Chronic Pregabalin Treatment and Oxycodone Requirement after Spinal Surgery Versus Short Course Perioperative Administration: A Prospective, Nonrandomized Study

BACKGROUND: Although being controversial, pregabalin (PGB) is proposed during a short perioperative period to improve pain relief.Comparisons between chronic and short-term users during lumbar spine surgery are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to compare opioid requirements and postoperative pain among PGB chronic users and naive patients receiving a 48-hour perioperative administration. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized study. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Chronic users (group PGB, n = 39) continued their treatment, naive patients (group C, n = 43) received a dose of 150 mg preoperatively and 75 mg/12 hours for 48 hours. Anesthesia and analgesia were standardized. The primary outcome was the cumulative oxycodone consumption at 24 hours, other outcomes included pain scores, DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions) scores, and side effects. RESULTS: Group PGB consumed less oxycodone at 24 hours (median [interquartile range] 10 mg [10–17.5] vs. 20 mg [10–20], P = 0.013], at 48 hours (15 mg [10–20] vs. 20 mg [12.5–30], P = 0.018), and required less intraoperative remifentanil (P = 0.004). Both groups showed similar pain scores during the 48-hour follow-up and at 3 months.Based on multivariate analysis, chronic users of PGB before surgery exhibited lower oxycodone requirements at 24 hours (odds ratio, 3.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.44–7.74; P = 0.008]. No differences were noted regarding side effects and DN4 scores. LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients chronically treated with PGB required less opioid when compared with a short perioperative administration before spinal surgery. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these results in spinal surgeries. KEY WORDS: Spinal surgery, pregabalin, postoperative pain, neuropathic pain

Abstract P316: Non-Stenotic Carotid Plaques in Ischemic Stroke - Analysis of the STRATIS Registry

Objective: To determine the prevalence of non-stenotic carotid plaques (<50%) and their association with ipsilateral strokes. Methods: Data was analyzed from the STRATIS registry (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke)—a prospective, nonrandomized study of patients undergoing thrombectomy with the Solitaire device. Prevalence of non-stenotic carotid plaques, ipsilateral and contralateral to the stroke was compared in patients with ESUS and cardioembolic strokes. Plaque features were further compared within both subgroups between patients with and without ipsilateral stroke. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine associations between non-stenotic carotid plaque, plaque characteristics, and ipsilateral stroke in both subgroups. Results: Of the 946 patients in the database, 226 patients with cardioembolic stroke (median age, 72 years) and 141 patients with ESUS (median age, 69 years) were included in the analysis.The prevalence of non-stenotic carotid plaque in the cardioembolic and ESUS subgroups was 33/226 (14.6%) and 32/141(22.7%) respectively. Bilateral non-stenotic carotid plaques were seen in 10/226(4.4%) cardioembolic and 13/141(9.2%) ESUS patients. Non-stenotic carotid plaques were significantly associated with ipsilateral strokes in cardioembolic stroke (aOR,1.91 [95% CI,1.15-3.18]) and in ESUS (aOR,1.69 [95% CI, 1.05-2.73]). Plaque irregularity, plaque hypodensity and increasing plaque thickness were significantly associated with ipsilateral stroke, only in the ESUS subgroup. Conclusion: Non-stenotic carotid plaques were significantly associated with ipsilateral stroke in cardioembolic and ESUS subgroups and there was increased association of hypodense plaque, increasing plaque thickness and plaque irregularity with ipsilateral stroke in the ESUS subgroup, suggesting these plaques could be a potential cause of stroke in these patient subgroups.

High incidence of deep vein thrombosis during the treatment of pseudoaneurysms – a retrospective nonrandomized study

Summary: Background: Pseudoaneurysms (PSAs) are concerning complications after arterial invasive interventions. Therapeutic options include manual ultrasound-assisted compression, pressure dressings, surgical intervention and thrombin injection. Compression of neighboring veins is obvious. However, the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with PSA has not previously been investigated. Patients and methods: In this retrospective, nonrandomized study 238 patients with PSA were analyzed from 2013 to 2018. In 149 patients, all of the parameters were complete for participating. PSAs were treated according to the local standard therapy with either ultrasound-guided compression followed by compression bandage or thrombin injection. Treatment success was evaluated 24 hours later, and the venous system was examined for the presence of DVT. Results: Peripheral DVT was found in 25.4% patients after ultrasound-assisted compression and subsequent pressure bandages, but only 6.4% of patients had DVT after thrombin injection (p = 0.013). Lower leg veins, particularly veins of the crural muscles, were primarily affected. Significantly more PSAs were successfully treated without the occurrence of DVT in the thrombin injection group compared to the compression group (93.6 vs. 69.0%; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Our study revealed that the use of thrombin injections resulted in a significantly lower rate of postinterventional DVT and a higher total number of successfully treated PSAs compared to compression therapy.