Rechtliche Regulierung der Produktlebensdauer

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Stadermann

The topic of this work is the lifespan of products as an object of regulation by German and European legislators. The life span of a product is an essential parameter to limit the negative environmental impact of a product. Based on this premise, the study shows possibilities to extend the lifespan of products through legal regulation in order to enable consumers to consume products more sustainably. The study first addresses the effects of current law on product life, both in civil law and in the public law of product regulation. Based on the current law, it then develops strategies for national and European legislators to regulate the longevity of products.

Author(s):  
A. S. Tymoshenko

The article discusses the issues of interpretation and applicability in competition law and in antitrust law enforcement practice of the civil law principle of good faith. The theoretical view of the concept of good faith as incompatible with the nature of public law is criticized.The law enforcement practice in cases of violation of antitrust laws by participants of anticompetitive agreements was studied, which influenced the formation of key judicial positions related to assessing compliance with the principle of good faith by bidders. According to the results of the study, it was concluded that the civil law principle of good faith is at the same time a general principle of competition law as an integrated branch of law combining public and private principles of legal regulation.It is noted that the use of this principle for legal assessment of the actions of participants in cartel agreements at tenders is not only an important tool to counteract cartelization of state and municipal procurements, but also a means of creating a business ethics of entrepreneurial relations in the public interest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 41-44
Author(s):  
Natalya T. Leonenko ◽  

The article studies the genesis of the deputy’s mandate institution. The relevancy of this subject is determined by the imperfection of the legal regulation of the institution under study; absence of clarity in its implementation; modernization of public law relations. The public government structure and the general democracy system largely depend on which type of mandate will be preferred in the Russian representative system. The purpose of the article is the research of the legal nature of the institution of mandate of a deputy of representative public government authorities and various aspects of this problem using formal legal, historical, comparative legal and logical methods.


Author(s):  
Vladimir Đurić ◽  
Nevenko Vranješ

It is the purpose of this paper to highlight the relation between official toponymy in comparative and domestic law. Toponymy is legally regulated. After the analyzing of the position of official toponymy in the comparative law, selected legal aspects of its regulation in the Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republic of Srpska legal systems are presented: the constitutional regulation of the names of country, constitutive unites and capitals, the constitutional and law regulation of the official use of language and script, the legal regulation of the local-self-government unit names and official place names, as well as the administrative procedure of the place names change.


Author(s):  
Maria A. Kapustina

Legal regulation is caused by the necessity to provide legal order of social regulation. The legal order of regulation is provided by formal legal certainty of regulatory provisions (legal prescripts) and their legal substance. However, there exist relations, whose content, namely, subjective rights and juridical responsibilities of the parties are not strictly prescribed in the legislative norms. Because a legislator cannot foresee all the variety of social relations that may occur in real life and prescribe their formal and legal substance in corresponding legislative acts. In such cases, we usually talk about gaps in law, about the uncertainty of legal regulation. Gaps are taken for granted, considered as an obligatory element of any legal system. Nonetheless, whether there can be gaps in the public law, if in the public law sphere norms are created purposively? In public law, norms are created purposefully (with a goal in mind), public law institutions are artificially established and rationally modernized. The lack of a norm of a statute can mean the refusal of the legislator to legally regulate the question, at least at the moment. This is so-called in legal literature “qualified silence of the legislator” that should not be considered as a gap in law.


Author(s):  
A.P. Ushakova ◽  

From the standpoint of the dominant interest criterion the article examines the justification of the legislator`s decision to apply public law methods in order to regulate relations concerning the use of land for infrastructural facilities placing. The author gives the arguments in favor of understanding the public interest as the interest of the whole society as a system, rather than the interest of an indefinite range of persons or the majority of the population. The author concludes that there is the simultaneous presence in the specified legal relations and private interests of the participants of legal relations, and public interests of society as a system. Both types of interests in these legal relations are important, but in terms of different aspects of the legal impact mechanism. Public interest is important because its realization is the purpose of legal regulation of this type of legal relations, from this point of view it acts as a dominant interest. The private interest of the holder of a public servitude is important as an incentive to attract the efforts of private individuals to achieve a publicly significant goal. The private interest of a land plot owner is important from the point of view of securing the right of ownership. It is substantiated that the public servitude is not an arbitrary decision of the legislator, but an example of application of the incentive method in the land law, which provides a favorable legal regime for a socially useful activity.


Lex Russica ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 37-50
Author(s):  
V. G. Golubtsov

Based on general legal and civilistic experience in the study of evaluative concepts, the author investigates the general and the specific in their civil law nature. As the result of the study, the author draws the conclusion that the existence of evaluative concepts forms a distinctive essential feature of civil law as private law. It is noted, however, that the doctrine, law-maker and law-enforcer need basic guidelines that will allow to define objective criteria for nominating concepts as evaluative, as well as for determining the boundaries of their systematic interpretation. Also, the author concludes that the impact of evaluation concepts on legal regulation in private and public law is different. In civil law, depending on the localization in the text of the Civil Code, it is possible to distinguish two groups of evaluation concepts. The first group includes the basic evaluation concepts that allow us to see the goals, meaning and specifics of civil law regulation. The second group, in the author’s opinion, includes peripheral evaluation concepts that are utilized by property law and separate contractual constructions and the presence of which allows to avoid unnecessary causality and, at the same time, makes it possible to bring legal regulation closer to real relations.


Author(s):  
Andris Pešudovs

Andris Pešudovs analizē Civilprocesa likuma 400. panta pirmās daļas 1. punkta – saistību bezstrīdus piespiedu izpildīšanas tiesu praksi un tās iespējamo ietekmi uz tiesiskā regulējuma pilnveidošanu, akcentējot uzmanību uz publiskas ķīlas formas kā atvieglotas pierādīšanas līdzekļa nozīmes palielināšanu. Andris Pešudovs analyses the Section 400, Part I, Paragraph 1 of the Civil Law – undisputed enforcement of obligations of court practice and its possible effect on the improvement of legal regulation, emphasising the attention on the importance of the public pledge form as a means of facilitated evidence.


Author(s):  
O. Pavlovskyi

In accordance with Part 2 of Art. 17 of the Constitution of Ukraine, military units, first of all, are the bearers of power and act in public relations as subjects of realization of the goal set by the state in the form of repulse of possible aggression from outside, and therefore the main tasks, internal structure, subordination, reporting and control in this area is governed by constitutional and administrative law. However, in some cases, the military unit for the implementation of its tasks may act as an independent entity in civil law, and therefore, certain relations are governed not only by constitutional, administrative, economic, but also civil law. This paper will deal with contractual obligations. The supply contract is extremely important in providing Ukraine, its subjects and state entities with the necessary goods, performance of works, provision of services. In essence, the institute of contract law is a legal means of implementing state policy in the field of industrial production, construction, national defense, social assistance, science, culture, the implementation of basic social and production tasks. Currently, there is a trend aimed at increasing the budget funds used through public procurement. In this regard, an urgent problem is the effective legal regulation of public relations related to the supply of goods for public use. The regulatory framework governing these legal relations must be transparent, understandable to all participants in trade and procurement operations, operational on changes in socio-economic conditions in the country, have an anti-corruption orientation. The quality of goods purchased for the state also remains a long-standing problem. One of the topical issues for the science of civil law is the question of the subject of the contract, with which the Central Committee of Ukraine connects the conclusion of the contract, its validity and some other significant circumstances. According to case law, disputes arising from the contract are usually complicated by non-compliance by the parties with the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine on the subject of the contract. The article analyzes the subject of the contract for the supply of material resources to military units. Military units are considered by the author as legal entities of a subject of public law.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-33
Author(s):  
Andrey G. Ananev

The civil legislation reform affects the provisions on public contracts. This article deals with the issues surrounding public contract qualification under the conditions of modern regulation. A characteristic feature of modern regulation and theoretical provisions of civil law is the lack of unified approaches to defining the public contract concept, its essence, and accompanying conditions. In practice, there are various situations wherein the legislator does not give clear instructions on certain aspects of contracts that have a public character. This determines the theoretical and practical relevance of examining this area. The article analyzes the main defining features of the designated contractual structure and examines the features of expression of public-legal principles in legal regulation in these contractual relations. The methodological basis of the research is the analysis of normative material, civil law theory and certain aspects of law enforcement on public contracts norms. The article highlights the legal and conceptual aspects of public contract institution in the context of modern legal regulation. The task of further research on this issue is not so much to find one correct definition of this agreement for the legislator, but rather to fix the individualizing features in the law, by integrating them either into the conceptual apparatus or by directly fixing them in the normative act text. The author attempts to systematize the relevant features and to identify the distinct principles for differentiating a public contract with the related contractual structures. The article also presents clear criteria for differentiation and the hierarchy of the application of certain rules to relations arising from a public contract. This paper concludes by highlighting the need to proceed not only from the definition of law, but also from specific features of a public contract, when identifying the designated contractual structure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-319
Author(s):  
Valeriya Goncharova

Settlement agreements in civil and arbitration proceedings are one of the most convenient and effective ways to resolve disputes arising between participants in civil legal relations. At the same time, within the framework of some civil disputes, the content of settlement agreements has significant specificity, and sometimes – due to the peculiarities of the subject composition and the merits of the case – they cannot be applied at all for the purpose of reconciling the parties. An example of such disputes are cases related to the recognition of the transaction as invalid and the application of the consequences of the invalidity of the transaction, the legal regulation of which is unique. The economic reasons for the invalidity of transactions predetermine the peculiarities of the content of settlement agreements in the relevant category of cases, limiting it exclusively to the procedure for fulfilling restorative obligations and obligations to compensate for losses. This circumstance is due to the fact that, from the point of view of the dynamics of civil legal relations, an invalid transaction introduces uncertainty in the ownership of property and the distribution of rights and obligations of the participants in legal relations, which can be eliminated only by restoring the situation that existed before the conclusion and execution of the transaction with a defect. The current civil law regulation in this part (Article 4311 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation), which allows the conclusion of analogues of amicable agreements in cases of invalidity of transactions involving other, in addition to restitution, the consequences of the invalidity of transactions, in this regard, cannot be recognized as satisfactory. Contestation of the transaction by “another person specified in the law” (Article 166 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation), as well as in the interests of third parties by specially authorized entities (procedural plaintiffs), the possibility of participation in a completed and executed transaction of public law entities determine the raising of questions about the possibility of concluding amicable agreements by these entities. It is noted that these subjects, as follows from the analysis of domestic civil, civil procedural, administrative and family legislation, being interested in resolving the case on recognizing the transaction as invalid and on the application of the consequences of its invalidity, do not participate in its execution, and therefore cannot determine the procedure for the fulfillment of obligations arising from it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document