scholarly journals Use of PARP Inhibitors for Ovarian Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (5.5) ◽  
pp. 636-638
Author(s):  
Deborah K. Armstrong
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Resistant Disease ◽  
Relapsed Disease ◽  
Increased Activity

PARP inhibitors have been used to treat numerous diseases, but these agents have been approved the longest for use in ovarian cancer. All trials of PARP inhibitor maintenance in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer are positive for prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), but patients with BRCA mutations consistently derive the most benefit. Testing for homologous recombination deficiency may provide information regarding the degree of PFS benefit. In individuals without a BRCA mutation, PARP inhibition also prolongs PFS after chemotherapy for platinum-sensitive, PARP-naïve disease. As in the up-front setting, patients with BRCA mutations derive the most benefit in these trials. Finally, PARP inhibitors are active as monotherapy in PARP-naïve, BRCA-mutated relapsed disease, with increased activity observed in platinum-sensitive versus platinum-resistant disease.

A randomized phase 2 trial comparing efficacy of the combination of the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the antiangiogenic cediranib against olaparib alone in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA5500-LBA5500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Liu ◽  
William Thomas Barry ◽  
Michael J. Birrer ◽  
Jung-min Lee ◽  
Ronald J. Buckanovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Angiogenic Therapy ◽  
Platinum Sensitive

LBA5500 Background: PARP inhibitors and anti-angiogenics are clinically active in recurrent ovarian cancer (OvCa). Preclinical studies suggest these agents can synergize, and a phase 1 study showed that the combination of cediranib (ced) and olaparib (olap) is well-tolerated. We therefore compared the activity of olap alone (Olap) to combined ced and olap (Ced/Olap) in treatment of recurrent platinum-sensitive (plat-sens) high-grade serous (HGS) or BRCA-related OvCa (NCT 01116648). Methods: Patients (pts) across 9 centers were randomized 1:1 in this Ph 2 open label study to Olap (olap 400 mg capsules BID) or Ced/Olap (olap 200 mg capsules BID; ced 30 mg daily), stratified by BRCA status and prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Eligibility included pts with recurrent plat-sens HGS or BRCA-related OvCa. Pts had measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, PS 0 or 1, and the ability to take POs. No prior anti-angiogenics in the recurrent setting or prior PARP inhibitor was allowed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from randomization to radiographic progression or death. With a target N=90 pts, the study was powered to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.75 (median PFS 6 vs 10.5 mo). Results: Pts were enrolled from Oct 2011 to Jun 2013: 46 to Olap, 44 to Ced/Olap. 48 pts were known BRCA carriers (25 Olap; 23 Ced/Olap). At a planned interim analysis the DSMB recommended release of data. As of Jan 7, 2014, 41 pts had a PFS event. Median PFS was 9.0 mos for Olap and 17.7 mos for Ced/Olap (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.6, p = 0.001). There were 2 complete responses (CR) and 21 partial responses (PR) in pts on Olap (56% objective response rate, ORR) and 3 CRs and 33 PRs in pts on Ced/Olap (84% ORR, p = 0.008). The overall rate of Gr3/4 toxicity was higher for pts on Ced/Olap (70%) than on Olap (7%). Differentially occurring toxicities included fatigue (27% Ced/Olap vs 7% Olap), diarrhea (23% vs 0%), and hypertension (39% vs 0%). Updated efficacy and exploratory subgroup analyses will be presented. Conclusions: Combined Ced/Olap significantly extended PFS and ORR compared to Olap in plat-sens OvCa. Further studies of this oral combination in plat-sens OvCa are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01116648.

scholarly journals DUETTE: a phase II randomized, multicenter study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a second maintenance treatment in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer, who have previously received poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1824-1828
Author(s):  
Michelle McMullen ◽  
Katherine Karakasis ◽  
Bienvenu Loembe ◽  
Emma Dean ◽  
Graem Parr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Recist 1.1

BackgroundWith the success of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy in the first-line and second-line treatment settings, a new patient population is emerging with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, who have previously received a PARP inhibitor in the maintenance setting and for whom no second maintenance standard of care exists. DUETTE (NCT04239014) will evaluate the combination of ceralasertib (a potent, selective inhibitor of the serine/threonine kinase ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) + olaparib, or olaparib monotherapy, compared with placebo, in this patient population of unmet need.Primary ObjectiveThe primary objective is to assess the efficacy of ceralasertib + olaparib combination, and olaparib monotherapy, compared with placebo, as second maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer.Study HypothesisThis study will test the hypothesis that ceralasertib + olaparib, or olaparib monotherapy, is tolerable, and effective at prolonging progression-free survival compared with placebo.Trial DesignThis is a phase II, multicenter study where patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either (Arm 1) ceralasertib + olaparib, (Arm 2) olaparib monotherapy, or (Arm 3) placebo. The olaparib and placebo arms will be double-blinded, whereas the ceralasertib + olaparib arm will be open label. Patients will be stratified according to BRCA status, and response to platinum-based chemotherapy.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaEligible patients will have histologically diagnosed high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer, with platinum-sensitive relapse on, or after, completion of at least 6 months of any prior PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy (a minimum of 12 months is required if the patient received PARP inhibitor maintenance following first-line chemotherapy). If the prior PARP inhibitor used was olaparib then patients must have received treatment without significant toxicity or the need for a permanent dose reduction. Disease relapse in the second-line or third-line setting is allowed. Patients who have received secondary debulking surgery are potentially eligible if they meet all other inclusion criteria.Primary EndpointsThe primary endpoint is progression-free survival determined by blinded independent central review according to RECIST 1.1, with sensitivity analysis of progression-free survival using investigator assessments according to RECIST 1.1.Sample Size192 patients.Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsDecember 2022.Trial RegistrationNCT04239014.

scholarly journals The role of subgroup analyses: results from the NOVA trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-42
Author(s):  
Massimo Di Maio ◽  
Alice Bergamini
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Adenosine Diphosphate ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Subgroup Analyses

The clinical efficacy of poly-adenosine diphosphate (ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer patients has been widely reported. However, novel challenges are currently aimed at broadening the benefit of PARP inhibitors to patients with wild-type BRCA and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and identifying a test able to select those patients who might benefit most from this therapy. The recently published ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial reported an advantage in progression-free survival (PFS) for patients receiving the PARP1/2 inhibitor niraparib, as maintenance treatment for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer compared to placebo, regardless of their germline BRCA or HRD status. This suggests that niraparib could potentially represent a valuable maintenance option for virtually all patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer and that the HRD assay used in this trial is not able to reliably identify those patients who benefit the most from niraparib maintenance. These provocative considerations are the result of subgroup analyses that should be interpreted with caution but are useful to show the consistency of the effect of niraparib across the whole population.

Efficacy and safety of olaparib according to age in BRCA-1/2 mutated patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: Analysis of the phase III SOLO2 (AGO-OVAR 2.23/ENGOT-Ov21) study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6068-6068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Trillsch ◽  
Sven Mahner ◽  
Beyhan Ataseven ◽  
Rebecca Asher ◽  
Coraline Dubot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Brca 1

6068 Background: Adding olaparib as maintenance treatment to BRCA-1/2 mutated patients (pts) with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC) has significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) as well as patient-centered endpoints. As BRCA mutated pts tend to be younger, specific information on efficacy and safety of olaparib for elderly pts is of special interest. Methods: 295 pts from the SOLO2 trial that randomly assigned to olaparib or placebo were categorized according to age cutoff at 65 years. The efficacy and tolerability of olaparib relative to placebo within in each age group was assessed based on PFS and toxicity outcomes. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using EQ-5D-5L descriptive system score and FACT Trial Outcome Index (TOI) and evaluated using generalized estimating equations (GEE) and time without significant symptoms of toxicity (TWiST) analysis. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in pts ≥65 years (N=62; 21%) compared to pts <65 years (N=233; 79%), except for more BRCA2 mutations in elderly pts (39% vs. 23%). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of PFS benefit from olaparib in elderly as compared with younger pts (interaction P=0.33). The PFS adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of olaparib vs. placebo arms were respectively HR≥65 0.43 (95%-confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.81) and HR<65 0.31 (95%-CI 0.22-0.43). Elderly and younger pts also had comparable safety profiles with no significant differences in median time on olaparib treatment (≥65: 27 vs. <65: 33 months), percentage of pts experiencing at least one grade >2 adverse event with olaparib (≥65: 73% vs. <65: 79%), or requiring at least one dose interruption or dose reduction (≥65: 77.5 vs. <65: 77.6%). No differences were found with regards to QoL scores. Quality adjusted TWiST analysis showed only non-significant differences in duration of good QoL under olaparib (≥65: 8.02 vs. <65: 9.24 months, P=0.48). Conclusions: In this large cohort of BRCA mutated PSOC pts treated with a PARP inhibitor within a phase III trial, no significant differences were detected in terms of efficacy, safety, and QoL with olaparib treatment for pts ≥65 years compared to younger pts. This information supports the use of PARP inhibitors as maintenance therapy for PSOC pts irrespective of age. Clinical trial information: NCT01874353.

scholarly journals Bevacizumab or PARP-Inhibitors Maintenance Therapy for Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Bartoletti ◽  
Giacomo Pelizzari ◽  
Lorenzo Gerratana ◽  
Lucia Bortot ◽  
Davide Lombardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Brca Genes ◽  
Brca 1

Introduction: Targeted agents such as bevacizumab (BEV) or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) which have been added as concomitant or maintenance therapies have been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PS rOC). In the absence of direct comparison, we performed a network meta-analysis considering BRCA genes status. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE for trials involving patients with PS rOC treated with BEV or PARPi. Different comparisons were performed for patients included in the PARPi trials, according to BRCA genes status as follows: all comers (AC) population, BRCA 1/2 mutated (BRCAm), and BRCA wild type patients (BRCAwt). Results: In the overall population, PARPi prolonged PFS with respect to BEV (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.70, 95% CI 0.54–0.91). In the BRCA mutated carriers, the PFS improvement in favor of PARPi appeared to be higher (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.36–0.59) while in BRCAwt patients the superiority of PARPi over BEV failed to reach a statistically significance level (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.63–1.20); however, according to the SUCRA analysis, PARPi had the highest probability of being ranked as the most effective therapy (90% and 60%, for PARPi and BEV, respectively). Conclusions: PARPi performed better as compared with BEV in terms of PFS for the treatment of PS rOC, especially in BRCAm patients who had not previously received PARPi.

ATL

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 846-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angeles Alvarez Secord ◽  
Jason Cory Barnett ◽  
Jonathan A. Ledermann ◽  
Bercedis L. Peterson ◽  
Evan R. Myers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Mutation Testing ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Serous Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive

Objectives(1) To determine whether use of a PARP inhibitor or (2) BRCA1/2 mutation testing followed by a PARP inhibitor for test positives is potentially cost-effective for maintenance treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer.MethodsA modified Markov decision analysis compared 3 strategies: (1) observe; (2) olaparib to progression; (3) BRCA1/2 mutation testing; treat mutation carriers with olaparib to progression. Progression-free survival and rates of adverse events were derived from a phase 2 randomized trial. Key assumptions are as follows: (1) 14% of patients harbor a BRCA1/2 mutation; (2) progression-free survival of individuals treated with olaparib is improved for BCRA1/2 carriers compared with noncarriers (estimated hazard ratio, approximately 0.4). Costs derived from national data were assigned to treatments, adverse events, and BRCA1/2 test. Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed.ResultsGlobal olaparib was the most effective strategy, followed by BRCA1/2 testing and no olaparib. BRCA1/2 testing had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $193,442 per progression-free year of life saved (PF-YLS) compared to no olaparib, whereas global olaparib had an ICER of $234,128 per PF-YLS compared to BRCA1/2 testing. At a 52% lower-than-baseline olaparib cost estimate of $3000 per month, BRCA1/2 testing became potentially cost-effective compared with observation, with an ICER of $100,000 per PF-YLS. When strategy (1) was removed from the analysis, BRCA1/2 testing was the preferred strategy.ConclusionsThe use of maintenance olaparib in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer is not cost-effective regardless of whether BRCA1/2 testing is used to direct treatment. However, BRCA1/2 testing is a preferred strategy compared to global maintenance olaparib alone.

Overall survival and updated progression-free survival results from a randomized phase 2 trial comparing the combination of olaparib and cediranib against olaparib alone in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5535-5535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce F. Liu ◽  
William Thomas Barry ◽  
Michael J. Birrer ◽  
Jung-min Lee ◽  
Ronald J. Buckanovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Angiogenic Therapy ◽  
Platinum Sensitive

5535 Background: We previously reported that the combination of cediranib (ced) and olaparib (olap) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rates (ORR) in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive (plat-sens) high-grade serous (HGS) or BRCA-related ovarian cancer (OvCa) (NCT 01116648). We conducted an updated PFS and overall survival (OS) analysis. Methods: Patients (pts) across 9 centers were randomized 1:1 in this Ph 2 open label study to Olap (olap 400 mg capsules BID) or Ced/Olap (olap 200 mg capsules BID; ced 30 mg daily), stratified by BRCA status and prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Eligibility included pts with recurrent plat-sens HGS or BRCA-related OvCa. Pts had measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, PS 0 or 1, and the ability to take POs. No prior anti-angiogenics in the recurrent setting or prior PARP inhibitor was allowed. PFS was defined as time from randomization to radiographic progression or death. OS was defined as time from randomization to death. Results: Pts were enrolled from Oct 2011 to Jun 2013: 46 to Olap, 44 to Ced/Olap. 48 pts were known BRCA carriers (25 Olap; 23 Ced/Olap). As of Dec 21, 2016, 67 pts had a PFS event, and 52 pts had an OS event. Updated median PFS was 8.2 mos for Olap and 16.5 mos for Ced/Olap (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.83, p=0.007). Median OS was 33.3 mos for Olap and 44.2 mos for Ced/Olap (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.36-1.11, p=0.11). Within known germline BRCA mut carriers, updated PFS was 16.5 vs 16.4 mos (HR 0.75, p=0.42), and OS was 40.1 vs 44.2 mos (HR 0.79, p=0.55) for Olap and Ced/Olap, respectively. In pts without known germline BRCA mut, updated PFS was 5.7 vs 23.7 mos (HR 0.32, p=0.002), and OS was 23.0 vs 37.8 mos (HR 0.48, p=0.074). Conclusions: Updated PFS results consistently demonstrated that Ced/Olap significantly extended PFS compared to Olap in the overall population of women with plat-sens OvCa. In this Phase 2 study not powered to detect OS diferences, there was a trend towards OS improvement with Ced/Olap, particularly in pts without a known germline BRCA mutation. Results from ongoing studies of this oral combination in OvCa are of clinical interest. Clinical trial information: NCT 01116648.

Phase II consolidation trial with anti-Lewis-Y monoclonal antibody (hu3S193) in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer after a second remission

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-002239
Author(s):  
Oren Smaletz ◽  
Gustavo Ismael ◽  
Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz ◽  
Ivana L O Nascimento ◽  
Ana Luiza Gomes de Morais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Lewis Y

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of hu3S193, a humanized anti-Lewis-Y monoclonal antibody, as a consolidation strategy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who achieved a second complete response after salvage platinum-doublet chemotherapy.MethodsThis single-arm phase II study accrued patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer with Lewis-Y expression by immunohistochemistry who had achieved a second complete response after five to eight cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received intravenous infusions of hu3S193, 30 mg/m2 every 2 weeks starting no more than 8 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy and continuing for 12 doses, until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival of the second remission. Secondary objectives were safety and pharmacokinetics.ResultsTwenty-nine patients were enrolled. Most had a papillary/serous histology tumor (94%), stage III disease at diagnosis (75%), and five (17%) underwent secondary cytoreduction before salvage chemotherapy. Two patients were not eligible for efficacy but were considered for toxicity analysis. Eighteen patients (62%) completed the full consolidation treatment while nine patients progressed on treatment. At the time of analysis, 23 patients (85%) of the eligible population had progressed and seven of these patients (26%) had died. Median progression-free survival of the second remission was 12.1 months (95% CI: 10.6–13.9), with a 1-year progression-free survival of the second remission rate of 50.1%. The trial was terminated early since it was unlikely that the primary objective would be achieved. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were nausea (55%) and vomiting (51%).ConclusionsHu3S193 did not show sufficient clinical activity as consolidation therapy in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who achieved a second complete response after platinum-based chemotherapy.Trial registrationNCT01137071.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document