scholarly journals Is YoutubeTM an accurate source of patient-information for awareness about periodontal diseases?

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Berceste Güler ◽  
Büşra Özaltun
Keyword(s):  
Periodontal Disease ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Periodontal Diseases ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Quality Scale ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Youtube Videos ◽  
Hygiene Education

Objectives: Oral hygiene education and patient awareness are crucial for prevention and the sustainability of its treatment because of high prevalence of periodontal diseases. This study aimed to evaluate YouTube videos related to periodontal diseases and assess them comprehensively, reliability, and quality for non-professional internet users.Methods: YouTube search was performed using the three keywords: ‘periodontal disease’, ‘gingival disease,’ and ‘gum disease’. Video lengths, duration, numbers of total views, likes, dislikes, comments values were recorded. The interaction index, viewing rates and video power index (VPI) were calculated. Comprehensiveness tailor-made index was assessed for content, Global Quality Scale (GQS), and DISCERN scales were used for reliability and quality of videos.Results: A total of 210 videos were evaluated, and 79 videos were included in the study. While 69 of the videos are useful videos, 9 of them have misleading video content. VPI values were found 2.88±0.67 for useful videos and 1.78±0.66 for misleading videos. The mean GQS value of the videos has seen as 2.76±0.7. According to the DISCERN score, 41.8% of the videos show poor quality. The number of videos with comprehensiveness value (2) score is 44 and the number of videos (1) score is 35.Conclusions: YouTube videos may be used as an education source about periodontal disease for non-professional users; however, videos need to be improved in terms of content and quality. These and similar publications may be supported for the optimization of videos to be shared on YouTube with periodontal disease and oral hygiene education.

scholarly journals Videos, Views, and Vaccines: Evaluating the Quality of COVID-19 Communications on YouTube

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
H.K. Marwah ◽  
K. Carlson ◽  
N.A. Rosseau ◽  
K.C. Chretien ◽  
T. Kind ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Health Communications ◽  
The Public ◽  
Closed Captioning ◽  
News Sources ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Quality Scale ◽  
Youtube Videos ◽  
Modern Landscape

Abstract Objective: As the COVID-19 vaccine is introduced, it is critical to recognize that public opinion on vaccines is largely influenced by health communications, with YouTube being a major source of information and misinformation. This analysis graded the accuracy, quality, and reliability of the most viewed YouTube videos depicting COVID-19 and vaccinations over a six-month period. Methods: We collected hyperlinks for the 150 most viewed YouTube videos discussing COVID-19 from January through June 2020. Closed captioning data was searched for the term “vaccine,” yielding 32 videos. This sample was evaluated for quality, accuracy, and reliability using a rubric that incorporated existing instruments: Global Quality Scale (GQS), JAMA Benchmark Criteria, and DISCERN. Results: These 32 videos had 139,764,188 views at the time of data collection. The majority of videos received low scores, with network news sources receiving the lowest scores overall. Conclusions: The overall quality of COVID-19 YouTube videos related to vaccines may be low and raises a precautionary alert for the public consuming these videos and for healthcare providers working to provide the best information to their patients. Existing scoring tools may not capture the complexities of social media. New tools could allow for a better understanding of the modern landscape of health communications.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Youtube Video Content About Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Oztermeli ◽  
Nazım Karahan
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review Process ◽  
International Health ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Youtube Videos ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Time ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study is to investigate the quality and reliability of YouTube videos regarding developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).YouTube is one of the most popular websites used as a source of information, but the variety in authorship and lack of a peer-review process are problems.Methods: The search string “developmental dysplasia of the hip” was inputted to the YouTube search engine, and the first 52 videos returned as a response were assessed. The Video Power Index (VPI) (like ratio*view ratio/100) was used to assess the popularity of the videos. Global Quality Score (GQS) and developmental dysplasia of the hip scores (DDHS) were used to evaluate the quality and educational quality of the videos, and The Journal of the American Medical Association Score (JAMAS) was used to evaluate the accuracy of the source of information.Results: According to our research, the mean duration time of the videos was 526 s (SD: 813), and the average view count of the videos was 34,644. The mean time since upload was 1907 days (SD: 1137). On average, the videos received 10.9 comments, 210.3 likes, and 6.8 dislikes. The mean like ratio and VPI were 92.9 (SD: 19.57) and 25.8 (SD: 53.43), respectively. The mean JAMAS, GQS, and DDHS of all videos evaluated were 1.37 (SD: 0.7), 2.46 (SD: 1.09), and 4.63 (SD: 5.00), respectively. The DDHS and GQS were positively correlated (p:0.001 r: 65.8%). The GQS and the DDHS were higher in the academic group than in the commercial group (p:0.01). (p:0.037).Conclusions: The videos regarding DDH on YouTube generally had poor quality. As a result, to maintain an optimal parent–physician or patient–physician relationship, we suggest that international health societies make their own educational videos for parents, patients, and fellow physicians.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Youtube Video Content About Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Oztermeli ◽  
Nazım Karahan
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review Process ◽  
International Health ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Youtube Videos ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Time ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study is to investigate the quality and reliability of YouTube videos regarding developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).YouTube is one of the most popular websites used as a source of information, but the variety in authorship and lack of a peer-review process are problems.Methods: The search string “developmental dysplasia of the hip” was inputted to the YouTube search engine, and the first 52 videos returned as a response were assessed. The Video Power Index (VPI) (like ratio*view ratio/100) was used to assess the popularity of the videos. Global Quality Score (GQS) and developmental dysplasia of the hip scores (DDHS) were used to evaluate the quality and educational quality of the videos, and The Journal of the American Medical Association Score (JAMAS) was used to evaluate the accuracy of the source of information.Results: According to our research, the mean duration time of the videos was 526 s (SD: 813), and the average view count of the videos was 34,644. The mean time since upload was 1907 days (SD: 1137). On average, the videos received 10.9 comments, 210.3 likes, and 6.8 dislikes. The mean like ratio and VPI were 92.9 (SD: 19.57) and 25.8 (SD: 53.43), respectively. The mean JAMAS, GQS, and DDHS of all videos evaluated were 1.37 (SD: 0.7), 2.46 (SD: 1.09), and 4.63 (SD: 5.00), respectively. The DDHS and GQS were positively correlated (p:0.001 r: 65.8%). The GQS and the DDHS were higher in the academic group than in the commercial group (p:0.01). (p:0.037).Conclusions: The videos regarding DDH on YouTube generally had poor quality. As a result, to maintain an optimal parent–physician or patient–physician relationship, we suggest that international health societies make their own educational videos for parents, patients, and fellow physicians.

scholarly journals Tetrahydrocannabinol and Skin Cancer: Analysis of YouTube Videos (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrina Mamo ◽  
Mindy D Szeto ◽  
Roya Mirhossaini ◽  
Andrew Fortugno ◽  
Robert P Dellavalle
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Cancer Information ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Inaccurate Information ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Quality Scale ◽  
Social Media Platforms

BACKGROUND Cannabis oil is being used topically by patients with skin cancer as a homeopathic remedy, and has been promoted and popularized on social media, including YouTube. Although topical cannabinoids, especially tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), may have antitumor effects, results from a sparse number of clinical trials and peer-reviewed studies detailing safety and efficacy are still under investigation. OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the accuracy, quality, and reliability of THC oil and skin cancer information available on YouTube. METHODS The 10 most-viewed videos on THC oil and skin cancer were analyzed with the Global Quality Scale (GQS), DISCERN score, and useful/misleading criteria based on presentation of erroneous and scientifically unproven information. The videos were also inspected for source, length, and audience likes/dislikes. Top comments were additionally examined based on whether they were favorable, unfavorable, or neutral regarding the video content. RESULTS All analyzed videos (10/10, 100%) received a GQS score of 1, corresponding to poor quality of content, and 9/10 (90%) videos received a DISCERN score of 0, indicating poor reliability of information presented. All 10 videos were also found to be misleading and not useful according to established criteria. Top comments were largely either favorable (13/27, 48%) or neutral (13/27, 48%) toward the content of the videos, compared to unfavorable (1/27, 4%). CONCLUSIONS Dermatologists should be aware that the spread of inaccurate information on skin cancer treatment currently exists on popular social media platforms and may lead to detrimental consequences for patients interested in pursuing alternative or homeopathic approaches.

scholarly journals Tetrahydrocannabinol and Skin Cancer: Analysis of YouTube Videos

10.2196/26564 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e26564
Author(s):  
Andrina Mamo ◽  
Mindy D Szeto ◽  
Roya Mirhossaini ◽  
Andrew Fortugno ◽  
Robert P Dellavalle
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Cancer Information ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Inaccurate Information ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Quality Scale ◽  
Social Media Platforms

Background Cannabis oil is being used topically by patients with skin cancer as a homeopathic remedy, and has been promoted and popularized on social media, including YouTube. Although topical cannabinoids, especially tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), may have antitumor effects, results from a sparse number of clinical trials and peer-reviewed studies detailing safety and efficacy are still under investigation. Objective We sought to assess the accuracy, quality, and reliability of THC oil and skin cancer information available on YouTube. Methods The 10 most-viewed videos on THC oil and skin cancer were analyzed with the Global Quality Scale (GQS), DISCERN score, and useful/misleading criteria based on presentation of erroneous and scientifically unproven information. The videos were also inspected for source, length, and audience likes/dislikes. Top comments were additionally examined based on whether they were favorable, unfavorable, or neutral regarding the video content. Results All analyzed videos (10/10, 100%) received a GQS score of 1, corresponding to poor quality of content, and 9/10 (90%) videos received a DISCERN score of 0, indicating poor reliability of information presented. All 10 videos were also found to be misleading and not useful according to established criteria. Top comments were largely either favorable (13/27, 48%) or neutral (13/27, 48%) toward the content of the videos, compared to unfavorable (1/27, 4%). Conclusions Dermatologists should be aware that the spread of inaccurate information on skin cancer treatment currently exists on popular social media platforms and may lead to detrimental consequences for patients interested in pursuing alternative or homeopathic approaches.

YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Exercise and Compensated Maneuver of Dysphagia (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Cheol Chang ◽  
Donghwi Park
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Related Information ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Quality Scale ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Dysphagia Rehabilitation ◽  
Youtube Videos ◽  
Dysphagia Therapy

BACKGROUND Acquiring online health-related information has become increasingly widespread. OBJECTIVE In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality of the most viewed YouTube videos on dysphagia on exercise and compensated maneuver. METHODS We searched for the keywords “dysphagia exercise,” “dysphagia rehabilitation,” “dysphagia maneuver,” “dysphagia therapy,” and “dysphagia compensation” on YouTube on February 5, 2021. The educational quality of videos on YouTube was investigated based on the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and categorized into three groups: high-, intermediate-, and low-quality. The modified DISCERN tool was used to evaluate the reliability of the YouTube videos. Video parameters were compared between the groups according to the quality of the videos. RESULTS Of the 51 videos evaluated, according to the GQS, 54.9% (n = 28), 35.3% (n = 18) quality, and 9.8% (n = 5) were of high-, intermediate- and low-quality, respectively. When the video parameters were compared among the groups, there were no significant differences in the number of views, likes, dislikes, or comments per day (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference in the DISCERN scores between the groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS YouTube can be deemed as a predominant source for high-quality videos on dysphagia exercise and compensated maneuvers. However, YouTube should be accepted as a mixed pool with high-, intermediate-, and low-quality videos. Therefore, healthcare professionals, such as physicians and therapists, should verify the suitability and quality of the video, and suggest it to the patient, to ensure that the patient gets the appropriate information.

scholarly journals YouTube Information about Diabetes and Oral Healthcare (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Pons-Fuster ◽  
Ruiz Roca Juan ◽  
Asta Tvarijonaviciute ◽  
Pia Lopez- Jornet
Keyword(s):  
Personal Experience ◽  
User Interaction ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Misleading Information ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Quality Scale

BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that is increasing at an alarming rate all over the world OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the information available on YouTube on diabetes and oral healthcare METHODS This cross-sectional study made a search in YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/) applying the search terms “oral healthcare for diabetics.” Two reviewers assessed the videos and categorized them into useful, misleading or personal experience, and scored them using a global quality scale (GQS) from 1-5 according to their overall quality (1 = poor quality; 5 = excellent quality). The source of each video was also registered, as was user interaction with each video RESULTS A total of 97 videos were included for analysis. Of these, 30 (30.9%) contained useful information, 61 (62.9%) contained misleading information, and six (6.2%) recounted personal experiences. Overall quality scores showed statistically significant differences between those containing useful information and those with misleading information and personal experience (p=0.001). Significant differences in content were also found regarding oral hygiene (p=0.022), periodontitis (p=0.002), and infection (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS YouTube provides informative videos about oral healthcare for diabetics. The quality of the videos was variable and the videos recorded by dental professionals and Universities showed a higher quality. Further research is needed into oral healthcare for diabetics.

scholarly journals Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-186
Author(s):  
Cem Yener ◽  
Sinan Ates
Keyword(s):  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Quality Scale ◽  
Youtube Videos ◽  
The Mean

Aim: Non-invasive prenatal testing is a method that determines the risk of a fetus being born with certain genetic abnormalities. In this study, we aimed to examine the quality of information on YouTube for non-invasive prenatal testing. Methods: The term "Non-invasive prenatal testing" was entered in the YouTube search bar on May 1, 2021, and the top 50 YouTube videos of the non-invasive prenatal testing with the highest number of views were recorded after the exclusion of videos with a non-English language, videos repeated twice and irrelevant videos. Length of the videos, likes, and dislikes were recorded. Videos were evaluated by two obstetricians. A questionnaire consisting of 9 dichotomous questions was conducted to assess whether there was adequate information about non-invasive prenatal testing. In addition, video quality was evaluated with the Global Quality Scale, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and the Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark Criteria. Results: The mean Global Quality Scale was 2.96±0.62. Most videos answered the question: ‘What is non-invasive prenatal testing?’ (94%), and ‘How is non-invasive prenatal testing done?’ (82%). However, there was a lack of information about the limitation of non-invasive prenatal testing in certain situations (only %16 of videos answered limitations of non-invasive prenatal testing). Three (6%) of the videos had misinformation. The mean Global Quality Scale was 2.96±0.62. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool mean value was 72% and 58% in terms of understandability and actionability, respectively. The mean Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark Criteria score was found as 1.4±0.8. Conclusion: The videos posted about non-invasive prenatal testing on YouTube were of poor-moderate quality. If the quality of the videos increases, patients can have sufficient and accurate information about non-invasive prenatal, especially during these pandemic days. Keywords: health information, prenatal diagnosis, online systems

Orthodontic patients peridontal diseases prevalence study

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Ulitovskiy ◽  
A. V. Shevtsov
Keyword(s):  
Periodontal Disease ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Periodontal Diseases ◽  
Oral Care ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Hygiene Measures ◽  
Periodontal Index ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Orthodontic Patients

Relevance. Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment of dental anomalies using braces have a high risk of developing inflammatory periodontal diseases, the occurrence of which is caused by an insufficient level of hygienic oral care and orthodontic apparatus. The quality of preventive measures during the period of orthodontic treatment affects the structure and prevalence of inflammatory periodontal diseases due to the low awareness of patients, their non-observance of the doctor’s instructions for hygiene measures, lack of hygiene quality monitoring and its correction during treatment [1-5, 7, 9].Purpose. The purpose of the research was studying the prevalence of periodontal diseases and its structure among orthodontic patients, taking into account the fixed appliances used.Materials and methods. 79 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment were involved in the study, they were divided into 4 age groups. In all groups, an inspection was conducted to determine the prevalence and intensity of the periodontal disease. From the outpatient records of dental patients, form «043/y», data was extracted. The intensity of periodontal diseases was determined using the communal periodontal index (CPI), the papillary-marginal-alveolar index (PMA), the gingival sulcus bleeding index (SBI), complex periodontal index ICP were also determined [19-22].Results. As a result of the study, a high prevalence of periodontal disease was established in patients with bracket systems, which was 84,81±6.12%, in the first group it was 77.78%, in the second group this indicator was equal to 81.25%, and in the third and fourth groups – 85.72% and 91.67%, respectively.Conclusion. The results obtained revealed a high prevalence of periodontal disease in orthodontic patients, which necessitates an improvement in the quality of dental health in this groups by means of dental education and improved hygienic procedures.

scholarly journals YouTube as a Source of Patient Information Regarding Exercises and Compensated Maneuvers for Dysphagia

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1084
Author(s):  
Min Cheol Chang ◽  
Donghwi Park
Keyword(s):  
High Quality ◽  
Related Information ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Quality Scale ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Dysphagia Rehabilitation ◽  
Youtube Videos ◽  
Dysphagia Therapy

Objective: Acquiring online health-related information has become increasingly widespread. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality of the most-viewed YouTube videos on dysphagia regarding exercises and compensated maneuvers. Method: We searched for the keywords “dysphagia exercise”, “dysphagia rehabilitation”, “dysphagia maneuver”, “dysphagia therapy”, and “dysphagia compensation” on YouTube on 5 February 2021. The educational quality of videos on YouTube was investigated based on the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and categorized into three groups: high-, intermediate-, and low-quality. The modified DISCERN tool was used to evaluate the reliability of the YouTube videos. Video parameters were compared between the groups according to the quality of the videos. Results: Of the 51 videos evaluated, according to the GQS, 54.9% (n = 28) were of high-quality, 35.3% (n = 18) were of intermediate-quality, and 9.8% (n = 5) were of low-quality, respectively. When the video parameters were compared among the groups, there were no significant differences in the number of views, likes, dislikes, or comments per day (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference in the DISCERN scores between the groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: YouTube can be deemed as a predominant source for high-quality videos on dysphagia exercise and compensated maneuvers. However, YouTube should be accepted as a mixed pool, with high-, intermediate-, and low-quality videos. Therefore, healthcare professionals, such as physicians and therapists, should verify the suitability and quality of the video, and suggest it to the patient, to ensure that the patient obtains the appropriate information.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document