scholarly journals Sentencing Reform in Canada: Recent Developments

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian V. Roberts ◽  
Andrew von Hirsch

Changes to the sentencing process in Canada are finally imminent. A number of reports in recent years have called for reforms in the area of sentencing and parole. In 1987, the Canadian Sentencing Commission released its final report Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach. This was followed in 1988 by the report of the Daubney Committee following its investigation into sentencing and parole. In addition to these proposals, the now-defunct Law Reform Commission of Canada, the Department of Justice and the Ministry of the Solicitor General all published reports containing reform proposals. In this article, the authors review recent events in the area of sentencing since the publication of the report of the Canadian Sentencing Commission. After a brief introduction, four principal policy issues are examined: (i) statutory statements of sentencing purpose; (ii) sentencing guidelines; (iii) the future of release on parole; (iv) the creation of a permanent sentencing commission for Canada. For each issue, the article critically examines the position taken by major players in the area of criminal law reform. The article concludes with a brief examination of Bill C-90, which recently received first reading, and which will be the object of further parliamentary scrutiny in the fall of 1992. In a subsequent article, the authors offer their own proposals to reform the sentencing of offenders in Canada.

2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Miller

Abstract Although contemporary events have made it appear that there is widespread support in Canada for history as a discipline, the reality is otherwise. Many individuals, interest groups, and even institutions make considerable use of historical arguments in public debate to advance their causes, it is true. However, it is almost invariably the case that these advocates making historical arguments are not historians. This painful reality was brought home to the historical profession in 1996-97 by such events as the release of the Final Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples and the debates over public policy issues such as copyright reform and a protocol for research involving humans. It is essential to the future of the discipline and of organisations such as CHAJSHC that historians reassert their role in the processes of researching, interpeting, and utilizing history in public discourse and academic arenas.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Muhammad Thaufik Hidayat ◽  
Anis Widyawati

The purpose of this study is to explain and describe how the formulation policy of weekend detention in Indonesia's positive law and how the formulation policy of weekend detention in the Indonesian criminal law reform in the future  (ius constituendum). This research uses normative juridical method of research which is legal research conducted by examining the library material in the form of secondary data such as law or library material as well as other documents that support and data retrieval technique used is library research techniques and analysis of data used is interactive analysis model. The results showed that (1) criminal formulation policy the weekend detention in Indonesia's positive law of the arrangement in the correctional Institution is not regulated about the policy of weekend detention. However, in Indonesian positive law formulation has an assimilation program which is one of the programs in the actual criminal implementation almost resembles a weekend detention system. (2) The policy formulation of the weekend detention in the renewal of Indonesian criminal law (penal policy) can be done by the study of the law comparative countries such as France, Portugal, Vanuatu, Queensland and New South Wales that have implemented a relatively advanced prison system that is the weekend detention. The formulation of weekend detention that is expected to be valid in Indonesia in the future is to develop it firmly in the draft Penal code and paste it in article 65 the Draft Penal code or if the government is about to arrange codification in the law of criminal implementation, the weekend detention is entered in one of the types of criminal sanctions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-291
Author(s):  
I Made Wirya Darma

Legal politics examines changes within present law due to consistent demands and needs of people. Legal politics continue to develop the rule of law, from the Ius Constitutum, which is based on the previous legal framework, to the formulation of the law in the future, the Ius Constituendum. The Indonesian 2019 draft of Criminal Code formulates customary sanctions as the fulfillment of customary obligations in several articles. These articles provide a new paradigm of criminal law policy to formulate criminal law reform in the future for customary sanctions in cases of customary crimes. The study used normative juridical or library research on normative legal substances. It aims to reveal the truth based on scientific logic from the normative side by examining library materials or secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. The results show that the fulfillment of customary obligations can be expected to become criteria or signs/guidelines for judges to determine “law that lives in society” or “The Living Law” as a source of law (material legality) in the future. It is a form of new paradigm in the renewal of customary criminal law. Thus, customary (criminal) law can become (1) a positive source of law, in the sense that customary criminal law (sanctions) can be the legal basis to examine cases at the Court; and (2) negative sources of law, in the sense that the provisions of customary criminal law (sanctions) can be justified reasons, reasons for mitigating punishment or providing more severe punishment.


Wajah Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 629
Author(s):  
Sahabuddin Sahabuddin ◽  
Warfian Saputra

There are quite a lot of problems faced by this nation in creating a just legal system regarding minor crimes (tipiring), this is because a legal system adopted by Indonesia today is a Dutch colonial heritage that is not in accordance with Indonesian cultural values, not to mention the problems The current legal system is based on the origin of written legality which is very rigid, causing the values that live in society to be increasingly eroded. For this reason, there is a need for a policy in criminal law reform in the future that is fair and Indonesian, so that the use of criminal sanctions is more appropriate and efficient in tackling crime.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 913
Author(s):  
Supardin Supardin ◽  
Abdul Syatar

This study aims to provide new ideas in the criminal law reform discourse in Indonesia, especially concerning the adultery issue, by employing a socio-legal approach and Islamic criminal law. The socio-legal approach was performed by combining normative analysis and non-legal scientific tactics in observing the applicable law. Meanwhile, the Islamic criminal law was used to assess and contribute new ideas to the Indonesian legal system in the future, presuming criminal law reforms are implemented. The results indicated fundamental weaknesses in Article 284 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) in terms of defining adultery and the prescribed sanctions. Hence, the community’s need for efforts to reform the adultery penalty following the national culture is inevitable. The best solution is that the spirit of adultery sanctions in Islamic criminal is expected to be an alternative to renew Indonesia’s criminal law system in the future. Although some elements of the nation may not expect the form of adultery sanction in Islamic penalties, the spirit in it aims to have strong legal certainty and maintain human life


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1625-1648
Author(s):  
Clara Herz

AbstractGiven the debate at the seventy-second Conference of the Association of German Jurists (Deutscher Juristentag) in September 2018 on whether German sentencing needs reform, this Article will explore this very question in greater detail. In this regard, this Article will present various empirical studies in order to demonstrate that notable inconsistencies in German sentencing practice exist. This Article will then point out that broad statutory sentencing ranges, along with fairly vague sentencing guidance, are among the main causes of these disparities. Subsequently, this Article will examine several mechanisms that selected foreign jurisdictions—namely the U.S., the U.K., and Australia—have put in place in order to enhance consistency in their sentencing practices. Three mechanisms of sentencing guidance will be distinguished here: First, formal sentencing guidelines; second, guideline judgments; and third, sentencing advisory bodies as they operate in some Australian states. This Article will compare these mechanisms and assess their merits and drawbacks. Based on this comparative study, this Article will look at how to improve consistency in German sentencing practice. In this respect, this Article will present three steps that German criminal law reform should follow, including a better sentencing framework, the strategic gathering of sentencing data, and the implementation of a flexible sentencing guidelines regime.


Moreana ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (Number 193- (3-4) ◽  
pp. 54-73
Author(s):  
Nicolas Tenaillon

As a renowned jurist first and then as a top politician, Thomas More has never given up researching about a judicial system where all the fields of justice would be harmonized around a comprehensive logic. From criminal law to divine providence, Utopia, despite its eccentricities, proposes a coherent model of Christian-inspired collective living, based on a concern for social justice, something that was terribly neglected during the early 16th century English monarchy. Not only did History prove many of More’s intuitions right, but above all, it gave legitimacy to the utopian genre in its task of imagining the future progress of human justice and of contributing to its coming.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document