The Arguments of Time

These nine chapters, commissioned on the initiative of the Philosophy section of the British Academy, address fundamental questions about time in philosophy, physics, linguistics, and psychology. Are there facts about the future? Could we affect the past? Physics, general relativity and quantum theory give contradictory treatments of time. So in the search for a theory of quantum gravity, which should give way: general relativity or quantum theory? In linguistics and psychology, how does our language represent time, and how do our minds keep track of it?

2020 ◽  
pp. 17-40
Author(s):  
Dean Rickles

This chapter describes some of the special challenges and novelties facing historical research in quantum gravity. Though often looked at with wry amusement when mentioned in the same breath, “history” and “quantum gravity” fit remarkably well together. Not only is there more than enough in chronological terms, the episodes are closely intertwined with other important developments in the life histories of the ingredient theories, quantum theory and general relativity. However, there are also more sociologically interesting aspects having to do with the emergence of a community of quantum gravity scholars, itself piggybacking on the availability of funding sources. Finally, we note the special status of quantum gravity, historiographically speaking, as a rare case of a field of research with more than a century of history behind it, including within it various rejections and selections of results, and yet which has as yet no experiments of its own, and no final endpoint from which to interpret the past.


2020 ◽  
pp. 41-70
Author(s):  
Dean Rickles

In this chapter we examine the very earliest work on the problem of quantum gravity (understood very liberally). We show that, even before the concept of the quantization of the gravitational field in 1929, there was a fairly lively investigation of the relationships between gravity and quantum stretching as far back as 1916, and certainly no suggestion that such a theory would not be forthcoming. Indeed, there are, rather, many suggestions explicitly advocating that an integration of quantum theory and general relativity (or gravitation, at least) is essential for future physics, in order to construct a satisfactory foundation. We also see how this belief was guided by a diverse family of underlying agendas and constraints, often of a highly philosophical nature.


Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephon Alexander ◽  
Joao Magueijo ◽  
Lee Smolin

We present an extension of general relativity in which the cosmological constant becomes dynamical and turns out to be conjugate to the Chern–Simons invariant of the Ashtekar connection on a spatial slicing. The latter has been proposed Soo and Smolin as a time variable for quantum gravity: the Chern–Simons time. In the quantum theory, the inverse cosmological constant and Chern–Simons time will then become conjugate operators. The “Kodama state” gets a new interpretation as a family of transition functions. These results imply an uncertainty relation between Λ and Chern–Simons time; the consequences of which will be discussed elsewhere.


Author(s):  
S. Majid

We consider Hilbert’s problem of the axioms of physics at a qualitative or conceptual level. This is more pressing than ever as we seek to understand how both general relativity and quantum theory could emerge from some deeper theory of quantum gravity, and in this regard I have previously proposed a principle of self-duality or quantum Born reciprocity as a key structure. Here, I outline some of my recent work around the idea of quantum space–time as motivated by this non-standard philosophy, including a new toy model of gravity on a space–time consisting of four points forming a square. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Hilbert’s sixth problem’.


Author(s):  
S. A. Larin

We analyze the R + R2 model of quantum gravity where terms quadratic in the curvature tensor are added to the General Relativity action. This model was recently proved to be a self-consistent quantum theory of gravitation, being both renormalizable and unitary. The model can be made practically indistinguishable from General Relativity at astrophysical and cosmological scales by the proper choice of parameters.


Quantum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 520
Author(s):  
Andrea Di Biagio ◽  
Pietro Donà ◽  
Carlo Rovelli

The operational formulations of quantum theory are drastically time oriented. However, to the best of our knowledge, microscopic physics is time-symmetric. We address this tension by showing that the asymmetry of the operational formulations does not reflect a fundamental time-orientation of physics. Instead, it stems from built-in assumptions about the users of the theory. In particular, these formalisms are designed for predicting the future based on information about the past, and the main mathematical objects contain implicit assumption about the past, but not about the future. The main asymmetry in quantum theory is the difference between knowns and unknowns.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Dean Rickles

This chapter provides a simple, schematic introduction to the problem of quantum gravity. The problem of quantum gravity spent much of its earliest history at the mercy of wider changes with respect to the ingredient theories, general relativity and quantum theory. Even once those theories settled down, quantum gravity remained firmly detached from experiments. This situation has only recently changed and promises to offer new phenomena to test proposed solutions to the problem which will enable us to make firmer statements about the more physical implications of these proposed solutions. However, we see that we may still face a problem of polysemicity stemming from the very differing interpretations and formulations that the ingredient theories allow, as well as differing motivations for pursuing quantum gravity.


Universe ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 232
Author(s):  
Nick E. Mavromatos

In the past two decades, we have witnessed extraordinary progress in precision measurements in cosmology [...]


2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (09) ◽  
pp. 1397-1474 ◽  
Author(s):  
MUXIN HAN ◽  
YONGGE MA ◽  
WEIMING HUANG

In the recent twenty years, loop quantum gravity, a background independent approach to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics, has been widely investigated. The aim of loop quantum gravity is to construct a mathematically rigorous, background independent, non-perturbative quantum theory for a Lorentzian gravitational field on a four-dimensional manifold. In the approach, the principles of quantum mechanics are combined with those of general relativity naturally. Such a combination provides us a picture of, so-called, quantum Riemannian geometry, which is discrete on the fundamental scale. Imposing the quantum constraints in analogy from the classical ones, the quantum dynamics of gravity is being studied as one of the most important issues in loop quantum gravity. On the other hand, the semi-classical analysis is being carried out to test the classical limit of the quantum theory. In this review, the fundamental structure of loop quantum gravity is presented pedagogically. Our main aim is to help non-experts to understand the motivations, basic structures, as well as general results. It may also be beneficial to practitioners to gain insights from different perspectives on the theory. We will focus on the theoretical framework itself, rather than its applications, and do our best to write it in modern and precise langauge while keeping the presentation accessible for beginners. After reviewing the classical connection dynamical formalism of general relativity, as a foundation, the construction of the kinematical Ashtekar–Isham–Lewandowski representation is introduced in the content of quantum kinematics. The algebraic structure of quantum kinematics is also discussed. In the content of quantum dynamics, we mainly introduce the construction of a Hamiltonian constraint operator and the master constraint project. At last, some applications and recent advances are outlined. It should be noted that this strategy of quantizing gravity can also be extended to obtain other background-independent quantum gauge theories. There is no divergence within this background-independent and diffeomorphism-invariant quantization program of matter coupled to gravity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (28n29) ◽  
pp. 1545015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hal M. Haggard ◽  
Carlo Rovelli

We present a metric that describes conventional matter collapsing into a black hole, bouncing and emerging from a white hole, and that satisfies the vacuum Einstein equations everywhere, including in the interior of the black hole and the subsequent white hole, except for a small compact 4d “quantum tunneling” zone. This shows that a black hole can tunnel into a white hole without violating classical general relativity where this can be trusted. We observe that quantum gravity can affect the metric in a region outside the horizon without violating causality because small quantum effects might pile up over time. We study how quantum theory can determines the bouncing time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document