scholarly journals Improving cloud information over deserts from SCIAMACHY Oxygen A-band measurements

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Fournier ◽  
P. Stammes ◽  
M. de Graaf ◽  
R. van der A ◽  
A. Piters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Algorithm ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Retrieval Scheme ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ◽  
Scanning Imaging ◽  
Cloud Top Pressure ◽  
Atmospheric Trace Gas

Abstract. The retrieval of column densities and concentration profiles of atmospheric trace gas species from satellites is sensitive to light scattered by clouds. The SCanning Imaging Absorption SpectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY) instrument on the Envisat satellite, principally designed to retrieve trace gases in the atmosphere, is also capable of detecting clouds. FRESCO (Fast Retrieval Scheme for Clouds from the Oxygen A-band) is a fast and robust algorithm providing cloud information from the O2 A-band for cloud correction of ozone. FRESCO provides a consistent set of cloud products by retrieving simultaneously effective cloud fraction and cloud top pressure. The FRESCO retrieved values are compared with the SCIAMACHY Level 2 operational cloud fraction of OCRA (Optical Cloud Recognition Algorithm) but, also, with cloud information from HICRU (Heidelberg Iterative Cloud Retrieval Utilities), SACURA (SemiAnalytical CloUd Retrieval Algorithm) and the MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) instrument. The results correlate well, but FRESCO overestimates cloud fraction over deserts. Thus, to improve retrievals at these locations, the FRESCO surface albedo databases are decontaminated from the presence of desert dust aerosols. This is achieved by using the GOME Absorbing Aerosol Index. It is shown that this approach succeeds well in producing more accurate cloud information over the Sahara.

scholarly journals Improving cloud information over deserts from SCIAMACHY O<sub>2</sub> A-band

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 6013-6039 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Fournier ◽  
P. Stammes ◽  
M. de Graaf ◽  
R. van der A ◽  
A. Piters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Albedo ◽  
Recognition Algorithm ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Trace Gas ◽  
Retrieval Scheme ◽  
Scanning Imaging ◽  
Cloud Top Pressure ◽  
Atmospheric Trace Gas ◽  
Aerosol Index ◽  
Level 2

Abstract. The retrieval of column densities and concentration profiles of atmospheric trace gas species from satellites is sensitive to light scattered by clouds. The SCanning Imaging Absorption SpectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY) instrument on the Envisat satellite, principally designed to retrieve trace gases in the atmosphere, is also capable of detecting clouds. FRESCO (Fast Retrieval Scheme for Clouds from the Oxygen A-band) is a fast and robust algorithm providing cloud information from the O2 A-band for cloud correction of ozone. FRESCO provides a consistent set of cloud products by retrieving simultaneously effective cloud fraction and cloud top pressure. The FRESCO retrieved values are compared with both the SCIAMACHY Level 2 operational cloud fraction of OCRA (Optical Cloud Recognition Algorithm) and cloud information deduced from the MODIS instrument. The results correlate well, but FRESCO overestimates cloud fraction over deserts. Thus, to improve retrievals at these locations, the FRESCO surface albedo databases are decontaminated from the presence of desert dust aerosols. This is achieved by using a GOME Absorbing Aerosol Index. It is shown that this approach succeeds well in producing more accurate cloud information over the Sahara.

scholarly journals Retrieval methods of effective cloud cover for the GOME instrument: an intercomparison

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 623-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. N. E. Tuinder ◽  
R. de Winter-Sorkina ◽  
P. J. H. Builtjes
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Algorithm ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Trace Gas ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Fitting Algorithm ◽  
Retrieval Scheme ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Radiative Scattering ◽  
Atmospheric Trace Gas ◽  
Surface Observations

Abstract. The radiative scattering by clouds leads to errors in the retrieval of column densities and concentration profiles of atmospheric trace gas species from satellites. Moreover, the presence of clouds changes the UV actinic flux and the photo-dissociation rates of various species significantly. The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) instrument on the ERS-2 satellite, principally designed to retrieve trace gases in the atmosphere is also capable of detecting clouds. Four cloud fraction retrieval methods for GOME data that have been developed are discussed in this paper (the Initial Cloud Fitting Algorithm, the PMD Cloud Retrieval Algorithm, the Optical Cloud Recognition Algorithm and the Fast Retrieval Scheme for Cloud Observables). Their results of cloud fraction retrieval are compared to each-other and also to synoptic surface observations. It is shown that all studied retrieval methods calculate an effective cloud fraction that is related to a cloud with a high optical thickness. Generally, we found ICFA to produce the lowest cloud fractions, followed by OCRA, then FRESCO and PC2K along four processed tracks (+2%, +10% and +15% compared to ICFA respectively). Synoptical surface observations gave the highest absolute cloud fraction when compared with individual PMD sub-pixels of roughly the same size.

scholarly journals Comparison of the cloud top heights retrieved from MODIS and AHI satellite data with ground-based Ka-band radar

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Huo ◽  
Daren Lu ◽  
Shu Duan ◽  
Yongheng Bi ◽  
Bo Liu
Keyword(s):  
Satellite Data ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Retrieval Accuracy ◽  
Retrieval Algorithms ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

Abstract. To better understand the accuracy of cloud top heights (CTHs) derived from passive satellite data, ground-based Ka-band radar measurements from 2016 and 2017 in Beijing were compared with CTH data inferred from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI). Relative to the radar CTHs, the MODIS CTHs were found to be underestimated by −1.10 ± 2.53 km and 49 % of CTH differences were within 1.0 km. Like the MODIS results, the AHI CTHs were underestimated by −1.10 ± 2.27 km and 42 % were within 1.0 km. Both the MODIS and AHI retrieval accuracy depended strongly on the cloud depth (CD). Large differences were mainly occurring for the retrieval of thin clouds of CD  1 km, the CTH difference decreased to −0.48 ± 1.70 km for MODIS and to −0.76 ± 1.63 km for AHI. MODIS CTHs greater than 6 km showed better agreement with the radar data than those less than 4 km. Statistical analysis showed that the average AHI CTHs were lower than the average MODIS CTHs by −0.64 ± 2.36 km. The monthly accuracy of both retrieval algorithms was studied and it was found that the AHI retrieval algorithm had the largest bias in winter while the MODIS retrieval algorithm had the lowest accuracy in spring.

scholarly journals MODIS Cloud Detection Evaluation Using CALIOP over Polluted Eastern China

Atmosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saichun Tan ◽  
Xiao Zhang ◽  
Guangyu Shi
Keyword(s):  
Eastern China ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Cloud Detection ◽  
Haze Pollution ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Cloud Optical Thickness ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

Haze pollution has frequently occurred in winter over Eastern China in recent years. Over Eastern China, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud detection data were compared with the Cloud–Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) for three years (2013–2016) for three kinds of underlying surface types (dark, bright, and water). We found that MODIS and CALIOP agree most of the time (82% on average), but discrepancies occurred at low CALIOP cloud optical thickness (COT < 0.4) and low MODIS cloud top height (CTH < 1.5 km). In spring and summer, the CALIOP cloud fraction was higher by more than 0.1 than MODIS due to MODIS’s incapability of observing clouds with a lower COT. The discrepancy increased significantly with a decrease in MODIS CTH and an increase in aerosol optical depth (AOD, about 2–4 times), and MODIS observed more clouds that were undetected by CALIOP over PM2.5 > 75 μg m−3 regions in autumn and particularly in winter, suggesting that polluted weather over Eastern China may contaminate MODIS cloud detections because MODIS will misclassify a heavy aerosol layer as cloudy under intense haze conditions. Besides aerosols, the high solar zenith angle (SZA) in winter also affects MODIS cloud detection, and the ratio of MODIS cloud pixel numbers to CALIOP cloud-free pixel numbers at a high SZA increased a great deal (about 4–21 times) relative to that at low SZA for the three surfaces. As a result of the effects of aerosol and SZA, MODIS cloud fraction was 0.08 higher than CALIOP, and MODIS CTH was more than 2 km lower than CALIOP CTH in winter. As for the cloud phases and types, the results showed that most of the discrepancies could be attributed to water clouds and low clouds (cumulus and stratocumulus), which is consistent with most of the discrepancies at low MODIS CTH.

scholarly journals Reconciling Simulated and Observed Views of Clouds: MODIS, ISCCP, and the Limits of Instrument Simulators

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 4699-4720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Pincus ◽  
Steven Platnick ◽  
Steven A. Ackerman ◽  
Richard S. Hemler ◽  
Robert J. Patrick Hofmann
Keyword(s):  
Optical Thickness ◽  
Model Error ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Global Models ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ◽  
Cloud Top Pressure

Abstract The properties of clouds that may be observed by satellite instruments, such as optical thickness and cloud-top pressure, are only loosely related to the way clouds are represented in models of the atmosphere. One way to bridge this gap is through “instrument simulators,” diagnostic tools that map the model representation to synthetic observations so that differences can be interpreted as model error. But simulators may themselves be restricted by limited information or by internal assumptions. This paper considers the extent to which instrument simulators are able to capture essential differences between the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP), two similar but independent estimates of cloud properties. The authors review the measurements and algorithms underlying these two cloud climatologies, introduce a MODIS simulator, and detail datasets developed for comparison with global models using ISCCP and MODIS simulators. In nature MODIS observes less midlevel cloudiness than ISCCP, consistent with the different methods used to determine cloud-top pressure; aspects of this difference are reproduced by the simulators. Differences in observed distributions of optical thickness, however, are not captured. The largest differences can be traced to different approaches to partly cloudy pixels, which MODIS excludes and ISCCP treats as homogeneous. These cover roughly 15% of the planet and account for most of the optically thinnest clouds. Instrument simulators cannot reproduce these differences because there is no way to synthesize partly cloudy pixels. Nonetheless, MODIS and ISCCP observations are consistent for all but the optically thinnest clouds, and models can be robustly evaluated using instrument simulators by integrating over the robust subset of observations.

scholarly journals The Continuity MODIS-VIIRS Cloud Mask

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 3334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Frey ◽  
Steven A. Ackerman ◽  
Robert E. Holz ◽  
Steven Dutcher ◽  
Zach Griffith
Keyword(s):  
Infrared Imaging ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Cloud Detection ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Hit Rates ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ◽  
Cloud Mask

This paper introduces the Continuity Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Cloud Mask (MVCM), a cloud detection algorithm designed to facilitate continuity in cloud detection between the MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) on the Aqua and Terra platforms and the series of VIIRS (Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite) instruments, beginning with the Soumi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (SNPP) spacecraft. It is based on the MODIS cloud mask that has been operating since 2000 with the launch of the Terra spacecraft (MOD35) and continuing in 2002 with Aqua (MYD35). The MVCM makes use of fourteen spectral bands that are common to both MODIS and VIIRS so as to create consistent cloud detection between the two instruments and across the years 2000–2020 and beyond. Through comparison data sets, including collocated Aqua MODIS and Cloud-Aerosol LIdar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) from the A-Train, this study was designed to assign statistical consistency benchmarks between the MYD35 and MVCM cloud masks. It is shown that the MVCM produces consistent cloud detection results between Aqua MODIS, SNPP VIIRS, and NOAA-20 VIIRS and that the quality is comparable to the standard Aqua MODIS cloud mask. Globally, comparisons with collocated CALIOP lidar show combined clear and cloudy sky hit rates of 88.2%, 87.5%, 86.8%, and 86.8% for MYD35, MVCM Aqua MODIS, MVCM SNPP VIIRS, and MVCM NOAA-20 VIIRS, respectively, for June through until August, 2018. For the same months and in the same order for 60S–60N, hit rates are 90.7%, 90.5%, 90.1%, and 90.3%. From the time series constructed from gridded daily means of 60S–60N cloud fractions, we found that the mean day-to-day cloud fraction differences/standard deviations in percent to be 0.68/0.55, 0.94/0.64, −0.20/0.50, and 0.44/0.82 for MVCM Aqua MODIS-MVCM SNPP VIIRS day and night, and MVCM NOAA-20 VIIRS-MVCM SNPP VIIRS day and night, respectively. It is seen that the MODIS and VIIRS 1.38 µm cirrus detection bands perform similarly but with MODIS detecting slightly more clouds in the middle to high levels of the troposphere and the VIIRS detecting more in the upper troposphere above 16 km. In the Arctic, MVCM Aqua MODIS and SNPP VIIRS reported cloud fraction differences of 0–3% during the mid-summer season and −3–4% during the mid-winter.

scholarly journals A Comparison of MODIS-Derived Cloud Fraction with Surface Observations at Five SURFRAD Sites

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 1009-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning An ◽  
Kaicun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Solar Radiation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Surface Radiation ◽  
Convective Clouds ◽  
Solar Radiation Incident ◽  
Surface Data ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

AbstractClouds determine the amount of solar radiation incident to the surface. Accurately quantifying cloud fraction is of great importance but is difficult to accomplish. Satellite and surface cloud observations have different fields of view (FOVs); the lack of conformity of different FOVs may cause large discrepancies when comparing satellite- and surface-derived cloud fractions. From the viewpoint of surface-incident solar radiation, this paper compares Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) level-2 cloud-fraction data with three surface cloud-fraction datasets at five Surface Radiation Network (SURFRAD) sites. The correlation coefficients between MODIS and the surface cloud fractions are in the 0.80–0.91 range and vary at different SURFRAD sites. In a number of cases, MODIS observations show a large cloud-fraction bias when compared with surface data. The variances between MODIS and the surface cloud-fraction datasets are more apparent when small convective or broken clouds exist in the FOVs. The magnitude of the discrepancy between MODIS and surface-derived cloud fractions depends on the satellite’s view zenith angle (VZA). On average, relative to surface cloud-fraction data, MODIS observes a larger cloud fraction at VZA > 40° and a smaller cloud fraction at VZA < 20°. When comparing long-term MODIS averages with surface datasets, Aqua MODIS observes a higher annual mean cloud fraction, likely because convective clouds are better developed in the afternoon when Aqua is observing.

scholarly journals Retrieval methods of effective cloud cover from the GOME instrument: an intercomparison

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. N. E. Tuinder ◽  
R. de Winter-Sorkina ◽  
P. J. H. Builtjes
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Algorithm ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Trace Gas ◽  
Actinic Flux ◽  
Fitting Algorithm ◽  
Retrieval Scheme ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Radiative Scattering ◽  
Atmospheric Trace Gas ◽  
Surface Observations

Abstract. The radiative scattering by clouds leads to errors in the retrieval of column densities and concentration profiles of atmospheric trace gas species from satellites. Moreover, the presence of clouds changes the UV actinic flux and the photo-dissociation rates of various species significantly. The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) instrument on the ERS-2 satellite, principally designed to retrieve trace gases in the atmosphere, is also capable of detecting clouds. Four cloud fraction retrieval methods for GOME data that have been developed are discussed in this paper (the Initial Cloud Fitting Algorithm, the PMD Cloud Recognition Algorithm, the Optical Cloud Recognition Algorithm (an in-house version and the official implementation) and the Fast Retrieval Scheme for Clouds from the Oxygen A-band). Their results of cloud fraction retrieval are compared to each-other and also to synoptic surface observations. It is shown that all studied retrieval methods calculate an effective cloud fraction that is related to a cloud with a high optical thickness. Generally, we found ICFA to produce the lowest cloud fractions, followed by our in-house OCRA implementation, FRESCO, PC2K and finally the official OCRA implementation along four processed tracks (+2%, +10%, +15% and +25% compared to ICFA respectively). Synoptical surface observations gave the highest absolute cloud fraction when compared with individual PMD sub-pixels of roughly the same size.

scholarly journals Indirect Assessment of Sedimentation in Hydropower Dams Using MODIS Remote Sensing Images

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Condé ◽  
Jean-Michel Martinez ◽  
Marco Pessotto ◽  
Raúl Villar ◽  
Gérard Cochonneau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Trapping Efficiency ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Independent Field ◽  
Hydropower Dams ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ◽  
Sedimentation Processes

In this study, we used moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite images to quantify the sedimentation processes in a cascade of six hydropower dams along a 700-km transect in the Paranapanema River in Brazil. Turbidity field measurement acquired over 10 years were used to calibrate a turbidity retrieval algorithm based on MODIS surface reflectance products. An independent field dataset was used to validate the remote sensing estimates showing fine accuracy (RMSE of 9.5 NTU, r = 0.75, N = 138). By processing 13 years of MODIS images since 2000, we showed that satellite data can provide robust turbidity monitoring over the entire transect and can identify extreme sediment discharge events occurring on daily to annual scales. We retrieved the decrease in the water turbidity as a function of distance within each reservoir that is related to sedimentation processes. The remote sensing-retrieved turbidity decrease within the reservoirs ranged from 2 to 62% making possible to infer the reservoir type and operation (storage versus run-of-river reservoirs). The reduction in turbidity assessed from space presented a good relationship with conventional sediment trapping efficiency calculations, demonstrating the potential use of this technology for monitoring the intensity of sedimentation processes within reservoirs and at large scale.

scholarly journals Adaption of the MODIS aerosol retrieval algorithm using airborne spectral surface reflectance measurements over urban areas: a case study

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 5237-5249 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Jäkel ◽  
B. Mey ◽  
R. Levy ◽  
X. Gu ◽  
T. Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urban Areas ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Surface Reflectance ◽  
Airborne Measurements ◽  
Modis Aod ◽  
Urban Sample ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

Abstract. MODIS (MOderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) retrievals of aerosol optical depth (AOD) are biased over urban areas, primarily because the reflectance characteristics of urban surfaces are different than that assumed by the retrieval algorithm. Specifically, the operational "dark-target" retrieval is tuned towards vegetated (dark) surfaces and assumes a spectral relationship to estimate the surface reflectance in blue and red wavelengths. From airborne measurements of surface reflectance over the city of Zhongshan, China, were collected that could replace the assumptions within the MODIS retrieval algorithm. The subsequent impact was tested upon two versions of the operational algorithm, Collections 5 and 6 (C5 and C6). AOD retrieval results of the operational and modified algorithms were compared for a specific case study over Zhongshan to show minor differences between them all. However, the Zhongshan-based spectral surface relationship was applied to a much larger urban sample, specifically to the MODIS data taken over Beijing between 2010 and 2014. These results were compared directly to ground-based AERONET (AErosol RObotic NETwork) measurements of AOD. A significant reduction of the differences between the AOD retrieved by the modified algorithms and AERONET was found, whereby the mean difference decreased from 0.27±0.14 for the operational C5 and 0.19±0.12 for the operational C6 to 0.10±0.15 and -0.02±0.17 by using the modified C5 and C6 retrievals. Since the modified algorithms assume a higher contribution by the surface to the total measured reflectance from MODIS, consequently the overestimation of AOD by the operational methods is reduced. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the MODIS AOD retrieval with respect to different surface types was investigated. Radiative transfer simulations were performed to model reflectances at top of atmosphere for predefined aerosol properties. The reflectance data were used as input for the retrieval methods. It was shown that the operational MODIS AOD retrieval over land reproduces the AOD reference input of 0.85 for dark surface types (retrieved AOD = 0.87 (C5)). An overestimation of AOD = 0.99 is found for urban surfaces, whereas the modified C5 algorithm shows a good performance with a retrieved value of AOD = 0.86.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document