simplicity of the proposed approach along with the easy readability of the results allow its direct applicability for all involved stakeholders.

An integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy AD approach for outsourcing provider selection

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 531-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selçuk Perçin
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Ratio Analysis ◽  
Functional Requirements ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Chemical Company ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose Unlike previous literature, this study offers a novel integrated fuzzy approach to the field of outsourcing decisions. The purpose of this paper is to use design ranges of evaluation criteria that satisfy the functional requirements (FRs) of decision makers to solve the outsourcing provider selection problem. Design/methodology/approach In this study, considering the expected significance of outsourcing evaluation criteria, and the FRs of decision makers expressed in linguistic terms, a robust multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) tool based on the integrated use of fuzzy Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis and weighted fuzzy axiomatic design methods is proposed for use in decision process. Findings The proposed method is applied to a Turkish chemical company. A sensitivity analysis is performed and the outcomes of the proposed integrated framework are compared with those of other MCDM methods such as fuzzy-based Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, fuzzy Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje and fuzzy Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis. This validates the usefulness and practicality of the proposed methodology. Practical implications The main contribution of this study is that it defines specific requirements that will assist company managers in eliminating alternatives that do not satisfy the needs and expectations of their company. Originality/value This paper compares the present study with other studies in the field of manufacturing. Additionally, it provides a well-documented case study, which makes the paper of value to researchers interested in the practical applications of MCDM methods.

scholarly journals Disassembly Sequence Planning (DSP) Applied to a Gear Box: Comparison between Two Literature Studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 4591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Frizziero ◽  
Alfredo Liverani
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Three Dimensional Model ◽  
Specific Component ◽  
Disassembly Sequence Planning ◽  
Sequence Planning ◽  
New Methods ◽  
Disassembly Sequence ◽  
Mechanical Products

This work aims to analyze the characteristics and importance that design techniques for disassembly assume in the modern design phase of a mechanism. To this end, the study begins by considering a three-dimensional model of a gear motor, taken from the components of which the overall drawings are arranged and from the relief of those not available. Once the mechanism has been digitally reconstructed, the activity focuses on the study of the optimal disassembly sequence by comparing different methodologies, according to two evaluation criteria—minimizing the time taken and minimizing the number of tool changes necessary to complete the sequence. The main results of the work are (1) defining a standard methodology to improve disassembly sequence planning, (2) finding the best disassembly sequence for the specific component among the literature and eventually new methods, and (3) offering to the industrial world a way to optimize maintenance operations in mechanical products. Referring to the limitation of the present works, it can be affirmed that the results are limited to the literature explored and to the case study examined.

scholarly journals Quantitative Risk Evaluation Model of the Multilevel Complex Structure Hierarchical System in the Petrochemical Industry

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Tang ◽  
Jiangjun Shu ◽  
Wang Li ◽  
Yin He ◽  
Yan Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Production System ◽  
Risk Evaluation ◽  
Petrochemical Industry ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Hierarchical System ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Petrochemical Production

In the petrochemical production system, the high-risk items malfunction may lead to major accidents so that the risk level of the items has become the highest focus of attention for the enterprises in petrochemical industry. Based on structural composition and risk relationship, a risk evaluation framework of the petrochemical production system can generally be divided into subsystems (SS), components and parts (CP), failure modes (FM), risk types, and risk factors. So it is a characteristic of multilevel, complex structure, and lack of evaluation criteria that the evaluated object has in the process of risk evaluation. However, there are few targeted modeling and calculation methods to carry out quantitative risk evaluation in the face of the evaluated object. In order to achieve risk quantitative evaluation of the complex structure hierarchical system, a multilevel Borda model (MLBM) is presented innovatively by us based on the traditional Borda method in this study. Moreover, the MLBM are applied to realize quantitative risk evaluation of the main structure system of truss type crane on the offshore platform. In this case study, the equivalent risk value (ERV) and risk priority number (RPN) of the evaluated object with multilevel, complex structure, and inadequate evaluation criteria are calculated and the risk ties in the RPN are effectively reduced. Then, the quantitative risk results can clarify the risk level and distribution of the high-risk items throughout the production system and provide data support for the development of risk control measures to better protect the production safety. Hence, the feasibility and practicability of the method are verified with the case study. The MLBM can be used to solve other comprehensive evaluation problems with a complex hierarchical structure as well.

Route Search and Evaluation Method Including Charging Plan for Electric Vehicles

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 698-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Taguchi ◽  
◽  
Kei Matsumoto ◽  
Keita Imamura ◽  
Koichiro Goto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electric Vehicles ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Navigation Systems ◽  
Charging Time ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Residual Capacity ◽  
Future Work ◽  
Route Search

Electric vehicles (EVs) have numerous inherent challenges, including running out of power frequently and taking a long time to charge. To make matters worse, current automotive navigation systems cannot provide proper route searches that include charging plans. One way to tackle these challenging problems is to propose several route plans and select one which meets the driver’s needs. In this paper, the following three evaluation criteria are proposed: shortening travel time by predicting charging queues, maintaining high residual capacity of the battery, and utilizing charging time. The proposed method is applied to Okinawa, Japan as a case study. The simulation results using this evaluation method in Okinawa demonstrate its potential utility and open the way for future work on relieving the stress of EV drivers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document