The Relevant Legal Framework of Human Rights Protection: ESC Rights and the Right to Water

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
The Right

EU Asylum Law and Human Rights Protection: Revisiting the Principle of Non-refoulement and the Prohibition of Torture and Other Forms of Ill-treatment

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Júlia Mink
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
International Norms ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Asylum Law ◽  
Depth Analysis ◽  
The Eu

Abstract The principal objective of the article is to examine the EU legal framework and international law parameters of legal harmonisation processes in a specific field of human rights protection: asylum legislation. In particular, it is to provide an in-depth analysis of the compatibility of EU asylum legislation with existing international norms in relation to the principle of non-refoulement and the prohibition of torture and other forms of ill-treatment. It also aims at exploring the correspondence and controversies of relevant legal principles and norms under international law. Similarly, it attempts to provide an analysis of the incomplete and inefficient implementation of these international norms and principles by EU asylum law as well.

scholarly journals Conscientious Objection to Abortion: A Comparative International Legal Framework

2020 ◽  
pp. 71-96
Author(s):  
Екатерина Вячеславовна Киселева ◽  
Ольга Сергеевна Кажаева
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Mutual Position ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Doctor Who ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
State Cooperation

В настоящем исследовании дается сравнительно-правовой анализ подхода к пониманию содержания и взаимного положения некоторых прав человека, связанных с искусственным прерыванием беременности, понимания, отраженного на универсальном уровне международно- правового сотрудничества государств в актах договорных органов защиты прав человека. Если по существу факт искусственного прерывания беременности поднимает правозащитные вопросы в отношении трёх субъектов (женщины, вынашивающей ребёнка, нерожденного ребёнка и врача, осуществляющего аборт или отказывающегося от проведения такового), то со стороны защиты прав человека речь ведётся почти исключительно о женщине, чья жизнь и материалистически понимаемые интересы приоритизируются над всеми остальными правозащитными аспектами. В настоящей работе сравнению подвергаются именно права различных субъектов, оказывающихся связанными через аборт, объем и защищенность этих прав международным правом. В качестве международно-правовой основы для сравнения взят Международный билль о правах человека. Тезисы авторов иллюстрируются двумя делами в отношении врачей, отказавшихся проводить процедуру аборта исходя из христианских убеждений в Польше и Аргентине, соответственно. Статья подготовлена при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта № 18-011- 00292. This study provides a comparative legal analysis of the understanding of the content and mutual position of some human rights associated with artificial termination of pregnancy, the understanding reflected at the universal level of international legal inter-state cooperation in the acts of human rights treaty bodies. While, in essence, the fact of artificial termination of pregnancy raises human rights questions in relation to three subjects (a woman carrying a child, an unborn child and a doctor who performs an abortion or refuses to perform it), from the point of human rights protection, it is almost exclusively about a woman, whose life and materialistically understood interests are prioritized over all other human rights aspects. In this work, it is the rights of various subjects who find themselves bound through abortion, the scope and protection of these rights by international law, limited to the International Bill of Human Rights as an international legal basis for comparison are subjected to comparison. The authors illustrate their theses with two cases against the doctors who refused to carry out an abortion procedure for reasons of conscience in accordance with their Christian beliefs in Poland and Argentina, correspondingly. The article was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research within the framework of research project № 18-011-00292.

scholarly journals The Rights of Intersex Persons to Establish a Family under Albanian Law. Practice of the ECHR

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Dr.Sc. Jorida Xhafaj
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Family Relationships ◽  
Family Life ◽  
National Legislation ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
European Court ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

identity is the way in which a person is self-identified with a gender category, as for example to be female or male, or in some cases intersex, which is none of the distinguishable biological sexes. In principal, intersex persons are part of the society with their rights and obligations, which are not the same with those of the other members of society, in special areas of life.This paper aims to treat the right of intersex persons to marriage and to establish a family. The paper begins with an overview of definition of intersex persons, their rights, and focuses primarily on the right to establish a family.The right for a family life has found protection in the Albanian national legislation. The Constitution of theRepublicofAlbaniaof 1998 in its Article 53 stipulates that "everyone has the right to marry and have a family" establishing the principle of equality before the law, closely linked to the principle of non-discrimination. The legal provisions set a controversial position on the right to get married and to establish family relationships of the intersex persons, which is based on different arguments.For the purposes of the research, we aim also to compare the national legislation with the European principles and practice of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred as ECHR). The paper also includes the opinions and recommendations of Albanian institutions, as well as those of foreign ones, mainly European, in the area of human rights protection, and especially regarding the rights of the intersex persons.

scholarly journals A Brief Analysis on Human Rights from Hannah Arendt’s Criticism

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Janilce Silva Praseres ◽  
Marcelo Ramos Saldanha
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Hannah Arendt ◽  
Ethical Values ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Right

Abstract: human rights are a set of ethical values whose purpose is to protect and enable the realization of human dignity in its various dimensions and also prevent the reduction of the individual to the condition of object or, above all, the reduction of his condition as subject of rights, such as the right to life, freedom, security, equality. The universal character of human rights protection demonstrates some weaknesses, especially in the transposition into concrete legal systems, so what we propose is a brief analysis of human rights from Hannah Arendt.Uma Breve Análise Acerca dos Direitos Humanos a partir da Crítica de Hannah ArendtResumo: os direitos humanos são um conjunto de valores éticos que têm por finalidade proteger e possibilitar a realização da dignidade humana em suas várias dimensões e, ainda, impedir a redução do indivíduo à condição de objeto ou, sobretudo, a diminuição da sua condição na qualidade de sujeito de direitos, a exemplo o direito à vida, à liberdade, à segurança, à igualdade. O caráter universal de proteção aos direitos humanos demonstra algumas fragilidades, principalmente, na transposição para ordenamentos jurídicos concretos, assim, o que propomos é uma breve análise acerca dos direitos humanos a partir de Hannah Arendt.

scholarly journals HOW CAN THE HUMAN RIGHTS LEGAL FRAMEWORK ADDRESS THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS EXTRATERRITORIALLY?

2021 ◽  
pp. 55-59
Author(s):  
M. Lazarenko ◽  
I. Chernohorenko
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Armed Conflict ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Domestic Courts ◽  
European Regional ◽  
Inter State

The armed conflict in Ukraine has been ongoing since 2014. As to date, the total number of recorded deaths has exceeded ten thousands civilians and combatants. Every day, i.e. during the present research, this number has been increasing. As outlined above, the European regional system of human rights protection, epitomised by the ECtHR, addresses this challenge within two interrelated tracks: individual and inter-State applications. The research focuses on landmark decisions of international, regional, and domestic courts in terms of human rights extraterritorially by way of establishing human rights duty-bearer jurisdiction outside states’ boundaries based on effective control test. It scrutinizes the jurisprudence of the ECtHR in terms of inconsistency between Bankovic and Aj-Jedda cases. In turn, the paper aims to model extraterritorial application of human rights law in Ukraine v. Russia inter-State applications (re Crimea and re Eastern Ukraine) based on Loizidou precedent as well as describes new forms of Russia’s violations of human rights in Crimea.

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) and Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR)

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Special Importance ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
American System ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Domestic Law

The Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights is a regional mechanism that has had a significant impact on the institutional framework of the State Parties to the Organization of American States (OAS), contributing to the elimination of structural human rights issues in the region. With a population of around 900 million people, the thirty-five States that comprise the OAS have accepted, to different extents, the supervising competence of its main human rights protection bodies: the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR). This research bibliography on the Inter-American System is organized in six sections. The first is a general overview that describes the regional legal framework, the different research approaches that doctrine has developed to study it, and the factual and statistical resources that are of special importance in such research. The second section introduces the regional protection bodies and their interaction within the Inter-American System. The third and fourth sections are dedicated to the particular analysis of each body. It begins with the Inter-American Commission, with a description of its two most relevant foci, namely, its human rights promotion tasks and its competence to receive individual petitions. It then moves to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and engages with the literature about its contentious jurisdiction—where reparations, supervision of judgments, and compliance to its judgments—along with its advisory and precautionary jurisdiction will be analyzed in greater depth. Finally, the fifth and sixth sections are dedicated to two topics of special analytical relevance and current importance: the dialogue between regional protection systems in the search for answers to common problems and finally the notion of control of conventionality as a particular and groundbreaking legal development of the system and its development within the State’s domestic law. The selected works in this bibliography are mostly available in English and Spanish (judgments of the IACtHR and reports of the Commission may be accessed in both languages) and the great majority of these texts are available without cost, digitally, online and without subscription. This research bibliography, accordingly, aims at avoiding obstacles to open research into this topic from the Global South and other latitudes.

22. Rights for specific vulnerable persons

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhona K. M. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Internally Displaced Persons ◽  
Displaced Persons ◽  
Group Rights ◽  
Internally Displaced ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Vulnerable Persons

This chapter examines human rights protection for four specific groups: women, children, internally displaced persons, and refugees. It first explains why group rights evolved in a system of human rights that, from the outset, was supposed to be universal and then discusses: the particular needs of these groups; the evolving international and regional human rights framework; and the extent to which the legal framework addresses the needs of the group in question.

scholarly journals The other side of the Article 21(3) coin: Human rights in the Rome Statute and the limits of Article 21(3)

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 837-850
Author(s):  
Emma Irving
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Criminal Court ◽  
Rome Statute ◽  
International Criminal ◽  
Central Place ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
The Past

AbstractThe drafters of the Rome Statute sought to accord human rights a central place within the legal framework of the International Criminal Court (ICC). This was done not only through numerous provisions on the rights of the accused, victims, and witnesses, but also through the inclusion of the overarching Article 21(3) of the Rome Statute. Article 21(3) Rome Statute requires that the interpretation and application of all ICC law be consistent with internationally recognized human rights. While this provision has been employed on numerous occasions to bolster human rights protection in the ICC legal framework, it is not without its limits. In a series of decisions over the past few years, ICC judges have placed limits on the protections that can be read into the ICC legal framework on the basis of Article 21(3). Beyond stating that the ICC ‘is not a human rights court’, the decisions in question articulate no clear justification for the limitations imposed on Article 21(3). The present article analyses these decisions and identifies the underlying rationale for the Court’s approach: the principle of speciality. However, the picture is further complicated by the judges’ willingness to overlook the principle of speciality when particularly serious violations of human rights are involved. This leaves the precise contours of human rights protection in the ICC legal framework undefined.

A Case-Law Study of the Truth as Human Right

Global Jurist ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Castillo-Córdova ◽  
Susana Mosquera-Monelos
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Focus Attention ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
International Recognition ◽  
Human Good ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

AbstractWe consider the right to the truth an essential human right that should be recognized and guaranteed by the Law. Allowing all humans access to the truth is a human good permitting the achievement of a higher degree of human perfection and realization and, consequently, there are strong reasons to affirm that the Law should recognize and guarantee as much as possible access to the truth. Considering that it has been the international recognition of the right to the truth which has provided the basis for domestic regulations it is logical that we should focus attention on the international sphere of human rights protection and it is for this reason that we have carried out a case-law method investigation to describe the concept of “the right to the truth”.

scholarly journals Wybrane zagadnienia dotyczące zwalczania terroryzmu w kontekście prawa do rzetelnego procesu

2019 ◽  
pp. 163-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Matusiak-Frącczak
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
International Peace ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Targeted Killing ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Peace And Security ◽  
The Right

Terrorism is nowadays one of the biggest threats to international peace and security. Nevertheless, its combatting must be compatible with the requirements of human rights protection, including the right to a fair trial. First the article discusses procedural guarantees of suspects of terrorist crimes in criminal proceedings. Then the article deliberates the aspects of judicial control of targeted sanctions. The next part will constitute the exploration of the legal professional privilege in the discussed area. Finally, the article will discuss the judicial control of targeted killing. The aim of the article is to prove that actually the right to a fair trial and the procedural guarantees enshrined therein constitute a guarantee to other human rights.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document