scholarly journals RT-PCR for COVID-19: Diagnosis Made Easy

BioMedica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2S) ◽  
pp. 115-120
Author(s):  
Osheen Sajjad ◽  
Aiman Shahzad ◽  
Saqib Mahmood
Keyword(s):  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Detection Method ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
Positive Sense ◽  
Affected Person ◽  
Sampling Procedures

<p>Coronavirus disease COVID-19, caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus-2 (SARS-CoV2), is highly contagious and has been a pandemic since March 2020. The SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA viruswhich spreadsthrough air droplets by sneezing and coughing from affected person. The diagnosis of the COVID-19 remains a challenge to the scientists since the genome of the SARS-CoV-2 was novel and varying. Various studies have reported the validated procedures for sampling and the detection method of SARS-CoV-2. This mini-review provides a brief introduction of the SARS-CoV-2 features and the current knowledge for the recommended COVID19 detection methods including sampling procedures and real time SARS-CoV-2 genome detection.</p>

scholarly journals The First Quarter of SARS-CoV-2 Testing: the University of Washington Medicine Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander L. Greninger ◽  
Keith R. Jerome
Keyword(s):  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
University Of Washington ◽  
Clinical Laboratories ◽  
To Come ◽  
The Many ◽  
The University

ABSTRACT In early March 2020, the University of Washington Medical Center clinical virology laboratory became one of the first clinical laboratories to offer testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). When we first began test development in mid-January, neither of us believed there would be more than 2 million confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections nationwide or that we would have performed more than 150,000 real-time PCR (RT-PCR) tests, with many more to come. This article will be a chronological summary of how we rapidly validated tests for SARS-CoV-2, increased our testing capacity, and addressed the many problems that came up along the way.

Comparative Evaluation of a Phage Protein Ligand Assay with Real-Time PCR and a Reference Method for the Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Raw Ground Beef and Trimmings

2011 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. SAVOYE ◽  
P. FENG ◽  
C. ROZAND ◽  
M. BOUVIER ◽  
A. GLEIZAL ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Raw Meat ◽  
E Coli

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 is an important pathogen associated with infections caused by consumption of undercooked raw meat. Sensitive and rapid detection methods for E. coli O157:H7 are essential for the meat industry to ensure a safe meat supply. This study was conducted to compare the sensitivity of the VIDAS ultraperformance E. coli test (ECPT UP) with a noncommercial real-time (RT) PCR method and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS) reference method for detecting E. coli O157:H7 in raw ground beef. Optimal enrichment times and the efficacy of testing different types of raw meat, either as individual samples (25 g) or as composites (375 g), were examined. For 25-g samples of each type of raw ground beef tested, 6 h of enrichment was sufficient for both the VIDAS ECPT UP and RT-PCR methods, but for 375-g samples, 24 h of enrichment was required. Both the VIDAS ECPT UP and RT-PCR methods produced results similar to those obtained with the USDA-FSIS reference method after 18 to 24 h of enrichment. The primer specificity of the RT-PCR assay and the highly specific phage ligand used in the VIDAS ECPT UP for target recognition enabled the detection of low levels of E. coli O157:H7 in 25 g of various types of raw ground beef. The tests also allowed the detection of E. coli O157:H7 in composite raw ground beef and trimmings in samples of up to 375 g.

scholarly journals Performance comparison of two malaria rapid diagnostic test with real time polymerase chain reaction and gold standard of microscopy detection method

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puspa Wardhani ◽  
Trieva Verawaty Butarbutar ◽  
Christophorus Oetama Adiatmaja ◽  
Amarensi Milka Betaubun ◽  
Nur Hamidah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Diagnostic Test ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Detection Method ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Background: The diagnostic test for malaria is mostly based on Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) and detection by microscopy. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is also a sensitive detection method that can be considered as a diagnostic tool. The outcome of malaria microscopy detection depends on the examiner's ability and experience. Some RDT has been distributed in Indonesia, which needs to be evaluated for their results. Objective: This study aimed to compare the performance of RightSign RDT and ScreenPlus RDT for detection of Plasmodium in human blood. We used specific real-time polymerase chain reaction abTESTMMalaria qPCRII) and gold standard of microscopy detection method to measure diagnostic efficiency. Methods: Blood specimens were evaluated using RightSign RDT, ScreenPlus RDT, Microscopy detection, and RT-PCR as the protocol described. The differences on specificity (Sp), sensitivity (Sn), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed using McNemar and Kruskal Wallis analysis. Results: A total of 105 subjects were recruited. Based on microscopy test, RightSign RDT had sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, 100%, 98%, 98.2%, 100%, respectively. ScreenPlus showed 100% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 98.2% PPV, 100% NPV. The sensitivity of both RDTs became lower (75%) and the specificity higher (100 %) when using real-time PCR. Both RDTs showed a 100% agreement. RT-PCR detected higher mix infection when compared to microscopy and RDTs. Conclusion: RightSign and ScreenPlus RDT have excellent performance when using microscopy detection as a gold standard. Real-time PCR method can be considered as a confirmation tool for malaria diagnosis.

scholarly journals Triplex Real Time RT-PCR for N1, N2 and RP probes from CDC EUA SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis kit

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byron Freire-Paspuel ◽  
Patricio Vega-Mariño ◽  
Alberto Velez ◽  
Marilyn Cruz ◽  
Miguel Angel Garcia-Bereguiain
Keyword(s):  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Reverse Transcription Pcr ◽  
Speed Up

AbstractCDC protocol for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) include 3 targets for detection (N1, N2 and RP) labelled with FAM so 3 PCR reactions are required per sample. We developed a triplex, real-time reverse transcription PCR for SARS-CoV-2 that maintained clinical performance compared with CDC singleplex assay. This protocol could speed up detection and save reagents during current SARS-CoV-2 testing supplies shortage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document