Detection of Salmonella species in a Variety of Foods by the DuPont™ BAX® System Real-Time PCR Assay for Salmonella: First Action 2013.02

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 868-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Morgan Wallace ◽  
Bridget Andaloro ◽  
Dawn Fallon ◽  
Nisha Corrigan ◽  
Stephen Varkey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Orange Juice ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract A multilaboratory study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the DuPont™ BAX® System Real-Time PCR Assay for Salmonella to detect the target species in a variety of foods and environmental surfaces. Internal validation studies were performed by DuPont Nutrition & Health on 24 different sample types to demonstrate the reliability of the test method among a wide variety of sample types. Two of these matrixes—pork and turkey frankfurters and pasteurized, not-from-concentrate orange juice without pulp—were each evaluated in 14 independent laboratories as part of the collaborative study to demonstrate repeatability and reproducibility of the internal laboratory results independent of the end user. Frankfurter samples were evaluated against the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service reference method as a paired study, while orange juice samples were evaluated against the U. S. Food and Drug Administration reference method as an unpaired study, using a proprietary media for the test method. Samples tested in this study were artificially inoculated with a Salmonella strain at levels expected to produce low (0.2–2.0 CFU/test portion) or high (5 CFU/test portion) spike levels on the day of analysis. For each matrix, the collaborative study failed to show a statistically significant difference between the candidate method and the reference method using the probability of detection statistical model.

Evaluation of VIDAS® UP Salmonella (SPT) Assay for the Detection of Salmonella in a Variety of Foods and Environmental Samples: Collaborative Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 808-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Bird ◽  
Kiel Fisher ◽  
Megan Boyle ◽  
Travis Huffman ◽  
Marc Juenger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Environmental Samples ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
The United States ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract The VIDAS® UP Salmonella (SPT) uses recombinant phage proteins to detect Salmonella species in human and animal food products and production environmental samples after 18–26 h of enrichment. The VIDAS SPT assay is performed with the automated VIDAS or mini-VIDAS instruments. The VIDAS SPT method was compared in a multilaboratory collaborative study to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) 4.05 (2011) Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg and Catfish Products reference method following the current AOAC guidelines. A total of 15 laboratories representing government, academia, and industry throughout the United States participated. One matrix, raw ground beef, was analyzed using two different test portion sizes, 25 and 375 g. Each test portion was artificially contaminated with Salmonella at three inoculation levels, an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2–2 CFU/test portion), and a high inoculum level (2–5 CFU/test portion). In this study, 1656 unpaired replicate samples were analyzed. Of those unpaired replicates, 476 were presumptive positive by the VIDAS method, with 475 confirmed positive by the traditional confirmation procedures and 476 confirmed positive by an alternative confirmation procedure. There were 411 confirmed positive replicates by the USDA/FSIS-MLG reference method. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD). For the low-level 375 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.01 (−0.12, +0.15) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation; 0.02 (−0.18, +0.2) for samples confirmed following traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP; and 0.03 (−0.18, +0.24) for samples confirmed following the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. For the low-level 25 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.41, (0.32, +0.49) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation, the traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP, and the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. With 0.0 within the confidence intervals for the 375 g test portions, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of positive samples detected by the VIDAS SPT method and the USDA/FSIS-MLG method at the 0.05 level. For the 25 g test portions, a statistically significant difference was observed between the VIDAS SPT method and the reference method for the low inoculum level, where the VIDAS SPT method recovered a higher number of positive results than the reference method. It is recommended that the VIDAS SPT method with the optional ASAP and IBISA agar confirmation method be adopted for Official First Action status for the detection of Salmonella in a variety of foods and environmental samples.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the GENE-UP ®E. coli O157:H7 Method for the Detection of E. coli O157:H7 in Select Foods: Collaborative Study, 2019.03

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 1338-1347
Author(s):  
Ronald Johnson ◽  
John Mills ◽  
Jean-Louis Pittet ◽  
Maryse Rannou ◽  
Patrick Bird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Control Level ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Contamination Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Contamination Levels

Abstract Background The GENE-UP®E. coli O157:H7 2 (ECO 2) assay (Performance Tested MethodSM 121805) incorporates Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer hybridization probes into its proprietary PCR technology for the rapid detection of E. coli O157:H7 in select foods. Objective The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method’s interlaboratory performance and submit the result to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as First Action Official MethodSM for the detection of E. coli O157:H7 in select foods. Method The GENE-UP® method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study as part of the MicroVal validation process using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, raw milk cheese (Comté, 34% fat, 0.8% salt). The candidate method was compared to the ISO 16654:2001 reference method. Fourteen participants from 13 laboratories throughout the European Union participated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 colony-forming units (CFU)/test portion), a low contamination level (∼5 CFU/test portion), and a high contamination level (∼10 CFU/test portion). Data from that study were analyzed according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model as presented in the AOAC validation guidelines. The difference in laboratory POD (dLPODC) values with 95% confidence interval across collaborators was calculated for each level between the candidate and reference method results, and between the candidate presumptive and confirmed results. Results The dLPODC values with 95% confidence interval were; 0.00 (–0.04, 0.04), 0.27 (0.04, 0.49), and 0.17 (0.01, 0.33) for the non-inoculated, low and high contamination levels respectively. Conclusions The dLPODC results indicate a significant difference between the candidate method and the reference method for both the low and high contamination levels, with the candidate method producing higher recovery of the target organism at both levels. Highlights The GENE-UP E. coli O157:H7 assay provides industry with a rapid, accurate detection method for E. coli O157:H7 in a broad range of foods.

Evaluation of 3M Molecular Detection Assay (MDA) 2–Listeria for the Detection of Listeria Species in Select Foods and Environmental Surfaces: Collaborative Study, First Action 2016.07

2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-98
Author(s):  
Patrick Bird ◽  
Jonathan Flannery ◽  
Erin Crowley ◽  
James Agin ◽  
David Goins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Detection ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Chicken Breast ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Listeria Species ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Detection Assay ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract 3M Molecular Detection Assay (MDA) 2–Listeria uses loop-mediated isothermal amplification and bioluminescence detection to rapidly detect Listeria species in a broad range of food types and environmental surfaces. Using an unpaired study design, MDA 2–Listeria was compared with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service's Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook Chapter 8.09 “Isolation and identification of Listeria monocytogenes from red meat, poultry and egg products, and environmental samples” reference method for the detection of Listeria in deli turkey and raw chicken breast fillet. Technicians from 13 laboratories located within the continental United States and Canada participated in the collaborative study. Each matrix was evaluated at three levels of contamination: uninoculated control (0 CFU/test portion), low inoculum (0.2–2 CFU/test portion), and high inoculum (2–5 CFU/test portion). Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD) statistical model. Results obtained for the low-inoculum-level test portions produced a difference between two laboratory POD values (dLPOD) with 95% confidence intervals of 0.04 (–0.08, 0.17) for deli turkey, indicating the difference between the methods was not statistically significant at the P = 0.05. For raw chicken breast fillet, a dLPOD value with 95% confidence interval of 0.16 (0.04, 0.28) indicated a statistically significant difference between the two methods, with an observed higher proportion of positive results by the candidate method than the reference method.

scholarly journals Validation of iQ-Check E. coli O157:H7 Real-Time PCR Test Kit for Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Selected Foods

2009 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 1095-1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy F Lauer ◽  
Sylvie Tymciu ◽  
Caroline D Sidi ◽  
Pierre Sonigo
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Target Sequence ◽  
Apple Cider ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Test Kit ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The U.S

Abstract iQ-Check E. coli O157:H7 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) is a real-time PCR kit for detection of E. coli O157:H7 from selected foods. Specific fluorescent oligonucleotide probes are used to detect target DNA during the amplification, by hybridizing to the amplicons. These fluorescent probes are linked to a fluorophore which fluoresces only when hybridized to the target sequence. Three foods (ground beef, apple cider, fresh spinach) were selected to compare the performance of iQ-Check E. coli O157:H7 to the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) reference method for ground beef and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference method for apple cider and fresh spinach. Three protocols were tested in this study: a shortened 8 h primary enrichment in buffered peptone water (BPW), a 24 h enrichment in BPW, and an enrichment in appropriate reference method enrichment broth. The iQ-Check E. coli O157:H7 method was able to identify more true/confirmed positive samples than the reference method. Inclusivity and exclusivity rates of the method were 100. iQ-Check E. coli O157:H7 performed as expected when minor procedural variations were introduced, validating the ruggedness of the method. There was no significant difference observed in performance over the shelf life of the kit.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Applied Biosystems MicroSEQ® Real-Time PCR System for Detection of Salmonella spp. in Food

2011 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 1106-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priya Balachandran ◽  
Yanxiang Cao ◽  
Lily Wong ◽  
Manohar R Furtado ◽  
Olga V Petrauskene ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Peanut Butter ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Black Pepper ◽  
Salmonella Spp ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Real-time PCR methods for detecting foodborne pathogens offer the advantages of simplicity and quick time-to-results compared to traditional culture methods. In this study, the MicroSEQ® real-time PCR system was evaluated for detection of Salmonella spp. in 10 different food matrixes following the AOAC Research Institute's Performance Tested MethodSM validation program. In addition, the performance of the MicroSEQ system was evaluated for the detection of Salmonella in peanut butter as a part of the Emergency Response Validation Program sponsored by the AOAC Research Institute. The system was compared to the ISO 6579 reference method using a paired-study design for detecting Salmonella spp. in raw ground beef, raw chicken, raw shrimp, Brie cheese, shell eggs, cantaloupe, chocolate, black pepper, dry infant formula, and dry pet food. For the peanut butter study, the system was compared to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual procedures using an unpaired-study design. No significant difference in performance was observed between the MicroSEQ Salmonella spp. detection system and the corresponding reference methods for all 11 food matrixes. The MicroSEQ system detected all Salmonella strains tested, while showing good discrimination against detection of an exclusivity panel of 30 strains, with high accuracy.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the iQ-Check®Salmonella II Assay in Select Foods: Collaborative Study, First Action 2017.06

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 1043-1057
Author(s):  
Patrick Bird ◽  
M Joseph Benzinger ◽  
Benjamin Bastin ◽  
Erin Crowley ◽  
James Agin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
The United States ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Milk Chocolate ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Dog Food ◽  
Interlaboratory Reproducibility

Abstract The iQ-Check Salmonella II Real-Time PCR test kit utilizes Salmonella-specific oligonucleotide probes and primers for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella species in select food types. The alternative method was evaluated by using 375 g test portions in an unpaired study design for two matrices, milk chocolate and dry dog food. Each matrix was compared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method. Fourteen technicians from 12 laboratories, including academia and industry, located within the United States and Canada participated in the collaborative study. Three levels of contamination were evaluated for each matrix: an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2–2 CFU/test portion), and a high inoculum level (2–5 CFU/test portion). The statistical analysis was conducted according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model. The results obtained for the low inoculum level test portions produced a difference in the candidate presumptive and confirmatory results (dLPOD) value with a 95% confidence interval of −0.05, (−0.15, 0.06) for the milk chocolate and 0.10, (−0.01, 0.21) for the dry dog food. The dLPOD results indicate an equivalence between the candidate method and reference method for the matrices evaluated, and the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. False positive and false negative rates were determined for each matrix and produce values of <2%. Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Solus One Salmonella Assay in Select Foods: Collaborative Study: First Action 2020.03

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 1568-1581
Author(s):  
Benjamin Bastin ◽  
M Joseph Benzinger ◽  
Erin S Crowley ◽  
James Agin ◽  
Raymond Wakefield
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Control Level ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
The United States ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
The Matrix

Abstract Background The Solus One Salmonella immunoassay utilizes Salmonella specific selective media and automated liquid handling, for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella species in select food types. Objective The candidate method was evaluated using 375 g test portions in an unpaired study design for a single matrix, instant non-fat dry milk (NFDM) powder. Method The matrix was compared to the United States Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM) Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method. Eleven participants from 10 laboratories within academia and industry, located within the United States, Mexico, South Africa, Germany, and the United Kingdom, contributed data for the collaborative study. Three levels of contamination were evaluated for each matrix: an uninoculated control level [0 colony forming units (CFU)/test portion], a low inoculum level (0.2–2 CFU/test portion) and a high inoculum level (2–5 CFU/test portion). Statistical analysis was conducted according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model. Results Results obtained for the low inoculum level test portions produced a dLPOD value with a 95% confidence interval between the candidate method confirmed (both alternative and conventional confirmation procedures) and the reference method of 0.07 (−0.02, 0.15). Conclusions The dLPOD results indicate equivalence between the candidate method and the reference method for the matrix evaluated and the method demonstrated acceptable inter-laboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. False positive and false negative rates were determined for the matrix and produce values of <2%. Highlights Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated acceptable inter-laboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis.

Evaluation of the GENE-UP ® Listeria monocytogenes Method for the Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in a Variety of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Collaborative Study, First Action 2019.11

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Johnson ◽  
John Mills ◽  
Jean-Louis Pittet ◽  
Olivier Mathia ◽  
Patrick Bird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Control Level ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Cottage Cheese ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Environmental Surfaces

Abstract Background The GENE-UP®Listeria monocytogenes 2 (LMO 2) assay (Performance Tested MethodSM 121804) uses real-time PCR technology and a proprietary detection platform, the GENE-UP® Thermocycler, to detect Listeria monocytogenes in a variety of foods and environmental surfaces. Objective The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method’s interlaboratory performance and submit the result to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as First Action Official MethodSM for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in a variety of foods and select environmental surfaces. Method The GENE-UP® method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study as part of the AFNOR NF VALIDATION certification process using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, full-cream goat milk cottage cheese (8.4% fat). The candidate method was compared to the ISO 11290-1/Amd.1:2004 reference method. Sixteen participants from 15 laboratories throughout the European Union participated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (∼2 CFU/test portion) and a high inoculum level (∼10 CFU/test portion). Data from the study were analyzed according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model as presented in the AOAC validation guidelines. Results The dLPODC values with 95% confidence interval for each comparison were; -0.02 (-0.07, 0.03), -0.08 (-0.31, 0.16) and 0.00 (-0.03, 0.03) for the non-inoculated, low and high contamination levels respectively. Conclusion The dLPODC results demonstrate no difference in performance between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated. Highlights The GENE-UP LMO method demonstrated accuracy and precision in detecting and discerning L. monocytogenes from other Listeria species.

Interlaboratory Validation for a Real-Time PCR Salmonella Detection Method Using the ABI 7500 FAST Real-Time PCR System

2015 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1119-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHORNG-MING CHENG ◽  
TARA DORAN ◽  
WEN LIN ◽  
KAI-SHUN CHEN ◽  
DONNA WILLIAMS-HILL ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Detection Method ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Network Member ◽  
Fast System ◽  
Enhanced Sensitivity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chili Powder

Sixteen FERN (Food Emergency Response Network) member laboratories collaborated in this study to verify extension of the real-time PCR Salmonella detection method originally designed for the single-tube Cepheid SmartCycler II and validated against the Salmonella method of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual to the Applied Biosystems (ABI) 7500 FAST Real-Time PCR system multiwell plate platform. Four foods were selected for this study: chili powder, soft cheese, fish, and tomatoes; these foods represent products that are commonly analyzed for the presence of Salmonella for regulatory purposes. Each food consisted of six uninoculated control samples, six samples inoculated with low Salmonella levels (target 1 to 5 CFU/25 g), and six samples inoculated with high levels (target 10 to 50 CFU/25 g). All samples were tested for Salmonella using the 24-h quantitative PCR (qPCR) method for detecting Salmonella, which utilizes modified buffered peptone water as the sole enrichment medium and an internal control for the qPCR. Each of these 18 samples was individually analyzed for Salmonella by the collaborating laboratories using both the ABI 7500 FAST system (alternative method) and the SmartCycler II system (reference method). Statistical analysis of the data revealed no significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) between these two qPCR platforms except for the chili powder samples. The differences noted with chili powder (P = 0.0455) were attributed to the enhanced sensitivity of the ABI 7500 FAST system compared with the SmartCycler II system. The detection limit of both qPCR methods was 0.02 to 0.15 CFU/g. These results provide a solid basis for extending the 24-h qPCR Salmonella method to the ABI 7500 FAST system for high-throughput detection of Salmonella in foods.

scholarly journals Improvement of Legionnaires’ disease diagnosis using real-time PCR assay: a retrospective analysis, Italy, 2010 to 2015

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (50) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Ricci ◽  
Antonella Grottola ◽  
Giulia Fregni Serpini ◽  
Antonino Bella ◽  
Maria Cristina Rota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
The Real ◽  
Legionnaires Disease ◽  
Antigen Tests

Aim To evaluate real-time PCR as a diagnostic method for Legionnaires’ disease (LD). Detection of Legionella DNA is among the laboratory criteria of a probable LD case, according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, although the utility and advantages, as compared to culture, are widely recognised. Methods Two independent laboratories, one using an in-house and the other a commercial real-time PCR assay, analysed 354 respiratory samples from 311 patients hospitalised with pneumonia between 2010–15. The real-time PCR reliability was compared with that of culture and urinary antigen tests (UAT). Concordance, specificity, sensitivity and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were calculated. Results Overall PCR detected eight additional LD cases, six of which were due to Legionella pneumophila (Lp) non-serogroup 1. The two real-time PCR assays were concordant in 99.4% of the samples. Considering in-house real-time PCR as the reference method, specificity of culture and UAT was 100% and 97.9% (95% CI: 96.2–99.6), while the sensitivity was 63.6% (95%CI: 58.6–68.6) and 77.8% (95% CI: 72.9–82.7). PPV and NPV for culture were 100% and 93.7% (95% CI: 91.2-96.3). PPV and NPV for UAT were 87.5% (95% CI: 83.6-91.4) and 95.8% (95% CI: 93.5-98.2). Conclusion Regardless of the real-time PCR assay used, it was possible to diagnose LD cases with higher sensitivity than using culture or UAT. These data encourage the adoption of PCR as routine laboratory testing to diagnose LD and such methods should be eligible to define a confirmed LD case.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document