scholarly journals “Ow, doc, it hurts”

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-16
Author(s):  
Brandon Chau ◽  
Robert Bobotsis

In a world where medical conditions are increasingly understood, chronic pain remains among the most difficult to diagnose and treat. Current first-line treatment of nonmalignant chronic pain include tricyclic antidepressants and physiotherapy, while topical lidocaine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and other antidepressants serve as appropriate second-line therapy. Opioids, though highly effective analgesics, remain medical options of last resort due to their highly addictive properties. Surgical implantation of nerve stimulators and/or spinal decompression may also be considered for treatment of chronic pain. As a parallel course of treatment, complementary and alternative medicine such as acupuncture may also be considered. Unfortunately, people with pain are among the least anticipated patients that doctors will see, and lack of both patience and expertise often result in cookie-cutter prescriptions and standardized healthcare that do not benefit individual patients. In the ever-evolving field of pain management, recent evidence has shown that a multidisciplinary approach, rather than traditional physician-based management, offers the best long-term results to patients.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 149-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie E. Chang ◽  
Christopher Peterson ◽  
Lakeesha L. Carmichael ◽  
KyungMann Kim ◽  
David T. Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: There remains no clear standard first-line therapy for MCL. VcR-CVAD is a novel, intermediate-intensity chemoimmunotherapy regimen which incorporates bortezomib into modified hyper-CVAD chemotherapy. We hypothesized that the addition of bortezomib would improve the complete response (CR) rate, and maintenance rituximab (MR) would improve the remission duration. The results of this study were previously reported (Chang JE, et al. Br J Haematol 2011), with an observed overall response rate (ORR) of 90% (CR/unconfirmed CR in 77%), and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 63% and 86%, respectively. Long-term follow-up (LTFU) is reported from this multicenter trial. Methods: The study enrolled patients ≥18 years of age with histologically confirmed MCL. Patients were previously untreated, with the exception of 1 cycle of CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy. Patients received VcR-CVAD induction chemotherapy every 21 days for 6 cycles: rituximab (R) 375 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1; bortezomib/Velcade® (Vc) 1.3 mg/m2 IV, days 1 & 4; cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 IV every 12 hours, days 1-3 (total of 6 doses); doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV continuous infusion days 1-2 (total dose over 48 hours equal to 50 mg/m2); vincristine 1 mg IV day 3; and dexamethasone 40 mg orally days 1-4. Patients received G-CSF support beginning day 5-6 of each induction cycle, and all appropriate supportive care measures were permitted throughout treatment including tumor lysis prophylaxis, transfusion support and antibiotics. Patients achieving at least a partial response to induction therapy received R consolidation (R 375 mg/m2 IV X 4 weekly doses) and MR (R 375 mg/m2 IV every 12 weeks for a total of 5 years; total of 20 doses). Restaging CT scans were performed after cycles 2, 4, and 6 of induction, 12 weeks after consolidation, every 6 months during maintenance, and yearly during LTFU. The primary endpoint was ORR and CR to induction chemotherapy; secondary endpoints were PFS and OS. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled from 7/2005-5/2008. Median age was 61 years (range 48-74), 80% male, all patients had advanced stage disease, and 60% had MIPI score of medium- or high-risk disease. Six patients had blastic morphology. Long-term results are reported after a median follow-up of 7.8 years in surviving patients. Twenty patients are alive, and 15 (50%) are alive in ongoing remission (Figure 1). Estimates of 6-year PFS and OS are 53.1% and 69.8%, respectively (Table 1). The observed PFS and OS differences between patients <age 60 and those ≥age 60 were not statistically significant. The observed PFS and OS differences by MIPI score were not statistically significant, although there was a trend towards worse PFS and OS for high-risk MIPI patients. Five patients have died from confirmed progression of MCL. Two deaths occurred from complications post-allogeneic transplant, and 3 deaths occurred from unrelated causes with MCL in remission. No MCL relapses have been observed beyond 5 years. No late toxicities from VcR-CVAD or from MR have emerged during the LTFU. Conclusions: VcR-CVAD is a moderate intensity chemotherapy regimen that is tolerable for many older and less fit adult patients as first-line therapy of MCL. LTFU of patients receiving VcR-CVAD induction followed by 5 years of MR demonstrates high rates of durable remission that are comparable with more intensive chemotherapy and consolidative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The highly promising activity of the VcR-CVAD regimen was recapitulated in ECOG-ACRIN protocol E1405 (Chang et al, Blood 2014). A randomized phase 3 trial has recently confirmed the beneficial effects of bortezomib incorporation into standard immunochemotherapy (Robak et al, NEJM 2015). VcR-CVAD remains an effective therapy choice for initial treatment of MCL, both in younger and older MCL populations. Disclosures Kahl: Celgene: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4424-4424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan A Oliveria ◽  
Marianne Ulcickas Yood ◽  
Ishan Hirji ◽  
Syd Phillips ◽  
Mark Cziraky ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4424 Background: Understanding adherence in oral CML therapy is an important part of selecting and managing long-term CML treatment. Literature indicates that imatinib adherence ranges widely (14–98%), and data for other BCR-ABL inhibitors (dasatinib and nilotinib) are currently sparse. Imatinib was approved as first-line therapy in the USA in 2001. Dasatinib and nilotinib were approved as first-line therapy at the end of 2010, leading to limited adherence data for this indication. Both dasatinib and nilotinib were approved for second-line therapy earlier in time (dasatinib approved in 2006, nilotinib approved in 2007). As survival rates improve for patients with CML and as multiple frontline therapeutic options exist, it is important to understand medication adherence patterns as part of long-term therapy. Methods: Using the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD™), we identified patients with ≥1 International Classification of Diseases (9th edition) code for CML (205.1x) and ≥1 prescription for a BCR-ABL inhibitor dispensed 1/1/2001–6/30/2010. We used medication possession ratio (MPR; number of days supply of current prescription divided by total days between current and next prescription) to calculate adherence to treatment. Cox proportional hazard models were used to quantify rates of poor adherence (MPR &lt;85%) comparing nilotinib to dasatinib. Models were adjusted for baseline characteristics, previous imatinib exposure, concomitant medications, and comorbidities. Results: We identified 2,145 patients with a CML diagnosis exposed to a BCR-ABL inhibitor from 2001 to 2010. Among these 2,145 patients, 2,064 received imatinib as first-line therapy, 65 received dasatinib first-line and 16 received nilotinib first-line during this time period. Among the 2,064 first-line imatinib users, 197 received dasatinib and 53 received nilotinib as second-line therapy. Sample size was too small to evaluate adherence in first-line dasatinib and nilotinib users in the current dataset. Among second-line users, mean exposure to dasatinib was 276 days (≤100 mg/day, 275 days; ≥140 mg/day, 276 days) and 170 days for nilotinib. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios comparing poor adherence in nilotinib vs. dasatinib were 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–2.4) overall, 1.9 (95% CI 1.2–3.0) for nilotinib vs. dasatinib ≤100 mg/day, and 1.2 (95% CI 0.7–2.0) for nilotinib vs. dasatinib ≥140 mg/day. Conclusion: When comparing treatment adherence for second-line CML therapy, overall, patients treated with nilotinb were 60% more likely to have poor adherence than patients receiving dasatinib. Sample size was too small to adequately examine adherence among first-line users. However, the cohort is being extended beyond 2010 and analyses are underway to assess adherence in first-line therapies. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Although dasatinib and nilotinib are now approved for first-line therapy, some patients in our study were prescribed dasatinib or nilotinib before they were approved as first line therapy. In our abstract, we report the number of users who may have been prescribed dasatinib or nilotinib as first-line therapy prior to approval of dasatinib or nilotinib as first-line therapy. Additional analyses may be reported. Hirji:BMS: Employment. Davis:BMS: Employment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 378-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Elaidi ◽  
A. Harbaoui ◽  
B. Beuselinck ◽  
J.-C. Eymard ◽  
A. Bamias ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 718-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Cong Ruan ◽  
Yue-Ping Che ◽  
Li Ding ◽  
Hai-Feng Li

Background: Pre-treated patients with first-line treatment can be offered a second treatment with the aim of improving their poor clinical prognosis. The therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who did not respond to first-line therapy has limited treatment options. Recently, many studies have paid much attention to the efficacy of bevacizumab as an adjuvant treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy compared with bevacizumab-naive based chemotherapy as second-line treatment in people with metastatic CRC. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies updated to March 2018. Randomized-controlled trials comparing addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy without bevacizumab in MCRC patients were included, of which, the main interesting results were the efficacy and safety profiles of the addition of bevacizumab in patients with MCRC as second-line therapy. Result: Five trials were eligible in the meta-analysis. Patients who received the combined bevacizumab and chemotherapy treatment in MCRC as second-line therapy showed a longer overall survival (OS) (OR=0.80,95%CI=0.72-0.89, P<0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (OR=0.69,95%CI=0.61-0.77, P<0.00001). In addition, there was no significant difference in objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.36,95%CI=0.82-2.24, P=0.23) or severe adverse event (SAE) (RR=1.02,95%CI=0.88-1.19, P=0.78) between bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and bevacizumabnaive based chemotherapy. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the addition of bevacizumab to the chemotherapy therapy could be an efficient and safe treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer as second-line therapy and without increasing the risk of an adverse event.


Author(s):  
Johannes Steinfurt ◽  
Babak Nazer ◽  
Martin Aguilar ◽  
Joshua Moss ◽  
Satoshi Higuchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The short-coupled variant of torsade de pointes (sc-TdP) is a malignant arrhythmia that frequently presents with ventricular fibrillation (VF) electrical storm. Verapamil is considered the first-line therapy of sc-TdP while catheter ablation is not widely adopted. The aim of this study was to determine the origin of sc-TdP and to assess the outcome of catheter ablation using 3D-mapping. Methods and results We retrospectively analyzed five patients with sc-TdP who underwent 3D-mapping and ablation of sc-TdP at five different institutions. Four patients initially presented with sudden cardiac arrest, one patient experienced recurrent syncope as the first manifestation. All patients demonstrated a monomorphic premature ventricular contraction (PVC) with late transition left bundle branch block pattern, superior axis, and a coupling interval of less than 300 ms. triggering recurrent TdP and VF. In four patients, the culprit PVC was mapped to the free wall insertion of the moderator band (MB) with a preceding Purkinje potential in two patients. Catheter ablation using 3D-mapping and intracardiac echocardiography eliminated sc-TdP in all patients, with no recurrence at mean 2.7 years (range 6 months to 8 years) of follow-up. Conclusion 3D-mapping and intracardiac echocardiography demonstrate that sc-TdP predominantly originates from the MB free wall insertion and its Purkinje network. Catheter ablation of the culprit PVC at the MB free wall junction leads to excellent short- and long-term results and should be considered as first-line therapy in recurrent sc-TdP or electrical storm. Graphic abstract


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document