scholarly journals Memastikan Efektivitas Implementasi Kebijakan Publik

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-36
Author(s):  
Yosep Gede Sutmasa

No matter how good the formulation of a public policy is, if it fails to be implemented then the policy is useless. Policy implementation is one of the determinant sequences in the entire public policy process, because it is directly related to the performance of a policy, the realization of goals and results (outputs and outcomes). Therefore, ensuring the effectiveness of public policy implementation is very important, that is, first of all by properly and correctly understanding the entire process of public policy, especially the factors that influence policy implementation. Some of the influencing factors are: size and policy objectives, resources, characteristics of implementing agents, attitudes / tendencies (disposition) of operators, communication, economic, social and political environment, whether the problems are easy or not, the ability of policies to structure implementation appropriately. Second, oversee the implementation of public policies with full responsibility through monitoring, evaluation and reward.

Author(s):  
Dhea Juniar ◽  
Ike Rachmawati ◽  
Dine Meigawati

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui implemetasi kebijakan penataan indekos atau rumah kontrakan di Kota Sukabumi, serta faktor-faktor yang mempegaruhinya. Peneliti menggunakan teori implementasi kebijakan publik menurut van Metter & van Horn. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan pengumpulan data melalui teknik observasi, wawancara, dokumentasi, dan studi kepustakaan. Implementasi kebijakan penataan indekos atau rumah kontrakan di Kota Sukabumi sudah berjalan dengan baik jika dilihat dari sisi sumber daya, karakteristik agen pelaksana, dan kecenderungan/disposisi para pelaksana. Namun dari sisi ukuran dan tujuan kebijakan, komunikasi antar organisasi dan aktivitas pelaksana serta lingkungan ekonomi, sosial dan politik belum berjalan dengan baik. Hal tersebutlah yang menghambat keberhasilan dari pelaksanaan implementasi kebijakan tentang penataan indekos atau rumah kontrakan di Kota Sukabumi.AbstractThe research aims to determine the implementation of the policy for structuring boarding houses or rented houses in Sukabumi City, as well as the factors that influence it. Researchers use the theory of public policy implementation according to van Metter & van Horn. This research uses the descriptive qualitative method by collecting data through observation, interview, documentation, and literature study techniques. The implementationof the structuring policy for boarding houses or rented houses in Sukabumi City has been running well when viewed in terms of resources, characteristics of implementing agencies, and propensity/dispositions of the implementers. However, in terms of size and policy objectives, communication between organizations and implementing activities as well as the economic, social and political environment has not gone well. This is what hinders the success of the implementation of the policy on structuring boarding houses or rented houses in the City of Sukabumi.


Author(s):  
Arzu Dilaveroglu

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the relationship between public policy which brings about within the concept of process model and political environment. In this descriptive study, the answers of three questions will be search which are 1) how do public policies proceed as a process 2) which partners are effective in this process; lastly 3) which kind of relation is available between political environment and public policy specifically. After a comprehensive literature review, the answers of aforementioned questions are supplied in the following; 1) the process flow of public policy includes firstly establishing public policy, secondly problem determination, agenda setting, policy formulation, implementation and lastly evaluation. 2) The main partners of this process are formal, informal and international organizations. 3) Political environment can be descripted as a combination of political systems, political culture and socio-economic conditions which have key determining role on public policy process.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwiyanto Indiahono ◽  
Erwan Purwanto ◽  
Agus Pramusinto

This research aims to examine differences in the relationship of bureaucratic and political officials during the New Order (Soeharto’s era) and the Reformation (post-Soeharto) era within the arena of public policy implementation. This is a matter of importance given that there is a change in relations between the two from integration in the New Order to bureaucratic impartiality in the Reformation Era. This study attempts to answer the question: How were the relations of bureaucratic and political officials in the implementation of local level public policy during the New Order and the Reformation Era? A qualitative research has been conducted in Tegal Municipality using the following data collection techniques: interview, focus group discussion, documentation, and observation. Tegal Municipality was selected as the study location because of the unique relationship shown between the mayor and the bureaucracy. Its uniqueness lies in the emergence of bureaucratic officials who dare to oppose political officials, based on their convictions that bureaucratic/public values should be maintained even if it means having to be in direct conflict with political officials. This research indicates that the relationship between bureaucratic and political officials in the arena of local level policy implementation during the New Order was characterized as being full of pressure and compliance, whereas during the Reformation Era bureaucrats have the audacity to hinder policy implementation. Such audacity to thwart policies is considered to have developed from a stance that aims to protect public budget and values in policies. The occurring conflict of values here demonstrates a dichotomy of political and bureaucratic officials that is different from the prevailing definition of politics-administration dichotomy introduced at the onset of Public Administration studies.


Author(s):  
Andrii Moisiiakha ◽  

The article is devoted to the problems of finding ways to improve the mechanisms of implementation of state policy in the socio-humanitarian sphere. The purpose of this article is to identify areas for improvement of mechanisms for implementing public policy in the socio-humanitarian sphere, taking into account the needs of their unification within a single approach to the organization of social processes in the analyzed area. Achieving this goal has provided solutions to more practical problems: the development of goals, objectives, areas of state policy in the socio-humanitarian sphere, as well as organizational and legal support for its implementation. All this together will allow to introduce quite detailed algorithms and tools for managing the socio-humanitarian development of Ukraine and to quickly and effectively overcome the negative risks that arise in it. The content, essence and state-legal nature of mechanisms of public administration, as a set of ways and tools of practical realization of state policy are revealed. The analysis of modern approaches to understanding the essence of mechanisms of public administration is carried out. The author's definition of the mechanism of public administration in the socio-humanitarian sphere is offered. The content and essence of state policy in the socio-humanitarian sphere are revealed. The conclusion concerning the basic determinants and features of its development is made. Approaches to the formation of mechanisms for the implementation of state policy in the socio-humanitarian sphere are generalized. The need to further unify approaches to the implementation of such public policy in different sectors of the socio-humanitarian sphere has been proved. The main directions of improvement of mechanisms of its realization are allocated. The mechanism of state policy implementation in the socio-humanitarian sphere is defined as a set of nonlinear sets of tools and methods of state influence, which is implemented through appropriate management decisions (a set of measures as components of state policy) to develop the rights and interests of citizens and practical implementation. guarantees of the state in the fields of education, health care, social security, as well as others covered by the humanitarian mission of the state and able to influence the formation of productive forces, human, intellectual and social capital in society.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document