Assessment Of Perinatal Outcome Of Breech Presentation At A Tertiary Care Hospital, Quetta

2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 218-221
Author(s):  
Safia Bibi ◽  
Khanda Gul ◽  
Fozia Mohammad Bukhsh ◽  
Palwasha Gul

Objective: To review the mode of delivery and perinatal outcome in breech presentation in a tertiary care hospital. Study Design and Setting: Retrospective Analytical Study. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit-4, Bolan Medical Complex Hospital, Quetta, from 1st January 2012 to 31st December, 2016. Methodology: This retrospective analytical study included review of clinical records of all patients who delivered either vaginally or via caesarean section with breech presentation. Results: During the study period, 806 patients presented with breech (2.4%). Vaginal breech delivery was carried out in 71.8% patients and caesarean section was done in 28.2% patients. In vaginal breech group 30.7% patients were primigravida and 69.3% patients were multigravida. In caesarean section group 50.3% patients were primigravida and 49.7% were multigravida. Most common birth weight was between 2.5-3.5 kg in both group. Most common indication for cesarean section was breech with previous one LSCS. Conclusion: Like all vaginal births, vaginal breech delivery is not only beneficial in the chance of having a vaginal birth in future but also prevents from the complications of caesarean delivery.

Author(s):  
Uma Mohanraj ◽  
A. Adhirai

Background: Aim of the study was to optimize the fetomaternal outcome using different modes of delivery in breech presentation and objective of the study was to optimize the maternal and perinatal outcome in various modes of breech delivery.Methods: Among 150 mothers with different parity and gestational age having singleton breech were studied during May 2019- October 2019 for the period of 6 months at KAPV government medical college. Fetomaternal outcome was compared in various modes of breech delivery during this study period in our institute. This study was a prospective analytical study.Results: Incidence of breech presentation was 3.3% of total deliveries in this institute. Around 4 (26.6%) cases by emergency LSCS, 48 (32%) cases delivered vaginally, 62 (41.3%) cases by elective LSCS. Comparatively, large number of cases were delivered by planned caesarean section in our institute. The maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality was found to be less in planned caesarean section compared with other modes of delivery in this study.Conclusions: In view of insignificant difference in the fetomaternal outcome balanced decision about mode of delivery on a case by case basis will go a long way in improving both fetal and maternal outcome. Regular drills and conduct of assisted vaginal breech delivery should be pursued in all maternity hospitals.


Author(s):  
Meeta Gupta ◽  
Vineeta Garg

Background: Caesarean section is one of the most widely performed surgical procedures in obstetrics worldwide. It was mainly evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mother and foetus during the difficult delivery. To analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of present study.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted over a period of one year from 1st Jan 2016 to 31st Dec 2016 at the Department of OBG, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur (Rajasthan), North India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the defined study period was recorded and a statistical analysis of various parameters namely, the caesarean section rates, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done.Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 2959, out of which C-Sections were 931. The overall CS rate was 31.46%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (36.52%) followed by arrest of labour (13.65%), CPD (12.03%), foetal distress (11.82%), breech presentation (7.52%), oligohydroamnios/IUGR (5.16%) and failed induction of labour (3.54%). 11.60% patients had various complications mainly infection (5.58%) and haemorrhage (3.98%). There was no mortality during this period.Conclusions: Being a tertiary care hospital, a high rate of Caesarean deliveries was observed. Individualization of the indication and careful evaluation, following standardized guidelines, practice of evidenced-based obstetrics and audits in the institution, can help us limit CSR.


Author(s):  
Parul T. Shah ◽  
Fiza Z. Saiyed ◽  
Kruti J. Deliwala ◽  
Priya Dhameliya

Background: Placenta previa is defined as placenta implanted partially or completely in the lower uterine segment. It contributes upto 30% of the cases the antepartum hemorrhage. This catastrophic complication not only poses a risk to the fetus but also endangers the mother’s life. The objective of the study was to determine the incidence and risk factors, obstetric management, maternal mortality and morbidity and perinatal outcome in women presenting with placenta previa.Methods: It is the prospective study of 50 cases carried out to study the maternal and perinatal outcome in cases of placenta previa in tertiary care hospital. This study included antenatal patient diagnosed as placenta previa by ultrasound >28 weeks to full term pregnancy. This data was compiled and analyzed for maternal and neonatal outcome.Results: In the present study, the incidence of placenta previa is 0.8% among which 42% of cases having age group of 25-29 years and 72% cases are multigravida. In this study 60% cases have major degree of placenta previa and 66% cases have previous history of caesarean section. Out of total cases 96% cases delivered by caesarean section and 4% had Normal delivery. NICU admission in the study is 28 babies i.e. 56%. There is no maternal mortality seen in the present study.Conclusions: Risk factors that increase the cases of placenta previa are multiparity, previous caesarean section, previous abortion. Placenta previa is major risk factor for adverse maternal and perinatal outcome. Good antenatal care, availability of emergency obstetrics services with senior obstetricians, blood bank facility, ICU care and NICU services can improve maternal and neonatal outcome in high risk cases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (212) ◽  
pp. 796-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajendra Kumar Chaudhary ◽  
Rajan Ghimire ◽  
Deepak Raj Kafle

Introduction: Breech delivery has always been matter of interest in obstetrics. Cesarean breech delivery has been preferred method of delivery. We aim to find out any differences in outcome between vaginal breech delivery and cesarean breech delivery in our setup. Methods: Data were collected from record book of Department of Gynaecology and obstetrics, Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences, Kaski, Nepal. Pregnant with breech presentation who had delivery in the centre from 2074 Baishak to 2074 chaitra were enrolled in the study. Data of 174 patients were analysed among which 74 underwent vaginal delivery for breech and 110 underwent cesarean breech delivery. Results: Only 1 (1.6%) of newborn delivered by vaginal route were admitted to NCU vs 17 (15.5% )in cesarean group which was significant (odds ratio= 0.071, 95% C.I 0.009-0.574; p= 0.004). There was only one death of newborn which was delivered by vaginal route. Mean APGAR score at 1 and 5 minute in vaginal breech delivery was 6 and 7 and in cesarean breech delivery was 6 and 8. Conclusions: Though perinatal morbidity was more with cesarean breech delivery but further study with more sample size is needed before reaching conclusion.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (20) ◽  
pp. 1577-1582
Author(s):  
Sobika Rana ◽  
Indra Bhati ◽  
Saroj Choudhary ◽  
Manisha Manisha ◽  
Priyanka Priyanka ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. e27-e27
Author(s):  
Sarah McKnight ◽  
Bishal Gautam ◽  
Michael Miller ◽  
Bryan S Richardson ◽  
Orlando da Silva

Abstract BACKGROUND The optimal mode of delivery for preterm infants remains controversial, and routine Caesarean sections (C/S) are not recommended, except for maternal indications. Nonetheless, many preterm infants are delivered by C/S, particularly those in breech presentation, and recent retrospective data have suggested that these infants may have improved outcomes. OBJECTIVES To examine whether C/S as the mode of preterm delivery is associated with decreased mortality and improved short term outcomes. DESIGN/METHODS This retrospective, population-based cohort study examined infants with a gestational age between 23 0/7 weeks and 32 6/7 weeks, born between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016, and admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at a single Canadian Tertiary Care hospital. Infants with major congenital anomalies were excluded. Data were abstracted from the local Neonatal-Perinatal database for all infants. Two groups, those delivered vaginally and those delivered by C/S, were compared for major neonatal outcomes including the primary outcomes of death and severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), defined as grade 3 or higher. RESULTS A total of 1442 infants met inclusion criteria (784 born by C/S and 658 vaginally). There was no significant difference in neonatal mortality (7.0% vs 7.1%, p=0.925) or severe IVH (6.1% vs 7.4%, p=0.317). There was, however, a significant difference in the incidence of IVH, any grade (19.9% vs 27.5%, p=0.001), which remained after controlling for other significant predictors. There were no other significant differences in the secondary outcomes examined including need for extensive resuscitation, respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular leukomalacia, or retinopathy of prematurity. CONCLUSION Caesarean section was not associated with decreased mortality in preterm infants, relative to vaginal births. Caesarean section was associated with a reduced rate of IVH (any grade) and there was a trend towards decreased severe IVH which may warrant further study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document