scholarly journals The Use of Reynolds Risk Score in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Apparently Healthy Bosnian Men and Women: Cross-Sectional Study

Author(s):  
Asija Zairagi
2008 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 783-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Dyakova ◽  
Elena Shipkovenska ◽  
Peter Dyakov ◽  
Plamen Dimitrov ◽  
Svetla Torbova

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tolou Hasandokht ◽  
Arsalan Salari ◽  
Salman Nikfarjam ◽  
Soheil Soltanipour ◽  
Mani Shalchi ◽  
...  

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality has increased in the Iranian population. Word Health Organization (WHO) risk score was recently used in Iranian prevention and control of non-communicable disease programs for risk assessment. The purpose of the study was to compare the 10-year cardiovascular risk using atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and WHO risk score. In a cross-sectional study, data from patients with cardiac symptoms without any documents related to CVD were collected from the outpatient clinic. The proportion of subjects with high CVD risk according to ASCVD and WHO risk score and also agreement between two scores was presented. The sensitivity and specificity of ASCVD according to the WHO risk score as a national risk assessment tool were calculated. The study included 284 subjects with a mean age of 53.80 (8.78) years and 68 % of women. The frequency of subjects with high CVD risk based on ASCVD and WHO was 35% and 6%, respectively. The agreement between the two scores was moderate (κ=0.45), with the most agreement in identifying low-risk subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of ASCVD according to the WHO risk score was 95.3% and 75.1%, respectively. The present finding showed that Agreement between two risk scores was moderated, especially in stratifying low-risk subjects. But, the ASCVD risk score categorized more people as a high risk rather than the WHO tool. Assessment of the accuracy of the WHO risk score with comparing predicted risk with observed risk in a cohort study for the Iranian population is necessary.


2019 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-131
Author(s):  
Jallyne Nunes Vieira ◽  
Marina Augusta Dias Braz ◽  
Flayane Oliveira Gomes ◽  
Priscilla Rafaella da Silva ◽  
Ohanna Thays de Medeiros Santos ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (56_suppl) ◽  
pp. 40-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.L. Jenkins ◽  
L. Weinehall ◽  
T.A. Erb ◽  
C. Lewis ◽  
A.N. Nafziger ◽  
...  

Objectives: This paper aims to develop and describe a method for combining, comparing, and maximizing the statistical power of two longitudinal studies of risk factors for cardiovascular disease that did not have identical data collection methodologies. Methods: Subjects from a 1986 cross-sectional study (n= 180) were pair-matched with subjects of corresponding gender and age (+ 5 years) from a 1990 cross-sectional study. The methodology is described and results are calculated for various measures of cardiovascular risk or risk factors (e.g. cholesterol, Finnish Risk Score). Results: Box's test of equality and symmetry of covariance matrices gave chi-square values of 223.8 and 710.0 for two cardiovascular risk factors (cholesterol and cardiac risk score, respectively); these values were highly significant (p=0.0001). For the North Karelia Risk Score, repeated measures ANOVA revealed a borderline significant interaction for treatment by time (p=0.054) and a significant interaction for treatment by time by country (p=0.035). These probabilities compared favorably with a randomized blocks model. Conclusions: Creation of a synthetic longitudinal control group resulted in a statistically valid ANOVA model that increased the statistical power of the study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document