scholarly journals Supplementary material to "The Fifth International Workshop on Ice Nucleation phase 2 (FIN-02): Laboratory intercomparison of ice nucleation measurements"

Author(s):  
Paul J. DeMott ◽  
Ottmar Möhler ◽  
Daniel J. Cziczo ◽  
Naruki Hiranuma ◽  
Markus D. Petters ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Mahrt ◽  
Claudia Marcolli ◽  
Robert O. David ◽  
Philippe Grönquist ◽  
Eszter J. Barthazy Meier ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Elena C. Maters ◽  
Donald B. Dingwell ◽  
Corrado Cimarelli ◽  
Dirk Müller ◽  
Thomas F. Whale ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Jones ◽  
M. J. Flynn ◽  
P. J. DeMott ◽  
O. Möhler

Abstract. An ice nucleus counter was developed and constructed to enable investigation of potential ice nucleating materials. The Manchester Ice Nucleus Chamber (MINC) is a concentric-cylinder continuous flow diffusion chamber (CFDC). A full explanation of the MINC instrument is given here, along with first results and a comparison to an established instrument of similar design (Colorado State University CFDC) during sampling of common ice nucleating aerosols at the 2007 International workshop on Comparing Ice nucleation Measuring Systems (ICIS-2007). MINC and CSU-CFDC detected the onset of ice nucleation under similar conditions of temperature and supersaturation for several different types of ice nuclei. Comparisons of the ratio of ice nuclei to total aerosol concentrations as a function of supersaturation with respect to water (SSw) showed agreement within one order of magnitude. Possible reasons for differences between the two instruments relating to differences in their design are discussed, along with suggestions to future improvements to the current design.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7512-7512 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Goy ◽  
S. H. Bernstein ◽  
B. S. Kahl ◽  
B. Djulbegovic ◽  
M. J. Robertson ◽  
...  

7512 Background: Bortezomib (VELCADE, Vc), a novel proteasome inhibitor, is approved in relapsed multiple myeloma and has shown activity in MCL in phase 2 NHL studies. Methods: Patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory MCL with a maximum of 2 prior therapies received Vc 1.3mg/m2 i.v. on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-d cycle for up to 1y. Full accrual (155 pts) was completed in this multicenter, phase 2 study. Primary endpoint was TTP, secondary endpoints included RR and duration of response (DOR). Response (International Workshop Criteria) was assessed by the investigators and separately by the sponsor using central radiology review. Results: Data are available for 154 pts. Baseline characteristics included median age 65y, 81% male, 28% KPS <90%, 35% LDH > normal, 43% IPI ≥3, 74% stage IV MCL. 90% of pts had prior intensive therapy (e.g. Hyper CVAD, CHOP, EPOCH), 96% had prior rituximab, and 14% had prior stem cell transplant. Median duration of Vc treatment was 4 cycles. 138 pts were evaluable for response. By investigator assessment, RR was 35% (CR + CRu = 8%) and median DOR was 9.2 mo. Median TTP was 5.5 mo (all patients, n = 154). Using central radiology review RR was 31% (CR + CRu = 7%), median DOR was 4.6 mo and median TTP was 4.1 mo. With median follow-up of 10 mo, median survival has not been reached. The most common non-hematologic AEs were fatigue (14% ≥grade 3), GI events (≥grade 3 diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea/vomiting in 5%, 4%, and 3%, respectively), and peripheral neuropathies (7% ≥grade 3). Hematologic toxicities were minimal except for transient thrombocytopenia (10% ≥grade 3), as previously seen with Vc. Conclusions: This study confirms the activity of Vc in relapsed/refractory MCL in a multicenter international setting and supports its rapid development as a new treatment for relapsed MCL. Vc is also being studied in the first-line setting in combination with standard chemotherapy. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte M. Beall ◽  
Dolan Lucero ◽  
Thomas C. Hill ◽  
Paul J. DeMott ◽  
M. Dale Stokes ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 20857-20886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. A. Kanji ◽  
P. J. DeMott ◽  
O. Möhler ◽  
J. P. D. Abbatt

Abstract. The University of Toronto continuous flow diffusion chamber (UT-CFDC) was used to study heterogeneous ice nucleation at the International Workshop on Comparing Ice Nucleation Measuring Systems (ICIS 2007) which also represented the 4th ice nucleation workshop, on 14–28 September 2007. One goal of the workshop was to inter-compare different ice nucleation measurement techniques using the same aerosol sample source and preparation method. The aerosol samples included four types of desert mineral dust, graphite soot particles, and live and dead bacterial cells (Snomax®). This paper focuses on the UT-CFDC results, with a comparison to techniques of established heritage including the Colorado State CFDC and the AIDA expansion chamber. Good agreement was found between the different instruments with a few specific differences attributed to the variation in how onset of ice formation is defined between the instruments. It was found that when efficiency of ice formation is based on the lowest onset relative humidity, Snomax® particles were most efficient followed by the desert dusts and then soot. For all aerosols, deposition mode freezing was only observed for T < 245 K except for the dead bacteria where freezing occurred below water saturation as warm as 263 K.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document