Behavioral Sleep-Wake Homeostasis and EEG Delta Power Are Decoupled By Chronic Sleep Restriction in the Rat

AbstractCompensatory elevation in NREM sleep EEG delta power has been typically observed following prolonged wakefulness and widely used as a sleep homeostasis indicator. However, recent evidence in human and rodent chronic sleep restriction (CSR) studies suggests that NREM delta power is not progressively increased despite of accumulated sleep loss over days. In addition, there has been little progress in understanding how sleep EEG in different brain regions responds to CSR. Using novel high-density EEG electrode arrays in the mouse model of CSR where mice underwent 18-h sleep deprivation per day for 5 consecutive days, we performed an extensive analysis of topographical NREM sleep EEG responses to the CSR condition, including period-amplitude analysis of individual slow waves. As previously reported in our analysis of REM sleep responses, we found different patterns of changes: (i) progressive decrease in NREM sleep duration and consolidation, (ii) persistent enhancement in NREM delta power especially in the frontal and parietal regions, and (iii) progressive increases in individual slow wave slope and frontal fast oscillation power. These results suggest that multiple sleep-wake regulatory systems exist in a brain region-specific manner, which can be modulated independently, especially in the CSR condition.

Download Full-text

112 Chronic sleep restriction disrupts slow-wave sleep homeostatic regulation and damages monoaminergic structures in the rat brain

SLEEP ◽

10.1093/sleep/zsab072.111 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. A46-A46

Author(s):

Mikhail Guzeev ◽

Nikita Kurmazov ◽

Valentina Simonova ◽

Daria Belan ◽

Ksenia Lapshina ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Slow Wave ◽

Slow Wave Sleep ◽

Cognitive Disorders ◽

Emotional Behavior ◽

Sleep Restriction ◽

High Tech ◽

Integrative Physiology ◽

Delta Power ◽

Monoaminergic Structures ◽

Chronic Sleep

Abstract Introduction The neurophysiological mechanisms underlying long-term neurological and cognitive disorders associated with chronic sleep restriction (CSR) are not fully understood. Here we evaluated how the sleep-wake cycle changes during and after a period of sleep restriction in rats, and whether CSR results in neurodegeneration in monoaminergic brain structures. Methods For CSR, 7-8-month-old Wistar rats underwent cycles of 3 h of sleep deprivation (SD) and 1 h of sleep opportunity (SO) continuously for 5 days on the orbital shaker. Telemetric sleep recordings were made before, during, and after CSR. Neurodegeneration in brain monoaminergic structures was assessed immunohistochemically. Results During SD, wakefulness comprised 85% of the total registration time; the remaining time was represented by drowsiness with low EEG delta power. Rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) was absent. During CSR, slow-wave sleep (SWS) and REMS were reduced by 62% and 57%. Total SWS time during SO periods increased on the first CSR day, but decreased to the baseline by the fifth CSR day. SWS EEG delta power (a measure of sleep intensity) decreased gradually from the first to the fifth CSR day. REMS total time remained elevated during all SO periods. During the first recovery day after CSR, SWS did not change, but REMS increased by 30%. No changes in total sleep time were found on the second recovery day but sleep intensity was decreased. In 14 days after CSR, all sleep parameters returned to the baseline. We revealed a loss of 24% of noradrenergic locus coeruleus neurons, 29% and 17% of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, the ventral tegmental area as well as in their striatal terminals. Conclusion We consider CSR as a damaging factor leading to a gradual suppression of homeostatic mechanisms governing sleep recovery. CSR can provoke neurodegeneration in monoaminergic structures involved in the regulation of emotional behavior, sleep, and autonomic functions. Support (if any) Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation grant (No. 075-15-2020-916 dated November 13, 2020) for the establishment and development of the Pavlovsky Center “Integrative Physiology for Medicine, High-Tech Healthcare and Stress Resilience Technologies”.

Download Full-text

Time-of-day modulation of homeostatic and allostatic sleep responses to chronic sleep restriction in rats

AJP Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology ◽

10.1152/ajpregu.00678.2011 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 302 (12) ◽

pp. R1411-R1425 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

S. Deurveilher ◽

B. Rusak ◽

K. Semba

Keyword(s):

Eye Movement ◽

Recovery Period ◽

Sleep Time ◽

Time Of Day ◽

Male Rats ◽

Sleep Restriction ◽

Rapid Eye Movement ◽

Rapid Eye Movement Sleep ◽

Delta Power ◽

Chronic Sleep

To study sleep responses to chronic sleep restriction (CSR) and time-of-day influences on these responses, we developed a rat model of CSR that takes into account the polyphasic sleep patterns in rats. Adult male rats underwent cycles of 3 h of sleep deprivation (SD) and 1 h of sleep opportunity (SO) continuously for 4 days, beginning at the onset of the 12-h light phase (“3/1” protocol). Electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG) recordings were made before, during, and after CSR. During CSR, total sleep time was reduced by ∼60% from baseline levels. Both rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) and non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) during SO periods increased initially relative to baseline and remained elevated for the rest of the CSR period. In contrast, NREMS EEG delta power (a measure of sleep intensity) increased initially, but then declined gradually, in parallel with increases in high-frequency power in the NREMS EEG. The amplitude of daily rhythms in NREMS and REMS amounts was maintained during SO periods, whereas that of NREMS delta power was reduced. Compensatory responses during the 2-day post-CSR recovery period were either modest or negative and gated by time of day. NREMS, REMS, and EEG delta power lost during CSR were not recovered by the end of the second recovery day. Thus the “3/1” CSR protocol triggered both homeostatic responses (increased sleep amounts and intensity during SOs) and allostatic responses (gradual decline in sleep intensity during SOs and muted or negative post-CSR sleep recovery), and both responses were modulated by time of day.

Download Full-text

Residual, differential neurobehavioral deficits linger after multiple recovery nights following chronic sleep restriction or acute total sleep deprivation

SLEEP ◽

10.1093/sleep/zsaa224 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Erika M Yamazaki ◽

Caroline A Antler ◽

Charlotte R Lasek ◽

Namni Goel

Keyword(s):

Sleep Deprivation ◽

Response Speed ◽

Sleep Loss ◽

Sleep Restriction ◽

Total Sleep Deprivation ◽

Psychomotor Vigilance Test ◽

Recovery Sleep ◽

Time In Bed ◽

Neurobehavioral Deficits ◽

Chronic Sleep

Abstract Study Objectives The amount of recovery sleep needed to fully restore well-established neurobehavioral deficits from sleep loss remains unknown, as does whether the recovery pattern differs across measures after total sleep deprivation (TSD) and chronic sleep restriction (SR). Methods In total, 83 adults received two baseline nights (10–12-hour time in bed [TIB]) followed by five 4-hour TIB SR nights or 36-hour TSD and four recovery nights (R1–R4; 12-hour TIB). Neurobehavioral tests were completed every 2 hours during wakefulness and a Maintenance of Wakefulness Test measured physiological sleepiness. Polysomnography was collected on B2, R1, and R4 nights. Results TSD and SR produced significant deficits in cognitive performance, increases in self-reported sleepiness and fatigue, decreases in vigor, and increases in physiological sleepiness. Neurobehavioral recovery from SR occurred after R1 and was maintained for all measures except Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) lapses and response speed, which failed to completely recover. Neurobehavioral recovery from TSD occurred after R1 and was maintained for all cognitive and self-reported measures, except for vigor. After TSD and SR, R1 recovery sleep was longer and of higher efficiency and better quality than R4 recovery sleep. Conclusions PVT impairments from SR failed to reverse completely; by contrast, vigor did not recover after TSD; all other deficits were reversed after sleep loss. These results suggest that TSD and SR induce sustained, differential biological, physiological, and/or neural changes, which remarkably are not reversed with chronic, long-duration recovery sleep. Our findings have critical implications for the population at large and for military and health professionals.

Download Full-text

Homeostatic Response to Sleep Restriction in Adolescents

SLEEP ◽

10.1093/sleep/zsab106 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Jelena Skorucak ◽

Nathan Weber ◽

Mary A Carskadon ◽

Chelsea Reynolds ◽

Scott Coussens ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Slow Wave ◽

Process Model ◽

Animal Studies ◽

Sleep Restriction ◽

Sleep Regulation ◽

Homeostatic Process ◽

Sleep Homeostasis ◽

High Prevalence ◽

Homeostatic Response ◽

Chronic Sleep

Abstract The high prevalence of chronic sleep restriction in adolescents underscores the importance of understanding how adolescent sleep is regulated under such conditions. One component of sleep regulation is a homeostatic process: if sleep is restricted, then sleep intensity increases. Our knowledge of this process is primarily informed by total sleep deprivation studies and has been incorporated in mathematical models of human sleep regulation. Several animal studies, however, suggest that adaptation occurs in chronic sleep restriction conditions, showing an attenuated or even decreased homeostatic response. We investigated the homeostatic response of adolescents to different sleep opportunities. Thirty-four participants were allocated to one of three groups with 5, 7.5 or 10 h of sleep opportunity per night for 5 nights. Each group underwent a protocol of 9 nights designed to mimic a school week between 2 weekends: 2 baseline nights (10 h sleep opportunity), 5 condition nights (5, 7.5 or 10 h), and two recovery nights (10 h). Measures of sleep homeostasis (slow-wave activity and slow-wave energy) were calculated from frontal and central EEG derivations and compared to predictions derived from simulations of the homeostatic process of the two-process model of sleep regulation. Only minor differences were found between empirical data and model predictions, indicating that sleep homeostasis is preserved under chronic sleep restriction in adolescents. These findings improve our understanding of effects of repetitive short sleep in adolescents.

Download Full-text