scholarly journals Second-year Outcomes of Implementing Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iman Khorshidi-Malahmadi ◽  
Setareh Sima ◽  
Najmeh Ansari ◽  
Azadeh Moghaddas
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
T Test ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Pediatric Hospital ◽  
Hospital Data ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Defined Daily Doses ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Impact

Background: The increasing use of antimicrobial agents and resistance is becoming a serious problem in pediatric patients. Hence, antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) is implemented to lessen the consequences. Objectives: This report aimed to demonstrate the impact of ASP on antimicrobials utilization in a referral and tertiary pediatric hospital in Isfahan, Iran. Methods: We launched an ASP for inpatients in March 2018 at the Imam Hussain Hospital, which is a 186-bed pediatrics hospital. Data was collected by ASP multidisciplinary team and using hospital records during February 2017-January 2018 (pre-intervention) and February 2019-January 2020 (post-intervention) periods. Consumption data were expressed as defined daily doses (DDDs) per 100 patient-days (PD). Independent sample t-test and paired t-test were used to assess the significance of differences. The rates of antimicrobials resistance for the most common hospital pathogens were also tracked. Results: Utilization of total antimicrobials decreased meaningfully by 12.41% (from 62.11 DDDs/100 PD in February 2017-January 2018 to 54.40 DDDs/100 PD in February 2019-January 2020; P = 0.024). The results showed that the reduction in non-restricted antimicrobials was less (5.43%) than restricted antimicrobials (27.6%). Conclusions: According to our results, the use of antimicrobials, especially the broad-spectrum ones, and the health burden costs significantly decreased after implementing ASP. Thus, continuous monitoring and educational programs are recommended to reduce the negative effects of using antimicrobials.

scholarly journals 43. Impact of a Five-Year Intervention of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on the Optimal Antibiotic Prophylaxis Selection in Surgery in a Hospital without Restrictions on Antibiotics Prescription in Costa Rica

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S143-S143
Author(s):  
José P Díaz-Madriz ◽  
Esteban Zavaleta-Monestel ◽  
Jorge A Villalobos-Madriz ◽  
Alison V Meléndez-Alfaro ◽  
Priscilla Castrillo-Portillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Defined Daily Doses ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Background In a private hospital without restrictions on antibiotic prescription, the success of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) depends mainly on prospective feedback and education. Previously, the ASP of this hospital (PROA-HCB) managed to achieve a positive impact on the antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean delivery. The purpose of this study is to characterize the impact after implementing the PROA-HCB on the optimal prophylaxis selection of all the procedures included in the clinical guideline for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in adult patients. Methods A retrospective observational study that compares the selection, duration, antibiotic consumption, bacterial resistance profiles and patient’s safety outcomes regarding antibiotic use for all surgical prophylaxis prescription over six months for the periods before (pre-ASP) and after a five-year intervention of PROA-HCB (post-ASP). Results After a five-year intervention, the percentage of optimal selection of antibiotic prophylaxis in Surgery was 21.0% (N=1598) in the pre-ASP period and 80.0% (N=841) in the post-ASP period (59% absolute improvement, p < 0.001). Percentage of optimal duration was 69,1% (N=1598) in the pre-ASP period and 78.0% (N=841) in the post-ASP period (8.9% absolute improvement, p < 0.001). Mean ceftriaxone utilization was 217.7 defined daily doses (DDD) per 1,000 patient days DDD for the pre-ASP period and 139.8 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the ASP period (35.8% decrease; p = 0.019). Mean cefazolin utilization was 14.9 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the pre-ASP period and 153.3 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the ASP period (928.6% increase; p = 0.021). Regarding percentage of bacterial resistance, there was detected an improvement in some isolates like Escherichia coli with a decrease of ESBL detection (11% decrease; p = 0.007). In addition, no serious adverse reactions or an increase in surgical site infections were detected after the intervention. Conclusion The implementation of an ASP in the surgical ward showed an overall positive impact on selection and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Furthermore, this intervention could have had a positive impact on antimicrobial resistance and at the same time had no negative effects on the patients. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 64. Impact of a Duration Bundle on Antimicrobial Use in a Pediatric Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S52-S52
Author(s):  
Erin Weslander ◽  
Diana Li ◽  
Xuanqing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Pediatric Hospital ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Limiting antibiotic durations to the shortest effective duration is a strong recommendation with moderate-quality evidence in the 2016 IDSA Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) guidelines. An ASP bundle including a decrease in antimicrobial automatic stop dates from 14 days to 10 days along with a guideline for standard durations for 48 specific indications was implemented at a tertiary pediatric hospital in November 2019. The purpose of this review and was to assess the impact of this ASP initiative on patient outcomes and hospital cost-savings by comparison of pre-intervention and post-intervention data. Methods A set of antimicrobial duration recommendations for pediatric patients was created by the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Pediatric Hospital Medicine providers, and Infectious Disease providers specific to indication, agent, or pathogen. After education of medical care providers and distribution of the recommendations, automatic stop dates in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) were updated from 14 days to 10 days for all antimicrobials. Concomitant advertising campaigns were shown on all hospital screensavers. Data were collected for a one month pre-intervention period of Nov.15 - Dec.15, 2018 including 133 patients and a one month intervention period of Nov.15 - Dec.15, 2019 including 125 patients. Results The average length of stay decreased from an average of 8.3 days pre-implementation to 6.7 days (p=0.043) post implementation. The ratio of actual to recommended duration also decreased from 1.56 to 1.30 (p< 0.001) when comparing pre vs. post initiative. Balancing measures did not change for restarting treatment within 48 hours of stopping or readmission within 30 days for the same infection. The decrease in inpatient therapy translated to more than $10,000 per year in direct drug cost. Conclusion This intervention lead to a significant reduction in average length of stay per admission and significantly reduced the secondary outcomes of the total duration of antimicrobial therapy and the ratio of actual duration compared to recommended duration. This lead to cost savings and decreased inappropriate antibiotic exposure. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Implementation of a Rapid Phenotypic Susceptibility Platform for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections With Paired Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan D Robinson ◽  
Allison M Stilwell ◽  
April E Attai ◽  
Lindsay E Donohue ◽  
Megan D Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Implementation of the Accelerate PhenoTM Gram-negative platform (RDT) paired with antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention projects to improve time to institutional-preferred antimicrobial therapy (IPT) for Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). However, few data describe the impact of discrepant RDT results from standard of care (SOC) methods on antimicrobial prescribing. Methods A single-center, pre-/post-intervention study of consecutive, nonduplicate blood cultures for adult inpatients with GNB BSI following combined RDT + ASP intervention was performed. The primary outcome was time to IPT. An a priori definition of IPT was utilized to limit bias and to allow for an assessment of the impact of discrepant RDT results with the SOC reference standard. Results Five hundred fourteen patients (PRE 264; POST 250) were included. Median time to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results decreased 29.4 hours (P < .001) post-intervention, and median time to IPT was reduced by 21.2 hours (P < .001). Utilization (days of therapy [DOTs]/1000 days present) of broad-spectrum agents decreased (PRE 655.2 vs POST 585.8; P = .043) and narrow-spectrum beta-lactams increased (69.1 vs 141.7; P < .001). Discrepant results occurred in 69/250 (28%) post-intervention episodes, resulting in incorrect ASP recommendations in 10/69 (14%). No differences in clinical outcomes were observed. Conclusions While implementation of a phenotypic RDT + ASP can improve time to IPT, close coordination with Clinical Microbiology and continued ASP follow up are needed to optimize therapy. Although uncommon, the potential for erroneous ASP recommendations to de-escalate to inactive therapy following RDT results warrants further investigation.

scholarly journals 142. Implementing an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Outpatient Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S82-S82
Author(s):  
Travis B Nielsen ◽  
Maressa Santarossa ◽  
Beatrice D Probst ◽  
Laurie Labuszewski ◽  
Jenna Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
The United States ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Stewardship Program

Abstract Background Antimicrobial-resistant infections lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Among the most facile modifiable risk factors for developing resistance is inappropriate prescribing. The CDC estimates that 47 million (or ≥30% of) outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in the United States are unnecessary. This has provided impetus for expanding our antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) into the outpatient setting. Initial goals included the following: continuous evaluation and reporting of antibiotic prescribing compliance; minimize underuse of antibiotics from delayed diagnoses and misdiagnoses; ensure proper drug, dose, and duration; improve the percentage of appropriate prescriptions. Methods To achieve these goals, we first sent a baseline survey to outpatient prescribers, assessing their understanding of stewardship and antimicrobial resistance. Questions were modeled from the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Precious Drugs & Scary Bugs Campaign. The survey was sent to prescribers at 19 primary care and three immediate/urgent care clinics. Compliance rates for prescribing habits were subsequently tracked via electronic health records and reported to prescribers in accordance with IRB approval. Results Prescribers were highly knowledgeable about what constitutes appropriate prescribing, with verified compliance rates highly concordant with self-reported rates. However, 74% of respondents reported intense pressure from patients to inappropriately prescribe antimicrobials. Compliance rates have been tracked since December 2018 and comparing pre- with post-intervention rates shows improvement in primary care since reporting rates to prescribers in August 2019. Conclusion Reporting compliance rates has been helpful in avoiding inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. However, the survey data reinforce the importance of behavioral interventions to bolster ASP efficacy in the outpatient setting. Going forward, posters modeled off of the IDPH template will be conspicuously exhibited in exam rooms, indicating institutional commitment to the enumerated ASP guidelines. Future studies will allow for comparison of pre- and post-intervention knowledge and prescriber compliance. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals An evaluation of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile positivity as a patient outcome metric of antimicrobial stewardship in Saudi Arabia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Okeahialam ◽  
Ali A. Rabaan ◽  
Albert Bolhuis
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcome ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Repeated Testing ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Impact

AbstractBackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship has been associated with a reduction in the incidence of health care associated Clostridium difficile infection (HA-CDI). However, CDI remains under-recognized in many low and middle-income countries where clinical and surveillance resources required to identify HA-CDI are often lacking. The rate of toxigenic C. difficile stool positivity in the stool of hospitalized patients may offer an alternative metric for these settings, but its utlity remains largely untested.Aim/ObjectiveTo examine the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship on the rate of toxigenic C. difficile positivity among hospitalized patients presenting with diarrhoeaMethodsA 12-year retrospective review of laboratory data was conducted to compare the rates of toxigenic C. difficile in diarrhoea stool of patients in a hospital in Saudi Arabia, before and after implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship programResultThere was a significant decline in the rate of toxigenic C difficile positivity from 9.8 to 7.4% following the implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship program, and a reversal of a rising trend.DiscussionThe rate of toxigenic C. difficile positivity may be a useful patient outcome metric for evaluating the long term impact of antimicrobial stewardship on CDI, especially in settings with limited surveillance resources. The accuracy of this metric is however dependent on the avoidance of arbitrary repeated testing of a patient for cure, and testing only unformed or diarrhoea stool specimens. Further studies are required within and beyond Saudi Arabia to examine the utility of this metric.

Development of an antimicrobial stewardship program in an integrated healthcare system

2018 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Lane ◽  
Amanda J Hays ◽  
Helen Newland ◽  
Jeanne E Zack ◽  
Rebecca M Guth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare System ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Gap Analysis ◽  
System Level ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Integrated Healthcare ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Regulatory Mandates ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose The development of an inpatient antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in an integrated healthcare system is described. Summary With increasing national focus on reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use, state and national regulatory mandates require hospitals to develop ASPs. In 2015, BJC HealthCare, a multihospital health system, developed a system-level, multidisciplinary ASP team to assist member hospitals with ASP implementation. A comprehensive gap analysis was performed to assess current stewardship resources, activities and compliance with CDC core elements at each facility. BJC system clinical leads facilitated the development of hospital-specific leadership support statements, identification of hospital pharmacy and medical leaders, and led development of staff and patient educational components. An antimicrobial-use data dashboard was created for reporting and tracking the impact of improvement activities. Hospital-level interventions were individualized based on the needs and resources at each facility. Hospital learnings were shared at bimonthly system ASP meetings to disseminate best practices. The initial gap analysis revealed that BJC hospitals were compliant in a median of 6 ASP elements (range, 4–8) required by regulatory mandates. By leveraging system resources, all hospitals were fully compliant with regulatory requirements by January 2017. Conclusion BJC’s ASP model facilitated the development of broad-based stewardship activities, including education modules for patients and providers and clinical decision support, while allowing hospitals to implement activities based on local needs and resource availability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document