scholarly journals Real-World Experience With Cabozantinib in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis

Author(s):  
Emily A. Lemke, DNP, RN, AGPCNP-BC, AOCNP ◽  
Amishi Y. Shah, MD ◽  
Matthew Campbell, MD ◽  
Nizar M. Tannir, MD
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payal Kapur ◽  
Samuel Peña-Llopis ◽  
Alana Christie ◽  
Leah Zhrebker ◽  
Andrea Pavía-Jiménez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4551-4551
Author(s):  
Kevin Zarrabi ◽  
Elizabeth A. Handorf ◽  
Benjamin Miron ◽  
Matthew R. Zibelman ◽  
Fern Anari ◽  
...  

4551 Background: Front-line treatment for patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has undergone rapid advances in the last five years. This evolution has led to uncertainty about the optimal first line combination regimen. Herein, we compare real-world outcomes in pts treated with either axitinib/pembrolizumab (A/P) or ipilimumab/nivolumab (I/N) reported by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score. Methods: The nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived database was used to select pts diagnosed with mRCC and treated with front-line A/P or I/N from 2018-2020. The primary endpoints were overall-survival (OS) and real-world progression free survival (rwPFS). The survival analyses were adjusted using propensity score-based Inverse Probability of Treatment weighting, providing balance on age, gender, insurance, race, IMDC, practice type, and nephrectomy. Survival was assessed from beginning of therapy, and survival by treatment groups was compared using weighted and unweighted Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests and weighted Cox proportional hazards regressions. Disease characteristics between the treatment groups were compared using chi-square and T-tests. Results: 821 pts received frontline A/P (n=259) or I/N (n= 562). Demographics and clinical parameters were similar between the two cohorts. Median age was 66 years, 73% were male, and 54.9% had a nephrectomy. 459 pts had all IMDC criteria factors available, 242 pts had missing factors but enough to define as intermediate/poor risk, 120 pts had unknown IMDC risk. Adjusted median OS was not statistically different: mOS for A/P was not reached (NR) while I/N was 22 mo (95% CI, 19.8-NR; p=0.40). Twelve-month survival was 68.5% for A/P treated pts and 65.8% for I/N treated pts (P=0.41). Twelve-month rwPFS was 41.4% for A/P treated pts and 39.7% for I/N treated pts (P=0.14). No statistical difference in survival was seen within IMDC risk strata (see table). Conclusions: In this retrospective, real-world study of pts treated with front-line A/P or I/N, 12-month survival was not statistically different irrespective of IMDC risk. Longer follow-up will be necessary to discern any significant differences.[Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 188-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Campbell ◽  
Mehmet A. Bilen ◽  
Amishi Y. Shah ◽  
Emily Lemke ◽  
E. Jonasch ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 468-468
Author(s):  
Chung-Han Lee ◽  
Andreas M Hoetker ◽  
Martin Henner Voss ◽  
Darren Richard Feldman ◽  
Kaitlin Woo ◽  
...  

468 Background: Bevacizumab targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and has showed benefit in first-line treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in combination with interferon α (Lancet 370: 2103). This retrospective analysis assessed the efficacy of bevacizumab monotherapy after progression on targeted drugs such as VEGFr tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and/or mTOR inhibitors. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with metastatic ccRCC who received bevacizumab monotherapy at MSKCC after progression on prior targeted therapies. Primary end point is overall survival and secondary endpoints include progression free survival, time on therapy, and toxicity analysis. Results: 71 patients were treated with bevacizumab monotherapy in the salvage setting. Patients were heavily pretreated with 36 (51%) patients receiving bevacizumab as a fourth-line agent or later and 33 (46%) patients received at least 2 prior VEGF targeted agents. Seventeen (24%) patients had a KPS <80% and 20 (28%) patients were in the poor prognosis MSKCC risk group. Overall median OS was 11.5 months (95% CI, 6.4-17.4 months) and overall median PFS was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.7-4.1). Nine (13%) patients had a prolonged time on therapy of >12 months. At last analysis, 8 (11%) patients remained on therapy. Therapy was discontinued for progression of disease (n=56, 89%), adverse events (n=4, 6%), or unknown/unrelated reasons (n=3, 5%). Univariate analysis showed KPS (<80% vs. ≥80%) and MSKCC Risk Factor Classification (poor vs. favorable) as prognostic for poor outcome with hazard ratios of 3.97 (95% CI, 2.09-7.52, p<0.001) and 2.84 (95% CI, 1.17-6.89, p=0.021), respectively. No significant differences in OS were seen when comparing number of lines of prior therapy or lines of prior VEGF targeted therapy. Conclusions: Bevacizumab monotherapy resulted in prolonged disease control in a subset of patients with few discontinuations for adverse events in patients after progression on other targeted therapies, including those who were heavily pretreated. The number of prior VEGF targeted TKI therapies did not correlate with response to bevacizumab, which may reflect a difference in targeting the receptor vs. ligand.


Kidney Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50
Author(s):  
Almudena Martín ◽  
Javier Puente ◽  
Alvaro Pinto ◽  
Pablo Gajate ◽  
Teresa Alonso Gordoa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document