Study of modern options for using combinations of gasflooding and traditional waterflooding (water-gas influence and its alternative)

2021 ◽  
pp. 248-256
Author(s):  
M. М. Irani ◽  
◽  
V. P. Telkov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Displacement Ratio ◽  
Water Gas

Water-gas influence (WGI) is an oil recovery method improving displacement ratio, sweep efficiency and adjusting the alignment of displacement. This study is a review of the traditional WAG methods (Immiscible WAG, Hybrid WAG, Simultaneous WAG and Selective Simultaneous WAG), including with stabilizing surfactants, WAG. We also consider such sparsely used methods as: SSWAG, FAWAG, CWAG, TWAG, VR-WAG, Up- and Down-dip WAG, HC-WAG, PAG, SAG, WASP, LSW WAG, LSASF, SMSW-AGF and others. The advantages and disadvantages of these tools are considered. Keywords: water-gas influence (WGI); WAG; SWAG; enhanced oil recovery; APG

Selection and Justification of Technologies for Enhanced Oil Recovery Methods Using Inter-Well Tracer Survey

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artem Galimzyanov ◽  
Konstantin Naydensky ◽  
Olaf Kristoffer Huseby
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Oil Fields ◽  
Mature Stage ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Tracer Studies ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Geological Conditions

Abstract Justified application of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods is one of the key tasks of oil operating companies for the effective development of not only brown oil fields at a mature stage of production, but also for green fields. The selection and justification of one or another method of enhanced oil recovery for certain geological conditions often requires not only looking for worldwide experience, conducting laboratory tests on a core, but also performing pilot tests at a polygon area. The subsequent full-field implementation of EOR method requires confirmation of its effectiveness based on the increase in oil recovery factor. This article describes both the experience of using interwell tracer studies to substantiate the effectiveness of EOR technologies in pilot areas, and the experience of evaluating the effectiveness of EOR technologies with full-field implementation in various fields. The work carried out on the integrated use of tracer studies makes it possible to apply a scientific and engineering approach to the selection of an enhanced oil recovery method by assessing the sweep efficiency before and after the application of the EOR technology. Examples of the use of this integrated approach for different oil fields are given. The presented technologies and experience of the work performed will significantly speed up the choice of the EOR technology for certain geological conditions and verify the effectiveness of the selected EOR method.

scholarly journals Research progress of viscoelastic surfactants for enhanced oil recovery

2021 ◽  
pp. 014459872098020
Author(s):  
Ruizhi Hu ◽  
Shanfa Tang ◽  
Musa Mpelwa ◽  
Zhaowen Jiang ◽  
Shuyun Feng
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Research Progress ◽  
Surfactant Flooding ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
The World ◽  
Washing Efficiency ◽  
Viscoelastic Surfactants ◽  
Viscoelastic Surfactant

Although new energy has been widely used in our lives, oil is still one of the main energy sources in the world. After the application of traditional oil recovery methods, there are still a large number of oil layers that have not been exploited, and there is still a need to further increase oil recovery to meet the urgent need for oil in the world economic development. Chemically enhanced oil recovery (CEOR) is considered to be a kind of effective enhanced oil recovery technology, which has achieved good results in the field, but these technologies cannot simultaneously effectively improve oil sweep efficiency, oil washing efficiency, good injectability, and reservoir environment adaptability. Viscoelastic surfactants (VES) have unique micelle structure and aggregation behavior, high efficiency in reducing the interfacial tension of oil and water, and the most important and unique viscoelasticity, etc., which has attracted the attention of academics and field experts and introduced into the technical research of enhanced oil recovery. In this paper, the mechanism and research status of viscoelastic surfactant flooding are discussed in detail and focused, and the results of viscoelastic surfactant flooding experiments under different conditions are summarized. Finally, the problems to be solved by viscoelastic surfactant flooding are introduced, and the countermeasures to solve the problems are put forward. This overview presents extensive information about viscoelastic surfactant flooding used for EOR, and is intended to help researchers and professionals in this field understand the current situation.

Undersaturated Hydrocarbon Reservoir Waterflooding: A simulation Approach to Performance Assessment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adekunle Tirimisiyu Adeniyi ◽  
Miracle Imwonsa Osatemple ◽  
Abdulwahab Giwa
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Solution Approach ◽  
Hydrocarbon Reservoir

Abstract There are a good numbers of brown hydrocarbon reservoirs, with a substantial amount of bypassed oil. These reservoirs are said to be brown, because a huge chunk of its recoverable oil have been produced. Since a significant number of prominent oil fields are matured and the number of new discoveries is declining, it is imperative to assess performances of waterflooding in such reservoirs; taking an undersaturated reservoir as a case study. It should be recalled that Waterflooding is widely accepted and used as a means of secondary oil recovery method, sometimes after depletion of primary energy sources. The effects of permeability distribution on flood performances is of concerns in this study. The presence of high permeability streaks could lead to an early water breakthrough at the producers, thus reducing the sweep efficiency in the field. A solution approach adopted in this study was reserve water injection. A reverse approach because, a producing well is converted to water injector while water injector well is converted to oil producing well. This optimization method was applied to a waterflood process carried out on a reservoir field developed by a two - spot recovery design in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria that is being used as a case study. Simulation runs were carried out with a commercial reservoir oil simulator. The result showed an increase in oil production with a significant reduction in water-cut. The Net Present Value, NPV, of the project was re-evaluated with present oil production. The results of the waterflood optimization revealed that an increase in the net present value of up to 20% and an increase in cumulative production of up to 27% from the base case was achieved. The cost of produced water treatment for re-injection and rated higher water pump had little impact on the overall project economy. Therefore, it can conclude that changes in well status in wells status in an heterogenous hydrocarbon reservoir will increase oil production.

scholarly journals ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY METHOD USING ENZYMATICALLY GENERATED OIL-DISPLACING SYSTEM, ITS EFFECT ON COMPOSITIONS AND PROPERTIES OF THE DISPLACED VISCOSITY OILS

2016 ◽  
Vol 0 (6) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Yuliya Zinurovna Guseva ◽  
Lubov Konstantinovna Altunina ◽  
Lidiya Ivanovna Svarovskaya ◽  
Varvara Sergeevna Ovsyannikova
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Recovery Method

scholarly journals Enhanced Oil Recovery: Chemical Flooding

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ragab ◽  
Eman M. Mansour
Keyword(s):  
Interfacial Tension ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Mobility Ratio ◽  
Chemical Flooding ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Oil Displacement ◽  
Remaining Oil ◽  
Oil Displacement Efficiency

The enhanced oil recovery phase of oil reservoirs production usually comes after the water/gas injection (secondary recovery) phase. The main objective of EOR application is to mobilize the remaining oil through enhancing the oil displacement and volumetric sweep efficiency. The oil displacement efficiency enhances by reducing the oil viscosity and/or by reducing the interfacial tension, while the volumetric sweep efficiency improves by developing a favorable mobility ratio between the displacing fluid and the remaining oil. It is important to identify remaining oil and the production mechanisms that are necessary to improve oil recovery prior to implementing an EOR phase. Chemical enhanced oil recovery is one of the major EOR methods that reduces the residual oil saturation by lowering water-oil interfacial tension (surfactant/alkaline) and increases the volumetric sweep efficiency by reducing the water-oil mobility ratio (polymer). In this chapter, the basic mechanisms of different chemical methods have been discussed including the interactions of different chemicals with the reservoir rocks and fluids. In addition, an up-to-date status of chemical flooding at the laboratory scale, pilot projects and field applications have been reported.

Effect of pressure variation on polymer flooding

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Ali Manzoor
Keyword(s):  
Polymer Solution ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Heavy Oil ◽  
Constant Pressure ◽  
Maximum Pressure ◽  
Core Flooding ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Black Oil Model ◽  
Original Oil In Place

Chemical-based enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques utilize the injection of chemicals, such as solutions of polymers, alkali, and surfactants, into oil reservoirs for incremental recovery. The injection of a polymer increases the viscosity of the injected fluid and alters the water-to-oil mobility ratio which in turn improves the volumetric sweep efficiency. This research study aims to investigate strategies that would help intensify oil recovery with the polymer solution injection. For that purpose, we utilize a lab-scale, cylindrical heavy oil reservoir model. Furthermore, a dynamic mathematical black oil model is developed based on cylindrical physical model of homogeneous porous medium. The experiments are carried out by injecting classic and novel partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide solutions (concentration: 0.1-0.5 wt %) with 1 wt % brine into the reservoir at pressures in the range, 1.03-3.44 MPa for enhanced oil recovery. The concentration of the polymer solution remains constant throughout the core flooding experiment and is varied for other subsequent experimental setup. Periodic pressure variations between 2.41 and 3.44 MPa during injection are found to increase the heavy oil recovery by 80% original-oil-in-place (OOIP). This improvement is approximately 100% more than that with constant pressure injection at the maximum pressure of 3.44 MPa. The experimental oil recoveries are in fair agreement with the model calculated oil production with a RMS% error in the range of 5-10% at a maximum constant pressure of 3.44 MPa.

scholarly journals Surfactant-Polymer Interactions in a Combined Enhanced Oil Recovery Flooding

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 6520
Author(s):  
Pablo Druetta ◽  
Francesco Picchioni
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Combined Processes ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Chemical Agents ◽  
Chemical Eor ◽  
Eor Processes ◽  
Adsorption Rates ◽  
Polymer Interaction

The traditional Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) processes allow improving the performance of mature oilfields after waterflooding projects. Chemical EOR processes modify different physical properties of the fluids and/or the rock in order to mobilize the oil that remains trapped. Furthermore, combined processes have been proposed to improve the performance, using the properties and synergy of the chemical agents. This paper presents a novel simulator developed for a combined surfactant/polymer flooding in EOR processes. It studies the flow of a two-phase, five-component system (aqueous and organic phases with water, petroleum, surfactant, polymer and salt) in porous media. Polymer and surfactant together affect each other’s interfacial and rheological properties as well as the adsorption rates. This is known in the industry as Surfactant-Polymer Interaction (SPI). The simulations showed that optimum results occur when both chemical agents are injected overlapped, with the polymer in the first place. This procedure decreases the surfactant’s adsorption rates, rendering higher recovery factors. The presence of the salt as fifth component slightly modifies the adsorption rates of both polymer and surfactant, but its influence on the phase behavior allows increasing the surfactant’s sweep efficiency.

The Effect of Phase Equilibria on the CO2 Displacement Mechanism

1979 ◽  
Vol 19 (04) ◽  
pp. 242-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.S. Metcalfe ◽  
Lyman Yarborough
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Phase Equilibria ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Miscible Displacement ◽  
Co2 Flooding ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Two Fluids ◽  
Reservoir Conditions

Abstract Carbon dioxide flooding under miscible conditions is being developed as a major process for enhanced oil recovery. This paper presents results of research studies to increase our understanding of the multiple-contact miscible displacement mechanism for CO2 flooding. Carbon dioxide displacements of three synthetic oils of increasing complexity (increasing number of hydrocarbon components) are described. The paper concentrates on results of laboratory flow studies, but uses results of phase-equilibria and numerical studies to support the conclusions.Results from studies with synthetic oils show that at least two multiple-contact miscible mechanisms, vaporization and condensation, can be identified and that the phase-equilibria data can be used as a basis for describing the mechanism. The phase-equilibria change with varying reservoir conditions, and the flow studies show that the miscible mechanism depends on the phase-equilibria behavior. Qualitative predictions with mathematical models support our conclusions.Phase-equilibria data with naturally occurring oils suggest the two mechanisms (vaporization and condensation) are relevant to CO2 displacements at reservoir conditions and are a basis for specifying the controlling mechanisms. Introduction Miscible-displacement processes, which rely on multiple contacts of injected gas and reservoir oil to develop an in-situ solvent, generally have been recognized by the petroleum industry as an important enhanced oil-recovery method. More recently, CO2 flooding has advanced to the position (in the U.S.) of being the most economically attractive of the multiple-contact miscibility (MCM) processes. Several projects have been or are currently being conducted either to study or use CO2 as an enhanced oil-recovery method. It has been demonstrated convincingly by Holm and others that CO2 can recover oil from laboratory systems and therefore from the swept zone of petroleum reservoirs using miscible displacement. However, several contradictions seem to exist in published results.. These authors attempt to establish the mechanism(s) through which CO2 and oil form a miscible solvent in situ. (The solvent thus produced is capable of performing as though the two fluids were miscible when performing as though the two fluids were miscible when injected.) In addition, little experimental work has been published to provide support for the mechanisms of multiple-contact miscibility, as originally discussed by Hutchinson and Braun.One can reasonably assume that the miscible CO2 process will be related directly to phase equilibria process will be related directly to phase equilibria because it involves intimate contact of gases and liquids. However, no data have been published to indicate that the mechanism for miscibility development may differ for varying phase-equilibria conditions.This paper presents the results of both flow and phase-equilibria studies performed to determine the phase-equilibria studies performed to determine the mechanism(s) of CO2 multiple-contact miscibility. These flow studies used CO2 to displace three multicomponent hydrocarbon mixtures under first-contact miscible, multiple-contact miscible, and immiscible conditions. Results are presented to support the vaporization mechanism as described by Hutchinson and Braun, and also to show that more than one mechanism is possible with CO2 displacements. The reason for the latter is found in the results of phase-equilibria studies. SPEJ P. 242

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document