Extending the Ice Watch system as a citizen science project for the collection of In-Situ sea ice observations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole Jakob Hegelund ◽  
Alistair Everett ◽  
Ted Cheeseman ◽  
Penelope Wagner ◽  
Nick Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Citizen Science ◽  
European Space Agency ◽  
Earth Observation ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
User Engagement ◽  
The Antarctic

<p>The Ice Watch program coordinates routine visual observations of sea-ice including icebergs and meteorological parameters. The development and use of the Arctic Shipborne Sea Ice Standardization Tool (ASSIST) software has enabled the program to collect over 6 800 records from numerous ship voyages and it is complementary to the Antarctic Sea-ice Processes and Climate (ASPeCt) in the Antarctic. These observations will enhance validation and calibration of data from the Copernicus Sentinel satellites and other Earth Observation missions where the lack of routine spatially and temporally coincident data from the Polar Regions hinders the development of automatic classification products. A critical piece of information for operations and research, photographic records of observations, is often missing. As mobile phones are nearly ubiquitous and feature high-quality cameras, capable of recording accurate ancillary timing and positional information we are developing the IceWatchApp to aid users in supplementing observations with a photographic record.</p><p>The IceWatchApp has been funded by the Citizen Science Earth Observation Lab (CSEOL) programme of the European Space Agency and the Polar Citizen Science Collective, which has successfully implemented similar observation projects within atmospherics, biology and marine geosciences, is collaborating in its development. The image database will aid the training of machine learning algorithms for automatic sea ice type classification and provide a mechanism for crowd-sourcing identification through an “ask a scientist” feedback feature. The app will also have the capability to provide near real-time satellite and Copernicus services products back to the user, thereby educating them on Earth Observation, and giving them an improved understanding of the surrounding environment.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Polar regions, Arctic, Antarctic, data collection, In-Situ measurements, remote sensing, Sea Ice, user engagement, citizen science, Earth Observation.<br><strong>Abstract</strong>: to session 35413</p><p> </p>

A comparison of Arctic and Antarctic climate change, present and future

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Atmospheric Circulation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Southern Annular Mode ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Apparent Paradox ◽  
Late 20Th Century ◽  
Model Simulations ◽  
The Antarctic

AbstractOngoing climate variations in the Arctic and Antarctic pose an apparent paradox. In contrast to the large warming and loss of sea ice in the Arctic in recent decades, Antarctic temperatures and sea ice show little change except for the Antarctic Peninsula. However, model simulations indicate that the Arctic changes have been shaped largely by low-frequency variations of the atmospheric circulation, superimposed on a greenhouse warming that is apparent in model simulations when ensemble averages smooth out the circulation-driven variability of the late 20th century. By contrast, the Antarctic changes of recent decades appear to be shaped by ozone depletion and an associated strengthening of the southern annular mode of the atmospheric circulation. While the signature of greenhouse-driven change is projected to emerge from the natural variability during the present century, the emergence of a statistically significant greenhouse signal may be slower than in other regions. Models suggest that feedbacks from retreating sea ice will make autumn and winter the seasons of the earliest emergence of the greenhouse signal in both Polar Regions. Priorities for enhanced robustness of the Antarctic climate simulations are the inclusion of ozone chemistry and the realistic simulation of water vapour over the Antarctic Ice Sheet.

scholarly journals Trends in the polar sea ice coverage under climate change scenario

MAUSAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-616
Author(s):  
AMITA PRABHU ◽  
P.N. MAHAJAN ◽  
R.M. KHALADKAR
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Interannual Variability ◽  
Arctic Region ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Change Scenario ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Ice Coverage ◽  
Satellite Microwave ◽  
The Antarctic

The development in the satellite microwave technology during the past three decades has offered an opportunity to the scientific community to access the sea ice data over the polar regions, which was otherwise inaccessible for continuous monitoring by any other means. The present study focuses on the trends in the Sea Ice Extent (SIE) over different sectors of the Arctic and the Antarctic regions and the interannual variability in their extremes. In general, the data over the period (1979-2007) reveal marked interannual variability in the sea ice cover with an increasing and the decreasing trend over the Antarctic and the Arctic region respectively. Over the southern hemisphere, only the Bellingshausen and Amundsen Seas sector shows an exceptional decreasing trend. However, in the northern hemisphere, all the sectors show a decreasing trend, with the Kara and Barents Seas sector being the most prominent one. Although, the decreasing trend of the SIE over the Arctic could be attributed to the global warming, an intriguing question still remains as to why the other polar region shows a different behaviour.

Notes on a General Purpose Boat for use in Polar Regions

Polar Record ◽  
1941 ◽  
Vol 3 (22) ◽  
pp. 399-406
Author(s):  
R. E. D. Ryder
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Important Requirement ◽  
The Antarctic

Few will dispute the fact that some type of boat for work in polar regions is an important requirement for all who live or travel there. As a corollary I think that few will agree about the exact type required. The reason for this is that the various regions of both Arctic and Antarctic differ widely, and it would be a mistake to suppose that the same set of conditions applies to all the coasts of the polar regions. With a view to provoking interest in this very absorbing subject, the following article describes a boat which was built in the Antarctic by the British Graham Land Expedition and was designed with the knowledge we had of that coast. Whether or not this boat would be suitable in other areas is better decided by those who may have a more varied knowledge of the Arctic and Antarctic foreshores and of travelling across sea ice.

scholarly journals Wintertime enhancements of sea salt aerosol in polar regions consistent with a sea ice source from blowing snow

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 3699-3712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiayue Huang ◽  
Lyatt Jaeglé
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Open Ocean ◽  
Sea Salt ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Blowing Snow ◽  
In Situ Observations ◽  
Frost Flowers ◽  
Mass Concentrations

Abstract. Sea salt aerosols (SSA) are generated via air bubbles bursting at the ocean surface as well as by wind mobilization of saline snow and frost flowers over sea-ice-covered areas. The relative magnitude of these sources remains poorly constrained over polar regions, affecting our ability to predict their impact on halogen chemistry, cloud formation, and climate. We implement a blowing snow and a frost flower emission scheme in the GEOS-Chem global chemical transport model, which we validate against multiyear (2001–2008) in situ observations of SSA mass concentrations at three sites in the Arctic, two sites in coastal Antarctica, and from the 2008 ICEALOT cruise in the Arctic. A simulation including only open ocean emissions underestimates SSA mass concentrations by factors of 2–10 during winter–spring for all ground-based and ship-based observations. When blowing snow emissions are added, the model is able to reproduce observed wintertime SSA concentrations, with the model bias decreasing from a range of −80 to −34 % for the open ocean simulation to −2 to +9 % for the simulation with blowing snow emissions. We find that the frost flower parameterization cannot fully explain the high wintertime concentrations and displays a seasonal cycle decreasing too rapidly in early spring. Furthermore, the high day-to-day variability of observed SSA is better reproduced by the blowing snow parameterization. Over the Arctic (> 60° N) (Antarctic, > 60° S), we calculate that submicron SSA emissions from blowing snow account for 1.0 Tg yr−1 (2.5 Tg yr−1), while frost flower emissions lead to 0.21 Tg yr−1 (0.25 Tg yr−1) compared to 0.78 Tg yr−1 (1.0 Tg yr−1) from the open ocean. Blowing snow emissions are largest in regions where persistent strong winds occur over sea ice (east of Greenland, over the central Arctic, Beaufort Sea, and the Ross and Weddell seas). In contrast, frost flower emissions are largest where cold air temperatures and open leads are co-located (over the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, coastal regions of Siberia, and off the Ross and Ronne ice shelves). Overall, in situ observations of mass concentrations of SSA suggest that blowing snow is likely to be the dominant SSA source during winter, with frost flowers playing a much smaller role.

scholarly journals Wintertime enhancements of sea salt aerosol in polar regions consistent with a sea-ice source from blowing snow

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiayue Huang ◽  
Lyatt Jaeglé
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Open Ocean ◽  
Sea Salt ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Blowing Snow ◽  
In Situ Observations ◽  
Frost Flowers ◽  
Mass Concentrations

Abstract. Sea salt aerosols (SSA) are generated via air bubbles bursting at the ocean surface, as well as by wind mobilization of saline snow and frost flowers over sea-ice covered areas. The relative magnitude of these sources remains poorly constrained over polar regions, affecting our ability to predict their impact on halogen chemistry, cloud formation and climate. We implement a blowing snow and a frost flower emission scheme in the GEOS-Chem global chemical transport model, which we validate against multi-year (2001–2008) in situ observations of SSA mass concentrations at three sites in the Arctic, two sites in coastal Antarctica, as well as during a cruise in the Arctic (ICEALOT, 2008). A simulation including only open ocean emissions underestimates SSA mass concentrations by factors of 2–10 during winter-spring for all ground-based and ship-based observations. When blowing snow emissions are added, the model is able to reproduce observed wintertime SSA concentrations, with the model bias decreasing from a range of −80 % to −34 % for the open ocean simulation to −2 % to +9 % for the simulation with blowing snow emissions. We find that the frost flower parameterization cannot fully explain the high wintertime concentrations and displays a seasonal cycle decreasing too rapidly in early spring. Furthermore, the high day-to-day variability of observed SSA is better reproduced by the blowing snow parameterization. Over the Arctic (Antarctic), we calculate that submicron SSA emissions from blowing snow account for 1.0 (2.5) Tg yr−1, while frost flower emissions lead to 0.25 (0.14) Tg yr−1 compared to 0.78 (1.0) Tg yr−1 from the open ocean. Blowing snow emissions are largest in regions where persistent strong winds occur over sea ice (East of Greenland, over the central Arctic, Beaufort Sea, as well as the Ross and Weddell Seas). In contrast, frost flower emissions are largest where cold air temperatures, open leads and mild winds are co-located (over the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, coastal regions of Siberia, and off the Ross and Ronne ice shelves). Overall, in situ observations of mass concentrations of SSA suggest that blowing snow is likely to be the dominant SSA source during winter, with frost flowers playing a much smaller role.

The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) in Arctic and Atarctic

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 56-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Gogorev ◽  
N. I. Samsonov
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Taxonomic Composition ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Species Number ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Arctic Seas ◽  
Cosmopolitan Species ◽  
Number Of Species ◽  
Antarctic Waters ◽  
The Antarctic

A floristic review of the genus Chaetoceros from Arctic and Antarctic waters is undertaken. Taxonomic composition of the Chaetoceros from the Russian Arctic seas, as well as from some regions of the Antarctic was investigated in both water column and sea ice. The genus is rather diverse in both polar regions: 55 species in Arctic and 34 ones in Antarctic. The regions differ in total number of species, number of species belonging to the subgenera Chaetoceros and Hyalochaete and to different sections. Species of the genus are often dominant and the most abundant in Arctic phytoplankton. However, the genus is not prevailing in number of the dominant species as well as in share of the total cell abundance of Antarctic phytoplankton. The importance of the species in sea ice assemblages of the Antarctic is more significant as compared with the Arctic. The Arctic is characterized by cosmopolitan species and those widely distributed in the Northern Hemisphere, more than half of the Chaetoceros taxa are common to all Arctic seas. The Antarctic has a high percentage of endemic Chaetoceros species. Both polar regions are similar in terms of Chaetoceros species composition mainly due to cosmopolitan species.

Sea surface height anomaly of the ice-covered oceans from ICESat-2 and CryoSat-2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Bagnardi ◽  
Nathan Kurtz ◽  
Alek Petty ◽  
Ron Kwok
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
European Space Agency ◽  
Sea Surface Height ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Height Anomaly ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Waveform Data ◽  
Polar Oceans ◽  
Sea Surface Height Anomaly

<p>Rapid changes in Earth’s sea ice and land ice have caused significant disruption to the polar oceans in terms of fresh water storage, ocean circulation, and the overall energy balance. While we can routinely monitor, from space, the ocean surface at lower latitudes, measurements of sea surface in the ice-covered oceans remains challenging due to sampling deficiencies and the need to discriminate returns between sea ice and ocean.</p><p>The European Space Agency’s (ESA) CryoSat-2 satellite has been acquiring unfocussed synthetic aperture radar altimetry data over the polar regions since 2010, providing a key breakthrough in our ability to routintely monitor the ice-covered oceans. Since October 2018, NASA’s Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) and its onboard Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter (ATLAS) have provided new measurements of sea ice and sea surface elevations over similar polar regions. With over two years of overlapping data, we now have the opportunity to compare coincident sea surface height retrievals from the two missions and assess potential elevation differences over two entire freeze-melt cycles across both polar oceans .</p><p>Also, as of August 2020, CryoSat-2’s orbit has been modified as part of the <em>CRYO2ICE</em> campaign, such that every 19 orbits (20 orbits for ICESat-2) the two satellites align for hundreds of kilometers over the Arctic Ocean, acquiring data along coincident ground tracks with a time difference of approximately three hours.</p><p>In this work, we compare sea surface height anomaly (SSHA) retrievals from CryoSat-2 (Level 1b and Level 2 data) and  ICESat-2 (Level 3a data, ATL10). We apply a recently updated waveform fitting method to the CryoSat-2 waveform data (Level 1b) to determine the retracking corrections,  based on <em>Kurtz et al.</em> (2014). We apply the same mean sea surface adjustment used for ICESat-2 to CryoSat-2 data, and we apply similar geophysical and atmospheric corrections to both datasets.</p><p>While we find an overall good agreement between the two datasets, some discrepancies between CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 SSHA estimates remain. In this work we explore the potential causes of these discrepancies, related to both lead finding/distribution, and range biases.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Impacts of assimilating Arctic surface sea salinities from SMOS in a coupled ocean and sea ice reanalysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiping Xie ◽  
Roshin P. Raj ◽  
Laurent Bertino ◽  
Justino Martínez ◽  
Carolina Gabarró ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
European Space Agency ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Nordic Seas

<p>In the Arctic, the sea surface salinity (SSS) has a key role in processes related to mixing, sea ice melt and freeze. However, due to insufficient salinity observations, uncertainties in present Arctic ocean forecasts and reanalysis are still large. Thanks to the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission, two successive versions of regional gridded SSS products for the Arctic Ocean have been developed by the Barcelona Expert Centre (BEC). These two SSS products (V2 and V3) are available from the BEC (http://bec.icm.csic.es/) and the Arctic+Salinity project funded by the ESA (https://arcticsalinity.argans.co.uk).<br>In this study, we show the impacts of assimilating the SMOS SSS  in a coupled ocean and sea ice forecasting system.</p><p>TOPAZ4, the Arctic component of the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Services (CMEMS), is a coupled ice-ocean data assimilative system, using the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) to assimilate jointly all available ocean and sea ice observations over the whole Arctic. Via the CMEMS portal, TOPAZ4 provides the products of both reanalysis and operational forecasts. Two parallel runs of TOPAZ4 are integrated from July to December in 2016, during which either the V2 or V3 SSS data product is assimilated in addition to other available data sources (altimeter data, SST, sea ice concentration, sea ice drift, T/S profiles, sea ice thickness). Independent in situ salinity profiles are used for validation of the model runs in three regions: 1) in the Beaufort Sea; 2) around Greenland; 3) in the Nordic Seas. Compared to the runs without SSS assimilation, the results show the reduction of a severe saline bias in the Beaufort Sea: 15.9% (V2) and 28.6% (V3), also the Root Mean Squared differences (RMSD) decreased by 10.8% (V2) and 16.2% (V3). Around Greenland, the SSS bias is decreased by 17.3% and the RMSD by 8.2% (V3 only). There are neither degradations or improvements for V2 both around Greenland and in the Nordic Seas. These basic statistics suggest the benefits of assimilating SMOS data on the TOPAZ4 outputs and the advantages from the V3 SSS product especially compared to the V2 product.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Arctic Ocean; Sea Surface Salinity; TOPAZ4; In situ; RMSD;</p>

Invasion of the Poles

2020 ◽  
pp. 216-246
Author(s):  
Joanna Legeżyńska ◽  
Claude De Broyer ◽  
Jan Marcin Węsławski
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Life Histories ◽  
Life Cycles ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Similar Species ◽  
Strong Impact ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Regional Food ◽  
Polar Species ◽  
The Antarctic

Polar Crustacea show high taxonomic and functional diversity and hold crucial roles within regional food webs. Despite the differences in the evolutionary history of the two Polar regions, present data suggest rather similar species richness, with over 2,250 taxa recorded in the Antarctic and over 1,930 noted in the Arctic. A longer duration of isolated evolution resulted in a high percentage of endemic species in the Antarctic, while the relatively young Arctic ecosystem, subjected to advection from adjacent seas, shows a very low level of endemism. Low temperatures and seasonal changes of food availability have a strong impact on polar crustacean life histories, resulting in their slow growth and development, extended life cycles, and reproduction well synchronized with annual peaks of primary production. Many species, Antarctic amphipods in particular, exhibit a clear tendency to attain large size. In both regions, abundant populations of pelagic grazers play a pivotal role in the transport of energy and nutrients to higher trophic levels. The sea-ice habitat unique to polar seas supports a wide range of species, with euphausiids and amphipods being the most important in terms of biomass in the Antarctic and Arctic, respectively. Deep sea fauna remains poorly studied, with new species being collected on a regular basis. Ongoing processes, namely a decline of sea-ice cover, increasing levels of ultraviolet radiation, and invasions of sub-polar species, are likely to reshape crustacean communities in both Polar regions.

scholarly journals Comparing and contrasting the behaviour of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice over the 35 year period 1979-2013

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (69) ◽  
pp. 18-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Simmonds
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Sea ◽  
The Antarctic

AbstractWe examine the evolution of sea-ice extent (SIE) over both polar regions for 35 years from November 1978 to December 2013, as well as for the global total ice (Arctic plus Antarctic). Our examination confirms the ongoing loss of Arctic sea ice, and we find significant (p˂ 0.001) negative trends in all months, seasons and in the annual mean. The greatest rate of decrease occurs in September, and corresponds to a loss of 3 x 106 km2 over 35 years. The Antarctic shows positive trends in all seasons and for the annual mean (p˂0.01), with summer attaining a reduced significance (p˂0.10). Based on our longer record (which includes the remarkable year 2013) the positive Antarctic ice trends can no longer be considered ‘small’, and the positive trend in the annual mean of (15.29 ± 3.85) x 103 km2 a–1 is almost one-third of the magnitude of the Arctic annual mean decrease. The global annual mean SIE series exhibits a trend of (–35.29 ± 5.75) x 103 km2 a-1 (p<0.01). Finally we offer some thoughts as to why the SIE trends in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Phase 5 (CMIP5) simulations differ from the observed Antarctic increases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document