Supervisor inclusiveness and group belongingness: to leave or to do more

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
pp. 17536
Author(s):  
Yumei Wang ◽  
Ningyu Tang Ningyu Tang ◽  
Chiyin Chen
Keyword(s):  

1968 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. Norton

A sampling of the literature on marihuana has been presented, and a description has been given of some of the attributes of a small group of marihuana smokers in the community. This group is probably not well representative, however, of a largely unknown parent population. While not entirely homogeneous, and while probably harbouring one or two marginally functioning people, this group may be described as composed of still young men and women of quite good intelligence and education, expressing preference for aesthetic, experiential values. For the most part single and without dependants, they support themselves in relatively conventional occupations but lean, less in fact and more in aspiration, towards what one might call artistic and expressive occupations. Current religious attachments are disowned and, instead, they are in search of some philosophy of life, adopting what one might call humanistic principles. They tend to see themselves, as, after all, most social groups do, as enlightened; and they feel united in their rejection or questioning of what they perceive as the contemporary social establishment. Some of them have misgivings about themselves, and are not sure of where they are going. However, the group probably assuages some of these anxieties, and possibly offers quite useful support to some of its less resourceful members. Perhaps, one of the most striking and seemingly paradoxical aspects of the situation is that, despite protestations of extraversion, concern with ‘the real’, and group belongingness, the apparent common denomination of the association lies in the seeking of what are entirely introversive or subjective experiences of an ‘unreal’, transcendental sort, and subsisting mainly in highly individualized phenomena. This consideration at least raises the question of whether the stronger gratification may not lie in membership of the group, rather than simply in indulging the marihuana habit for its own sake. The narcissistic aspects of the group process appear to constitute one important variable underlying the apparent difficulty and delay which these young people meet in establishing an eventual identification of sorts (probably in most cases) with a wider and more representative community.



1947 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt Lewin


Author(s):  
LEON FESTINGER
Keyword(s):  


1956 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin M. Grossack
Keyword(s):  


1957 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin M. Grossack


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveed Shibli ◽  
Hina Saleem

<p></p><p>Caste is a known reality in rural subcontinent. In a randomized group design 265 college students belonging to 13 caste groups selected with a questionnaire for high ’caste feel’,and were given a few other structured questionnaires comprising of the questions about day to day matters for personal preference. It was assumed that caste feel because of integrated heredity transmission, group belongingness, identity, familial or other social or personal reasons may predict some personal preference patterns? Findings reflected visible similarity in participants’ response patterns due to may be a mix of nature and nature and its role in social groups, the information could be useful for varied applications, more studies would clarify further.<br></p><p></p>



2017 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 284-289
Author(s):  
O. O. Khlestkova

The paper indicates that a forensic soil-science examination is a multistage comprehensive research, and the evaluation is being carried out after each research phase taking into account the knowledge as in the field ofsoil-science and adjacent sciences (a naturalscience evaluation), and in the field of Criminalistics (criminalistic evaluation). The natural-science evaluation is performedfrom the point of view of classification, taxonomy and other structural units of soil-science, geology, biology and other sciences. The criminalistic evaluation foresees transformation of a natural-science evaluation results in accordance with the special knowledge in the field of the criminalistic identification theory. The features of criminalistic evaluation in the identification researches of forensic soil-science examination are considered, they consist in specific properties of objects of a soil-mineral origination: the absence of data on the structure of a genetic profile of soil in overlayings on object-carrier, multicomponentness of soils, possibility of some indicators of soil to be both as patrimonial and group signs depending on the character of the ground where the crime was committed. The patrimonial belongingness of soil objects corresponds to the broadest plots of terrain and is the initial stage at localization (separation) of accident scene plot under identification. The group belongingness unites objects with certain specific conditions of emergence and existence which, mainly, are conditioned by economic activities of a person in the industry, agriculture, construction. Group signs are namely those allow to separate a local plot on a broad territory with a certain complex of properties and indicators. Each expert research of soils needs the creative approach with taking into account all features of identification objects, including suitability of accident scene plot for localization and identification, the identification importance of signs, the presence of enough quantity of ground overlayings and preservation of initial indicators in them, coincidence ofproperties of all components and impurities in compared soils.



Nowadays e-commerce has gained recognition in day to day life; hence network became tremendous source for gathering customer reviews/opinions by marketplace analyzers. The count of user reviews that merchandise receives is increasing at high velocity. Opinions being posted on social media differ significantly in superiority. The client needs to essentially go through all reviews regardless of their superiority and decide whether to purchase or not purchase the manufactured goods. The main difficulty in obtainable study on opinion assessment is that all opinions are considered regardless of the implication of each of them. Hence categorization of opinions depending on implication is an essential job. In this article, attempt is made for opinion assessment depending on its superiority, and help buyer make a proper buying judgment. A web mining technique that is narrative and effective is used to assess the consumer opinion for manufactured goods depending on marked allocation are anticipated. The superiority consideration of consumer reviews are classified as genuine, near duplicate, and duplicate opinion. It is carried out in three steps: (1) Recognize opinion regions to take out opinions. (2) Take out and separate features of reviews by quartile compute and assign weights to the features that belong to each group. (3) Consider the feature weights and group belongingness to assess the reviews. Investigational output demonstrates the usefulness of the proposed method which measures the quality of review and assesses it in view of that. The efficiency of client opinion summarization task is probably improved by recognizing and discarding irrelevant opinions.



2021 ◽  
pp. 136843022110503
Author(s):  
Angelo Fasce ◽  
Jesús Adrián-Ventura ◽  
Stephan Lewandowsky ◽  
Sander van der Linden

Previous research has confirmed the prominent role of group processes in the promotion and endorsement of disinformation. We report three studies on a psychological framework derived from integrated threat theory—a psychological theory which describes how perceived threat leads to group polarization and prejudice—composed of the following constructs: group belongingness, perceived threat, outgroup derogation, and intergroup anxiety. Our pilot study suggested that need to belong and intergroup anxiety predict antiscientific beliefs (pseudoscientific, paranormal, and conspiracy theories), thus justifying the general applicability of integrated threat theory. Study 1 investigates the transition from weak to strong critical thinking regarding pseudoscientific doctrines. Besides greater outgroup derogation and perceived threats among strong critical thinkers, the model does not perform well in this context. Study 2 focuses on the intergroup conflict around anthropogenic global warming, revealing the strong predictive power of the model. These results are discussed in relation to the distinctive psychological profiles of science acceptance and rejection.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document