The Emergence of Multilateral AEI

Author(s):  
Lukas Hakelberg

This chapter explains that the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) has its origins in the longstanding efforts of anti-tax haven activists within the Democratic Party. These activists utilized testimony from a whistleblower and a former Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS) private banker to prepare a report on the bank's illegal offshore business with US clients. To increase publicity, they held a corresponding Senate hearing, which eventually triggered the UBS scandal. Shortly afterward, Barack Obama entered office. The scandal, his cordial relationship with Democratic anti-tax haven activists, and personal interest in the issue made combating tax evasion and avoidance a top priority for his administration. In contrast to proposed anti-avoidance measures potentially affecting US multinationals, legislation requesting more transparency from foreign banks serving US clients easily passed Congress. The result was FATCA, a law threatening foreign financial institutions unwilling to report account data of US clients with a 30 percent withholding tax on payments from US sources.

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicja Brodzka

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act requires foreign financial institutions to report to the US Internal Revenue Service the information about financial accounts held by US taxpayers, or by foreign entities in which US taxpayers hold a substantial ownership interest. This aim of FATCA, which is to increase the ability of the American tax authorities to combat cross-border tax evasion by US persons, is reasonable. However, it imposes burdensome due-diligence, information reporting and withholding obligations on all foreign (non-US) financial institutions. It also raises legal concerns – notably data protection issues. The article analyses the main issues connected with FATCA, presents the pro and contra opinions, and looks at the reaction of EU Member States at the announcement of American provisions.


Author(s):  
Reuven S. Avi-Yonah ◽  
Gianluca Mazzoni

This chapter describes how the due diligence standard was developed in international tax law before 2008, and then how the standard was greatly modified after the financial crisis, the enactment of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act of 2010 (FATCA), and the subsequent development of the Common Reporting Standards (CRS). The chapter outlines how the due diligence concept is applied to private actors, especially financial institutions, to prevent tax evasion. It ends with some conclusions including that while due diligence in international tax law is currently embodied in a specific set of rules, there remains an absence of an overarching standard of due diligence, so that the overall efficiency of the rules requiring due diligence is weakened.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Endra Iraman ◽  
Yoshikuni Ono ◽  
Makoto Kakinaka

Abstract Identifying taxpayers who engage in noncompliant behaviour is crucial for tax authorities to determine appropriate taxation schemes. However, because taxpayers have an incentive to conceal their true income, it is difficult for tax authorities to uncover such behaviour (social desirability bias). Our study mitigates the bias in responses to sensitive questions by employing the list experiment technique, which allows us to identify the characteristics of taxpayers who engage in tax evasion. Using a dataset obtained from a tax office in Jakarta, Indonesia, we conducted a computer-assisted telephone interviewing survey in 2019. Our results revealed that 13% of the taxpayers, old, male, corporate employees, and members of a certain ethnic group had reported lower income than their true income on their tax returns. These findings suggest that our research design can be a useful tool for understanding tax evasion and for developing effective taxation schemes that promote tax compliance.


Telaah Bisnis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dekeng Setyo Budiarto ◽  
. Yennisa ◽  
Fitri Nurmalisa

Abstract Tax compliance has long been an issue for governments throughout the world and there is a large and rich research literatur in this field. This study examines the influence religiosity,and machiavellian on the tax evasion based from gender. The sample of this study are 202 account­ing students from 8 private university of Special Region of Yogyakarta. The results of the study prove that religiosity has significant influence on tax evasion, while machiavellian has no sig­nificant influence on tax evasion. Moreover, there is significant different on tax evasion based from gender. The results are expected for the government to designing policies to prevent tax evasion.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-244
Author(s):  
Subagio Efendi

This study fills the gap in the tax authority’s Covid-19 financial aid verifications by examining, and nominating, Long-run ETR (Dyreng et al., 2008) as the better corporate tax avoidance measure in excluding tax evader firms from the broad stimulus programs. Analysing confidential tax returns of 4,752 largest firms (32,120 firm-years) in Indonesia over 2009 to 2017 periods, this study found 18.12 percent of total sample firms is able to retain its Long-run ETR below 10 percent, which indicates continual tax avoidance activities by these firms during observation periods. Moreover, applying univariate and multivariate Ordinary Least Squares and Panel Data estimations, this study reveals, relative to other tax avoidance measures, Lagged Cash ETR (Lisowsky, 2010; Lisowsky et al., 2013) present the most consistent reliability in predicting long-run income tax burdens. Thus, this study asserts, in the conditions of computing Long-run ETR is costly and impractical (i.e. because of data unavailability), tax authority and policymakers can directly analyse firms’ Lagged Cash ETR to gauge their long-run income tax burdens and tax compliance behaviours prior the economic downturn. 


2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-77
Author(s):  
Herbert Schwarzenberger ◽  
Stephan Muehlbacher ◽  
Cécile Bazart ◽  
Lucas Unger ◽  
Erich Kirchler

A representative sample of 471 Austrian self-employed taxpayers was investigated and types of taxpayers selected on the basis of their motivational postures were extracted. By means of a cluster analysis four basic clusters of taxpayers were identified. ‘Solidary’ taxpayers pay their taxes because they perceive the tax system as fair. ‘Non-solidary’ taxpayers experience their tax burden as unfair. ‘Critical’ taxpayers feel unfairly treated and show high resistance but do not necessarily react by evading taxes. ‘Strategic’ taxpayers feel fairly treated but still try to reduce their tax burden if they perceive the opportunity to do so. The results show that positive and negative attitudes, respectively, to taxes do not necessarily lead to tax compliance or tax evasion. Cooperative and uncooperative behaviour originates from different motives.


2022 ◽  
pp. 228-242
Author(s):  
Larissa Batrancea

The topic of tax behavior always stirs attention among scholars, professionals, national and international authorities, organizations, and citizens alike since it is a complex matter. There are four types of tax behavior acknowledged in the literature, namely voluntary tax compliance, enforced tax compliance, tax avoidance, tax evasion. The complexity of tax behavior stems from the fact that there are a manifold of factors influencing it, from economic to psychological ones. The chapter surveys relevant sources on tax behavior in the quest for eliciting the impact of ethnic diversity on tax compliance. At the same time, the difference between countries are also addressed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document