Revised Description of the Early Permian Recumbirostran “Microsaur” Nannaroter mckinziei Based on New Fossil Material and Computed Tomographic Data

The early Permian Richards Spur locality of Oklahoma has produced abundant material of numerous terrestrial fossil tetrapods, including various “microsaurs,” several of which are considered to belong to the clade Recumbirostra. We present a new partial skull of the recumbirostran “microsaur” Nannaroter mckinziei; through computed tomography (CT) analysis of both this new specimen and the holotype, we provide an updated description of the taxon. This new description provides novel information regarding several regions that could not be examined previously due to either being absent in the holotype or difficult to access. This includes missing and obscured aspects of the skull roof, braincase, lower jaw, and the palatal region. Furthermore, the new information obtained from this description was used to update phylogenetic character codings of Nannaroter, and a revised phylogenetic analysis was conducted. The results of this updated analysis are congruent with those of other recent phylogenetic analyses of recumbirostran “microsaurs.” This new information adds to the ever-growing body of early tetrapod CT data, which has been, and will continue to be, important in revealing details regarding early tetrapod anatomy, interrelationships, paleoecology, and evolution.

Morphology of the pupae of Physonota humilis Boheman and Physonota stigmatilis Boheman (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Ischyrosonychini)

Pupal morphology has been described for 11 species in six genera of the Neotropical tortoise beetle tribe, Ischyrosonychini Chapuis, 1875. This life stage may offer valuable phylogenetic information but more pupae need to be documented. The pupae of Physonota humilis Boheman, 1856 and P. stigmatilis Boheman, 1854 are described and illustrated for the first time. The pupa of P. humilis does not exhibit lateral scoli on the abdominal segments. Additionally, the body surfaces of P. humilis and P. stigmatilis are somewhat tuberculate, different from other described Physonota Boheman, 1854 pupae. A key to the described pupae of Physonota is provided and 10 phylogenetic character hypotheses are proposed.

Differences in developmental potential predict the contrasting patterns of dental diversification in characiform and cypriniform fishes

Morphological diversification during adaptive radiation may depend on factors external or internal to the lineage. We provide evidence for the latter in characiform fishes (tetras and piranhas), which exhibit extensive dental diversity. Phylogenetic character mapping supported regain of lost teeth as contributing to this diversity. To test for latent potential for dentition that would facilitate its evolutionary expansion, we overexpressed a tooth initiation signal, the tumour necrosis factor pathway ligand ectodysplasin , in a model characiform, the Mexican tetra ( Astyanax mexicanus ). This manipulation resulted in extensive ectopic dentition, in contrast with its previously reported limited effect in the zebrafish ( Danio rerio ). Tooth location in the order Cypriniformes, to which the zebrafish belongs, is much more restricted than in characiforms, a pattern that may be explained by differences in the retention of ancestral developmental potential. Our results suggest that differences in evolvability between lineages may lead to contrasting patterns of diversification.

Anatomical diversity and evolution of the anthocarp in Nyctaginaceae

Nyctaginaceae are one of the most diverse families in core Caryophyllales. The most diagnostic character of the family is a persistent anthocarp derived from a calyx-like perianth. Anthocarp morphology is highly variable across the family, but its evolution is poorly studied. We investigate anthocarp evolution in Nyctaginaceae through extensive anatomical studies (159 species from 28 genera representing six of seven tribes) and phylogenetic character state reconstructions. We found highly diverse anthocarp anatomy across Nyctaginaceae, with most traits analysed evolving multiple times throughout the family. The representatives of three early-diverging clades of Nyctaginaceae (Leucastereae, Boldoeae and Colignonieae) possess a calyx-like anthocarp with simplified anatomy. The so-called ‘glands’ in Nyctagineae and Pisonieae are emergences, whereas wings originate by accrescence of perianth segments, elongation of the ribs and outgrowths (emergences) of anthocarp mesophyll. Anthocarp anatomy can be considered as a generic-level feature in Colignonieae, Pisonieae, Bougainvilleeae and Nyctagineae. The most dramatic transitions from perianth to anthocarp involve the shrivelling and abscission of the upper perianth part and the maintenance of the basal modified perianth portion that originated in the clade comprising Colignonieae and sister clades.

Differences in developmental potential predict the contrasting patterns of dental diversification in characiform and cypriniform fishes

Morphological diversification during adaptive radiation may depend on factors external or internal to the lineage. We provide evidence for the latter in characiform fishes (tetras and piranhas), which exhibit extensive dental diversity. Phylogenetic character mapping supported regain of lost teeth as contributing to this diversity. To test for latent potential for dentition that would facilitate its evolutionary expansion, we overexpressed a tooth initiation signal, the tumor necrosis factor pathway ligand ectodysplasin, in a model characiform, the Mexican Tetra (Astyanax mexicanus). This manipulation resulted in extensive ectopic dentition, in contrast to its previously-reported limited effect in the Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Tooth location in the Order Cypriniformes, to which the Zebrafish belongs, is much more restricted than in characiforms, a pattern that may be explained by differences in the retention of ancestral developmental potential. Our results suggest that differences in evolvability between lineages may lead to contrasting patterns of diversification.

The deep(er) roots of Eukaryotes and Akaryotes

Background: Locating the root node of the “tree of life” (ToL) is one of the hardest problems in phylogenetics, given the time depth. The root-node, or the universal common ancestor (UCA), groups descendants into organismal clades/domains. Two notable variants of the two-domains ToL (2D-ToL) have gained support recently. One 2D-ToL posits that eukaryotes (organisms with nuclei) and akaryotes (organisms without nuclei) are sister clades that diverged from the UCA, and that Asgard archaea are sister to other archaea. The other 2D-ToL proposes that eukaryotes emerged from within archaea and places Asgard archaea as sister to eukaryotes. Williams et al. ( Nature Ecol. Evol. 4: 138–147; 2020) re-evaluated the data and methods that support the competing two-domains proposals and concluded that eukaryotes are the closest relatives of Asgard archaea. Critique: The poor resolution of the archaea in their analysis, despite employing amino acid alignments from thousands of proteins and the best-fitting substitution models, contradicts their conclusions. We argue that they overlooked important aspects of estimating evolutionary relatedness and assessing phylogenetic signal in empirical data. Which 2D-ToL is better supported depends on which kind of molecular features are better for resolving common ancestors at the roots of clades – protein-domains or their component amino acids. We focus on phylogenetic character reconstructions necessary to describe the UCA or its closest descendants in the absence of reliable fossils. Clarifications: It is well known that different character types present different perspectives on evolutionary history that relate to different phylogenetic depths. We show that protein structural-domains support more reliable phylogenetic reconstructions of deep-diverging clades in the ToL. Accordingly, Eukaryotes and Akaryotes are better supported clades in a 2D-ToL.

The deep(er) roots of Eukaryotes and Akaryotes

Background: Locating the root node of the “tree of life” (ToL) is one of the hardest problems in phylogenetics. The root-node or the universal common ancestor (UCA) divides descendants into organismal domains. Two notable variants of the two-domains ToL (2D-ToL) have gained support recently. One 2D-ToL posits that eukaryotes (organisms with nuclei) and akaryotes (organisms without nuclei) are sister clades that diverged from the UCA and that Asgard archaea are sister to other archaea, whereas the other proposes that eukaryotes emerged within archaea and places Asgard archaea sister to eukaryotes. Williams et al. (Nature Ecol. Evol. 4: 138–147; 2020) re-evaluated the data and methods that support the competing two-domains proposals and concluded that eukaryotes are the closest relatives of Asgard archaea. Critique: We argue that important aspects of estimating evolutionary relatedness and assessing phylogenetic signal in empirical data were overlooked. We focus on phylogenetic character reconstructions necessary to describe the UCA or its closest descendants in the absence of reliable fossils. It is well known that different character types present different perspectives on evolutionary history that relate to different phylogenetic depths. Which 2D-ToL is better supported depends on which kind of molecular features – protein-domains or their component amino acids – are better for resolving common ancestors at the roots of clades. In practice, this involves reconstructing character compositions of the ancestral nodes all the way back to the UCA. We believe the criticisms of 2D-ToL focus on superficial aspects of the data and reflects common misunderstandings of phylogenetic reconstructions using protein domains (folds). Clarifications: Models of protein domain evolution support more reliable phylogenetic reconstructions. In contrast, even the best available amino acid substitution models fail to resolve the archaeal radiation, despite employing thousands of genes. Therefore, the primary domains Eukaryotes and Akaryotes are better supported in a 2D-ToL.

The Deep(er) Roots of Eukaryotes and Akaryotes

Locating the root-node of the “tree of life” (ToL) is one of the hardest problems in phylogenetics1. The root-node or the universal common ancestor (UCA) divides the descendants into organismal domains2. Two notable variants of the two-domains ToL (2D-ToL) have gained support recently3,4, though, Williams and colleagues (W&C)4 claim that one is better supported than the other. Here, we argue that important aspects of estimating evolutionary relatedness and assessing phylogenetic signal in empirical data were overlooked4. We focus on phylogenetic character reconstructions necessary to describe the UCA or its closest descendants in the absence of reliable fossils. It is well-known that different character-types present different perspectives on evolutionary history that relate to different phylogenetic depths5–7. Which of the 2D-ToL2,4 hypotheses is better supported depends on which kind of molecular features – protein-domains or their component amino-acids – are better for resolving the common ancestors (CA) at the roots of clades. In practice, this involves reconstructing character compositions of the ancestral nodes all the way back to the UCA2,3.

Novel phylogeny of angiosperms inferred from whole-genome microsynteny analysis

Despite the wealth of genomic and transcriptomic data of pivotal angiosperm species, the phylogenetic relationships of flowering plants are still not fully resolved. Microsynteny, or the conservation of relative gene order, has been recognized as a valuable and alternative phylogenetic character to sequence-based characters (nucleotides or amino acids). Here, we present a novel approach for phylogenetic tree reconstruction based on genome-wide synteny network data. We generated and analyzed synteny networks from 123 species from 52 families across 31 orders of flowering plants, including several lineages for which phylogenetic relationships are ambiguous. We obtained a stable and highly resolved phylogeny that is largely congruent with sequence-based phylogenies. However, our results unveiled several novel relationships for some key clades, such as magnoliids sister to monocots, Vitales as sister to core-eudicots, and Saxifragales sister to Santalales, in turn both sister to Caryophyllales. Our results highlight that phylogenies based on genome structure and organization are complementary to sequence-based phylogenies and provide alternative hypotheses of angiosperm relationships to be further tested.