The sensitivity of landscape evolution models to spatial and temporal rainfall resolution
Abstract. Climate is one of the main drivers for landscape evolution models (LEMs), yet its representation is often basic with values averaged over long time periods and frequently lumped to the same value for the whole basin. Clearly, this hides the heterogeneity of precipitation – but what impact does this averaging have on LEM outcomes? This paper examines the sensitivity of the CAESAR-Lisflood LEM to different spatial and temporal precipitation resolutions – as well as how this interacts with different size drainage basins over short and long time scales. A range of simulations were carried out varying rainfall from 0.25 hour, 5 km to 24 hour lumped resolution over three different sized basins for 30 year durations. Results showed that there was a sensitivity to temporal and spatial resolution, with the finest leading to > 100 % increases in basin sediment yields. To look at how these interactions manifested over longer time scales, several simulations were carried out to model a 1000 year period. These showed a systematic bias towards greater erosion in uplands and deposition in valley floors with the highest spatial and temporal resolution data. Further tests showed that this effect was due solely to the data resolution, not from other (e.g. orographic) factors. The implications of these findings are that past and present LEMs may be under-predicting basin sediment yields, as well upland erosion and downstream deposition - that may have significant impacts on the modelled basin profile and shape.