bilateral relation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

17
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Meng Qin ◽  
Tong Wu ◽  
Ran Tao ◽  
Chi-Wei Su ◽  
Stefea Petru

Author(s):  
Sumanta Bhattacharya ◽  
Jayanta Ray ◽  
Shakti Sinha ◽  
Bhavneet Kaur Sachdev

73 years of bilateral relation between India and Russia, Today India and Russia have emerged as global powers with cooperation in different sectors like technical, nuclear energy, outer space, security, education,counter terrorism, defense, politics, the food security has recently become an area of cooperation between the two countries. With the coming of Putin to power, we see India and Russia bilateral relationship entering new areas of cooperation. A healthy relation with Russia is a key element for the cultivation of India Foreign policy. The foundation element for the rapid increase in bilateral relation between the two countries can be traced back to October 2000 with the signing of the Declaration on the Indo –Russia Strategic Partnership. India and Russia are dependent on each other and the cooperation exists because of much mutual self-interest. Both India and Russia are part of BRICS, SCO AND RIC which have provided them a platform to have discussion on issues outside the Western block and emerge as global power in Asia, The cultural exchange programme and education initiatives programmes with people to people contact play a vital role in strengthening and bringing the two countries close to each other. Economic partnership between the two countries is regarded as a strong pillar for strategic partnership along with defence cooperation which provide maximum economic growth and development for both the countries. Keywords: Bilateral relation, economic, defence cooperation, mutual self-interest, strategic partnership, cultural exchange


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-103
Author(s):  
Iulian Chifu

The US-China relation becomes the most important part of the international new post-pandemic order related to the evolution of the world order after the Covid-19. We are talking about the most important economies of the world, giving 25% and 23.5% of the world GDP, economies and countries involved in a number of strategic rivalries as well as of harsh competitions, with a lot of newly come instruments that do not benefit of any international regime, rules and norms – cyber, a.i., quantum computers, space, Arctic region etc. In the absence of a dominant power able to impose the respect of a rules based world and to project its power in order to forge the new rules and norms in the field of new technologies, the US needs a real multilateralism and a conjunction of the democratic powers in order to acquire altogether the needed preeminence in order to get those rules and norms approved at the level of global institutions, if it is not for a smooth bilateral relation with China which could agree a number of such provisions and try to negotiate for including its own interest.


2021 ◽  
pp. 219-239
Author(s):  
Nicolas Levrat

This chapter provides an overview of the new governance framework for EU-UK cooperation, exploring the mechanisms established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) in managing bilateral relations. It examines the complex institutional machinery created by the TCA, including the Partnership Council, a dispute resolution system, and dozens of committees and sub-committees. As a consequence of the thin material scope of the TCA, its institutional mechanism will become the framework for continuing future negotiation between the parties. The chapter warns that the ongoing mistrust between the partners to the bilateral relation does not bode well for cooperation ahead, as a degree of trust is a necessary precondition for any efficient governance scheme.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 4729-4736
Author(s):  
M. Joshi ◽  
N. Srimannarayana ◽  
M. V. Chakradhara Rao ◽  
M. Radha Madhavi ◽  
B. Satyanarayana

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-225
Author(s):  
Jojin V. John

Of late India–South Korea relations have witnessed an upswing with the elevation of bilateral relation to Special Strategic Partnership (SSP) in 2015. Explaining the context and developments in bilateral relations, the article observes that the new momentum articulated in SSP constitutes a convergence of interests through the meeting of India’s ‘Act East Policy’ and South Korea’s ‘New Southern Policy’. The growing cooperation in defence, security, development, industry and a shared vision for regional order has visibly enhanced the scope and depth of the strategic partnership between the two countries, however, not without challenges in the emerging Indo-Pacific regional context.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toya Nath Baral

This paper examines the historical events of Nepal-India international boundary. How the delineation and demarcation of international boundary was carried out, is strategically explained. Border water issues are raised. Encroachments and disputes due to river boundary are also discussed. Disputes on both Physical and artificial boundary and their impacts on bilateral relation is analyzed. Both positive and negative impact of an open border system between Nepal and India is discussed. Border problems are identified clearly. Initiatives taken how to resolve the border management issues are categorically presented. Strip mapping of boundary area was carried out using GPS and GIS technology and the maps of whole Nepal-India boundary, except Kalapani and Susta, are prepared jointly and signed by the joint technical committee assigned by the respective government.  


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Dian Mukti Wuri

The paper describes the economic influence in the cultural policy seen through the big number of the diaspora of ethnic and national of India in Southeast Asia. Although in one hand, the India diaspora is one of the substantial sources in developing India, however, on the other, there are some obstacles found in this matter, such as that the Indian policy is partial against other countries in Southeast Asia, so as that the countries of Southeast Asia partial against the Indian diaspora. The writer of this paper, starts his argument with the idea to offer double citizenship to the Indian migrants, and then seeing in social perspective the Indian cultural identity in Southeast Asia. Besides this, the writer brings to highlight the bilateral relation between India and Indonesia and last is the importance of how the Indian government places itself among the Southeast Asian countries, which may become a way of approach the countries of Southeast Asia encounter the migrants of India.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Naufal Azizi

The paper describes the economic influence in the cultural policy seen through the big number of the diaspora of ethnic and national of India in Southeast Asia. Although in one hand, the India diaspora is one of the substantial sources in developing India, however, on the other, there are some obstacles found in this matter, such as that the Indian policy is partial against other countries in Southeast Asia, so as that the countries of Southeast Asia partial against the Indian diaspora. The writer of this paper, starts his argument with the idea to offer double citizenship to the Indian migrants, and then seeing in social perspective the Indian cultural identity in Southeast Asia. Besides this, the writer brings to highlight the bilateral relation between India and Indonesia and last is the importance of how the Indian government places itself among the Southeast Asian countries, which may become a way of approach the countries of Southeast Asia encounter the migrants of India.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document