scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Various Software Development Approaches

2021 ◽  
pp. 88-91
Author(s):  
Megha V. Polishwala ◽  
Dr. Amit kumar Shastri
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Software Management ◽  
Management Processes ◽  
Pros And Cons

This research paper deals with the software management processes concern with the software development. Varity of SDLC models have been designed accepted and used for software development. This model give a theoretical guideline regarding development of the software. Each SDLC has its own pros and cons. The aim of this paper is to analysis some methodologies that gives comparison on SDLC models by studied available, tools, techniques and methodologies of SDLC models.

scholarly journals Illusory freedom of physical platform workers: Insights from Uber Eats in Japan

2021 ◽  
pp. 103530462199246
Author(s):  
Hamza Umer
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Collective Bargaining ◽  
Food Delivery ◽  
Jel Codes ◽  
Delivery Platform ◽  
Pros And Cons

Platform work is often advocated as offering freedom of work to labour. Contesting this claim, this article undertakes a comparative analysis of the pros and cons of food delivery platform work prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and argues that the freedom of food delivery platform workers is essentially an ‘illusory freedom’. In reality, platform work has only changed mechanisms through which companies can exercise control over labour and evade their employer obligations. As a case, the article examines the illusory freedom of food delivery platform workers associated to Uber Eats in Japan. The collective bargaining efforts of food delivery workers against the excessive control of Uber Eats and the extent of success of these efforts are also examined. The article concludes by discussing the possible factors that have undermined the effectiveness of the collective bargaining efforts of the labour union. JEL Codes: J52; J81

scholarly journals Longevity of risks in software development projects: a comparative analysis with an academic environment

2021 ◽  
Vol 181 ◽  
pp. 827-834
Author(s):  
Luís M. Alves ◽  
Gustavo Souza ◽  
Pedro Ribeiro ◽  
Ricardo J. Machado
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
Academic Environment

Integrated Framework for Enhancing Software Development Methodologies With Comparative Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Vijayakumaran ◽  
G. Radhamani ◽  
P. Ranjit Jeba Thangaiah
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Six Sigma ◽  
Quality Standards ◽  
Lean Six Sigma ◽  
Quality Models ◽  
Integrated Framework ◽  
Standard Quality ◽  
It Organization ◽  
Software Development Methodologies

The delivery process of any IT organization depends on the effective software development methodologies. Along with conventional software development methodologies, corporates are also found to adopt various quality standards in order to enhance their development methodologies. Although there were substantial researches work carried out in past, majority of the study discusses about the theoretical implementation of quality standards. Due to various intermittent impediments, e.g., requirement volatility, skill gap, schedule slippage, etc., the standard quality models are very often violated in real time environment leading to degradation in development methodologies. Hence, this manuscript discusses an integrated framework using Scrum, Lean Six Sigma, and Agile which has been formulated on the basis on existing flaws in software development methodologies and propose some of the potential features to enhance it.

Project Implementation Decision Using Software Development Life Cycle Models: A Comparative Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Adeagbo ◽  
J.E.T. Akinsola ◽  
A.A. Awoseyi ◽  
F. Kasali
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Cost Estimation ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Project Implementation ◽  
Development Life Cycle ◽  
Software Development Life Cycle ◽  
Waterfall Model ◽  
Spiral Model

Selection of a suitable Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) model for project implementation is somewhat confusing as there are a lot of SDLC models with similar strengths and weaknesses. Also, the solutions proffered among the researchers so far have been the  qualitative comparative analysis of SDLC models. Hence, this paper proposes a comparative analysis of SDLC models using quantitative approach in relation to strengths and weaknesses of SDLC models. The study adapted comparative analysis and Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) models features’ classification using ten characteristics such as project complexity, project size, project duration, project with risk, implementation/initial cost, error discovery, associated cost, risk analysis, maintenance and cost estimation. A quantitative measure that employs online survey using experts in software design and engineering, project management and system analysis was carried out for the evaluation of SDLC models. Purposeful Stratified Random Sampling (SRS) technique was used to gather the data for analysis using XLSTAT after pre-processing, taking into consideration both benefit and cost criteria. The overall performance evaluation showed that Spiral-Model is the best followed by V-Model and lastly Waterfall Model with comparative values of 38.63%, 35.76% and 25.61% respectively. As regards cost estimation, Waterfall Model is the most efficient with value of 41%, then V-Model with 31% and lastly Spiral Model with 28%. V-Model has great error recovery capability with value of 45% which is closely followed by Spiral Model with 37% and lastly Waterfall Model with 18%. The study revealed that, a model with efficient risk assurance does not guarantee efficient cost management. In the future work, more characteristics regarding SDLC models shall be considered.

scholarly journals Agrarian reforms of Russia at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries in the coverage of economists of the XX century

2021 ◽  
pp. 141-144
Author(s):  
I. K. Shcherbakova
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
19Th Century ◽  
Economic Reforms ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Agrarian Reforms ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
The 19Th Century ◽  
Different Parts

The article analyses the features of the development of agriculture in Russia at the end of the 19th century - the beginning of the 20th century. The paper studies and considers attempts to solve the agrarian issue in the specified period. The study considers the course and results of the reform of 1861, as well as economic reforms of the beginning of the 20th century. The author gives an assessment of these reforms, as well as the situation of the peasantry made by the leading economists of that time: N.D. Kondrat'ev, S.L. Maslov, A.V. Peshekhonov, A.V. Chayanov, and also analyses the measures aimed at alleviating the situation of the peasantry and solving the agrarian problems of that period. The research paper also presents a comparative analysis of the consequences of the 1861 reform, its impact on the solution of the agrarian issue in different parts of the Russian Empire, in particular in Poland after the Polish Uprising of 1863.

PARTICULARITIES REGARDING THE USE OF PLANNING METHODOLOGIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF LAND FORCES’ MILITARY OPERATIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31
Author(s):  
Paul TUDORACHE
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
National Level ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Military Operations ◽  
Primary Activity ◽  
The Military ◽  
Military Decision Making

Abstract: The manifestation of different dissensions regarding the use of planning methodologies in the operations process has become a reality, both at national level and within NATO. Therefore, this research paper contributes to the theoretical clarification on defining the specific methodologies, respectively their employment in relation to the level of Land Forces military operations. Another objective of this paper is to make a comparative analysis between the design methodology, military decision making process (MDMP) and troop leading procedures (TLP), targeting the military structures within the Land Forces, and those belonging to NATO. Also, at the end, the paper highlights some perspectives of improving planning, as the primary activity which starts the operations process.

Big Data Analytics Tools and Platform in Big Data Landscape

2018 ◽  
pp. 80-89
Author(s):  
Mohd Imran ◽  
Mohd Vasim Ahamad ◽  
Misbahul Haque ◽  
Mohd Shoaib
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Data Analytics ◽  
Big Data Analytics ◽  
Big Data Analysis ◽  
Apache Hadoop ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Analytical Tools

The term big data analytics refers to mining and analyzing of the voluminous amount of data in big data by using various tools and platforms. Some of the popular tools are Apache Hadoop, Apache Spark, HBase, Storm, Grid Gain, HPCC, Casandra, Pig, Hive, and No SQL, etc. These tools are used depending on the parameter taken for big data analysis. So, we need a comparative analysis of such analytical tools to choose best and simpler way of analysis to gain more optimal throughput and efficient mining. This chapter contributes to a comparative study of big data analytics tools based on different aspects such as their functionality, pros, and cons based on characteristics that can be used to determine the best and most efficient among them. Through the comparative study, people are capable of using such tools in a more efficient way.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document