scholarly journals Assessing stratospheric transport in the CMAM30 simulations using ACE-FTS measurements

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicia Kolonjari ◽  
David A. Plummer ◽  
Kaley A. Walker ◽  
Chris D. Boone ◽  
James W. Elkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Dynamics Simulation ◽  
Global Circulation Models ◽  
Extratropical Tropopause ◽  
Hemisphere Winter ◽  
June July

Abstract. Stratospheric transport in global circulation models and chemistry-climate models is an important component in simulating the recovery of the ozone layer as well as changes in the climate system. The Brewer-Dobson circulation is not well constrained by observations and further investigation is required to resolve uncertainties related to the mechanisms driving the circulation. This study has assessed the specified dynamics mode of the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model (CMAM30) by comparing to the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) profile measurements of CFC-11 (CCl3F), CFC-12 (CCl2F2), and N2O. In the CMAM30 specified dynamics simulation, the meteorological fields are nudged using the ERA-Interim Reanalysis and a specified tracer was used for each species, with hemispherically-defined surface measurements used as the boundary condition. A comprehensive sampling technique along the line-of-sight of the ACE-FTS measurements has been employed to allow for direct comparisons between the simulated and measured tracer concentrations. The model consistently overpredicts tracer concentrations in the lower stratosphere, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere winter and spring seasons. The three mixing barriers investigated, including the polar vortex, the extratropical tropopause, and the tropical pipe, show that there are significant inconsistencies between the measurements and the simulations. In particular, the CMAM30 simulation exhibits too little isentropic mixing in the June-July-August season.

scholarly journals Assessing stratospheric transport in the CMAM30 simulations using ACE-FTS measurements

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 6801-6828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicia Kolonjari ◽  
David A. Plummer ◽  
Kaley A. Walker ◽  
Chris D. Boone ◽  
James W. Elkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Dynamics Simulation ◽  
Mixing Efficiency ◽  
Global Circulation Models ◽  
June July

Abstract. Stratospheric transport in global circulation models and chemistry–climate models is an important component in simulating the recovery of the ozone layer as well as changes in the climate system. The Brewer–Dobson circulation is not well constrained by observations and further investigation is required to resolve uncertainties related to the mechanisms driving the circulation. This study has assessed the specified dynamics mode of the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model (CMAM30) by comparing to the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier transform spectrometer (ACE-FTS) profile measurements of CFC-11 (CCl3F), CFC-12 (CCl2F2), and N2O. In the CMAM30 specified dynamics simulation, the meteorological fields are nudged using the ERA-Interim reanalysis and a specified tracer was employed for each species, with hemispherically defined surface measurements used as the boundary condition. A comprehensive sampling technique along the line of sight of the ACE-FTS measurements has been utilized to allow for direct comparisons between the simulated and measured tracer concentrations. The model consistently overpredicts tracer concentrations of CFC-11, CFC-12, and N2O in the lower stratosphere, particularly in the northern hemispheric winter and spring seasons. The three mixing barriers investigated, including the polar vortex, the extratropical tropopause, and the tropical pipe, show that there are significant inconsistencies between the measurements and the simulations. In particular, the CMAM30 simulation underpredicts mixing efficiency in the tropical lower stratosphere during the June–July–August season.

Variations in the Frequency of Stratospheric Sudden Warmings in CMIP5 and CMIP6 and Possible Causes

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (23) ◽  
pp. 10305-10320
Author(s):  
Zheng Wu ◽  
Thomas Reichler
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Past Research ◽  
Wave Activity ◽  
Cold Bias ◽  
Dynamical Characteristic ◽  
Vertical Resolution ◽  
Upper Lid ◽  
Extratropical Tropopause

AbstractThe climatological frequency of stratospheric sudden warming events (SSWs) is an important dynamical characteristic of the extratropical stratosphere. However, modern climate models have difficulties in simulating this frequency, with many models either considerably under- or overestimating the observational estimates. Past research has found that models with a higher upper lid tend to simulate a higher and more realistic number of SSWs. The present study revisits this issue and investigates causes for biases in the simulated SSW frequency from the CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. It is found that variations in the frequency are closely related to 1) the strength of the polar vortex and 2) the upward-propagating wave activity in the stratosphere. While it is difficult to explain the variations in the polar vortex strength from the available model output, the stratospheric wave activity is influenced by different aspects of the climatological mean state of the atmosphere in the lower stratosphere. We further find that models with a finer vertical resolution in the stratosphere are overall more realistic: vertical resolution is associated with a smaller cold bias above the extratropical tropopause, more upward-propagating wave activity in the lower stratosphere, and a higher frequency of SSWs. We conclude that not only a high model lid but also a fine vertical resolution in the stratosphere is important for simulating the dynamical variability of the stratosphere.

scholarly journals Comparison of the CMAM30 data set with ACE-FTS and OSIRIS: polar regions

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 11179-11221
Author(s):  
D. Pendlebury ◽  
D. Plummer ◽  
J. Scinocca ◽  
P. Sheese ◽  
K. Strong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapour ◽  
Southern Hemisphere ◽  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Imaging System ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Cloud Formation ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Chemical Tracers

Abstract. CMAM30 is a 30 year data set extending from 1979 to 2010 that is generated using a version of the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model (CMAM) in which the winds and temperatures are relaxed to the Interim Reanalysis product from the European Centre Medium-Range for Weather Forecasts (ERA-Interim). The data set has dynamical fields that are very close to the reanalysis below 1 hPa and chemical tracers that are self-consistent with respect to the model winds and temperature. The chemical tracers are expected to be close to actual observations. The data set is here compared to two satellite records – the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectometer and the Odin Optical Spectrograph and InfraRed Imaging System – for the purpose of validating the temperature, ozone, water vapour and methane fields. Data from the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder is also used for validation of the chemical processing in the polar vortex. It is found that the CMAM30 temperature is warm by up to 5 K in the stratosphere, with a low bias in the mesosphere of ~ 5–15 K. Ozone is reasonable (± 15%) except near the tropopause globally, and in the Southern Hemisphere winter polar vortex. Water vapour is consistently low by 10–20%, with corresponding high methane of 10–20%, except in the Southern Hemisphere polar vortex. Discrepancies in this region are shown to stem from the treatment of polar stratospheric cloud formation in the model.

Variations in The Frequency of Sudden Stratospheric Warmings in CMIP5 and CMIP6

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Wu ◽  
Thomas Reichler
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Specific Model ◽  
Wave Activity ◽  
Index Of Refraction ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Important Regulator ◽  
Extratropical Tropopause ◽  
Tropopause Temperature

<p>The frequency of sudden stratospheric warming events (SSWs) is an essential characteristic of the coupled stratosphere-troposphere system. This study is motivated by the fact that many of the CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate models considerably over- or underestimate the observed SSW frequency. The goal is to understand the causes for the large intermodel spread in the number of SSWs and relate it to specific model configurations. To this end, various dynamical quantities associated with the simulation of SSWs are investigated. It is found that variations in the SSW frequency are closely related to the strength of the polar vortex and the stratospheric wave activity. While it is difficult to explain the variations in the strength of the polar vortex, the stratospheric wave activity is strongly influenced by the background state (i.e., zonal wind and index of refraction) of the lower stratosphere. An important regulator for the background is the extratropical tropopause temperature, which in turn is associated with the vertical model resolution. Low-resolution models tend to have large biases in simulating the location and temperature of the extratropical tropopause. The results indicate that the simulated SSW frequency is a useful metric for model performance, as the frequency is highly sensitive to a number of stratospheric and tropospheric factors.</p>

scholarly journals Comparison of the CMAM30 data set with ACE-FTS and OSIRIS: polar regions

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (21) ◽  
pp. 12465-12485 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Pendlebury ◽  
D. Plummer ◽  
J. Scinocca ◽  
P. Sheese ◽  
K. Strong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapour ◽  
Southern Hemisphere ◽  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Imaging System ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Cloud Formation ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Chemical Tracers

Abstract. CMAM30 is a 30-year data set extending from 1979 to 2010 that is generated using a version of the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model (CMAM) in which the winds and temperatures are relaxed to the Interim Reanalysis product from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ERA-Interim). The data set has dynamical fields that are very close to the reanalysis below 1 hPa and chemical tracers that are self-consistent with respect to the model winds and temperature. The chemical tracers are expected to be close to actual observations. The data set is here compared to two satellite records – the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier transform spectrometer and the Odin Optical Spectrograph and Infrared Imaging System – for the purpose of validating the temperature, ozone, water vapour and methane fields. Data from the Aura microwave limb sounder are also used for validation of the chemical processing in the polar vortex. It is found that the CMAM30 temperature is warmer by up to 5 K in the stratosphere, with a low bias in the mesosphere of ~ 5–15 K. Ozone is reasonable (±15 %), except near the tropopause globally and in the Southern Hemisphere winter polar vortex. Water vapour is consistently low by 10–20 %, with corresponding high methane of 10–20 %, except in the Southern Hemisphere polar vortex. Discrepancies in this region are shown to stem from the treatment of polar stratospheric cloud formation in the model.

scholarly journals The influence of the stratosphere on the tropospheric zonal wind response to CO<sub>2</sub> doubling

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 23895-23925
Author(s):  
Y. B. L. Hinssen ◽  
C. J. Bell ◽  
P. C. Siegmund
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Zonal Wind ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Eddy Heat Flux ◽  
Wind Response ◽  
Hemisphere Winter

Abstract. The influence of a CO2 doubling on the stratospheric potential vorticity (PV) is examined in two climate models. Subsequently, the influence of changes in the stratosphere on the tropospheric zonal wind response is investigated, by inverting the stratospheric PV. Radiative effects dominate the stratospheric response to CO2 doubling in the Southern Hemisphere. These lead to a stratospheric PV increase at the edge of the polar vortex, resulting in an increased westerly influence of the stratosphere on the tropospheric midlatitude winds in late winter. In the Northern Hemisphere, dynamical effects are also important. Both models show a reduced polar PV and an enhanced midlatitude PV in the Northern Hemisphere winter stratosphere. These PV changes are related to an enhanced wave forcing of the winter stratosphere, as measured by an increase in the 100 hPa eddy heat flux, and result in a reduced westerly influence of the stratosphere on the high latitude tropospheric winds. In one model, the high latitude PV decreases are, however, restricted to higher altitudes, and the tropospheric response due to the stratospheric changes is dominated by an increased westerly influence in the midlatitudes, related to the increase in midlatitude PV in the lower stratosphere. The tropospheric response in zonal wind due to the stratospheric PV changes is of the order of 0.5 to 1 m s−1. The total tropospheric response has a somewhat different spatial structure, but is of similar magnitude. This indicates that the stratospheric influence is of importance in modifying the tropospheric zonal wind response to CO2 doubling.

Analysis of interaction between parameterized orographic gravity wave drag and resolved dynamics in CMAM.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Šácha ◽  
Aleš Kuchař ◽  
Christoph Jacobi ◽  
Petr Pišoft ◽  
Roland Eichinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Internal Gravity Waves ◽  
Wave Drag ◽  
Dynamical Analysis ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex

&lt;div class=&quot;page&quot; title=&quot;Page 1&quot;&gt; &lt;div class=&quot;layoutArea&quot;&gt; &lt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the extratropical atmosphere, Rossby waves (RWs) and internal gravity waves (GWs) propagating from the troposphere mediate a coupling with the middle atmosphere by influencing the dynamics herein. In current generation chemistry-climate models (CCMs), GWs are usually smaller than the model resolution and the majority of their spectrum therefore must be parameterized. From observations, we know that GWs are intermittent and asymmetrically distributed around the globe, which holds to some extent also for the parameterized GW drag (GWD) (in particular for orographic GWD (oGWD)). The GW parameterizations in CCMs are usually tuned to mitigate biases in the zonal mean climatology of particular quantities, but the complex interaction of parameterized GWs with the large- scale circulation and resolved waves in the models remains to date poorly understood.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This presentation will combine observational evidence, idealized modeling and dynamical analysis of a CCM output to study both the short-term and long-term model response to the oGWD. Our results demonstrate that the oGW-resolved dynamics interaction is a complex two-way process, with the most prominent oGWD impact being the alteration of propagation of planetary-scale Rossby waves on a time-scale of a few days. The conclusions give a novel perspective on the importance of oGWD for the stratospheric polar vortex and atmospheric transport studies outlining potential foci of future research.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;

scholarly journals The influence of the stratosphere on the tropospheric zonal wind response to CO<sub>2</sub> doubling

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4915-4927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. B. L. Hinssen ◽  
C. J. Bell ◽  
P. C. Siegmund
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Zonal Wind ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Eddy Heat Flux ◽  
Wind Response ◽  
Hemisphere Winter

Abstract. The influence of a CO2 doubling on the stratospheric potential vorticity (PV) is examined in two climate models. Subsequently, the influence of changes in the stratosphere on the tropospheric zonal wind response is investigated, by inverting the stratospheric PV. Radiative effects seem to dominate the stratospheric response to CO2 doubling in the Southern Hemisphere. These lead to a stratospheric PV increase at the edge of the polar vortex, resulting in an increased westerly influence of the stratosphere on the troposphere, increasing the midlatitude tropospheric westerlies in late winter. In the Northern Hemisphere, dynamical effects are also important. Both models show a reduced polar PV and an enhanced midlatitude PV in the Northern Hemisphere winter stratosphere. These PV changes are likely related to an enhanced wave forcing of the winter stratosphere, as measured by an increase in the 100 hPa eddy heat flux, and result in a reduced westerly influence of the stratosphere on the high latitude tropospheric winds. In one model, the high latitude PV decreases are, however, restricted to higher altitudes, and the tropospheric response due to the stratospheric changes is dominated by an increased westerly influence in the midlatitudes, related to the increase in midlatitude PV in the lower stratosphere. The tropospheric response in zonal wind due to the stratospheric PV changes is of the order of 0.5 to 1 m s−1. The total tropospheric response has a somewhat different spatial structure, but is of similar magnitude. This indicates that the stratospheric influence is of importance in modifying the tropospheric zonal wind response to CO2 doubling.

The Role of the Middle Atmosphere in Simulations of the Troposphere during Northern Hemisphere Winter: Differences between High- and Low-Top Models

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. 3048-3064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Sassi ◽  
R. R. Garcia ◽  
D. Marsh ◽  
K. W. Hoppel
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Lower Thermosphere ◽  
Numerical Algorithms ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Downward Propagation ◽  
Hemisphere Winter ◽  
Mean State

Abstract This paper compares present-day simulations made with two state-of-the-art climate models: a conventional model specifically designed to represent the tropospheric climate, which has a poorly resolved middle atmosphere, and a configuration that is built on the same physics and numerical algorithms but represents realistically the middle atmosphere and lower thermosphere. The atmospheric behavior is found to be different between the two model configurations, and it is shown that the differences in the two simulations can be attributed to differences in the behavior of the zonal mean state of the stratosphere, where reflection of quasi-stationary resolved planetary waves from the lid of the low-top model is prominent; the more realistic physics in the high-top model is not relevant. It is also shown that downward propagation of zonal wind anomalies during weak stratospheric vortex events is substantially different in the two model configurations. These findings extend earlier results that a poorly resolved stratosphere can influence simulations throughout the troposphere.

scholarly journals Characteristics of Arctic tides at CANDAC-PEARL (80° N, 86° W) and Svalbard (78° N, 16° E) for 2006–2009: radar observations and comparisons with the model CMAM-DAS

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1939-1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. H. Manson ◽  
C. E. Meek ◽  
X. Xu ◽  
T. Aso ◽  
J. R. Drummond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
High Arctic ◽  
Wind Component ◽  
Meteor Radar ◽  
The North ◽  
Wave Numbers ◽  
Central Canada ◽  
June July ◽  
Abstract Operation

Abstract. Operation of a Meteor Radar (MWR) at Eureka, Ellesmere Island (80° N, 86° W) began in February 2006: this is the location of the Polar Environmental and Atmospheric Research Laboratory (PEARL), operated by the "Canadian Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Change" (CANDAC). The first 36 months of tidal wind data (82–97 km) are here combined with contemporaneous tides from the Meteor Radar (MWR) at Adventdalen, Svalbard (78° N, 16° E), to provide the first significant evidence for interannual variability (IAV) of the High Arctic's diurnal and semidiurnal migrating (MT) and non-migrating tides (NMT). The three-year monthly means for both diurnal (DT) and semi-diurnal (SDT) winds demonstrate significantly different amplitudes and phases at Eureka and Svalbard. Typically the summer-maximizing DT is much larger (~24 m s−1 at 97 km) at Eureka, while the Svalbard tide (5–24 m s−1 at 97 km)) is almost linear (north-south) rather than circular. Interannual variations are smallest in the summer and autumn months. The High Arctic SDT has maxima centred on August/September, followed in size by the winter features; and is much larger at Svalbard (24 m s−1 at 97 km, versus 14–18 m s−1 in central Canada). Depending on the location, the IAV are largest in spring/winter (Eureka) and summer/autumn (Svalbard). Fitting of wave-numbers for the migrating and non-migrating tides (MT, NMT) determines dominant tides for each month and height. Existence of NMT is consistent with nonlinear interactions between migrating tides and (quasi) stationary planetary wave (SPW) S=1 (SPW1). For the diurnal oscillation, NMT s=0 for the east-west (EW) wind component dominates (largest tide) in the late autumn and winter (November–February); and s=+2 is frequently seen in the north-south (NS) wind component for the same months. The semi-diurnal oscillation's NMT s=+1 dominates from March to June/July. There are patches of s=+3 and +1, in the late fall-winter. These wave numbers are also consistent with SPW1-MT interactions. Comparisons for 2007 of the observed DT and SDT at 78–80° N, with those within the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model Data Assimilation System CMAM-DAS, are a major feature of this paper. The diurnal tides for the two locations have important similarities as observed and modeled, with seasonal maxima in the mesosphere from April to October, and similar phases with long/evanescent wavelengths. However, differences are also significant: observed Eureka amplitudes are generally larger than the model; and at Svalbard the modeled tide is classically circular, rather than anomalous. For the semi-diurnal tide, the amplitudes and phases differ markedly between Eureka and Svalbard for both MWR-radar data and CMAM-DAS data. The seasonal variations from observed and modeled archives also differ at each location. Tidal NMT-amplitudes and wave-numbers for the model differ substantially from observations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document