In ACS, de-escalation of DAPT reduces bleeding and does not increase ischemic events vs. other DAPT strategies

Author(s):  
Ameenathul M. Fawzy ◽  
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
MARY ANN MOON
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (06) ◽  
pp. 0939-0943 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Boneu ◽  
G Destelle ◽  

SummaryThe anti-aggregating activity of five rising doses of clopidogrel has been compared to that of ticlopidine in atherosclerotic patients. The aim of this study was to determine the dose of clopidogrel which should be tested in a large scale clinical trial of secondary prevention of ischemic events in patients suffering from vascular manifestations of atherosclerosis [CAPRIE (Clopidogrel vs Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events) trial]. A multicenter study involving 9 haematological laboratories and 29 clinical centers was set up. One hundred and fifty ambulatory patients were randomized into one of the seven following groups: clopidogrel at doses of 10, 25, 50,75 or 100 mg OD, ticlopidine 250 mg BID or placebo. ADP and collagen-induced platelet aggregation tests were performed before starting treatment and after 7 and 28 days. Bleeding time was performed on days 0 and 28. Patients were seen on days 0, 7 and 28 to check the clinical and biological tolerability of the treatment. Clopidogrel exerted a dose-related inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation and bleeding time prolongation. In the presence of ADP (5 \lM) this inhibition ranged between 29% and 44% in comparison to pretreatment values. The bleeding times were prolonged by 1.5 to 1.7 times. These effects were non significantly different from those produced by ticlopidine. The clinical tolerability was good or fair in 97.5% of the patients. No haematological adverse events were recorded. These results allowed the selection of 75 mg once a day to evaluate and compare the antithrombotic activity of clopidogrel to that of aspirin in the CAPRIE trial.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (45) ◽  
pp. 4827-4834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Limin Zhang ◽  
Xingang Li ◽  
Dongzhi Wang ◽  
Hong Lv ◽  
Xuezhong Si ◽  
...  

Background: A considerable proportion of acute noncardiogenic ischemic stroke patients continue to experience recurrent ischemic events after standard therapy. Aim: We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrent ischemic event prediction at an early stage. Methods : 286 non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke patients with the onset of symptoms within 24 hours were enrolled. Vascular risk factors, routine laboratory data on admission, thromboelastography test seven days after clopidogrel therapy and any recurrent events within one year were assessed. Patients were divided into case group (patients with clinical adverse events, including ischemic stokes, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction and vascular related mortality) and control group (events-free patients). The risk of the recurrent ischemic events was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Clinical adverse events were observed in 43 patients (case group). The mean levels of Mean Platelet Volume (MPV), Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), Lymphocyte Count (LY) and Fibrinogen (Fib) on admission were significantly higher in the case group as compared to the control group (P<0.001). Seven days after clopidogrel therapy, the ADP-induced platelet inhibition rate (ADP%) level was lower in the case group, while the Maximum Amplitude (MA) level was higher in the case group as compared to the control group (P<0.01). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve of LY, PLR, , Fib, MA, ADP% and MPV were 0.602, 0.614, 0.629, 0.770, 0.800 and 0.808, respectively. The logistic regression analysis showed that MPV, ADP% and MA were indeed predictive factors. Conclusion: MPV, ADP% and MA were risk factors of recurrent ischemic events after acute noncardiogenic ischemic stroke. Urgent assessment and individual drug therapy should be offered to these patients as soon as possible.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1113-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud H Mohammaden ◽  
Stephen W English ◽  
Christopher J Stapleton ◽  
Eman Khedr ◽  
Ahmed Shoyb ◽  
...  

BackgroundFlow diversion (FD) is a common treatment modality for complex intracranial aneurysms. A major concern regarding the use of FD is thromboembolic events (TEE). There is debate surrounding the optimal antiplatelet regimen to prevent TEE. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor as a single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) for the prevention of TEE following FD for complex aneurysm treatment.MethodsA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained neuroendovascular database at three endovascular centers was performed. Patients were included if they had an intracranial aneurysm that was treated with FD between January 2018 and September 2019 and were treated with ticagrelor as SAPT. Primary outcomes included early (within 72 hours post-procedure) and late (within 6 months) ischemic events.ResultsA total of 24 patients (mean age 47.7 years) with 36 aneurysms were eligible for analysis, including 15 (62.5%) females. 14 (58.3%) patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. 35 aneurysms arose from the anterior circulation and 1 from the posterior circulation. 23 aneurysms had a saccular morphology, whereas 7 were fusiform and 6 were blister. For the treatment of all 36 aneurysms, 30 procedures were performed with 32 FD devices. Procedural in-stent thrombosis occurred in 2 cases and was treated with intra-arterial tirofiban without complications. Aneurysm re-bleeding was reported in 1 (4.2%) patient. There were no reported early or late TEE. Three patients discontinued ticagrelor due to systemic side effects.ConclusionTicagrelor is a safe and effective SAPT for the prevention of TEE after FD. Large multicenter prospective studies are warranted to validate our findings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Zareini ◽  
P.B Blanche ◽  
A.H Holt ◽  
M.M Malik ◽  
D.P Rajan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Development of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is common in patients with heart failure (HF), but knowledge of future cardiovascular events is lacking. Purpose We compared risk of heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or death versus ischemic events in real-life HF patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D. Methods Using the Danish nationwide registers, we identified all patients with HF between 1998–2016. The patients were separated in two different HF cohorts based on the status of T2D. One cohort consisted of HF patients with either prevalent or absent T2D at the time of HF diagnosis. The other cohort consisted of HF patients, who developed new-onset T2D, included at time of diagnosis. The two HF cohorts were analyzed separately. Outcomes for both cohorts were analyzed as time-to-first event as either an ischemic event (i.e. composite outcome of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral artery disease), HFH, or event-free death (not related to HFH or the ischemic event). For each cohort, we estimated the five-year absolute risk of ischemic event, HFH and event-free death, along with five-year risk ratio of HFH or event-free death versus ischemic events. Effects among subgroups were investigated by stratifying both cohorts based on age, gender and comorbidities present at inclusion. Results A total of 139,264 HF patients were included between 1998 and 2016, of which 29,078 (21%) patients had prevalent T2D at baseline. A total of 11,819 (8%) developed new-onset T2D and were included in the second cohort. The median duration of time between HF diagnosis and new-onset T2D diagnosis was: 4.1 years (IQR:1.5; 5.8). The absolute five-year risk of an ischemic event in patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D was: 17.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 17.2; 18.6), 26.1% (95% CI: 25.6; 26.7), and 18.8% (95% CI:18.6; 19.0). Corresponding estimates for HFH were: 31.5% (95% CI: 30.6; 32.3), 33.6% (95% CI: 33.0; 34.2), and 30,7% (95% CI: 30.5; 31.0). The absolute five-year risk of event-free death among patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D was: 20.9% (95% CI: 20.2; 21.7), 18.9% (95% CI:18.4; 19.3), and 18.6% (95% CI: 18.4; 18.8) (see Figure). The five-year risk ratio of experiencing HFH or event-free death versus an ischemic event was: 2.9 (95% CI: 2.8; 3.1), 2.0 (95% CI:2.0; 2.1), and 2.6 (95% CI: 2.6; 2.7) for patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D, respectively. Similar results of absolute and relative risk were present across all subgroups. Conclusion In our population of HF patients, 8% developed new-onset diabetes. Development of T2D in patients with HF increases the risk of HFH and mortality three-fold. The increased risk of new-onset T2D is higher than the importance of prevalent T2D in patients with HF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Vandenbriele ◽  
L Dannenberg ◽  
M Monteagudo-Vela ◽  
T Balthazar ◽  
D Metzen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bleeding and ischemic complications are the main cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill cardiogenic shock patients, supported by short-term percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) devices. Hence, finding the optimal antithrombotic regimen is challenging. Bleeding not only occurs because of heparin and antiplatelet therapy (both required in the prevention of pump and acute stent thrombosis) but also because of device- and disease related coagulopathy. To prevent clotting-related device failure, most centers target full therapeutic heparin anticoagulation levels in left ventricular (LV) Impella™ supported patients in analogy with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. We aimed to investigate the safety (related to bleeding and thrombotic complications) of targeting low-dose versus therapeutic heparin levels in left Impella™-supported cardiogenic shock patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Methods In this hypothesis generating pilot study, we investigated 114 patients supported for at least two days by LV Impella™ mechanical support due to cardiogenic shock at three tertiary ICUs, highly specialized in mechanical support. Low-dose heparin (aPTT 40–60s or anti-Xa 0.2–0.3) was compared to standard of care (aPTT 60–80s or anti-Xa 0.3–0.5). Major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack) and BARC bleeding (bleeding academic research consortium classification) during 30 day follow-up were assessed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was calculated with age, gender, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, chronic kidney disease, previous stroke, previous myocardial infarction, previous coronary arterial bypass grafting, hypercholesterolemia and DAPT as matching variables. COX regression analysis was conducted to test for robustness. Results IPTW revealed 52 patients in the low-dose heparin group and 62 patients in the therapeutic group. Mean age of patients after IPTW was 62±16 years in the intermediate and 62±13 years in the therapeutic group (p=0.99). 25% and 42.2% were male (p=0.92). Overall bleeding events and major (BARC3b) bleeding events were higher in the therapeutic heparin group (overall bleeding: Hazard ratio [HR]=2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–5.5; p=0.015; BARC 3b: HR=4.4, 95% CI 1.4–13.6, p=0.009). Minor bleeding (BARC3a) as well as MACCE and its single components (ischemic events) did not differ between both groups. These findings were robust in the COX regression analysis. Conclusion In this pilot analysis, low-dose heparin in 114 LV Impella™ cardiogenic shock patients was associated with less bleeding without increased ischemic events, adjusted for DAPT. Reducing the target heparin levels in critically ill patients supported by LV Impella™ might improve the outcome of this precarious group. These findings need to be validated in randomized clinical trials. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document