Antiobesity Effect of Citrus Aurantium (Bitter Orange) on Wistar Albino Rat Fed with Formulated Fatty Diet

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 913
Author(s):  
Sule O ◽  
Arhoghro M
2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (24) ◽  
pp. 9769-9775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryant C. Nelson ◽  
Karsten Putzbach ◽  
Katherine E. Sharpless ◽  
Lane C. Sander

2016 ◽  
Vol 227 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Fasani ◽  
P. Fermo ◽  
P. J. Barroso ◽  
J. Martín ◽  
J. L. Santos ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
D B Allison ◽  
G Cutter ◽  
E T Poehlman ◽  
D R Moore ◽  
S Barnes

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 358-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert R. Kaats ◽  
Howard Miller ◽  
Harry G. Preuss ◽  
Sidney J. Stohs

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney J. Stohs ◽  
Harry G. Preuss ◽  
Mohd Shara

Bitter orange (Citrus aurantium) extract and its primary protoalkaloidp-synephrine are used widely in weight loss/weight management and sports performance products. Because of structural similarities, the pharmacological effects ofp-synephrine are widely assumed to be similar to those of ephedrine,m-synephrine (phenylephrine), and endogenous amine neurotransmitters as norepinephrine and epinephrine. However, small structural changes result in the receptor binding characteristics of these amines that are markedly different, providing a plausible explanation for the paucity of adverse effects associated with the wide-spread consumption ofp-synephrine in the form of dietary supplements as well as in variousCitrusfoods and juices. This paper summarizes the adrenoreceptor binding characteristics ofp-synephrine relative tom-synephrine, norepinephrine, and other amines as related to the observed pharmacological effects.


2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 1934578X1000501
Author(s):  
Nicolle de Carvalho Ribeiro ◽  
Claudio Augusto Gomes da Camara ◽  
Flávia de Souza Born ◽  
Herbert Álvaro Abreu de Siqueira

The fumigant action of peel essential oils of Citrus sinensis var. pear (pear orange = PO) and C. aurantium (bitter orange = BO) from the northeast of Brazil were evaluated against Bemisia tabaci biotype B and compared with eugenol as a positive control. The oil concentration in the PO at 8.5 μL/L of air caused 97% mortality, while the oil concentration of BO at 9.5 μL/L of air caused 99% mortality. However, the LC50 estimates for both oils (LC50 = 3.80 μL/L of air for PO and LC50 = 5.80 μL/L of air for BO) did not differ from each other, but they did when compared with eugenol (LC50 = 0.20 μL/L of air). Regarding their effects on oviposition, the Citrus oils showed concentration-response dependence, reducing the number of eggs as the concentration increased, which was not observed for eugenol. The minimum concentrations of the oils that caused a significant reduction in the egg lay were 3.5 and 7.0 μL/L of air for BO and PO, respectively. These results suggest that oils from PO and BO peels may be promising as models to develop new insecticides that might be applied into the integrated management of whiteflies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document