scholarly journals The deep(er) roots of Eukaryotes and Akaryotes

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Ajith Harish ◽  
David Morrison
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Structural Domains ◽  
Root Node ◽  
Molecular Features ◽  
Phylogenetic Reconstructions ◽  
Universal Common Ancestor ◽  
Evolutionary Relatedness ◽  
Best Fitting ◽  
Phylogenetic Character

Background: Locating the root node of the “tree of life” (ToL) is one of the hardest problems in phylogenetics, given the time depth. The root-node, or the universal common ancestor (UCA), groups descendants into organismal clades/domains. Two notable variants of the two-domains ToL (2D-ToL) have gained support recently. One 2D-ToL posits that eukaryotes (organisms with nuclei) and akaryotes (organisms without nuclei) are sister clades that diverged from the UCA, and that Asgard archaea are sister to other archaea. The other 2D-ToL proposes that eukaryotes emerged from within archaea and places Asgard archaea as sister to eukaryotes. Williams et al. ( Nature Ecol. Evol. 4: 138–147; 2020) re-evaluated the data and methods that support the competing two-domains proposals and concluded that eukaryotes are the closest relatives of Asgard archaea. Critique: The poor resolution of the archaea in their analysis, despite employing amino acid alignments from thousands of proteins and the best-fitting substitution models, contradicts their conclusions. We argue that they overlooked important aspects of estimating evolutionary relatedness and assessing phylogenetic signal in empirical data. Which 2D-ToL is better supported depends on which kind of molecular features are better for resolving common ancestors at the roots of clades – protein-domains or their component amino acids. We focus on phylogenetic character reconstructions necessary to describe the UCA or its closest descendants in the absence of reliable fossils.     Clarifications: It is well known that different character types present different perspectives on evolutionary history that relate to different phylogenetic depths. We show that protein structural-domains support more reliable phylogenetic reconstructions of deep-diverging clades in the ToL. Accordingly, Eukaryotes and Akaryotes are better supported clades in a 2D-ToL.

scholarly journals The Deep(er) Roots of Eukaryotes and Akaryotes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajith Harish ◽  
David A. Morrison
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
The Other ◽  
Root Node ◽  
Molecular Features ◽  
Universal Common Ancestor ◽  
Evolutionary Relatedness ◽  
The Common ◽  
Phylogenetic Character

AbstractLocating the root-node of the “tree of life” (ToL) is one of the hardest problems in phylogenetics1. The root-node or the universal common ancestor (UCA) divides the descendants into organismal domains2. Two notable variants of the two-domains ToL (2D-ToL) have gained support recently3,4, though, Williams and colleagues (W&C)4 claim that one is better supported than the other. Here, we argue that important aspects of estimating evolutionary relatedness and assessing phylogenetic signal in empirical data were overlooked4. We focus on phylogenetic character reconstructions necessary to describe the UCA or its closest descendants in the absence of reliable fossils. It is well-known that different character-types present different perspectives on evolutionary history that relate to different phylogenetic depths5–7. Which of the 2D-ToL2,4 hypotheses is better supported depends on which kind of molecular features – protein-domains or their component amino-acids – are better for resolving the common ancestors (CA) at the roots of clades. In practice, this involves reconstructing character compositions of the ancestral nodes all the way back to the UCA2,3.

scholarly journals The deep(er) roots of Eukaryotes and Akaryotes

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Ajith Harish ◽  
David Morrison
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Protein Domains ◽  
Protein Domain ◽  
Root Node ◽  
Molecular Features ◽  
Phylogenetic Reconstructions ◽  
Universal Common Ancestor ◽  
Evolutionary Relatedness ◽  
Protein Domain Evolution ◽  
Phylogenetic Character

Background: Locating the root node of the “tree of life” (ToL) is one of the hardest problems in phylogenetics. The root-node or the universal common ancestor (UCA) divides descendants into organismal domains. Two notable variants of the two-domains ToL (2D-ToL) have gained support recently. One 2D-ToL posits that eukaryotes (organisms with nuclei) and akaryotes (organisms without nuclei) are sister clades that diverged from the UCA and that Asgard archaea are sister to other archaea, whereas the other proposes that eukaryotes emerged within archaea and places Asgard archaea sister to eukaryotes. Williams et al. (Nature Ecol. Evol. 4: 138–147; 2020) re-evaluated the data and methods that support the competing two-domains proposals and concluded that eukaryotes are the closest relatives of Asgard archaea. Critique: We argue that important aspects of estimating evolutionary relatedness and assessing phylogenetic signal in empirical data were overlooked. We focus on phylogenetic character reconstructions necessary to describe the UCA or its closest descendants in the absence of reliable fossils. It is well known that different character types present different perspectives on evolutionary history that relate to different phylogenetic depths. Which 2D-ToL is better supported depends on which kind of molecular features – protein-domains or their component amino acids – are better for resolving common ancestors at the roots of clades. In practice, this involves reconstructing character compositions of the ancestral nodes all the way back to the UCA. We believe the criticisms of 2D-ToL focus on superficial aspects of the data and reflects common misunderstandings of phylogenetic reconstructions using protein domains (folds).   Clarifications: Models of protein domain evolution support more reliable phylogenetic reconstructions. In contrast, even the best available amino acid substitution models fail to resolve the archaeal radiation, despite employing thousands of genes. Therefore, the primary domains Eukaryotes and Akaryotes are better supported in a 2D-ToL.

Disentangling the role of shared ancestry and the environment on leaf stable isotopes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko J. Spasojevic ◽  
Sören Weber1
Keyword(s):  
Stable Isotopes ◽  
Environmental Conditions ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Environmental Control ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Individual Species ◽  
Habitat Types ◽  
Δ13c And Δ15n ◽  
Environmental Controls ◽  
Shared Ancestry

Stable carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) isotopes in plants are important indicators of plant water use efficiency and N acquisition strategies. While often regarded as being under environmental control, there is growing evidence that evolutionary history may also shape variation in stable isotope ratios (δ13C and δ15N) among plant species. Here we examined patterns of foliar δ13C and δ15N in alpine tundra for 59 species in 20 plant families. To assess the importance of environmental controls and evolutionary history, we examined if average δ13C and δ15N predictably differed among habitat types, if individual species exhibited intraspecific trait variation (ITV) in δ13C and δ15N, and if there were a significant phylogenetic signal in δ13C and δ15N. We found that variation among habitat types in both δ13C and δ15N mirrored well-known patterns of water and nitrogen limitation. Conversely, we also found that 40% of species exhibited no ITV in δ13C and 35% of species exhibited no ITV in δ15N, suggesting that some species are under stronger evolutionary control. However, we only found a modest signal of phylogenetic conservatism in δ13C and no phylogenetic signal in δ15N suggesting that shared ancestry is a weaker driver of tundra wide variation in stable isotopes. Together, our results suggest that both evolutionary history and local environmental conditions play a role in determining variation in δ13C and δ15N and that considering both factors can help with interpreting isotope patterns in nature and with predicting which species may be able to respond to rapidly changing environmental conditions.

A fossil record of land plant origins from charophyte algae

Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 373 (6556) ◽  
pp. 792-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul K. Strother ◽  
Clinton Foster
Keyword(s):  
Fossil Record ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Land Plant ◽  
Fossil Plants ◽  
Fossil Plant ◽  
Molecular Phylogenetic ◽  
History Of ◽  
Time Gap ◽  
Evolutionary Continuity

Molecular time trees indicating that embryophytes originated around 500 million years ago (Ma) during the Cambrian are at odds with the record of fossil plants, which first appear in the mid-Silurian almost 80 million years later. This time gap has been attributed to a missing fossil plant record, but that attribution belies the case for fossil spores. Here, we describe a Tremadocian (Early Ordovician, about 480 Ma) assemblage with elements of both Cambrian and younger embryophyte spores that provides a new level of evolutionary continuity between embryophytes and their algal ancestors. This finding suggests that the molecular phylogenetic signal retains a latent evolutionary history of the acquisition of the embryophytic developmental genome, a history that perhaps began during Ediacaran-Cambrian time but was not completed until the mid-Silurian (about 430 Ma).

Evolution of the vertebrate globin gene family

Hemoglobin ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 94-123
Author(s):  
Jay F. Storz
Keyword(s):  
Whole Genome Duplication ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Functional Divergence ◽  
Globin Gene ◽  
Globin Genes ◽  
Tandem Gene Duplication ◽  
Animal Evolution ◽  
Phylogenetic Reconstructions ◽  
Duplication Events ◽  
History Of

Chapter 5 provides an overview of the evolutionary history of the globin gene superfamily and places the evolution of vertebrate-specific globins in phylogenetic context. The duplication and functional divergence of globin genes has promoted key physiological innovations in respiratory gas transport and other physiological functions during animal evolution. A combination of both tandem gene duplication and whole-genome duplication contributed to the diversification of vertebrate globins. Phylogenetic reconstructions arrange vertebrate globins into those that derive from vertebrate-specific duplications (cytoglobin, globin E, globin Y, and the independently derived myoglobin-like and hemoglobin-like genes of jawed vertebrates and jawless fishes [lampreys and hagfish]) and those that derive from far more ancient duplication events that predate the divergence between deuterostomes and protostomes (androglobin, globin X, and neuroglobin). Tracing the evolutionary history of deuterostome globins reveals evidence for the repeated culling of ancestral diversity, followed by lineage-specific diversification of surviving gene lineages via repeated rounds of duplication and divergence.

scholarly journals Evolutionary heritage influences Amazon tree ecology

2016 ◽  
Vol 283 (1844) ◽  
pp. 20161587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Coelho de Souza ◽  
Kyle G. Dexter ◽  
Oliver L. Phillips ◽  
Roel J. W. Brienen ◽  
Jerome Chave ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Life History Strategies ◽  
Relative Importance ◽  
Life History Variation ◽  
Trait Variation ◽  
Closed Canopy ◽  
Repeated Evolution

Lineages tend to retain ecological characteristics of their ancestors through time. However, for some traits, selection during evolutionary history may have also played a role in determining trait values. To address the relative importance of these processes requires large-scale quantification of traits and evolutionary relationships among species. The Amazonian tree flora comprises a high diversity of angiosperm lineages and species with widely differing life-history characteristics, providing an excellent system to investigate the combined influences of evolutionary heritage and selection in determining trait variation. We used trait data related to the major axes of life-history variation among tropical trees (e.g. growth and mortality rates) from 577 inventory plots in closed-canopy forest, mapped onto a phylogenetic hypothesis spanning more than 300 genera including all major angiosperm clades to test for evolutionary constraints on traits. We found significant phylogenetic signal (PS) for all traits, consistent with evolutionarily related genera having more similar characteristics than expected by chance. Although there is also evidence for repeated evolution of pioneer and shade tolerant life-history strategies within independent lineages, the existence of significant PS allows clearer predictions of the links between evolutionary diversity, ecosystem function and the response of tropical forests to global change.

scholarly journals Intragenic Conflict in Phylogenomic Data Sets

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 3380-3388
Author(s):  
Stephen A Smith ◽  
Nathanael Walker-Hale ◽  
Joseph F Walker
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Empirical Data ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
Simulated Data ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Alignment Error ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Simple Method

Abstract Most phylogenetic analyses assume that a single evolutionary history underlies one gene. However, both biological processes and errors can cause intragenic conflict. The extent to which this conflict is present in empirical data sets is not well documented, but if common, could have far-reaching implications for phylogenetic analyses. We examined several large phylogenomic data sets from diverse taxa using a fast and simple method to identify well-supported intragenic conflict. We found conflict to be highly variable between data sets, from 1% to >92% of genes investigated. We analyzed four exemplar genes in detail and analyzed simulated data under several scenarios. Our results suggest that alignment error may be one major source of conflict, but other conflicts remain unexplained and may represent biological signal or other errors. Whether as part of data analysis pipelines or to explore biologically processes, analyses of within-gene phylogenetic signal should become common.

scholarly journals New Phylogenomic Analysis of the Enigmatic Phylum Telonemia Further Resolves the Eukaryote Tree of Life

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 757-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen F H Strassert ◽  
Mahwash Jamy ◽  
Alexander P Mylnikov ◽  
Denis V Tikhonenkov ◽  
Fabien Burki
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Evolutionary Origin ◽  
Phylogenetic Position ◽  
Aquatic Environments ◽  
Phylogenomic Analysis ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Transcriptome Data ◽  
Phylogenetic Reconstructions ◽  
Phylogenomic Analyses ◽  
Alignment Length

AbstractThe resolution of the broad-scale tree of eukaryotes is constantly improving, but the evolutionary origin of several major groups remains unknown. Resolving the phylogenetic position of these “orphan” groups is important, especially those that originated early in evolution, because they represent missing evolutionary links between established groups. Telonemia is one such orphan taxon for which little is known. The group is composed of molecularly diverse biflagellated protists, often prevalent although not abundant in aquatic environments. Telonemia has been hypothesized to represent a deeply diverging eukaryotic phylum but no consensus exists as to where it is placed in the tree. Here, we established cultures and report the phylogenomic analyses of three new transcriptome data sets for divergent telonemid lineages. All our phylogenetic reconstructions, based on 248 genes and using site-heterogeneous mixture models, robustly resolve the evolutionary origin of Telonemia as sister to the Sar supergroup. This grouping remains well supported when as few as 60% of the genes are randomly subsampled, thus is not sensitive to the sets of genes used but requires a minimal alignment length to recover enough phylogenetic signal. Telonemia occupies a crucial position in the tree to examine the origin of Sar, one of the most lineage-rich eukaryote supergroups. We propose the moniker “TSAR” to accommodate this new mega-assemblage in the phylogeny of eukaryotes.

scholarly journals Deep Ancestry of Orthologs and a Theoretical, Gradualist Perspective for the Formation of the LUCA’s (Last Universal Common Ancestor) Genome

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Prosdocimi ◽  
Sávio Torres de Farias
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Deep Understanding ◽  
Sister Group ◽  
Recent Common Ancestor ◽  
Evolutionary Relationships ◽  
Universal Common Ancestor ◽  
History Of ◽  
Group Relationships ◽  
Level Of Understanding

Genes and gene trees have been extensively used to study the evolutionary relationships among populations, species, families and higher systematic clades of organisms. This brought modern Biology into a sophisticated level of understanding about the evolutionary relationships and diversification patterns that happened along the entire history of organismal evolution in Earth. Genes however have not been placed in the center of questions when one aims to unravel the evolutionary history of genes themselves. Thus, we still ignore whether Insulin share a more recent common ancestor to Hexokinase or DNA polymerase. This brought modern Genetics into a very poor level of understanding about sister group relationships that happened along the entire evolutionary history of genes. Many conceptual challenges must be overcome to allow this broader comprehension about gene evolution. Here we aim to clear the intellectual path in order to provide a fertile research program that will help geneticists to understand the deep ancestry and sister group relationships among different gene families (or orthologs). We aim to propose methods to study gene formation starting from the establishment of the genetic code in pre-cellular organisms like the FUCA (First Universal Common Ancestor) until the formation of the highly complex genome of LUCA (Last UCA), that harbors hundreds of genes families working coordinated into a cellular organism. The deep understanding of ancestral relationships among orthologs will certainly inspire biotechnological and biomedical approaches and allow a deep understanding about how Darwinian molecular evolution operates inside cells and before the appearance of cellular organisms.

scholarly journals Recombination-aware phylogenomics unravels the complex divergence of hybridizing species.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Li ◽  
Henrique V. Figueiro ◽  
Eduardo Eizirik ◽  
William J. Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Flow ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Selective Sweeps ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Chromosome Recombination ◽  
History Of ◽  
Lineage Divergence ◽  
Recurrent Patterns ◽  
Ancient Gene

Current phylogenomic approaches implicitly assume that the predominant phylogenetic signal within a genome reflects the true evolutionary history of organisms, without assessing the confounding effects of gene flow that result in a mosaic of phylogenetic signals that interact with recombinational variation. Here we tested the validity of this assumption with a recombination-aware analysis of whole genome sequences from 27 species of the cat family. We found that the prevailing phylogenetic signal within the autosomes is not always representative of speciation history, due to ancient hybridization throughout felid evolution. Instead, phylogenetic signal was concentrated within large, conserved X-chromosome recombination deserts that exhibited recurrent patterns of strong genetic differentiation and selective sweeps across mammalian orders. By contrast, regions of high recombination were enriched for signatures of ancient gene flow, and these sequences inflated crown-lineage divergence times by ~40%. We conclude that standard phylogenomic approaches to infer the Tree of Life may be highly misleading without considering the genomic partitioning of phylogenetic signal relative to recombination rate, and its interplay with historical hybridization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document