scholarly journals The Position of Military Justice to the Indonesian Judiciary System

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Budi Pramono ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Fourth Amendment ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Military Justice ◽  
Legal Norms

The main problem in this paper is how the position of military justice in the Indonesian judicial system with the issuance of Article 3 paragraph (4) Letter (a) of MPR Decree Number: VII / MPR / 2000, which explains that Indonesian National Military submit to the power of military justice in cases of lawlessness. military and submit to the general court for violations of general criminal law. This research is a type of juridical normative research that bases positive legal norms using statutory, conceptual and comparative approaches. The position of Military Justice in the Indonesian judicial system is part of the judicial power which has a strong and unquestionable position, because it is not against the constitution and is still in the corridor of the legal system in Indonesia, which is stated in Article 24 Paragraph (2) of the Fourth Amendment of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution as the constitution. state, and more emphasized in Article 18 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power.

scholarly journals SISTEM PERADILAN DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UUD NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945

Yustitia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-62
Author(s):  
Ihat Subihat
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Military Justice ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

A country’s judicial system cannot be separated from the legal system in force in the country. In other words, a country’s justice system is a sub-system of the country’s justice system. Because the legal system that applies in Indonesia is a legal system based on the Pancasila and the 1945 constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the judicial system in Indonesia must also be based on Pancasila values and articles in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study was conducted by using normative juridical method by reviewing various legal materials; primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. While the data collection method was carried out through library studies. The analysis technique used descriptive method with prescriptive approach. The result of this study showed that the four judicial environments are under the Indonesia Supreme Court; general justice, religious justice, military justice and state administrative courts, as sub-judicial systems in Indonesia, each of which has an institutional, authority and legal structure separate events that differ from one another according to the specificity and absolute competence of each that cannot be mixed up. In contrast to other judicial environments which have adjusted to the changes in the new judicial power law, the institutional structure and authority of the courts within the military court which is part of the judicial system under the Supreme court of the Republic of Indonesia is still regulated in Law Number 31 of 1997 concerning Military justice and not yet adjusted to Lay Number 14 of 2004 concerning Judicial Power, because the Amendment Draft to the Law on Military Justice which had been discussed since 2005 has not yet been agreed upon by the DPR and the Government. Even when the Lay on Military Justice cannot be adjusted to Law Number 4 of 2004, on October 29, 2009 Law Number 4 of 2004 was revoked and then replaced with Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning the latest Judicial Power.

scholarly journals Sourses of Criminal Law of some European Countries and Rules for the Application of Criminal Law in Time

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 1133-1137
Author(s):  
Zayniddin Ziyoviddinovich Shamsiddinov
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Criminal Legislation

 This article discusses the sources of criminal law in some European countries and the rules of timely application of criminal law. Study of different areas of law, legal institutions and legal norms in a legal system will help to find a solution to such issues that legal science and the legislature had to decide in particular issues related to the temporal application of criminal law. According to the Article 1 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan the criminal legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan is based on the Constitution and generally recognized norms of international law and consists of this Code[1]. From this it is clear that the only source of criminal law is the criminal code.

scholarly journals PENCURIAN PRATIMA DALAM KAJIAN HUKUM PIDANA HINDU

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
I Made Suastika Ekasana
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Unitary State ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
Interaction Factors ◽  
The Republic

<p><em>Pratima Theft Crime is part of the crime of theft or crimes against property or objects that are sacred and sacred or sacred and sanctified which are related to symbols of God, Goddesses, Bhatara-Bhatari and their manifestations. Pratima theft is part of a crime against property as regulated in Book II of the Criminal Code and is also regulated in Hindu Law as Corah or Asteya in Article 6 in conjunction with Articles 336 - 343 Astamo dhyayah Weda Smrti (Manawa Dharmasastra) in conjunction with Articles 51 - 70 Ekodaco dhyayah Weda Smrti (Manawa Dharmasastra). Corah or Asteya is part of Hindu legal norms in the field of Criminal Law or Kantaka Sodhana. The problems studied in the writing are, Are Hindu law norms in the field of Criminal Law included in the national legal system in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia? What are the factors causing the rampant theft of pratima in Bali Province ?. Using the normative legal research method, the conclusion obtained is that the legal norms of Pratima Theft are regulated in the legal system of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. support each other in the administration of the State. The Pratima Theft legal norms are part of the Criminal Law Norms including one of the Areas of Hindu Law which is one of the recognized religious laws in Indonesia, therefore the Pratima Theft legal norms as one of the religious laws (Hinduism) are automatically included as part of and regulated in the legal system in the Republic of Indonesia. Factors causing pratima theft include human factors, environmental factors, educational factors, social interaction factors and opportunity factors.</em></p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: <em>Crime, Theft, Pratima, Hindu Law, Criminal Law.</em></p><p align="center"> </p>

Criminal Law in Communist Hungary

Slavic Review ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tibor Arthur Marczali
Keyword(s):  
World War Ii ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
County Government ◽  
World War ◽  
Revolution Of 1848 ◽  
The Revolution

Prior to World War II, Hungary had no written constitution. The Arany Bulla (Golden Bull) in 1222, the Pragmatica Sanctio in 1723, and the Compromise of 1867 were considered basic laws, because they regulated the relations between the king and the “nation” (i.e., the nobility) and contained certain safeguards against tyrannical (arbitrary) government. Before the Compromise, justice was administered by the local (county) government for all inhabitants without state-wide supervision, except for the serfs who were subject to their landlords. The Compromise of 1867, which created a constitutional dual monarchy for Austria and Hungary, was the outgrowth of the revolution of 1848. The immediate results of this revolution were the emancipation of the serfs and the establishment of the Ministry of Justice. Law No. IV of 1869 unified the judicial system nationally by removing judicial power from the jurisdiction of the counties.

scholarly journals Kilka uwag o potrzebie zachowania spójności pomiędzy prawem karnym a innymi dziedzinami prawa

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-42
Author(s):  
Anna Jaworska-Wieloch
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The One

The principle of subsidiarity of criminal law requires the location of the norms which regulate specific social relations beyond the branch of law which was adduced. On the one hand, it enables the realisation of the postulate, peculiar to the system of repressive law, to place the rules of conduct and the norms which regulate specific relations beyond criminal law. On the one hand, the intervention with criminalisation into relations regulated by other branches of law should enforce a significant synchronisation of the regulations of criminal law with the norms which are peculiar to a given branch of law. A legal system which features co-relations should represent consistency. As a result, the criminalisation of behaviour regulated by other branches of law deepens the connotations between them. The enracinement of legal regulations into an increasing number of new areas is the source of doubts associated with the lack of consistency between the particular regulations or, in the case of a strong drive of the criminal law to inscribe itself into legal norms which regulate a given sphere of life, to the negation of the capability of the criminal law to acquire functions which are set to this branch of law. On the basis of selected examples, the article attempts to reflect upon the legislator’s maintenance of the balance between these values.

Justice et utopie chez Thomas More

Moreana ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (Number 193- (3-4) ◽  
pp. 54-73
Author(s):  
Nicolas Tenaillon
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
16Th Century ◽  
Divine Providence ◽  
Thomas More ◽  
The Future

As a renowned jurist first and then as a top politician, Thomas More has never given up researching about a judicial system where all the fields of justice would be harmonized around a comprehensive logic. From criminal law to divine providence, Utopia, despite its eccentricities, proposes a coherent model of Christian-inspired collective living, based on a concern for social justice, something that was terribly neglected during the early 16th century English monarchy. Not only did History prove many of More’s intuitions right, but above all, it gave legitimacy to the utopian genre in its task of imagining the future progress of human justice and of contributing to its coming.

The Kelsenian Model of Constitutional Review in Times of European Integration – Reconsidering the Basic Features

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-37
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Kustra-Rogatka
Keyword(s):  
European Integration ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Centralized Control ◽  
Constitutional Treaty ◽  
Constitutional Courts ◽  
Constitutional Review ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Basic Features ◽  
The Eu

Summary The paper deals with the changes in the centralized (Kelsenian) model of constitutional review resulting from a state’s membership of the EU, which unequivocally demonstrates the decomposition of the classic paradigm of constitutional judiciary. The main point raised in the paper is that European integration has fundamentally influenced on the four above-mentioned basic elements of the Kelsenian model of constitutional review of legislation, which are the following: the assumption of the hierarchical construction of a legal system; the assumption of the supreme legal force of the constitution as the primary normative act of a given system; a centralised model of reviewing hierarchical conformity of legal norms; coherence of the system guaranteed by a constitutional court’s power to declare defectiveness of a norm and the latter’s derogation. All its fundamental elements have evolved, i.e. the hierarchy of the legal system, the overriding power of the constitution, centralized control of constitutionality, and the erga omnes effect of the ruling on the hierarchical non-conformity of the norms. It should be noted that over the last decade the dynamics of these changes have definitely gained momentum. This has been influenced by several factors, including the “great accession” of 2004, the pursuit of formal constitutionalization of the EU through the Constitutional Treaty, the compromise solutions adopted in the Treaty of Lisbon, the entry into force of the Charter, and the prospect of EU accession to the ECHR. The CJEU has used these factors to deepen the tendencies towards decentralization of constitutional control, by atomising national judicial systems and relativizing the effects of constitutional court rulings within national legal systems. The end result is the observed phenomenon, if not of marginalisation, then at least of a systemic shift in the position of constitutional courts, which have lost their uniqueness and have become “only ones of many” national courts.

The ‘Soul of an Army’: A Defence of Military Court Trials for Violations of the Law of Armed Conflict

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-33
Author(s):  
Conor Donohue
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Armed Conflict ◽  
International Criminal ◽  
Large Body ◽  
International Criminal Law ◽  
Service Members ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
International Forum ◽  
Military Justice ◽  
Law Of Armed Conflict

Military justice as a body of law was subject to much criticism in the preceding decades before undergoing significant reforms to ensure that fair trial rights could be achieved. However, modern military justice systems are appropriate mechanisms for addressing law of armed conflict (LOAC) violations committed by service members. It is argued that the goals of military justice are consistent with LOAC, and that military justice has a valid legal basis to try violations. Such trials have a large body of precedent. The purported disadvantages of military trials are sufficiently mitigated to prevent cover-ups and unfair trials. Furthermore, military justice offers several benefits that cannot be achieved in a civilian or international forum. It is concluded that although military legal systems are imperfect, their role in the enforcement of international criminal law is worthy of further debate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document