TIN2 is an architectural protein that facilitates TRF2-mediated trans- and cis-interactions on telomeric DNA

The telomere specific shelterin complex, which includes TRF1, TRF2, RAP1, TIN2, TPP1 and POT1, prevents spurious recognition of telomeres as double-strand DNA breaks and regulates telomerase and DNA repair activities at telomeres. TIN2 is a key component of the shelterin complex that directly interacts with TRF1, TRF2 and TPP1. In vivo, the large majority of TRF1 and TRF2 are in complex with TIN2 but without TPP1 and POT1. Since knockdown of TIN2 also removes TRF1 and TRF2 from telomeres, previous cell-based assays only provide information on downstream effects after the loss of TRF1/TRF2 and TIN2. Here, we investigated DNA structures promoted by TRF2–TIN2 using single-molecule imaging platforms, including tracking of compaction of long mouse telomeric DNA using fluorescence imaging, atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging of protein–DNA structures, and monitoring of DNA–DNA and DNA–RNA bridging using the DNA tightrope assay. These techniques enabled us to uncover previously unknown unique activities of TIN2. TIN2S and TIN2L isoforms facilitate TRF2-mediated telomeric DNA compaction (cis-interactions), dsDNA–dsDNA, dsDNA–ssDNA and dsDNA–ssRNA bridging (trans-interactions). Furthermore, TIN2 facilitates TRF2-mediated T-loop formation. We propose a molecular model in which TIN2 functions as an architectural protein to promote TRF2-mediated trans and cis higher-order nucleic acid structures at telomeres.

Emerging Accessibility Patterns in Long Telomeric Overhangs

We present single molecule experimental and computational modeling studies investigating the accessibility and folding landscape of human telomeric overhangs of physiologically relevant lengths. The overhangs contain 4-28 repeats of GGGTTA (G-Tract) sequence and accommodate 1-7 tandem G-quadruplex (GQ) structures. Using FRET-PAINT, we probed the distribution of accessible sites via a short imager strand, which is complementary to a G-Tract and transiently binds to unfolded sites. We report accessibility patterns that periodically change with overhang length and provide insights about the underlying folding frustration. Overhangs that have 4n G-Tracts, (12, 16...), demonstrate maximum frustration, while those with 4n+2 G-Tracts, (14, 18...), have minimal frustration. We also developed a computational model that suggests positive folding cooperativity between neighboring GQs is required for persistence of such patterns. Our experimental and computational studies suggest lower folding stability at the junction between single and double stranded telomeric DNA, which has implications for Shelterin complex formation.

MRE11 and UBR5 Co-Operate to Suppress RNF168-Mediated Fusion of Dysfunctional Telomeres

TRF2 is part of the shelterin complex that hides telomeric DNA ends and prevents the activation of the cNHEJ pathway that can lead to chromosomal fusion. TRF2, however, also actively suppresses the cNHEJ pathway by recruiting two proteins, MRE11 and UBR5. MRE11 binds BRCC3, which in turn deubiquitinates γH2AX deposited at exposed telomeric DNA ends and limits RNF168 recruitment to the telomere. UBR5, in contrast directly ubiquitinates and destroys RNF168. The loss of telomeric RNF168 in turn blocks the subsequent recruitment of 53BP1 and prevents the cNHEJ-mediated fusion of chromosomes with exposed telomeric DNA ends. Although MRE11 and UBR5 are both involved in the control of telomeric RNF168 levels and the chromosome fusion process, their relative contributions have not been directly addressed. To do so we genetically suppressed MRE11 and UBR5 alone or in combination in glioma cell lines which we previously showed contained dysfunctional telomeres that were dependent on TRF2 for suppression of telomeric fusion and monitored the effects on events associated with telomere fusion. We here show that while suppression of either MRE11 or UBR5 alone had minimal effects on RNF168 telomeric accumulation, 53BP1 recruitment, and telomeric fusion, their combined suppression led to significant increases in RNF168 and 53BP1 telomeric recruitment and telomeric fusion and eventually cell death, all of which were reversible by suppression of RNF168 itself. These results show that MRE11 and UBR5 co-operate to suppress fusion at dysfunctional telomeres.

Ccq1–Raf2 interaction mediates CLRC recruitment to establish heterochromatin at telomeres

Telomeres, highly ordered DNA-protein complexes at eukaryotic linear chromosome ends, are specialized heterochromatin loci conserved among eukaryotes. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the shelterin complex is important for subtelomeric heterochromatin establishment. Despite shelterin has been demonstrated to mediate the recruitment of the Snf2/histone deacetylase–containing repressor complex (SHREC) and the Clr4 methyltransferase complex (CLRC) to telomeres, the mechanism involved in telomeric heterochromatin assembly remains elusive due to the multiple functions of the shelterin complex. Here, we found that CLRC plays a dominant role in heterochromatin establishment at telomeres. In addition, we identified a series of amino acids in the shelterin subunit Ccq1 that are important for the specific interaction between Ccq1 and the CLRC subunit Raf2. Finally, we demonstrated that the Ccq1–Raf2 interaction is essential for the recruitment of CLRC to telomeres, that contributes to histone H3 lysine 9 methylation, nucleosome stability and the shelterin-chromatin association, promoting a positive feedback mechanism for the nucleation and spreading of heterochromatin at subtelomeres. Together, our findings provide a mechanistic understanding of subtelomeric heterochromatin assembly by shelterin-dependent CLRC recruitment to chromosomal ends.

Increase in lamin B1 promotes telomere instability by disrupting the shelterin complex in human cells

Telomere maintenance is essential to preserve genomic stability and involves telomere-specific proteins, DNA replication and repair proteins. Lamins are key components of the nuclear envelope and play numerous roles, including maintenance of the nuclear integrity, regulation of transcription, and DNA replication. Elevated levels of lamin B1, one of the major lamins, have been observed in some human pathologies and several cancers. Yet, the effect of lamin B1 dysregulation on telomere maintenance remains unknown. Here, we unveil that lamin B1 overexpression drives telomere instability through the disruption of the shelterin complex. Indeed, lamin B1 dysregulation leads to an increase in telomere dysfunction-induced foci, telomeric fusions and telomere losses in human cells. Telomere aberrations were preceded by mislocalizations of TRF2 and its binding partner RAP1. Interestingly, we identified new interactions between lamin B1 and these shelterin proteins, which are strongly enhanced at the nuclear periphery upon lamin B1 overexpression. Importantly, chromosomal fusions induced by lamin B1 in excess were rescued by TRF2 overexpression. These data indicated that lamin B1 overexpression triggers telomere instability through a mislocalization of TRF2. Altogether our results point to lamin B1 as a new interacting partner of TRF2, that is involved in telomere stability.

Multifunctionality of the Telomere-Capping Shelterin Complex Explained by Variations in Its Protein Composition

Protecting telomere from the DNA damage response is essential to avoid the entry into cellular senescence and organismal aging. The progressive telomere DNA shortening in dividing somatic cells, programmed during development, leads to critically short telomeres that trigger replicative senescence and thereby contribute to aging. In several organisms, including mammals, telomeres are protected by a protein complex named Shelterin that counteract at various levels the DNA damage response at chromosome ends through the specific function of each of its subunits. The changes in Shelterin structure and function during development and aging is thus an intense area of research. Here, we review our knowledge on the existence of several Shelterin subcomplexes and the functional independence between them. This leads us to discuss the possibility that the multifunctionality of the Shelterin complex is determined by the formation of different subcomplexes whose composition may change during aging.