scholarly journals 5 TIMES SIT-TO-STAND TEST PERFORMANCE IN DIFFERENT CATEGORY OF UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS PATIENTS

Author(s):  
Manoj kumar ◽  
Dipti Padole ◽  
Chaitany Patel ◽  
Arjun Panchal ◽  
Nisarg Raval
2021 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 38-44
Author(s):  
Marina Petrella ◽  
Luiz Fernando A. Selistre ◽  
Paula R.M.S. Serrão ◽  
Giovanna C. Lessi ◽  
Glaucia H. Gonçalves ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1155
Author(s):  
Mª Piedad Sánchez-Martínez ◽  
Roberto Bernabeu-Mora ◽  
Mariano Martínez-González ◽  
Mariano Gacto-Sánchez ◽  
Rodrigo Martín San Agustín ◽  
...  

Poor performance in the 6-min walk test (6MWT < 350 m) is an important prognostic indicator of mortality and risk of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Little is known about the stability of this state over time and what factors might predict a poor 6MWT performance. To determine the stability of 6MWT performance over a 2-year period in COPD patients participating in annual medical follow-up visits, and to assess the ability of several clinical, pulmonary, and non-pulmonary factors to predict poor 6MWT performance, we prospectively included 137 patients with stable COPD (mean age, 66.9 ± 8.3 years). The 6MWT was scored at baseline and 2-year follow-up. To evaluate clinical, pulmonary, and non-pulmonary variables as potential predictors of poor 6MWT performance, we used multiple logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, weight, height, and 6MWT performance at baseline. Poor 6MWT performance was stable over 2 years for 67.4% of patients. Predictors of poor 6MWT performance included a five-repetition sit-to-stand test score ≤2 (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.22–7.42), the percentage of mobility activities with limitations (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00–1.07), and poor 6MWT performance at baseline (OR, 4.64; 95% CI, 1.88–11.43). Poor 6MWT performance status was stable for the majority of COPD patients. Lower scores on the five-repetition sit-to-stand test and a higher number of mobility activities with limitations were relevant predictors of poor 6MWT performance over 2 years. Prognostic models based on these non-pulmonary factors can provide non-inferior discriminative ability in comparison with prognostic models based on only pulmonary factors.


Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2824
Author(s):  
Sebastian Fudickar ◽  
Sandra Hellmers ◽  
Sandra Lau ◽  
Rebecca Diekmann ◽  
Jürgen M. Bauer ◽  
...  

Comprehensive and repetitive assessments are needed to detect physical changes in an older population to prevent functional decline at the earliest possible stage and to initiate preventive interventions. Established instruments like the Timed “Up & Go” (TUG) Test and the Sit-to-Stand Test (SST) require a trained person (e.g., physiotherapist) to assess physical performance. More often, these tests are only applied to a selected group of persons already functionally impaired and not to those who are at potential risk of functional decline. The article introduces the Unsupervised Screening System (USS) for unsupervised self-assessments by older adults and evaluates its validity for the TUG and SST. The USS included ambient and wearable movement sensors to measure the user’s test performance. Sensor datasets of the USS’s light barriers and Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) were analyzed for 91 users aged 73 to 89 years compared to conventional stopwatch measurement. A significant correlation coefficient of 0.89 for the TUG test and of 0.73 for the SST were confirmed among USS’s light barriers. Correspondingly, for the inertial data-based measures, a high and significant correlation of 0.78 for the TUG test and of 0.87 for SST were also found. The USS was a validated and reliable tool to assess TUG and SST.


Author(s):  
Sarah Crook ◽  
Anja Frei ◽  
Tsung Yu ◽  
Gerben Ter Riet ◽  
Milo Puhan

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Sotirios Kakavas ◽  
Aggeliki Papanikolaou ◽  
Steven Kompogiorgas ◽  
Eleftherios Stavrinoudakis ◽  
Evangelos Balis ◽  
...  

Background/Aims The sit-to-stand test is a quick and cost-effective measure of exercise tolerance and lower body strength. The literature focuses on its use in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study in patients hospitalised for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation aimed to investigate possible associations of the sit-to-stand test with pulmonary function and risk of future acute exacerbations. Methods This study was conducted on a sample of 22 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Participants' clinical details were recorded before they undertook spirometry, 30-second and five-repetition sit-to-stand tests. Participants were assessed via a structured telephone interview for the occurrence of acute exacerbation events in the 12 months following discharge. Results Patients were classified based on the presence or absence of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease over 12 months. A negative correlation was observed between five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance time and number of repetitions during the 30-second sit-to-stand test; longer sit-to-stand times and fewer repetitions were observed in patients who experienced exacerbations during follow up. The 30-second sit-to-stand test repetitions correlated positively with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance correlated negatively with FEV1, FEV1% predicted, forced vital capacity and FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio. From the various exercise parameters, five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance time demonstrated a moderate ability to predict exacerbations. Conclusions This study is the first to focus on the use of the sit-to-stand tests in inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There was a significant correlation between the 30-second sit-to-stand test and five-repetition sit-to-stand test results. Both tests were associated with pulmonary function indices and risk of future chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1933.2-1933
Author(s):  
S. Fellous ◽  
H. Rkain ◽  
S. Afilal ◽  
J. Moulay Berkchi ◽  
T. Fatima Zahrae ◽  
...  

Background:Knee osteoarthritis is a major public health issue that causes chronic pain and functional limitation.Objectives:This study aims to evaluate physical performance in knee osteoarthritis by clinical tests and accelerometer measurements, and investigate the relationship between physical perfomance alteration and clinical parameters.Methods:This is a cross-sectional study, included 40 patients with knee osteoarthritis (100% female, average age 57.6 ± 5.2 years, median evolution time was 36 [24, 69] months, overweight in 82.5% of patients). Clinical evaluation performed with the visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequesne score, Get up and Go (GUG) and Timed up and Go (TUG) tests. The percentage of fat mass was measured using impedencemetry.All subjects were instructed to perform sit-to-stand transfers during 30 secondes. We measured the speed, strength and muscular power of the lower limbs during this test using the Myotest PRO® accelerometer.A correlation analysis was performed in search of factors associated with physical performance alteration.Results:The median speed during the sit-to-stand test was 4.3 [3.1-6.2] cm / sec. The median muscular strength and power during this test were 15.2 [13.6-17.7] Nm / kg and 14.5 [9.9-21.7] W / kg respectively.Body mass index (BMI) correlated negatively with the 3 parameters of physivcal performance mesured by the Myotest PRO® accelerometer (speed, strength and muscle power) during the sit-to-stand test (p<0,05). There was no correlation between those measured parameters of physical performance, pain and functional indices of knee osteoarthritis.Conclusion:Our pilot study assessed the physical performance of the lower limbs in knee osteoarthritis patients, by measuring the speed, strength and muscle power during the the sit-to-stand test. It suggests an association between obesity and physical performance alteration in knee osteoarthritis patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 100389
Author(s):  
A.M. Klukowska ◽  
V.E. Staartjes ◽  
W.P. Vandertop ◽  
M.L. Schröder

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-226
Author(s):  
Hülya Nilgün GÜRSES ◽  
Hilal DENİZOĞLU KÜLLİ ◽  
Elif DURGUT ◽  
Melih ZEREN

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document