scholarly journals Tangible interaction on tabletop, definitions and models

2016 ◽  
Vol Volume 5, Number 1 (Research articles) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Lepreux ◽  
Julien Castet ◽  
Nadine Couture ◽  
Emmanuel Dubois ◽  
Christophe Kolski ◽  
...  

International audience In recent years, tangible user interfaces, which imply interactions performed with one or several objects, gain more and more interest in research in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). The tangible object represents a subject or an action. It acts on the system, as an action in classical user interfaces (e.g,. GUI). Interaction on a table, which is a common furniture in everyday life and used in multiple activities (desktop, coffee table, kitchen table, etc.), opens a new way for research and development in HCI. In this article, we present definitions, models, and key issues elicited from the literature that enable understanding and reasoning about the couple < interactive tabletop, tangible object> within an interactive system. Then, we propose a framework that allows to characterize applications supported by the couple <interactive tabletop, tangible object> in a domain-independent manner. Depuis quelques années les interfaces tangibles impliquant des interactions réalisées via un objet (ou plusieurs) prennent de plus en plus d’importance dans les recherches en interaction homme-machine. L’objet tangible représente un sujet ou une action ; l’objet agit sur le système, telle une action sur une interface « classique ». L’interaction sur table, c’est-à-dire sur un meuble présent dans la vie courante et utilisé à diverses fins (bureau, table à manger, table de salon, table bar, etc.), ouvre un champ nouveau de recherche et de développement. La mise en exergue, issue de l’état de l’art, des définitions, modèles et problématiques, permet d’abord d’appréhender le couple (table, objet tangible) au sein d’un système interactif. Puis, nous proposons un cadre qui permet de positionner des applications mettant en oeuvre le couple (table, objet tangible). Le cadre est décrit de manière à être utilisé pour positionner des applications indépendamment du domaine.


2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 5, Number 1 (Research articles) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Lepreux ◽  
Julien Castet ◽  
Nadine Couture ◽  
Emmanuel Dubois ◽  
Christophe Kolski ◽  
...  

International audience Since many years, the Human-Computer Interaction community is interested in the tangible user interfaces (TUI). A part of these TUI focuses on the interaction performed with one or several objects. The domain is in extension by the development of contactless objects (using NFC, RFID technology, etc.). In the system, tangible objects could represent data, action, or complex part. Interaction on a table, which is a common furniture in the everyday life and used in multiple activities (desktop, coffee table, kitchen table, etc.), opens a new way for the research and development in HCI. This article proposes to use a framework, previously proposed in a conjunct article, to characterize applications supported by the couple <interactive tabletop, tangible object>. These applications aim at supporting complex business tasks; they are described from a technological point of view on the one hand, and from an applicative point of view on the other hand. These applications show the benefit brought by the couple <interactive tabletop, tangible object> to the interaction and they are immersed in the framework. The framework shows with these instantiations that it is generic and supports such descriptions. Depuis plusieurs années, les interfaces tangibles impliquant des interactions réalisées via un ou plusieurs objets prennent une importance grandissante en interaction homme-machine. Ce domaine est en extension grâce au développement d'objets exploitant des technologies sans contact (NFC, RFID, etc.). L'objet tangible représente un sujet ou une action ; cet objet agit sur le système, telle une action sur une interface « classique ». L'interaction sur table, c'est-à-dire sur un meuble présent dans la vie courante et utilisé à diverses fins (bureau, table à manger, table de salon, table bar, etc.), ouvre un champ nouveau de recherche et de développement. Nous proposons d'illustrer un cadre proposé dans un article conjoint, en positionnant des applications mettant en oeuvre le couple <table, objet tangible>. Plusieurs applications, visant à supporter chacune une tâche métier complexe, sont décrites à la fois d'un point de vue technologique et d'un point de vue applicatif. Ces applications montrent les apports de l'association <table, objet tangible> à l'interaction et sont caractérisées selon les dimensions du cadre de conception présenté dans un article conjoint, montrant ainsi la généricité et le pouvoir descriptif du cadre proposé.



2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Patrick Sunnen ◽  
Béatrice Arend ◽  
Valérie Maquil

In recent years, tangible user interfaces (TUI) have gained in popularity in educational contexts, among others to implement problem-solving and discovery learning science activities. In the context of an interdisciplinary and cross-institutional collaboration, we conducted a multimodal EMCA-based video user study involving a TUI-mediated bicycle mechanics simulation. This article focusses on the discovering work of a group of three students with regard to a particular tangible object (a red button), designed to support participants engagement with the underlying physics aspects and its consequences with regard to their engagement with the targeted mechanics aspects.



Information ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Sandra Cano ◽  
Victor Peñeñory ◽  
César A. Collazos ◽  
Sergio Albiol-Pérez

Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs) are a new, non-traditional way to interact with digital information using a physical environment. Therefore, TUIs connect a physical set of objects that can be explored and manipulated. TUI can be interconnected over the Internet, using Internet of Things (IoT) technology to monitor a child’s activities in real-time. Internet of Tangible Things (IoTT) is defined as a tangible interaction applied to IoT. This article describes four case studies that apply IoTT to children with cochlear implants and children whose communication is sign language. For each case study, a discussion is presented, discussing how IoTT can help the child development in skills such as: social, emotional, psychomotor, cognitive, and visual. It was found that IoTT works best when it includes the social component in children with hearing impairment, because it helps them to communicate with each other and build social-emotional skills.



2021 ◽  
pp. 073563312110272
Author(s):  
Neila Chettaoui ◽  
Ayman Atia ◽  
Med Salim Bouhlel

Embodied learning pedagogy highlights the interconnections between the brain, body, and the concrete environment. As a teaching method, it provides means of engaging the physical body in multimodal learning experiences to develop the students’ cognitive process. Based on this perspective, several research studies introduced different interaction modalities to support the implementation of an embodied learning environment. One such case is the use of tangible user interfaces and motion-based technologies. This paper evaluates the impacts of motion-based, tangible-based, and multimodal interaction merging between tangible interfaces and motion-based technology on improving students’ learning performance. A controlled study was performed at a primary school with 36 participants (aged 7 to 9), to evaluate the educational potential of embodied interaction modalities compared to tablet-based learning. The results highlighted a significant difference in the learning gains between all groups, as determined by one-way ANOVA [F (3,32) = 6.32, p = .017], in favor of the multimodal learning interface. Findings revealed that a multimodal learning interface supporting richer embodied interaction that took advantage of affording the power of body movements and manipulation of physical objects might improve students’ understanding of abstract concepts in educational contexts.



Sensors ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 1775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graciela Guerrero ◽  
Andrés Ayala ◽  
Juan Mateu ◽  
Laura Casades ◽  
Xavier Alamán


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Rivière ◽  
Nadine Couture ◽  
Fabrice Jurado


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Ishii ◽  
C Ratti ◽  
B Piper ◽  
Y Wang ◽  
A Biderman ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document