scholarly journals Evaluating residual error approaches for post-processing monthly and seasonal streamflow forecasts

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitsum Woldemeskel ◽  
David McInerney ◽  
Julien Lerat ◽  
Mark Thyer ◽  
Dmitri Kavetski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skill Score ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Residual Error ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
Processing Scheme ◽  
Error Models ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System

Abstract. Streamflow forecasting is prone to substantial uncertainty due to errors in meteorological forecasts, hydrological model structure and parameterization, as well as in the observed rainfall and streamflow data used to calibrate the models. Statistical streamflow post-processing is an important technique available to improve the probabilistic properties of the forecasts. This study evaluates three residual error models based on the logarithmic (Log), log-sinh (Log-Sinh) and Box-Cox with λ = 0.2 (BC0.2) transformation schemes and identifies the best performing scheme for post-processing monthly and seasonal (3-months) streamflow forecasts, such as those produced by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Using the Bureau’s operational dynamic streamflow forecasting system, we carry out comprehensive analysis of the three post-processing schemes across 300 Australian catchments with a wide range of hydro-climatic conditions. Forecast verification is assessed using reliability and sharpness metrics, as well as the Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Score (CRPSS). Results show that the uncorrected forecasts (i.e. without post-processing) are unreliable at half of the catchments. Post-processing using the three residual error models substantially improves reliability, with more than 90 % of forecasts classified as reliable. In terms of sharpness, the BC0.2 scheme significantly outperforms the Log and Log-Sinh schemes. Overall, the BC0.2 scheme achieves reliable and sharper-than-climatology forecasts at a larger number of catchments than the Log and Log-Sinh error models. This study is significant because the reliable and sharper forecasts obtained using the BC0.2 post-processing scheme will help water managers and users of the forecasting service to make better-informed decisions in planning and management of water resources.

scholarly journals Evaluating post-processing approaches for monthly and seasonal streamflow forecasts

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 6257-6278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitsum Woldemeskel ◽  
David McInerney ◽  
Julien Lerat ◽  
Mark Thyer ◽  
Dmitri Kavetski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skill Score ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
Processing Scheme ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow ◽  
Sharpness Metrics

Abstract. Streamflow forecasting is prone to substantial uncertainty due to errors in meteorological forecasts, hydrological model structure, and parameterization, as well as in the observed rainfall and streamflow data used to calibrate the models. Statistical streamflow post-processing is an important technique available to improve the probabilistic properties of the forecasts. This study evaluates post-processing approaches based on three transformations – logarithmic (Log), log-sinh (Log-Sinh), and Box–Cox with λ=0.2 (BC0.2) – and identifies the best-performing scheme for post-processing monthly and seasonal (3-months-ahead) streamflow forecasts, such as those produced by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Using the Bureau's operational dynamic streamflow forecasting system, we carry out comprehensive analysis of the three post-processing schemes across 300 Australian catchments with a wide range of hydro-climatic conditions. Forecast verification is assessed using reliability and sharpness metrics, as well as the Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Score (CRPSS). Results show that the uncorrected forecasts (i.e. without post-processing) are unreliable at half of the catchments. Post-processing of forecasts substantially improves reliability, with more than 90 % of forecasts classified as reliable. In terms of sharpness, the BC0.2 scheme substantially outperforms the Log and Log-Sinh schemes. Overall, the BC0.2 scheme achieves reliable and sharper-than-climatology forecasts at a larger number of catchments than the Log and Log-Sinh schemes. The improvements in forecast reliability and sharpness achieved using the BC0.2 post-processing scheme will help water managers and users of the forecasting service make better-informed decisions in planning and management of water resources. Highlights. Uncorrected and post-processed streamflow forecasts (using three transformations, namely Log, Log-Sinh, and BC0.2) are evaluated over 300 diverse Australian catchments. Post-processing enhances streamflow forecast reliability, increasing the percentage of catchments with reliable predictions from 50 % to over 90 %. The BC0.2 transformation achieves substantially better forecast sharpness than the Log-Sinh and Log transformations, particularly in dry catchments.

Does the application of multiple hydrological models improve seasonal streamflow forecasting skill?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian Klein ◽  
Ilias Pechlivanidis ◽  
Louise Arnal ◽  
Louise Crochemore ◽  
Dennis Meissner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Europe ◽  
Bayesian Model Averaging ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

<p>Many sectors, such as hydropower, agriculture, water supply and waterway transport, need information about the possible evolution of meteorological and hydrological conditions in the next weeks and months to optimize their decision processes on a long term. With increasing availability of meteorological seasonal forecasts, hydrological seasonal forecasting systems have been developed all over the world in the last years. Many of them are running in operational mode. On European scale the European Flood Awareness System EFAS and SMHI are operationally providing seasonal streamflow forecasts. In the context of the EU-Horizon2020 project IMPREX additionally a national scale forecasting system for German waterways operated by BfG was available for the analysis of seasonal forecasts from multiple hydrological models.</p><p>Statistical post processing tools could be used to estimate the predictive uncertainty of the forecasted variable from deterministic / ensemble forecasts of a single / multi-model forecasting system. Raw forecasts shouldn’t be used directly by users without statistical post-processing because of various biases. To assess the added potential benefit of the application of a hydrological multi-model ensemble, the forecasting systems from EFAS, SMHI and BfG were forced by re-forecasts of the ECMWF’s Seasonal Forecast System 4 and the resulting seasonal streamflow forecasts have been verified for 24 gauges across Central Europe. Additionally two statistical forecasting methods - Ensemble Model Output Statistics EMOS and Bayesian Model Averaging BMA - have been applied to post-process the forecasts.</p><p>Overall, seasonal flow forecast skill is limited in Central Europe before and after post-processing with a current predictability of 1-2 months. The results of the multi-model analysis indicate that post-processing of raw forecasts is necessary when observations are used as reference. Post-processing improves forecast skill significantly for all gauges, lead times and seasons. The multi-model combination of all models showed the highest skill compared to the skill of the raw forecasts and the skill of the post-processed results of the individual models, i.e. the application of several hydrological models for the same region improves skill, due to the different model strengths.</p>

scholarly journals Assessment of an ensemble seasonal streamflow forecasting system for Australia

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Bennett ◽  
Quan J. Wang ◽  
David E. Robertson ◽  
Andrew Schepen ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lead Times ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Forecast Horizon ◽  
Australian Continent ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Ephemeral Rivers ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. Despite an increasing availability of skillful long-range streamflow forecasts, many water agencies still rely on simple resampled historical inflow sequences (stochastic scenarios) to plan operations over the coming year. We assess a recently developed forecasting system called forecast guided stochastic scenarios (FoGSS) as a skillful alternative to standard stochastic scenarios for the Australian continent. FoGSS uses climate forecasts from a coupled ocean-land-atmosphere prediction system, post-processed with the method of calibration, bridging and merging. Ensemble rainfall forecasts force a monthly rainfall-runoff model, while a staged hydrological error model quantifies and propagates hydrological forecast uncertainty through forecast lead times. FoGSS is able to generate ensemble streamflow forecasts in the form of monthly time series to a 12-month forecast horizon. FoGSS is tested on 63 Australian catchments that cover a wide range of climates, including 21 ephemeral rivers. In all perennial and many ephemeral catchments, FoGSS provides an effective alternative to resampled historical inflow sequences. FoGSS generally produces skillful forecasts at shorter lead times (

scholarly journals Benchmarking Real-Time Streamflow Forecast Skill in the Himalayan Region

Forecasting ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-247
Author(s):  
Ganesh R. Ghimire ◽  
Sanjib Sharma ◽  
Jeeban Panthi ◽  
Rocky Talchabhadel ◽  
Binod Parajuli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Water Policy ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Critical Issue ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Forecast ◽  
Time Flow ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts

Improving decision-making in various areas of water policy and management (e.g., flood and drought preparedness, reservoir operation and hydropower generation) requires skillful streamflow forecasts. Despite the recent advances in hydrometeorological prediction, real-time streamflow forecasting over the Himalayas remains a critical issue and challenge, especially with complex basin physiography, shifting weather patterns and sparse and biased in-situ hydrometeorological monitoring data. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of low-complexity data-driven persistence-based approaches for skillful streamflow forecasting in the Himalayan country Nepal. The selected approaches are: (1) simple persistence, (2) streamflow climatology and (3) anomaly persistence. We generated the streamflow forecasts for 65 stream gauge stations across Nepal for short-to-medium range forecast lead times (1 to 12 days). The selected gauge stations were monitored by the Department of Hydrology and Meteorology (DHM) Nepal, and they represent a wide range of basin size, from ~17 to ~54,100 km2. We find that the performance of persistence-based forecasting approaches depends highly upon the lead time, flow threshold, basin size and flow regime. Overall, the persistence-based forecast results demonstrate higher forecast skill in snow-fed rivers over intermittent ones, moderate flows over extreme ones and larger basins over smaller ones. The streamflow forecast skill obtained in this study can serve as a benchmark (reference) for the evaluation of many operational forecasting systems over the Himalayas.

Seasonal streamflow forecasting - Which are the drivers controlling the forecast quality?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilias Pechlivanidis ◽  
Louise Crochemore ◽  
Thomas Bosshard
Keyword(s):  
A Priori ◽  
Hydrological Regime ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Key Drivers ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow ◽  
Forecast Quality

<p>Streamflow information for the months ahead is of great value to existing decision-making practices, particularly to those affected by the vagaries of the climate and who would benefit from better understanding and managing climate-related risks. Despite the large effort, there is still limited knowledge of the key drivers controlling the quality of the seasonal streamflow forecasts. In this investigation, we show that the seasonal streamflow predictability can be clustered, and hence regionalised, based on a priori knowledge of local hydro-climatic conditions. To reach these conclusions we analyse the seasonal forecasts of streamflow volumes across about 35400 basins in Europe, which vary in terms of climatology, scale and hydrological regime. We then link the forecast quality to various descriptors including physiography, hydro-climatic characteristics and meteorological biases. This allows the identification of the key drivers along a strong hydro-climatic gradient. Results show that, as expected, the seasonal streamflow predictability varies geographically and seasonally with acceptable values for the first lead months. In addition, the predictability deteriorates with increasing lead months particularly in the winter months. Nevertheless, we show that the forecast quality is well correlated to a set of drivers, which vary depending on the initialization month. The forecast quality of seasonal streamflow volumes is strongly dependent on the basin’s hydrological regime, with quickly reacting basins (of low river memory) showing limited predictability. On the contrary, snow and/or baseflow dominated regions with long recessions (and hence high river memory) show high streamflow predictability. Finally, climatology and precipitation biases are also strongly related to streamflow predictability, highlighting the importance of developing robust bias-adjustment methods.</p>

scholarly journals The benefit of using an ensemble of seasonal streamflow forecasts in water allocation decisions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Kaune ◽  
Faysal Chowdhury ◽  
Micha Werner ◽  
James Bennett
Keyword(s):  
Water Allocation ◽  
Irrigation Season ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Additional Time ◽  
Initial Allocation ◽  
Available Water ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Reservoir Inflow ◽  
Allocation Decisions

Abstract. The area to be cropped in irrigation districts needs to be planned according to the allocated water, which in turn is a function of the available water resource. Initially conservative estimates of future (in) flows in rivers and reservoirs may lead to unnecessary reduction of the water allocated. Though water allocations may be revised as the season progresses, inconsistency in allocation is undesirable to farmers as they may then not be able to use that water, leading to an opportunity cost in agricultural production. We assess the benefit of using reservoir inflow estimates derived from seasonal forecast datasets to improve water allocation decisions. A decision model is developed to emulate the feedback loop between simulated reservoir storage and water allocations to irrigated crops, and is evaluated using inflow forecasts generated with the Forecast Guided Stochastic Scenarios (FoGSS) model, a 12-month ensemble streamflow forecasting system. Two forcings are used to generate the forecasts: ESP (historical rainfall) and POAMA (calibrated rainfall forecasts from the POAMA climate prediction system). We evaluate the approach in the Murrumbidgee basin in Australia, comparing water allocations obtained with an expected reservoir inflow from FoGSS against the allocations obtained with the currently used conservative estimate based on climatology, as well as against allocations obtained using observed inflows (perfect information). The inconsistency in allocated water is evaluated by determining the total changes in allocated water made every 15 days from the initial allocation at the start of the water year to the end of the irrigation season, including both downward and upward revisions of allocations. Results show that the inconsistency due to upward revisions in allocated water is lower when using the forecast datasets (POAMA and ESP) compared to the conservative inflow estimates (reference) which is beneficial to the planning of cropping areas by farmers. Overconfidence can, however, lead to an increase in undesirable downward revisions. This is more evident for dry years than for wet years. Over the 28 years for which allocation decisions are evaluated, we find that the accuracy of the available water estimates using the forecast ensemble improves progressively during the water year; especially one and a half months before the start of the cropping season in November. This is significant as it provides farmers additional time to make key decision on planting.

scholarly journals Performance of ensemble streamflow forecasts under varied hydrometeorological conditions

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harm-Jan F. Benninga ◽  
Martijn J. Booij ◽  
Renata J. Romanowicz ◽  
Tom H. M. Rientjes
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Snow Accumulation ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Precipitation And Temperature

Abstract. The paper presents a methodology to give insight in the performance of ensemble streamflow forecasting systems. We developed an ensemble forecasting system for the Biała Tarnowska, a mountainous river catchment in southern Poland, and analysed the performance for lead times from 1 day to 10 days for low, medium and high streamflow and related runoff generating processes. Precipitation and temperature forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts serve as input to a deterministic lumped hydrological (HBV) model. Due to inconsistent bias, the best streamflow forecasts were obtained without pre- and post-processing of the meteorological and streamflow forecasts. Best forecast skill, relative to alternative forecasts based on historical measurements of precipitation and temperature, is shown for high streamflow and for snow accumulation low streamflow events. Forecasts of medium streamflow events and low streamflow events generated by precipitation deficit show less skill. To improve the performance of the forecasting system for high streamflow events, in particular the meteorological forecasts require improvement. For low streamflow forecasts, the hydrological model should be improved. The study recommends improving the reliability of the ensemble streamflow forecasts by including the uncertainties in hydrological model parameters and initial conditions, and by improving the dispersion of the meteorological input forecasts.

scholarly journals Improving Operational Short- to Medium-Range (SR2MR) Streamflow Forecasts in the Upper Zambezi Basin and Its Sub-Basins Using Variational Ensemble Forecasting

Hydrology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Valdés-Pineda ◽  
Juan B. Valdés ◽  
Sungwook Wi ◽  
Aleix Serrat-Capdevila ◽  
Tirthankar Roy
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Optimal Parameter ◽  
Ensemble Forecasting ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Satellite Precipitation ◽  
Daily Streamflow ◽  
Medium Range ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System

The combination of Hydrological Models and high-resolution Satellite Precipitation Products (SPPs) or regional Climatological Models (RCMs), has provided the means to establish baselines for the quantification, propagation, and reduction in hydrological uncertainty when generating streamflow forecasts. This study aimed to improve operational real-time streamflow forecasts for the Upper Zambezi River Basin (UZRB), in Africa, utilizing the novel Variational Ensemble Forecasting (VEF) approach. In this regard, we describe and discuss the main steps required to implement, calibrate, and validate an operational hydrologic forecasting system (HFS) using VEF and Hydrologic Processing Strategies (HPS). The operational HFS was constructed to monitor daily streamflow and forecast them up to eight days in the future. The forecasting process called short- to medium-range (SR2MR) streamflow forecasting was implemented using real-time rainfall data from three Satellite Precipitation Products or SPPs (The real-time TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis TMPA-RT, the NOAA CPC Morphing Technique CMORPH, and the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed data using Artificial Neural Networks, PERSIANN) and rainfall forecasts from the Global Forecasting System (GFS). The hydrologic preprocessing (HPR) strategy considered using all raw and bias corrected rainfall estimates to calibrate three distributed hydrological models (HYMOD_DS, HBV_DS, and VIC 4.2.b). The hydrologic processing (HP) strategy considered using all optimal parameter sets estimated during the calibration process to increase the number of ensembles available for operational forecasting. Finally, inference-based approaches were evaluated during the application of a hydrological postprocessing (HPP) strategy. The final evaluation and reduction in uncertainty from multiple sources, i.e., multiple precipitation products, hydrologic models, and optimal parameter sets, was significantly achieved through a fully operational implementation of VEF combined with several HPS. Finally, the main challenges and opportunities associated with operational SR2MR streamflow forecasting using VEF are evaluated and discussed.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the ECMWF System 4 climate forecasts for streamflow forecasting in the Upper Hanjiang River Basin

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1864-1879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuqiang Tian ◽  
Yilu Li ◽  
Tongtiegang Zhao ◽  
Hongchang Hu ◽  
Florian Pappenberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Processing Method ◽  
Water Diversion ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Distributed Hydrological Model ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Hanjiang River

Abstract This paper assesses the potential of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) System 4 forecasts and investigates the post-processing precipitation to enhance the skill of streamflow forecasts. The investigation is based on hydrological modelling and is conducted through the case study of the Upper Hanjiang River Basin (UHRB). A semi-distributed hydrological model, TsingHua Representative Elementary Watershed (THREW), is implemented to simulate the rainfall–runoff processes, with the help of hydrological ensemble prediction system (HEPS) approach. A post-processing method, quantile mapping method, is applied to bias correct the raw precipitation forecasts. Then we evaluate the performance of raw and post-processed streamflow forecasts for the four hydrological stations along the mainstream of Hanjiang River from 2001 to 2008. The results show that the performance of the streamflow forecasts is greatly enhanced with post-processing precipitation forecasts, especially in pre-dry season (November and December), thus providing useful information for water supply management of the central route of South to North Water Diversion Project (SNWDP). The raw streamflow forecasts tend to overpredict and present similarly to forecast accuracy with the extended streamflow prediction (ESP) approach. Streamflow forecast skill is considerably improved when applying post-processing method to bias correct the ECMWF System 4 precipitation forecasts.

scholarly journals Performance of ensemble streamflow forecasts under varied hydrometeorological conditions

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 5273-5291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harm-Jan F. Benninga ◽  
Martijn J. Booij ◽  
Renata J. Romanowicz ◽  
Tom H. M. Rientjes
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Snow Accumulation ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Hydrometeorological Conditions

Abstract. The paper presents a methodology that gives insight into the performance of ensemble streamflow-forecasting systems. We have developed an ensemble forecasting system for the Biała Tarnowska, a mountainous river catchment in southern Poland, and analysed the performance for lead times ranging from 1 to 10 days for low, medium and high streamflow and different hydrometeorological conditions. Precipitation and temperature forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts served as inputs to a deterministic lumped hydrological (HBV) model. Due to a non-homogeneous bias in time, pre- and post-processing of the meteorological and streamflow forecasts are not effective. The best forecast skill, relative to alternative forecasts based on meteorological climatology, is shown for high streamflow and snow accumulation low-streamflow events. Forecasts of medium-streamflow events and low-streamflow events under precipitation deficit conditions show less skill. To improve performance of the forecasting system for high-streamflow events, the meteorological forecasts are most important. Besides, it is recommended that the hydrological model be calibrated specifically on low-streamflow conditions and high-streamflow conditions. Further, it is recommended that the dispersion (reliability) of the ensemble streamflow forecasts is enlarged by including the uncertainties in the hydrological model parameters and the initial conditions, and by enlarging the dispersion of the meteorological input forecasts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document