scholarly journals Clinical Factors Associated With the Feeling of Incomplete Bladder Emptying in Women With Little Postvoided Residue

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-179
Author(s):  
Kwang Suk Lee ◽  
Kyo Chul Koo

Purpose: To investigate the clinical factors associated with the feeling of incomplete bladder emptying in female patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).Methods: Records were obtained from a prospectively maintained database for 353 female patients without a history of treatment for LUTS. Patients with comorbidities that may affect voiding function and with postvoid residual (PVR) volume >20 mL or PVR volume-to-bladder capacity ratio of >10% were excluded. Finally, 211 patients were eligible for the study.Results: Patients were stratified according to the severity of the feeling of incomplete emptying: non-severe group (n=147, 69.7%) and severe group (n=64, 30.3%). The severe group showed longer time to maximum flow rate (Qmax) and greater total overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS). No differences in age, PVR volume, and diagnosis of overactive bladder (OAB) were found between the 2 severity groups. Multivariable analysis identified the severity of the feeling of incomplete emptying to be significantly associated with time to Qmax and minimum volume of voids. Time to Qmax was identified as a significant predictor of severe symptoms in women with OAB. In addition, the feeling of incomplete emptying, total OABSS, and minimum volume of voids were significantly associated with quality of life.Conclusions: Female patients with the feeling of incomplete emptying who have insignificant PVR volume exhibited severe voiding symptoms and low quality of life. The treatment strategy should be focused on improving the minimum volume of voids and shortening the time to Qmax.

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1472.2-1472
Author(s):  
T. El Joumani ◽  
H. Rkain ◽  
T. Fatima Zahrae ◽  
H. Kenza ◽  
R. Abouqal ◽  
...  

Objectives:To evaluate the effect of containment, during the Covid-19 pandemic, on the pain of patients with CIRD, and to analyze the factors associated with the experience of pain.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with rheumatic diseases using a questionnaire providing information on patients and disease characteristics. Impact of COVID-19 on This is a cross-sectional study that consecutively includedPatients were asked to assess the global pain which they had experienced before and during the containment period, using a single Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (greatest pain).Statistical Analysis System IBM SPSS Statistics V20.0.0 was used to analyze the study data.We performed univariate then multivariate analysis to search any related factors to pain perception during to quarantines. Qualitative values were analyzed by the chi2 test. Quantitative values were analyzed by the Student test when the measures were normally distributed or by nonparametric test (Mann–Whitney U) when the measures were not normally distributed (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to test normality).Results:Among the 350 patients who answered to the questionnaire online, rheumatoid arthritis represented 62.3%, spondyloarthropathy 34.3% and undifferentiated CIRD 3.4%.Pain experience caused by the CIRD during the containment was reported by 79.1% of patients.The level of pain, using the VAS of Pain increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic (4,6 ± 2,8 and 5,4 ± 3 before and during the containment; p<0.001).In multivariate analysis, the factors implicated in pain were the negative impact of Coronavirus on access to rheumatologic care, discontinuation of therapeutic adherence, the disturbed quality of sleep and the negative psychological impact (table 1).Table 1: Summarize multivariable analysis of factors associated with painful experience related to CIRD during containement.Table 1.Multivariable analysis of factors associated with painful experience related to CIRD during containementPImpact on monitoring0.05Impact on therapeutic adherence<0.001Quality of sleep disturbed0.001Negative psychological impact0.02Conclusion:This survey showed the that the COVID-19 pandemic have incresed painful experience in CIRD patients. Factors influencing painful experience should be taken into account to help patients to cope with their chronic rheumatism and this global health crisis.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Pegram ◽  
Carol Gray ◽  
Rowena M. A. Packer ◽  
Ysabelle Richards ◽  
David B. Church ◽  
...  

AbstractThe loss of a pet can be particularly distressing for owners, whether the method of death is euthanasia or is unassisted. Using primary-care clinical data, this study aimed to report the demographic and clinical factors associated with euthanasia, relative to unassisted death, in dogs. Method of death (euthanasia or unassisted) and clinical cause of death were extracted from a random sample of 29,865 dogs within the VetCompass Programme from a sampling frame of 905,544 dogs under UK veterinary care in 2016. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to evaluate associations between risk factors and method of death. Of the confirmed deaths, 26,676 (89.3%) were euthanased and 2,487 (8.3%) died unassisted. After accounting for confounding factors, 6 grouped-level disorders had higher odds in euthanased dogs (than dogs that died unassisted), using neoplasia as the baseline. The disorders with greatest odds included: poor quality of life (OR 16.28), undesirable behaviour (OR 11.36) and spinal cord disorder (OR 6.00). Breed, larger bodyweight and increasing age were additional risk factors for euthanasia. The results highlight that a large majority of owners will face euthanasia decisions and these findings can support veterinarians and owners to better prepare for such an eventuality.


2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Youn Chun ◽  
Miho Song ◽  
Ji-Yeon Han ◽  
Selee Na ◽  
Bumsik Hong ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 297-297
Author(s):  
Hiren V. Patel ◽  
Joshua Sterling ◽  
Arnav Srivastava ◽  
Sinae Kim ◽  
Biren Saraiya ◽  
...  

297 Background: Palliative care (PC) offers various benefits for patient with cancer that include, but are not limited to, decrease in disease-specific symptoms and improvement in functional status. Several oncological guidelines have adopted early integration of PC into oncologic care to improve quality of life among patients with advanced malignancies. However, PC utilization patterns and factors associated with its use in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain poorly understood. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we abstracted patients with stage III and IV RCC from 2004-2014 and evaluated PC utilization amongst this cohort. Socioeconomic and clinical factors were compared for patient receiving and not receiving PC for advanced RCC. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors that were associated with receipt of PC. Results: We identified 20,122 and 42,014 patients with stage III and IV RCC, respectively. Among this cohort, 329 and 9,317 patients received PC for stage III and IV RCC, respectively. From 2004 to 2014, PC utilization has been stable at ~1% for stage III RCC and has significantly increased from 17% to 20% for stage IV RCC. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that Blacks, income >$48,000, regions outside of Northeast, stage III RCC, and patients that received surgery were less likely to receive PC. Patients that were female, with more comorbidities, uninsured or with government insurance, lower educational status, treated at academic or integrated cancer program, with sarcomatoid histology, receiving systemic therapy were more likely to receive PC. Conclusions: While PC utilization has significantly increased for stage IV RCC, there are several demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors that predict PC usage among patients with advanced RCC. Taken together, this suggests the need for more equitable and systematic use of PC among patients with advanced RCC.


Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 166 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sneha Goswami ◽  
Benjamin J. Peipert ◽  
Michael N. Mongelli ◽  
Sasha K. Kurumety ◽  
Irene B. Helenowski ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. e2604
Author(s):  
M. Hasanbegovic ◽  
J. Kovačević-Prstojević ◽  
S. Sadović ◽  
S. Perla ◽  
M. Hiroš

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 204 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sahai ◽  
P. Sangster ◽  
V. Kalsi ◽  
D. Griffiths ◽  
M. Khan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document