scholarly journals Primary palliative care. Caring for patients with life-limiting illness in the community

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 2-5
Author(s):  
Sylvia McCarthy

The 9th October 2021, was World Palliative Care Day. This year’s theme for world palliative care is “Leave No One Behind – Equity in Access to Palliative Care”. Evidence for the outcomes of early palliative care is growing. In 2014, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution that was co-sponsored by Malaysia. The resolution called for countries to improve access to palliative care as a core component of health systems, with an emphasis on primary health care and community/home-based care. One study conducted in Malaysia in 2019 estimated that by 2030, with the increase in noncommunicable diseases, 246 000 patients would require palliative care. For Malaysia to achieve equity in access to palliative care, care for these patients must be integrated into primary care. This article discusses some of the tools available for early identification of patients assessment and management of patients with palliative care needs

Author(s):  
Abigail Sy Chan ◽  
Amit Rout ◽  
Christopher R. D.’Adamo ◽  
Irina Lev ◽  
Amy Yu ◽  
...  

Background: Timely identification of palliative care needs can reduce hospitalizations and improve quality of life. The Supportive & Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) identifies patients with advanced medical conditions who may need special care planning. The Rothman Index (RI) detects patients at high risk of acutely decompensating in the inpatient setting. SPICT and RI among cancer patients were utilized in this study to evaluate their potential roles in palliative care referrals. Methods: Advanced cancer patients admitted to an institution in Baltimore, Maryland in 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, length of hospital stay (LOS), palliative care referrals, RI scores, and SPICT scores were obtained. Patients were divided into SPICT positive or negative and RI > 60 or RI < 60.Unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests were utilized to determine the associations between SPICT and RI and early palliative care needs and mortality. Results: 227 patients were included, with a mean age of 68 years, 63% Black, 59% female, with the majority having lung and GI malignancies. Sixty percent were SPICT +, 21% had RI < 60. SPICT + patients were more likely to have RI < 60 (p = 0.001). SPICT + and RI < 60 patients were more likely to have longer LOS, change in code status, more palliative/hospice referrals, and increased mortality (p <0.05). Conclusions: SPICT and RI are valuable tools in predicting mortality and palliative/hospice care referrals. These can also be utilized to initiate early palliative and goals of care discussions in patients with advanced cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 663-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Meffert ◽  
Isaak Hatami ◽  
Carola Xander ◽  
Gerhild Becker

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a growing cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. However, many patients with severe COPD do not receive adequate palliative care. The main goals of our study were to identify the percentage of hospital patients with palliative care needs, particularly those who suffer from COPD.Data were collected prospectively from inpatients at the University Medical Centre Freiburg (Freiburg, Germany). Based on the World Health Organization definition of palliative care, the treating physician reported for each patient discharged whether the patient had palliative care needs or not. Data from 39 849 patients could be analysed, of which 1455 were suffering from COPD.Of all COPD patients, 9.1% had palliative care needs. In COPD patients with palliative care needs, hospital stay was significantly longer (13.7 versus 10.3 days) than in the group without palliative care needs, and significantly more patients died during their hospital stay (8.3% versus 3.7%). The presence of metastases was the highest risk factor for developing palliative care needs (OR 4.18). Furthermore, a main diagnosis of COPD implied an increased probability of palliative care needs (OR 1.87).Our results show that COPD patients have a high risk of developing palliative care needs. Further efforts are required to provide palliative care to COPD patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dröfn Birgisdóttir ◽  
Anette Duarte ◽  
Anna Dahlman ◽  
Bengt Sallerfors ◽  
Birgit H. Rasmussen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Even when palliative care is an integrated part of the healthcare system, the quality is still substandard for many patients and often initiated too late. There is a lack of structured guidelines for identifying and caring for patients; in particular for those with early palliative care needs. A care guide can act as a compass for best practice and support the care of patients throughout their palliative trajectory. Such a guide should both meet the needs of health care professionals and patients and families, facilitating discussion around end-of-life decision-making and enabling them to plan for the remaining time in life. The aim of this article is to describe the development and pilot testing of a novel Swedish palliative care guide. Methods The Swedish Palliative Care Guide (S-PCG) was developed according to the Medical Research Council framework and based on national and international guidelines for good palliative care. An interdisciplinary national advisory committee of over 90 health care professionals together with patient, family and public representatives were engaged in the process. The feasibility was tested in three pilot studies in different care settings. Results After extensive multi-unit and interprofessional testing and evaluation, the S-PCG contains three parts that can be used independently to identify, assess, address, follow up, and document the individual symptoms and care-needs throughout the whole palliative care trajectory. The S-PCG can provide a comprehensive overview and shared understanding of the patients’ needs and possibilities for ensuring optimal quality of life, the family included. Conclusions Based on broad professional cooperation, patients and family participation and clinical testing, the S-PCG provides unique interprofessional guidance for assessment and holistic care of patients with palliative care needs, promotes support to the family, and when properly used supports high-quality personalised palliative care throughout the palliative trajectory. Future steps for the S-PCG, entails scientific evaluation of the clinical impact and effect of S-PCG in different care settings – including implementation, patient and family outcomes, and experiences of patient, family and personnel.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 164s-164s
Author(s):  
C. Goh

Background and context: According to the World Health Organization (WHO) global atlas which maps palliative care needs worldwide, just over 50% of the palliative care needs reside in Asia. Development of palliative care services in Asia is patchy, with a few high income countries, such as Singapore and Japan, with palliative care services integrated into the health system. In the vast majority of countries, particularly low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), such services are lacking or only available in a few centers. Aim: To develop palliative care services in countries with no services. Strategy/Tactics: The Asia Pacific Hospice Palliative Care Network (APHN) is a nongovernmental organization which supports the development of palliative care in the Asia Pacific region. Since 2012 , it has developed a comprehensive program to build capacity for palliative care in several countries in the region, including Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Program/Policy process: Coconceptualized and funded by the Lien Foundation, the APHN sends interdisciplinary teams of volunteer faculty to these countries to run a training of trainers program over a period of three years. Major tertiary institutions were chosen as partners, with the understanding that palliative care services would be set up once a team had been trained. An interdisciplinary team of doctors, nurses, social workers and pharmacists from each institution went through the training program together. Individuals with potential to become champions for palliative care in these countries were given further training through a clinical fellowship program at established institutions in the region. During the training participants would be expected to start palliative care services in their institutions, which will become training centers for palliative care in the future. Concomitantly, a program of advocacy for medications essential for palliative care, such as oral morphine, was also undertaken. Outcomes: Six modules of the training course were completed in each of the three countries. A corps of 20 to 30 master trainers completed the training. In each of those countries, one or more palliative care services were started in major tertiary teaching hospitals. Oral morphine availability was greatly enhanced. The master trainers organized training within their hospitals, and also for the public. Other outcomes include the recognition of palliative care as a specialty, the introduction of palliative care into undergraduate medical and nursing curricula, and development of postgraduate courses in palliative care. What was learned: It was important to target institutions which were willing establish palliative care services. An interdisciplinary group of faculty was able to teach and inspire the trainees to take up the discipline. A drug availability program was essential to provide the tools to work with.


BJGP Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. BJGPO.2020.0100
Author(s):  
Bert Leysen ◽  
Bart Van den Eynden ◽  
Johan Wens

Background: For general practitioners (GPs) to implement early palliative care, the first step is to identify patients with palliative care needs, e.g. with a no-response to the Surprise Question (SQ) (not surprised if a patient would die within a year). Aim: To describe setting-specific screening results of patients eligible for early palliative care in family practices, here defined as patients aged 45 years with a GPs’ no-answer to the SQ. Design and setting: Secondary analysis. Cross-sectional descriptive study in family practices in 5 Belgian areas. Methods: GPs were recruited by targeted sampling. As a first part of an implementation research project, participating GPs provided demographic information about themselves and also provided a response to the SQ for all patients who came to the practice in ten consecutive office days. A summary table describing the gender, age, location of contact (surgery, patient’s home, or nursing home) of the patients was provided by each GP. Results: 56 GPs provided complete data for the practice summary tables. In total 9,150 patients were described (all ages, all settings), of which 506 patients (6%) had a SQ-no-as-answer. The distribution of SQ-no-as-answer patients per setting was 152/7659 (2%) patients seen in family practice surgeries, 139/998 (14%) patients seen in their homes, and 215/493 (44%) patients seen innursing homes. Conclusions: There was quite a large number of SQ-no-as-answer patients, with possible palliative care needs. To enhance implementation of early palliative care, future research should compare results of SQ and other screening tools with palliative care symptoms assessments.


2019 ◽  
pp. 85-96
Author(s):  
Jessica H. Ballou ◽  
David H. Zonies

Trauma results in acute and chronic physical, spiritual, and emotional injuries for patients and their families that can be as devastating as their new physical limitations. Trauma patients have palliative care needs and benefit from early palliative care assessments to meet their multidisciplinary needs. Palliative care, with its focus on multidisciplinary symptom management and coordinated care, is an integral component of trauma care. Identifying persons in need of specialty palliative care, such as frail persons at the extremes of age, spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injuries, or complex comorbidities or social circumstances allows for better allocation of palliative care resources.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0248738
Author(s):  
Mirgissa Kaba ◽  
Marlieke de Fouw ◽  
Kalkidan Solomon Deribe ◽  
Ephrem Abathun ◽  
Alexander Arnold Willem Peters ◽  
...  

Introduction In Ethiopia there is an extensive unmet need for palliative care, while the burden of non-communicable diseases and cancer is increasing. This study aimed to explore palliative care needs and preferences of patients, their caregivers, and the perspective of stakeholders on service provision in palliative programs for women, mostly affected by cervical cancer and breast cancer. Methods A rapid program evaluation using a qualitative study approach was conducted in three home-based palliative care programs in Addis Ababa and Yirgalem town, Ethiopia. Female patients enrolled in the programs, and their primary caregivers were interviewed on palliative care needs, preferences and service provision. We explored the views of purposely selected stakeholders on the organization of palliative care and its challenges. Audio-taped data was transcribed verbatim and translated into English and an inductive thematic analysis was applied. Descriptive analyses were used to label physical signs and symptoms using palliative outcome scale score. Results A total of 77 interviews (34 patients, 12 primary caregivers, 15 voluntary caregivers, 16 stakeholders) were conducted. The main physical complaints were moderate to severe pain (70.6%), followed by anorexia (50.0%), insomnia, nausea and vomiting (41.2%). Social interaction and daily activities were hampered by the patients’ condition. Both patients and caregivers reported that programs focus most on treatment of symptoms, with limited psychosocial, emotional, spiritual and economic support. Lack of organizational structures and policy directions limit the collaboration between stakeholders and the availability of holistic home-based palliative care services. Conclusions Although female patients and caregivers appreciated the palliative care and support provided, the existing services did not cover all needs. Pain management and all other needed supports were lacking. Multi-sectorial collaboration with active involvement of community-based structures is needed to improve quality of care and access to holistic palliative care services.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 108-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Feld ◽  
Leora Horn ◽  
Sharon E. Phillips

108 Background: Early implementation of palliative care has shown to improve quality of life and prolong survival in pts with metastatic NSCLC. We sought to investigate the attitudes and referral practices among medical oncologists treating pts with metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Participants were identified through the IASLC 2015 membership directory. All participants were contacted via email to complete an 18-question online survey that included demographic variables as well as questions on referral practice and attitudes regarding the role of palliative care in the treatment of metastatic NSCLC pts. Results: The response rate was 31% (93/303). The majority of participants (94%) practice in an academic setting and 57% had no prior palliative care training. 88% of oncologists report easy access to palliative care providers and 94% have an affiliated palliative care practice within their institution. 83% believe there is definitive evidence in the literature supporting the benefit of early palliative care; however, 40% feel this evidence supports only improved quality of life, not prolonged survival. 58% of oncologists agree that metastatic NSCLC pts should be referred to palliative care early in their disease course. In practice, however, they refer 19% of pts to palliative care at the time of first treatment initiation and this only increases to 38% when considering all referrals made when pts are actively receiving chemotherapy. Reasons for not referring pts include lack of symptoms (56%), belief that oncologists can manage palliative care needs independently (46%), not wanting to burden pts with appointments (41%), concern that referral may not be well received by pts (38%), and long wait times (20%). Reasons for referral include inadequately managed pain (97%), no further treatment options (70%), weak support network (71%), depression/anxiety (68%), other cancer-related symptoms (69%), dwindling treatment options (66%), and lack of time to address palliative care needs (58%). Conclusions: While most oncologists acknowledge the benefit of early palliative care consultation for metastatic NSCLC pts, a minority of pts are referred and strategies to improve referrals are needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document