scholarly journals Estimation of Lane Utilization Adjustment Factors for Signalized Intersections Adjacent to an Off-ramp-Street Junction

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 71-78
Author(s):  
Chandle Chae ◽  
Dongwoo Jung ◽  
Youngho Kim
Author(s):  
Mohammed S. Tarawneh

To increase the capacity of through traffic at signalized intersections, additional lanes with limited length—called auxiliary lanes—are added to the roadway at the intersection. Because of their limited length, as well as other factors, these lanes are not as fully utilized as other continuous through lanes. Research was undertaken with two objectives: ( a) to observe and identify the level of use of auxiliary through lanes added at intersections of four-lane, two-way roadways; and ( b) to study the effects of auxiliary lane length, right-turn volume, and through/right-turn lane group delay on the level of their use. Lane-use data collected during 1,050 saturated cycles at eight signalized intersections with different auxiliary lane lengths were used to accomplish research objectives. All factors investigated—auxiliary lane length, right-turn volume, and stopped-delay—were found to contribute significantly to the use of auxiliary lanes at 0.01 level. The level of each factor’s contribution, however, was dependent on the level of the other two. Lane use of nearly one to seven straight-through vehicles per cycle, depending on levels of factors investigated, was observed at the study locations. Longer auxiliary lanes, lower right-turn volumes, and excessive approach delays encouraged the use of auxiliary lanes by straight-through vehicles. The range of lane utilization adjustment factors ( fLU-factors) calculated from field data was 0.73 to 0.82, which is lower than the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual default value of 0.91 for a three-lane through/right-turn group.


Author(s):  
Shannon Warchol ◽  
Nagui Rouphail ◽  
Chris Vaughan ◽  
Brendan Kearns

This research collected and analyzed gap acceptance in North Carolina to develop a data-driven method for determining the need for considering additional signalization analysis at intersections with fewer than four legs. This method can be used for movements that merge with or cross two lanes of oncoming traffic. It is intended to provide guidance and support to traffic engineers in their decision-making process. Charts are provided to determine the expected 95th percentile queue lengths for left-turn, right-turn, and U-turn movements crossing or merging with two lanes of conflicting traffic. This situation is typically present along four-lane roadways where a one-way primary movement opposes either a minor road right-turn movement or a left-turn movement, or in the case of a median U-turn opening. Adjustment factors to the conflicting flowrate were developed to account for the presence of upstream signalized intersections. This method less frequently recommends further signal consideration when compared with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices peak hour warrant, but is similar to the delay-based level of service D/E threshold for two-way stop-controlled intersections in HCM6 Chapter 19.


Author(s):  
Sida Luo ◽  
Yu (Marco) Nie ◽  
Lin Zhu

This paper proposes an information-based dynamic lane (IDYL) scheme for signalized intersections with exclusive left-turn phases. Similar to the tandem design, the proposed scheme aims to increase the capacity of an isolated intersection by sorting incoming vehicles based on their turning movements. Its novelty is to guide vehicles of different movements into pre-designated dynamic lanes without stopping them via pre-signal. The assumption is that vehicles themselves or their drivers have access to, and can act on, real-time signal timing information through vehicle-to-signal connection to select the correct lane to enter as they approach the intersection. A mixed integer program is proposed to optimize jointly the lane configuration, timing plan, and dynamic lane utilization for an intersection. Results from numerical and simulation experiments show that IDYL can increase the reserve capacity by more than 25% when implemented on all legs of a standard four-leg intersection, and reduce the delay by around 15% when implemented on two opposing legs. The results from this study could help traffic engineers to operate signalized intersections with dynamic lanes when vehicle-to-signal connection becomes widely available in the near future.


Author(s):  
Pan Liu ◽  
Jian John Lu ◽  
Jingjing Fan ◽  
Juan C. Pernia ◽  
Gary Sokolow

In Florida, the increased use of restrictive medians and directional median openings has generated many U-turns at signalized intersections. There is no widely accepted procedure for estimating the effects of U-turning vehicles on signalized intersection capacity. In the 2000 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, U-turns are treated as left turns for estimation of saturation flow rates. However, the operational effects of U-turns and left turns are different. This study analyzed the effects of U-turning vehicles on the left-turn saturation flow rate. Data were collected at three signalized intersections in the Tampa Bay area in Florida. In total, the study team recorded the queue discharge times for 260 queues, including 571 U-turning vehicles and 1,441 left-turning vehicles. On the basis of the data collected in the field, a regression model was developed to estimate the relationship between the average queue discharge time for each turning vehicle and the various percentages of U-turning vehicles in the left-turn traffic stream. Adjustment factors for various percentages of U-turning vehicles were also developed by using the regression model. The adjustment factors developed in this study can be directly used to estimate the capacity reduction due to the presence of various percentages of U-turning vehicles at a signalized intersection.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 4485
Author(s):  
Abdelrahman Abuhijleh ◽  
Charitha Dias ◽  
Wael Alhajyaseen ◽  
Deepti Muley

The Saturation Flow Rate (SFR) is a primary measure that can be used when estimating intersection capacity. Further, the efficiency of signal control parameters also depends on the accuracy of assumed SFR values. Driver behavior, type of movement, vehicle type, intersection layout, and other factors may have a significant impact on the saturation flow rate. Thus, it is expected that driving environments that have heterogeneous driver populations with different driving habits and cultures may have different SFRs. In practice, the proposed SFRs based on US standards (Highway Capacity Manual, 2016) have been adopted in the State of Qatar without validation or calibration to consider the local road environment and the characteristics of the driving population. This study aims to empirically analyze the saturation flow rates for exclusive left-turn lanes and shared left- and U-turn lanes at two signalized intersections in Doha city, while considering the effects of heavy vehicles and U-turn maneuvers. Empirical observations revealed that the average base SFR, i.e., when the influences from heavy vehicles and U-turns were excluded, could vary approximately from 1800 vehicles per hour per lane (vphpl) to 2100 vphpl for exclusive left-turning lanes and approximately from 1800 vphpl to 1900 vphpl for shared left- and U-turning lanes. Furthermore, this study proposed different adjustment factors for heavy vehicle and U-turn percentages which can be applied in practice in designing signalized intersections, particularly in the State of Qatar.


Author(s):  
Jae-Joon Lee ◽  
Nagui M. Rouphail ◽  
Joseph E. Hummer

Lane drops downstream of signalized intersections can be found on many urban and suburban streets and highways. Because drivers tend to avoid using the short lane because of the potential for stressful merges downstream of the signal, the short lane is typically underused. Previous research indicates that the default lane utilization factors in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) appear to overestimate traffic in the short lane. The purpose of this research is to develop models to predict lane utilization factors for six intersection types and to assess how low lane utilization affects the observed intersection capacity and level of service. Traffic and signal data were collected at 47 sites in North Carolina. On the basis of 15 candidate factors, multiple regression models were developed for predicting the lane utilization factor. Field-measured delays were compared with delays estimated by the HCM with the use of regression models for lane utilization. It was found that even with the new models for lane utilization, the HCM consistently overestimated delay for all types of lane drop intersections with low lane utilization: a reassessment of the effect of lane utilization on capacity may be in order. This study also found that the downstream lane length and traffic intensity positively correlate with the lane utilization factor and that some geometric variables at the approach may also influence lane utilization.


2000 ◽  
Vol 1710 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhu Zhou ◽  
Jian John Lu ◽  
Edward A. Mierzejewski ◽  
Xuewen Le

In the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), driver population factors are included to adjust for the impact of nonlocal drivers on freeway capacity. There are no such factors in the HCM to account for the possible change of capacity at signalized intersections caused by unfamiliar drivers in the traffic stream. The results obtained from a research study to develop driver population adjustment factors for capacity analysis of signalized intersections are summarized. Detailed procedures for quantifying driver population adjustment factors are presented. The factors were derived on the basis of data collected in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Orange, and Osceola counties in Florida. Study results indicated that nonlocal drivers had a significant impact on the saturation flow rate. When a signalized intersection was identified with a high level of nonlocal drivers, the saturation flow rate as well as the capacity could be reduced by 19 percent, which corresponded to a driver population factor as low as 0.81.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document