scholarly journals Developmental pathways of youth gang membership: a structural test of the social development model

2020 ◽  
pp. 30-51
Author(s):  
Asia S. Bishop ◽  
Karl G. Hill ◽  
Amanda B. Gilman ◽  
James C. Howell ◽  
Richard F Catalano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Development ◽  
Development Model ◽  
Developmental Pathways ◽  
Gang Membership ◽  
Youth Gang ◽  
Social Development Model ◽  
Structural Test ◽  
The Social

scholarly journals Developmental pathways of youth gang membership: a structural test of the social development model

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asia S. Bishop ◽  
Karl G. Hill ◽  
Amanda B. Gilman ◽  
James C. Howell ◽  
Richard F. Catalano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Development ◽  
Development Model ◽  
Developmental Pathways ◽  
Gang Membership ◽  
Youth Gang ◽  
Social Development Model ◽  
Structural Test ◽  
The Social

The Social Development Model

2018 ◽  
pp. 223-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Cambron ◽  
Richard F. Catalano ◽  
J. David Hawkins
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Social Development ◽  
Human Behavior ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Development Model ◽  
Antisocial Behaviors ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Social Development Model ◽  
The Social ◽  
Empirical Tests

This chapter presents an overview of the social development model (SDM)—a general theory of human behavior that integrates research on risk and protective factors into a coherent model. The goal of this synthesis is to provide more explanatory power than its component theories. This chapter first specifies the model constructs and their hypothesized relationships to prosocial and antisocial behaviors. It then provides a synthesis of what has been learned from empirical tests of social development hypotheses for predicting pro- and antisocial behaviors. This chapter also highlights interventions derived from the SDM and summarizes their impact on pro- and antisocial behaviors. Finally, the chapter concludes by presenting future directions for SDM-based research.

Juvenile Delinquency and the Social Development Model: The Retrospective Accounts of Homeless Substance Abusers

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-233
Author(s):  
Stephanie W. Hartwell
Keyword(s):  
Social Development ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Substance Abusers ◽  
Development Model ◽  
Adolescent Delinquency ◽  
Social Development Model ◽  
Life Chances ◽  
Retrospective Reports ◽  
The Social ◽  
Drug Involvement

Teens involved with drugs and engaged in delinquent behavior lessen their life chances. This article examines the relationship between early illicit drug exposure, delinquency, and subsequent adult experience through the life history accounts of 31 men who are homeless drug addicts today. The men's retrospective reports link personal history and social circumstance to describe common pathways associated with and emerging from adolescent delinquency and drug involvement. Their accounts, framed within the social development model, indicate that the life chances of teens at risk might improve if policy-based solutions and interventions target and ameliorate contextual and interpersonal risk factors interfering with the accumulation of social capital.

MODELING MEDIATION IN THE ETIOLOGY OF VIOLENT BEHAVIOR IN ADOLESCENCE: A TEST OF THE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT MODEL*

Criminology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
BU HUANG ◽  
RICK KOSTERMAN ◽  
RICHARD F. CATALANO ◽  
J. DAVID HAWKINS ◽  
ROBERT D. ABBOTT
Keyword(s):  
Social Development ◽  
Violent Behavior ◽  
Development Model ◽  
Social Development Model ◽  
The Social

Ladders and Bushes: The Problem of Caseloads and Studying Court Activities over Time

1984 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 751-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Daniels
Keyword(s):  
Social Development ◽  
Development Model ◽  
Social Development Model ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Social ◽  
Single Pattern ◽  
Long Term Trends ◽  
Open Question ◽  
Over Time

The “litigation explosion” has been a frequent topic of concern in both academic circles and the popular press. This idea draws its polemical power from the assumption that litigation rates were lower in the past. But we presently know little about long-term trends in court activity. This article is a critical review of the existing literature on long-term litigation trends and the social development model which scholars have posited to explain changes in litigation patterns. Whether courts are indeed facing imminent crisis because of an explosion is still very much an open question; the extant literature offers no proof of an explosion. The available data do suggest, however, that previous studies may have been overly optimistic in expecting litigation trends to follow any single pattern. The questions about litigation rates will remain open until we are able to gain a fuller understanding of the trends in court activity over time.

scholarly journals Modeling the Etiology of Adolescent Substance Use: A Test of the Social Development Model

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard F. Catalano ◽  
Rick Kosterman ◽  
J. David Hawkins ◽  
Michael D. Newcomb ◽  
Robert D. Abbott
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Social Development ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Development Model ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Path Coefficient ◽  
Social Development Model ◽  
The Social ◽  
High Crime

The social development model is a general theory of human behavior that seeks to explain antisocial behaviors through specification of predictive developmental relationships. It incorporates the effects of empirical predictors (“risk factors” and “protective factors”) for antisocial behavior and attempts to synthesize the most strongly supported propositions of control theory, social learning theory, and differential association theory. This article examines the power of social development model constructs measured at ages 9 to 10 and 13 to 14 to predict drug use at ages 17 to 18. The sample of 590 is from the longitudinal panel of the Seattle Social Development Project, which in 1985 sampled fifth grade students from high crime neighborhoods in Seattle, Washington. Structural equation modeling techniques were used to examine the fit of the model to the data. Although all but one path coefficient were significant and in the expected direction, the model did not fit the data as well as expected (CF1=.87). We next specified second-order factors for each path to capture the substantial common variance in the constructs' opportunities, involvement, and rewards. This model fit the data well (CFI=.90). We conclude that the social development model provides an acceptable fit to predict drug use at ages 17 to 18. Implications for the temporal nature of key constructs and for prevention are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document