immunologic memory
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

139
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

36
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Gustavo Falero-Diaz ◽  
Catarina de A. Barboza ◽  
Felipe Pires ◽  
Maeva Fanchin ◽  
Jingjing Ling ◽  
...  

Objective: Monocytes, which play an important role in arteriogenesis, can build immunologic memory by a functional reprogramming that modifies their response to a second challenge. This process, called trained immunity, is evoked by insults that shift monocyte metabolism, increasing HIF (hypoxia-inducible factor)-1α levels. Since ischemia enhances HIF-1α, we evaluate whether ischemia can lead to a functional reprogramming of monocytes, which would contribute to arteriogenesis after hindlimb ischemia. Methods and Results: Mice exposed to ischemia by 24 hours of femoral artery occlusion (24 hours trained) or sham were subjected to hindlimb ischemia one week later; the 24-hour trained mice showed significant improvement in blood flow recovery and arteriogenesis after hindlimb ischemia. Adoptive transfer using bone marrow-derived monocytes (BM-Mono) from 24-hour trained or sham donor mice, demonstrated that recipients subjected to hindlimb ischemia who received 24 hours ischemic-trained monocytes had remarkable blood flow recovery and arteriogenesis. Further, ischemic-trained BM-Mono had increased HIF-1α and GLUT-1 gene expression during femoral artery occlusion. Circulating cytokines and GLUT-1 were also upregulated during femoral artery occlusion.Transcriptomic analysis and confirmatory qPCR performed in 24 hours trained and sham BM-Mono revealed that among the 15 top differentially expressed genes, 4 were involved in lipid metabolism in the ischemic-trained monocytes. Lipidomic analysis confirmed that ischemia training altered the cholesterol metabolism of these monocytes. Further, several histone-modifying epigenetic enzymes measured by qPCR were altered in mouse BM-Mono exposed to 24 hours hypoxia. Conclusions: Ischemia training in BM-Mono leads to a unique gene profile and improves blood flow and arteriogenesis after hindlimb ischemia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S136-S137
Author(s):  
Jamie Findlow ◽  
Paul Balmer

Abstract Background Immunologic hyporesponsiveness (HyR) is considered as an inability to mount immune responses to vaccination of at least the same degree as earlier doses. For meningococcal vaccines, HyR has classically been associated with unconjugated but not conjugated polysaccharide (PS) vaccine dosing, but the clinical relevance is unclear. Methods To characterize meningococcal vaccine HyR, a PubMed search was conducted without date limits as follows: (hyporespons*) AND (meningococcal) AND (vaccine OR mechanism OR MOA OR causes). Papers from the authors’ files, including HyR insights with other vaccines, were included. Results Classic HyR with repeat unconjugated PS vaccine (MPV) dosing is thought to be associated with memory B-cell (BC) depletion, causing reduced responses on redosing with the same PS. This lack of immunologic memory and interference is seen years after MPV dosing across age groups. As data is added, other examples seem to fit the HyR definition but differ from the classical mechanism and its implications. First, passively transferred maternal antibodies (Abs) may interfere with neonatal adaptive immune response and ultimately those of childhood vaccination by binding to vaccine antigen (Ag) and inhibiting Ab production. Second, multiple dose schedules of meningococcal conjugate vaccines can show reduced responses to later doses in the series but memory is still established and amnestic booster response later achieved. Finally, carrier-induced epitopic suppression, occurring when PS Ag epitopes presented on a protein carrier are inhibited by prior/concurrent dosing with the same carrier, has also been reported. These 3 examples of alternative HyR mechanisms are not associated with memory BC depletion but are likely due to high circulatory Ab levels reducing responses, which is transient, reduces with Ab waning, immunologic memory remains intact, and is not clinically significant. Conclusion This literature review identified HyR mechanisms other than the classic mechanism associated with memory BC depletion that may account for decreased immune response to subsequent vaccination. Understanding the type of HyR observed with meningococcal vaccines is crucial, as these mechanisms vary in terms of potential clinical significance and the duration of their impact. Disclosures Jamie Findlow, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Paul Balmer, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder)


Nanophotonics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 3295-3302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Ericka Chorniak ◽  
Ren Odion ◽  
Wiguins Etienne ◽  
Smita K. Nair ◽  
...  

Abstract Cancer is the second leading cause of death and there is an urgent need to improve cancer management. We have developed an innovative cancer therapy named Synergistic Immuno Photothermal Nanotherapy (SYMPHONY) by combining gold nanostars (GNS)-mediated photothermal ablation with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Our previous studies have demonstrated that SYMPHONY photoimmunotherapy not only treats the primary tumor but also dramatically amplifies anticancer immune responses in synergy with checkpoint blockade immunotherapy to treat remote and unresectable cancer metastasis. The SYMPHONY treatment also induces a ‘cancer vaccine’ effect leading to immunologic memory and prevents cancer recurrence in murine animal models. This manuscript provides an overview of our research activities on the SYMPHONY therapy with plasmonic GNS for cancer treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (15) ◽  
pp. 8269
Author(s):  
Aikaterini Poulaki ◽  
Stavroula Giannouli

B lymphocytes are an indispensable part of the human immune system. They are the effective mediators of adaptive immunity and memory. To accomplish specificity against an antigen, and to establish the related immunologic memory, B cells differentiate through a complicated and strenuous training program that is characterized by multiple drastic genomic modifications. In order to avoid malignant transformation, these events are tightly regulated by multiple checkpoints, the vast majority of them involving bioenergetic alterations. Despite this stringent control program, B cell malignancies are amongst the top ten most common worldwide. In an effort to better understand malignant pathobiology, in this review, we summarize the metabolic swifts that govern normal B cell lymphopoiesis. We also review the existent knowledge regarding malignant metabolism as a means to unravel new research goals and/or therapeutic targets.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21561-e21561
Author(s):  
Taylor J. Aiken ◽  
David Komjathy ◽  
Mat Rodriguez ◽  
Arika Feils ◽  
Stephen D. Gillies ◽  
...  

e21561 Background: GD2 is disialoganglioside preferentially expressed in neuroblastoma and melanoma and anti-GD2 directed therapies are used clinically in neuroblastoma, with ongoing clinical trials in melanoma. We are currently developing an in situ vaccination approach using intratumoral (IT) delivery of an immunocytokine (IC) consisting of IL-2 linked to an anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody. While IT-IC monotherapy does not cure mice bearing established B78 melanoma tumors, it is effective when combined with local radiation therapy (RT). Here, we tested whether short course IT-IC monotherapy prior to surgical resection could result in a robust adaptive immune response preventing tumor recurrence following rechallenge after surgery. Methods: Mice bearing 50-100mm3 GD2-expressing melanoma (B78) tumors were treated with a 5-day course of 50μg IT-IC and complete surgical resection was performed 3 days following the final treatment. The immune infiltrate of resected tumors was assessed by flow cytometry. Rechallenge experiments consisted of either 2x106 B78 cells injected into the contralateral flank or 2x105 B16-GD2 cells injected via tail vein for pulmonary metastasis rechallenge. Results: IT-IC treated tumors had fewer viable tumor cells, increased CD8 T-cells, and an improved CD8:Treg ratio. Rejection of B78 contralateral flank rechallenge (implanted 40 days following surgical resection of the primary tumor) was observed in 78% (7/9) of mice treated with IT-IC compared to 50% (5/10) that received surgery alone and 0% (0/5) of naïve mice. Immunologic memory was potent in neoadjuvant-treated mice early after surgery, with all mice (5/5) rejecting contralateral B78 rechallenge that occurred on the day of surgery compared to 0% (0/5) in both surgery-alone and naïve mice. Neoadjuvant IT-IC also prevented the development of B16-GD2 lung metastasis compared to naïve mice or the surgery-alone group (when the IV injected experimental metastases were given 80 days following surgery). Conclusions: While ineffective in curing large B78 melanoma flank tumors as monotherapy, mice receiving neoadjuvant IT-IC developed robust immunologic memory preventing recurrence following surgery. The memory response was present as early as the day of surgery and was sufficient to prevent pulmonary metastasis. IT-IC should be further investigated as a neoadjuvant therapy for preventing recurrence in high-risk settings.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Goyal ◽  
Daniel Reeves ◽  
Joshua T. Schiffer

The emergence of multiple new SARS-CoV-2 variants, characterized to varying degrees by increased infectivity, higher virulence and evasion of vaccine and infection-induced immunologic memory, has hampered international efforts to contain the virus. While it is generally believed that these variants first develop in single individuals with poor immunologic control of the virus, the factors governing variant predominance in the population remain poorly characterized. Here we present a mathematical framework for variant emergence accounting for the highly variable number of people secondarily infected by individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our simulations suggest that threatening new variants probably develop within infected people fairly commonly, but that most die out and do not achieve permanence in the population. Variants that predominate are more likely to be associated with higher infectiousness, but also the occurrence of a super-spreader event soon after introduction into the population.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Ram Kumar Singh ◽  
Richard J. Jones ◽  
Fazal M. Shirazi ◽  
Jianxuan M. Zou ◽  
Hua Wang ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma continue to represent an unmet medical need, and this is especially true for those with deletion (del) 17p, who have an inferior prognosis. We previously reported the ability of HDP-101 to induce anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects in myeloma cell lines and primary patient samples. HDP-101 showed enhanced efficacy against del 17p models, which are characterized by concurrent haploinsufficiency of RNA polymerase II subunit A (POLR2A), which is the target of amanitin. This occurred in conjunction with activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress, and at least two arms of the unfolded protein response. Also, a single dose of HDP-101 was sufficient to induce cures in murine models of myeloma both with and without TP53 and/or POLR2A. Therefore, we sought to better understand the mechanisms of action of HDP-101 and its potential immunologic sequelae. Methods: Pre-clinical studies were performed using HDP-101, the unconjugated BCMA antibody, free α-Amanitin, and a non-targeting control Amanitin antibody drug conjugate in myeloma cell line models and in vivo. These included H929, MM1.S, and MOLP-8 TP53 wild-type (WT) lines and isogenic cells in which TP53 had been knocked out (KO) using genome editing techniques. To further model del 17p and POLR2A haploinsufficiency, POLR2A expression was knocked down using sequence-specific shRNAs. Tumor rechallenge experiments were performed after 100 days of tumor free survival in NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J mice with longitudinal monitoring of tumor growth kinetics. Results: HDP-101 induced immunogenic cell death (ICD) in myeloma cell lines as determined by increased expression of Calreticulin (CRT), Heat shock protein (HSP)-70, and release of High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) by flow cytometry and Western blotting. Microscopic analysis of ICD upon treatment with HDP-101 in MM1.S cells showed a speckled arrangement of both CRT and HMGB1 on the cell surface. In addition, an increased ADP/ATP ratio was observed across three different cell lines in a TP53-independent manner suggestive of an operational ICD pathway. Using our current knowledge of ER stress activation and induction of ICD, we evaluated the combination of bortezomib and HDP-101 in H929, MM1.S, and MOLP-8 cells and primary samples. A significant loss of cellular viability (p<0.01) was observed upon combination treatment across the cell lines, and primary samples also showed a similar effect but only in CD138+ve populations while sparing the CD138-ve fraction. NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J mice injected with MM1.S luciferase-transfected cells uniformly developed systemic disease, and one dose of HDP-101 induced cures with no evidence of relapse out to 100 days. These same mice were then rechallenged with MM1.S cells but none developed recurrent disease, suggesting the generation of immunologic memory. Natural killer (NK) cells isolated from these mice showed ex vivo activity against myeloma cell lines which was greatest against MM1.S cells. Finally, cured mice were treated with the anti-asialo GM1 antibody that depletes NK cells or control serum first, and then rechallenged with MM1.S cells. While MM1.S-based tumors could not become established in control serum treated mice, pre-treatment with the anti-asialo GM1 antibody did allow tumors to develop. Studies to compare the activity of HDP-101 with other antibody drug conjugates are currently ongoing. Conclusions: Our results support the statement that HDP-101 is a novel anti-BCMA antibody drug conjugate that shows potent activity against drug-naïve and -resistant models of myeloma, and has the potential to show enhanced anti-tumor activity against del 17 p myeloma. Moreover, its mechanism of action involves both a direct cytotoxic effect, as well as the induction of immunogenic cell death, with the latter potentially leading to immunologic memory. These studies were supported by a Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Specialized Center of Research (SCOR-12206-17). Disclosures Jones: Asylia Therapeutics, Inc.: Current equity holder in private company, Patents & Royalties. Lee:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy. Manasanch:Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; JW Pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Quest Diagnostics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria. Pahl:Heidelberg Pharma AG: Current Employment. Orlowski:Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, EcoR1 Capital LLC, Forma Therapeutics, Genzyme, GSK Biologicals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Biotech, Juno Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech USA, Molecular Partners, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Laboratory research funding from BioTheryX, and clinical research funding from CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding; STATinMED Research: Consultancy; Founder of Asylia Therapeutics, Inc., with associated patents and an equity interest, though this technology does not bear on the current submission.: Current equity holder in private company, Patents & Royalties.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A462-A462
Author(s):  
Robert Saddawi-Konefka ◽  
Aoife O’Farrell ◽  
Andrew Sharabi ◽  
Joseph Califano ◽  
J Silvio Gutkind ◽  
...  

BackgroundOncologically-sound standard of care therapy often indicates ablation of draining lymphatic basins to eradicate repositories of metastatic disease. However, emerging cancer immunotherapies often necessitate intact secondary lymphoid organs to achieve maximum effect. Therefore, multimodal immune-oncology (IO) therapeutic approaches introduce an inherent paradox into the clinical management of the cancer patient: how to reconcile the clinical benefit of lymphatic ablation with the destruction of an indispensable immune organ.MethodsHere, we leverage a novel preclinical model of tobacco-signature head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to examine the impact of lymphatic ablation on the efficacy of immunotherapy and to identify sequences of therapy that maximize durable response without compromising oncologically-sound standard of care therapy.ResultsWe show that cervical lymphatic ablation in tumor bearing animals abolishes the response to CTLA- 4 blockade by eradicating lymph-node associated conventional dendritic cells and restricting CD8 T cell priming and subsequent tumor infiltration. By modelling recurrent HNSCC, we find that upfront, elective cervical lymphatic ablation eliminates the tumor response to adjuvant CTLA-4 blockade in contrast to a lymphatic-sparing approach, which preserves sensitivity to CTLA-4 blockade. In the neoadjuvant setting, we show that delayed, but not early, cervical lymphatic ablation leads to durable response after CTLA-4 blockade. Lastly, we demonstrate that a successful tumor response to CTLA-4 blockade begets long-lasting immunologic memory, resistant to delayed cervical lymphatic ablation.ConclusionsCollectively, this work addresses an inherent paradox in the delivery of combination IO therapy, informs optimal sequencing of multimodal therapy and affords a premise for the introduction of CTLA-4 blockade into the clinical management of HNSCC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 121-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yahya Sohrabi ◽  
Sina M.M. Lagache ◽  
Vivienne C. Voges ◽  
Dilvin Semo ◽  
Glenn Sonntag ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Gelbard ◽  
Celestine Wanjalla ◽  
Christopher T. Wootten ◽  
Wonder P. Drake ◽  
Anne S. Lowery ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document